It is a win win situation for both nations
* The joint statement shows continuity over the previous governments
* significant is the reference to concluding a framework on defence cooperation
* Sri Lankan president says his land won't 'be used against' India
* “we would like to share our progress, our growth, with our neighbours.”
The visit of Sri Lanka’s President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to India was a significant step in the evolving relationship between the two countries, believes Ambassador Yash Sinha, one of India’s top diplomats who served as India’s High Commissioner to the UK and Sri Lanka, among other senior roles.
 |
| Ambassador Yash Sinha |
“Though the agreements that were signed were quite anodyne, the joint statement shows continuity over the previous governments,” says Ambassador Sinha, who also headed the sensitive Pakistan-Afghanistan-Iran desk of the Ministry of External Affairs for four years.
“And considering the breaks with the previous governments that the victory of the National People’s Power represents, the fact that the ongoing projects and programs are being continued, are significant by themselves, but what I find the most significant in the joint statement is the reference to concluding a framework on defence cooperation, something that I have not seen mentioned so explicitly in any joint statement,” he said. “The fact that this is mentioned up front, and that there is likelihood of a framework being concluded is important, and we must take note of that.”
“Of course, the defence cooperation between the two countries are very significant, in terms of training, in terms of equipment over the years, between most of the wings of the armed forces, including the coast guard,” said Ambassador Sinha, who post retirement went on to become Information Commissioner and then Chief Information Commissioner, a post he held till October 2023.
Responding to continuing assertions by Sri Lankan analysts and politicians that India has blocked access to its market, Ambassador Sinha said that “to some extent, yes, they have a point, but largely, no.
“One of the earliest free trade agreements that India signed was with Sri Lanka, over 24 years ago. And in that sense it was pathbreaking. Since then, trade has expanded considerably, but of course we could potentially do much more,” he explained.
The reason, he said, was that even with the introduction of the South Asian Free Trade Area, or SAFTA, there have been some roadblocks. “ Even when I was high commissioner there, there were constant complaints about some of their main exports like spices like pepper, tea…”
“Tea of course we are a major producer, largely for our domestic consumption, though we export small quantities. But it is one of Sri Lanka’s main exports. Coming back to spices, they would say we had put up non-tariff barriers to pepper…valid or not, there was a perception that this was happening,” he said.
However, “it is more than that. It’s not the barriers that are being put up for Sri lanka exports, because for instance Sri Lanka has made huge investments in India. Brandix, for instance has made huge investments in Visakhapatnam, to set up a garment city, which employs a large number of ladies from the backward areas,” he pointed out.
I think the headwinds were political rather than economic, “ he felt, “like largely unfounded fears that we will be swamped with Indian products, and that Indian doctors and whoever else will come in,” he said.
“But we must appreciate that being a smaller country, it does have these fears, something that’s common in any part of the world you see. This is not uncommon. So we have to address these very carefully.”
It is important to stress that it is a win win situation for both nations, he said, because “India is one of the fastest growing large economies in the world. And when there is a global economic slowdown, India is a bright spot, “ he felt. And “we would like to share our progress, our growth, with our neighbours.”
Sri Lanka is our closest and dearest neighbour, (of course all our neighbours are close and dear)..but sometimes we forget that,” he said.
But what led to the decimation of the traditional parties by the Dissanayake-led NPP in the last presidential and parliamentary elections?
And has the JVP, President Dissanakaye’s party, and the largest one in the NPP coalition that he leads, really shed its anti-India position?
Once the euphoria of this massive mandate wears off, will Dissanayake be able to balance the IMF’s stringent conditions for its bailout with the growing hopes of the people upset over rising prices for goods and services?
And why did The Economist ignore the fact that despite all its economic and political troubles, Sri Lanka held firm to democratic traditions, decide to name Bangladesh as its country of the year, and Syria as the runner up?
Watch the full interview to get answers to those questions, as well as insights from a veteran diplomat with deep insights into the issues involved in both nations, juxtaposed with a world in flux.⍐
ENB இணைப்பு:
No comments:
Post a Comment