Muhammad Ali on the Vietnam War-Draft

ஐபிஎல் 2018 : சென்னை

தமிழகம் எங்கும் காவிரி ஆணையம் அமைக்கக் கோரி, விவசாய இயக்கம் கொழுந்து விட்டு எரியும் சூழலில், ஐபிஎல் 2018 திட்டமிட்டபடி  சென்னையில் நடைபெறும் என அறிவிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது.

தமிழகத்துக்கு துரோகம் இழைத்த மோடி அரசையும், அதன் தமிழக எடுபிடி எடப்பாடி நிர்வாகத்தையும் எதிர்த்துப் போராடும் மக்கள் இவ் விழாவை நடத்தக்கூடாது எனக் கோரி வருகின்றனர். ENB Tenn

=============================

ஐபிஎல் 2018 : சென்னையில் நடைபெறும் கிரிக்கெட் போட்டிக்கான டிக்கெட் விலை அறிவிப்பு
By Saro - March 30, 2018

11 வது ஐபிஎல் 20 ஓவர் கிரிக்கெட் போட்டி ஏப்ரல் 7 ம் தேதி முதல் மே 27 ம் தேதி வரை நடைபெற உள்ளது.ஐபிஎல் தொடக்க நாளான ஏப்ரல் 7 ம் தேதி சென்னை சூப்பர் கிங்ஸ் அணி நடப்பு சாம்பியனான மும்பை இந்தியன்ஸ் உடன் விளையாட உள்ளது.இந்த ஆட்டம் மும்பையில் நடைபெற உள்ளது.

சென்னை சூப்பர் கிங்ஸ் அணி உள்ளூரில் 7  ஆட்டங்களில் விளையாட உள்ளது.முதல் ஆட்டம் ஏப்ரல் 10 ம் தேதி கொல்கத்தா நைட் ரைடர்ஸ் உடன் நடைபெற உள்ளது.இந்த ஆட்டம் சென்னை சேப்பாக்கத்தில் நடைபெற உள்ளது

இந்நிலையில் சென்னையில் நடைபெறும் போட்டிக்கான டிக்கெட் விலை வெளியாகி உள்ளது.குறைந்தபட்ச டிக்கெட் கட்டணமாக ரூ.1,300 நிர்ணயம் செய்யப்பட்டுள்ளது. அதிகபட்ச டிக்கெட் விலை ரூ.6,500 (பெவிலியன் டெரஸ்) ஆகும். மேலும் ரூ.1,500, ரூ.2,500, ரூ.4,500, ரூ.5 ஆயிரம் ஆகிய விலைகளிலும் டிக்கெட் விற்பனை செய்யப்படுகிறது.

இந்த டிக்கெட்டுகளை ஆன்லைனிலும்,ஸ்டேடியத்தில் உள்ள டிக்கெட் கவுண்டர்களிலும் பெறலாம்.

Father of girl raped by BJP MLA beaten by UP cops, dead!

Father of girl allegedly raped by BJP MLA beaten by UP cops, dead

The father of the girl who had been taken into police custody for protesting outside Yogi Adityanath's residence died early this morning

In the latest development, the girl's father, who had been taken into police custody for protesting outside Adityanath's residence, died early this morning.

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath

An 18-year-old woman on Sunday tried to immolate herself near Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath's residence, after alleging that she had been raped by a legislator of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The immolation bid took place outside the Golf Club gate of the chief minister's residence. The woman alleged that she was raped in June last year by Kuldeep Singh Sengar, the MLA of Unnao district's Bangermau constituency, around 90 km from Lucknow. She also accused the Unnao police of not taking any action and registering a case on her complaint, Vijay Sen Singh, in-charge of the Gautampalli police station, said.

In the latest development, the girl's father, who had been taken into police custody for protesting outside Adityanath's residence, died early this morning.

UPDATES

1. Father of alleged rape victim dies in police custody: Father of the woman who said that she was raped by a BJP MLA and his accomplices, passed away, allegedly in police custody, after he was arrested on Sunday.

He was admitted to hospital last night by Police after he complained of abdominal pain & vomiting. He passed away in early morning hours: Dr Atul, District hospital, Unnao on father of rape victim. The victim along with her family had attempted suicide outside CM residence, y'day pic.twitter.com/UqBoSI6EfI

2. 'Man died of vomiting and abdominal pain': "The man was admitted to the hospital last night after he complained of abdominal pain and vomiting. He passed away in the early morning hours," Dr Atul, District hospital of Unnao said about the father of the alleged rape victim.

3. "Arrest the rapist or I'll kill myself": The girl told mediapersons, "that the BJP MLA should be arrested, and until he is not, I am not going back home… I will take my life otherwise… I was threatened that if I tell anyone my family members will be killed and thrown away.

4. Girl's father was beaten by BJP MLA's brother: The 18-year-old girl claimed that her father sustained multiple injuries after he was beaten up by the BJP MLA's brother and some of his accomplices a few days ago.

5. Magisterial inquiry to be conducted: If lapse found on the side of police, action will be taken.The incident happened while the man was in judicial custody, said DIG.

6. UP police had beaten the girl's father: Two police officers and four constables suspended and 4 accused of beating the rape victim's father arrested: Pushpanjali Devi, SP of Unnao.

7. Girl asked for protection, but in vain: Samajwadi Party leader Juhi Singh accused Yogi Adityanath's government of inaction which led to Mr Singh's death.

"The girl kept requesting for security for the family. But nothing was done. Insensitivity is rampant in this state. This is murder," she said.

8. BJP MLA denies allegations: Sengar denied the allegations, saying it was a conspiracy to malign his image. "It is a conspiracy hatched by my political opponents to tarnish my image and damage my reputation... I have no problems with any probe. Let a probe be conducted, and the guilty be given the stringent punishment. If I am found guilty in the probe, I am ready to face the punishment," the BJP MLA said.

9. No case registered yet: The woman was made to appear before Rajiv Krishan, the Additional Director-General of Police, Lucknow, who ordered a probe, the inspector said. However, no case had been registered yet, Vijay Sen Singh added.

Macron's rail reforms and French union strikes

Macron's rail reforms and French union strikes

Reuters Staff WORLD NEWSAPRIL 8, 2018 / 6:24 PM / A DAY AGO

PARIS (Reuters) - France’s rail workers on Sunday launched the second wave of rolling strikes over government plans to reform the debt-ridden national state-owned railway company SNCF before its monopoly on domestic passenger rail expires.

Though the reforms were not on French President Emmanuel Macron’s ‘to do’ list when he ran for election last May, the politically charged showdown with trade unions they triggered may come to define his presidency.

Why is Macron doing this?

The SNCF reform plans fit in with the 40-year-old former banker’s pledge to modernize the economy.

Macron is pro-business, pro-liberalization and intent on tackling the deeply entrenched vested interests he believes choke growth - all of which help to explain why he chose to tackle an unwieldy, costly monopoly.

The SNCF’s monopoly on domestic passenger rail begins to expire during Macron’s 2017-2022 term.

Competitive tendering starts EU-wide in 2019, although the government and local authorities can invoke get-out clauses that will delay effective free-tender competition until 2033, or maybe even later.

A safer, more reliable and perhaps cheaper train network would be popular with its 4.5 million daily users, many of whom complain it has been neglected at the expense of decades of investment in the high-speed TGV train network.

How is Macron going about it?

Action so far has been swift and resolute. Macron’s prime minister aims to have the reform in place by summer and has said direct government decrees could be used to deliver the plan’s essential elements if met with opposition from labor unions.

Any remaining points would follow the usual path of debate and approval in parliament, where Macron’s party had a sizeable majority. A parliamentary committee is already discussing some details of the reform and a draft on a broad framework could be put to a preliminary vote as soon as April 17.

The proposed use of direct decrees has angered unions, prompting the transport minister to signal that the government will largely avoid them.

The French government used direct decrees to push through Macron’s labor market reforms in 2017, which also sparked protests and gave rise to accusations that it was skirting parliament and undermining democracy.

In parallel to any legislative changes, the SNCF’s state-appointed chairman Guillaume Pepy is negotiating internally with the unions to settle more granular aspects of company organization.

Why all the fuss about legal structure?

Under the reform plans, the SNCF’s legal corporate status would change from a state enterprise (known as an EPIC) to what is known in many other countries as a limited or joint-stock company.

To make the SNCF more competitive, the government believes it should be a legal entity in its own right, with more independent management.

It is also under pressure to shake-up the SNCF’s structure after EU court rulings against the EPIC structure of La Poste, that led the French post office to become a limited company while remaining state-owned.

Opponents fear that creating a limited company is the first step towards privatization and point to former state telecoms monopoly France Telecom as an example.

The government insists the SNCF will remain fully state-owned.

What else would change?

The existing 150,000 rail workers will hold on to their generous employment rights but new recruits will not be given the job-for-life guarantees and automatic annual pay increases that SNCF employees have enjoyed for decades.

Early retirement rights are also likely to vanish but as part of a separate overhaul of the French pensions system.

One of the tasks facing SNCF Chairman Pepy as he conducts his parallel negotiations is to ensure operational cost savings of around 30 percent to bring the rail operator into line with its competitors before these start vying for business on French tracks.

What is driving union anger?

Trade unions say their special employment status is not the cause of the SNCF’s financial difficulties but blame high spending on the TGV for the SNCF’s 46 billion euros ($56.5 billion) of debt.

The CGT union, the most powerful rail union, objects to the entire shake-up of the SNCF. It rejects the end of the monopoly and the liberalization programed under the EU’s so-called Fourth Package rail deregulation rules, agreed in 2016.

The more reform-minded CFDT union is angry about the government’s haste and its refusal to commit now to a write-off of the SNCF’s debt, which is increasing by 3 billion euros a year.

The minimum, the CFDT says, is that work conditions be dealt with in a new collective bargaining round which should conclude before anything happens to hiring status. But this could take longer than a year, according to some union officials.

What do the French make of it?

Most polls so far show that as many as three in four people back reform of the railways. They also show that a majority, albeit a slim one, see the rail strikes as unjustified.

But Macron cannot afford to be perceived as riding roughshod over the unions. Opinions can change quickly: Two polls last week showed more than half felt the government should modify its reform plans to meet the demands of their opponents.

Macron will want to keep public opinion on his side. The last time a French president and his government squared off against rail unions was in 1995, at a time of a wider protests against social welfare reforms.

Widespread public anger led to the rail reform being pulled and ultimately the government’s downfall. ($1 = 0.8143 euros)

Reporting By Brian Love; Editing by Richard Lough and Raissa Kasolowsky
Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

காஸ்மீர் இளைஞர்கள் கல் எறிந்தால் `இந்திய ஜனநாயகம்` என்ன செய்யும்?

Only alternative to pellet is not to throw stones

'More than 200 youth were injured and majority of them have sustained pellet injuries in the recent protests at the encounter sites in South Kashmir. As per hospital records, 41 youth were hit by pellets in their eyes'

Only alternative to pellet guns is for youth not to throw stones: ADG CRPF

“Public cooperation and trust is the only thing we need to bring the situation to normal. People, especially youth should understand that stone pelting is illegal and invites trouble,” he said.

ABID BASHIR
Srinagar, Publish Date: Apr 9 2018 11:49PM | Updated Date: Apr 9 2018 11:49PM

File Photo V S K Kaumudi

Only alternative to pellet guns is for youth not to throw stones:  ADG CRPF

The best alternative to the use of pellet shotguns is for people of Kashmir to realize that it is risky to protest and attack government forces with stones, a top Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) officer said on Monday.

“Stone pelting at the encounter sites would obviously result in loss of life and use of pellet guns,” additional director general (ADG) of CRPF for J&K zone, V S K Kaumudi told reporters on the sidelines of  CRPF’s Valour Day function at the Regional Training Centre Humhama.

Talking about the recent incident of stone pelting at Hiller in Anantnag district in which two CRPF men were killed, the officer said that the stone pelting does not do any good. “If you (youth) have something to say, the social media can also be used to vent anger,” he said adding that the stone pelting was not a new issue in Kashmir.  “Its pattern keeps changing. It’s like here today and there tomorrow. The CRPF has been dealing with the stone pelting effectively and we will continue to do so.”

Kaumudi, however, said all CRPF men deployed on the ground for law and order duty have their pellet guns fitted with deflectors. “The main aim of deflectors is to fire pellets in lower direction to ensure no loss of life,” said Kaumudi.

Asked about the total number of pellet guns allotted to CRPF men in Kashmir, the officer evaded the query. “There are 61 battalions of CRPF deployed in J&K and all men were trained in various capacities,” he said.  “I am sure that all battalions are fulfilling their responsibility in a very professional manner”.

Kaumudi, who took over as the ADG CRPF (J&K zone) in February, said there was need for public cooperation. Youth, he said, should desist from targeting forces with the stones.

“Public cooperation and trust is the only thing we need to bring the situation to normal. People, especially youth should understand that stone pelting is illegal and invites trouble,” he said.
He said that the youth must focus on their future and education. “I am sure that the parents want quality education for their children,” he said. “Youth must realize that they can also study outside J&K. They should search for better opportunities and benefit from it, instead of resorting to violence,” he said.

More than 200 youth were injured and majority of them have sustained pellet injuries in the recent protests at the encounter sites in South Kashmir. As per hospital records, 41 youth were hit by pellets in their eyes.

Trump’s Trade War – or “De-Globalization”?

Trump’s Trade War – or “De-Globalization”?
By Peter Koenig
Global Research, March 13, 2018

President Trump’s bold ‘protectionist’ move of introducing import duties of 25% and 10% for steel and aluminum, respectively – and possibly more to come – may be more than just ‘populism’ and fulfilling a campaign promise. And why is the term ‘populism’ always used with a derogative slant? As if it was way below the intellect of those who deride it as addressing the thoughtless and primitive behavior by the people? Aren’t politicians supposed to work for the people? Educate them with the truth instead of ridiculing them; giving them real news instead of ‘fake news’ – and giving them jobs and decent livelihood? – Is that addressing “populism”?

President Trump, or whoever directs him, may have noticed the steady decline of the American economy into a hollow war and service machine, with rising unemployment at the tune of more than 20% (though the fake statistics pretend otherwise, putting git below 5%); a country gradually choking on junk consumption, anti-Russia propaganda and a rapidly deterioration physical infrastructure and civil society.

This unexpected protectionist decision may also be a genuine move against globalization – which, as we know, is controlled by neoliberal economics and has in fact nothing to do with real economics. It is sheer criminalizing of economics. It has done enormous harm to the 99.9 % and benefitted only the 0.1% (or less). “Make America Great Again” is supposed to address this fallacy. Bring production and jobs back, primarily for the domestic market and second only, for international trade, for trade that doesn’t harm the local economy. This is a recipe which would also suit many European countries – Greece is a case in point, but Spain, Italy, Ireland and even France would fall into the same category. “Local production for local markets” is indeed the model that helped rescuing the US from the depression of the 30’s and Europe, in particular Germany, after WWII.

The so-called Free Trade Agreements (FTA) and multi country Trade Agreements like, NAFTA, TTIP, and TPP – the former being renegotiated and the latter two suspended – are quite different from “local production for local markets”. They all, without fault, favor US corporations’ maximizing profit objective, but not the United States local economy. Insofar Trump is right, when he says that all these trade deals have been bad for his countries. They were and are a bonanza for US corporations, but indeed bad for the US national economy, because they are incentives for more and more outsourcing of production and services into low labor cost countries.

By granting corporations tax breaks and incentives to invest at home rather than in low-wage countries, and by levying import duties, President Trump is taking a decisive step – maybe willy-nilly – to rehabilitate a faltering US economy. Will it work? It might. It’s too early to say. Economy is no precise science, but rather the result of the dynamic interaction between different at times unpredictable elements. True economics are certainly not based on a set of blueprints; they are not black and white, as neoliberal theories would like us to believe. Real economics do not fit today’s most popular teachings of ‘modelling’ – a complex linear approach of algorithm which produces desired results for propagating neoliberal ideas – that depart from reality by a long shot. The fact of reestablishing trust in local labor, may have power way beyond that of capital investments.

Trump capitalizes on this momentum and, simultaneously, may set a signal for the rest of the world to follow – and for the end of globalization. Interestingly, he said at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos in January this year, that all the American partner countries should think, “Make my country great again”. Isn’t this a slap in the face of globalization?

Of course, there will be noises of ‘retaliation’ by Europe, China, Japan – so what? – Steps of retaliation may actually trigger a political rethinking of globalized WTO propagated trade. It may reveal who are the winners and losers. It may have taken 30 years to realize that the winners are an ever-smaller corporate elite, while the bedrock of national economies, local labor, is the big loser. That is precisely the direction into which the neofascist West is moving – towards selling the national economy out to corporate profits. The people are understandably unhappy.

Today’s economists are in shock, whenever somebody dares questioning the mainstream globalized economic models, depicting a linear right or wrong vision of the world. Remember George Bush – “you are either for us or against us”; the phrase that set the eternal war on terror in motion; the war that brought death to millions, intimidation to hundreds of millions and billions of profits to the war industry.

Yet, we were and are still indoctrinated with the neoliberal norm, which consists of open-border trade, limitless cross-border transfer of capital – but very restricted transfer of labor. And worst of all, today and for the last 100 years, is our (western) dollar-based monetary system (born from the Federal Reserve Act of 1913) that shapes and manipulates the western boom – bust economy. Logic would rather dictate a reverse monetary system, where a nation’s economic output is the basis for its monetary system, not the other way around.

This monetary anomality has been driven to extremes with the US-dollar’s offspring, the euro, which has zero connection with the European economy, let alone with the economy of each member country. The western monetary system on which international trade is based is a fraud, a mere house of cards, a Ponzi scheme, the collapse of which is inevitable.

The Donald is a largely unpredictable character. As a war monger, he screams “fire and fury” at North Korea, threatening to wipe out the entire country; yet is willing to sit down to negotiate with Kim Jong-un – under certain conditions – debating whose Red Button is bigger, Kim’s or the Donald’s. At the same time, driven by Netanyahu, the same Donald has only slander and insults left for Iran, threatening the country with annihilating war and imposing more sanctions, knowing quite well that Europe, mainly France and Germany, has established billion euros worth of trade relations since the lifting of the original sanctions after the signing of the ‘nuclear deal’ in July 2015.

So, let’s not get this wrong. Trump is no panacea for the good of the world. By a very long shot. He is a loose cannon, shooting from the hips, he may have hit the target by declaring unilateral import tariffs on steel and aluminum. This may be just the beginning, a trial balloon so to speak, for more protection measures to follow. His neocolonial trained chief economic adviser, Gary Cohn, can’t see the logic and quit. Trump is unmoved and stays the course. He knows these tariffs won’t affect consumer prices at home, but they may be a boost for the US rust-belt – reviving investments, including the local car industry, a key economic indicator, creating thousands of much needed jobs and reestablishing labor’s trust in Washington’s leadership – to “Make America Great Again.”

**************************
Peter Koenig is an economist and geopolitical analyst. He is also a former World Bank staff and worked extensively around the world in the fields of environment and water resources. He lectures at universities in the US, Europe and South America. He writes regularly for Global Research; ICH; RT; Sputnik; PressTV; The 21st Century; TeleSUR; The Vineyard of The Saker Blog; and other internet sites. He is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed – fiction based on facts and on 30 years of World Bank experience around the globe. He is also a co-author of The World Order and Revolution! – Essays from the Resistance.

The original source of this article is Global Research
Copyright © Peter Koenig, Global Research, 2018

US CHINA TRADE WAR AND AUSTRALIA

What could a US-China trade war do?

What could a US-China trade war do?

Gavin Jackson - FT

Last week my colleagues reported that global investors and German manufacturers have both found themselves unwilling participants in a trade dispute between China and the US, but could the UK economy also be counted among the collateral damage?

German manufacturers are worried that tariffs on Chinese exports to the US will end up reducing demand for the German-made machines that are used in Chinese production. Fewer Chinese toys, for example, bought by US consumers means fewer German toymaking machines bought by Chinese investors.

The UK does not export many capital goods to China, which is the eighth-largest destination for UK exports after Italy. In 2016, cars made up 28 per cent of UK goods exports to China, followed by oil and petroleum products (12 per cent of exports) and pharmaceuticals (6 per cent).

In terms of services trade, the UK mainly sells business services and “travel services” meaning tourism. The UK has a surplus in services trade in China, but overall it sells more goods than it does services — £13.5bn goods exports in 2016 compared with £3.3bn of services.

Fewer Chinese toys, for example, bought by US consumers means fewer German toymaking machines bought by Chinese investors.

A slowdown in the Chinese economy due to US tariffs may mean fewer tourists visit London and wealthy Chinese industrialists buy fewer Land Rovers and Aston Martins, but overall the UK’s consumer-oriented exports are less exposed than German investment goods to an interruption in transpacific trade.

However, another, more indirect, channel by which an escalation in the dispute could affect the UK is so-called trade diversion. If less Chinese production is destined for the US it may end up in Europe instead, lowering prices for consumers but making it harder for producers to compete.

That’s the concern for the steel industry in particular, but mostly the UK does not produce the same kind of industrial goods targeted by the US tariffs or the agricultural goods targeted by China. For once, the UK may enjoy a rare upside from its smaller manufacturing sector.

The Bank of England’s chief economist will be giving the David Finch public lecture at the University of Melbourne. His topic will be whether central banks have made inequality worse through monetary policy. The Bank of England published research on this topic last week and concluded that their policies had reduced wealth inequality.

The Office for National Statistics will publish its monthly update on construction output, industrial output and trade flows for February. The figures for January showed the manufacturing sector had enjoyed the longest period of expansion since 1968, but bad weather (and reversion to the mean) are likely to bring that record-breaking run to an end in the latest figures. Construction is likely to register a hit from the snow as well.

Non-manufacturing production, which includes energy and gas, is likely to see a boost as thermostats across the country were cranked up. Either way, the data are unlikely to tell us much about the long-term trend in economic growth and are likely to reflect temporary weather effects.

The deputy governor of the Bank of England will be giving the second speech down under this week by a member of the Monetary Policy Committee. Mr Broadbent will be speaking at the Reserve Bank of Australia, no details have been released about the topic.

Purchasing managers’ indices last week showed the damage the Beast from the East was likely to inflict on the UK economy. Manufacturing emerged relatively unscathed, according to the surveys, but both construction and services activity growth dropped at the fastest rate since the immediate aftermath of the Brexit vote.

BATTLE OF THE BEANS

On Wednesday, China announced it would levy 25 per cent duties on 106 products, including soyabeans, cars and chemicals if the US went ahead with its plans to raise tariffs on Chinese products. Patti Waldmeir and Tom Hancock have the details on what this means for the Iowa farmers who have found themselves at the centre of a global trade dispute.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FT

மன்னாரில் சவூதி உதவியில் ஜும்மா பள்ளிவாசல்

மன்னாரில் ஜும்மா பள்ளிவாசலுக்கு அடிக்கல்

மன்னார் காட்டாஸ்பத்திரிப் பகுதியில் ஜும்மா பள்ளிவாசல் அமைப்பதற்கான அடிக்கல் நடப்பட்டுள்ளது.

கைத்­தொ­ழில் மற்­றும் வர்த்­தக அமைச்­ச­ரும் அகில இலங்கை மக்­கள் காங்கிரசின் தேசிய தலை­வ­ரு­மான ரிசாத் பதி­யு­தீன் வாக்­கு­று­திக்கு அமைய சவூதி நாட்­டின் நிதி உத­வி­யு­டன் ஜும்மா பள்­ளிக்­கான அடிக்­கல் நடப்­பட்­டது.

காட்­டாஸ்­பத்­திரி ஜும்மா பள்ளி நிர்­வா­கத் தலை­வர் அப்­துர் ரஹீம் அவர்­க­ளின் வழி நடத்­த­லில், முன்­னாள் வட­மா­காண சபை உறுப்­பி­ன­ரும், அமைச்­சர் ரிசாத் பதி­யு­தீ­னின் பிரத்­தி­யேக செய­லா­ள­ரு­மான ரிப்­கான் பதி­யு­தீன் தலை­மை­யில் குறித்த நிகழ்வு இடம்­பெற்­றது.

நிகழ்­வில் ஒ.எச்.ஆர்.டி நிறு­வ­னத் தலை­வர் சஹாப்­தீன், மன்­னார் பிர­தேச சபை உறுப்­பி­னர்­கள், நிதி உத­விய சவூதி நாட்­டின் பிர­தி­நி­தி­கள், பள்ளி நிர்­வா­கத்­தி­னர், தேசிய இளை­ஞர் சேவை­கள் மன்­றத்­தின் வன்னி மாகாண பணிப்­பா­ளர் என்.எம்.முனவ்­பர் மற்­றும் கிராம மக்கள் என பலர் கலந்து கொண்டனர்.

உதயன் Apr 9, 2018