SHARE
Thursday, October 03, 2024
U.S. Navy Destroyers “Successfully Engaged” Iranian Ballistic Missiles On Their Way To Israel
Australia tightens security ahead of Oct 6-7 pro-Palestine protests
Australia tightens security ahead of Oct 6-7 pro-Palestine protests
World Braces For Israel’s Retaliation To Iran’s Ballistic Missile Barrage
Israel has vowed to strike back after Iran's missile barrage and signs point to its response being far more significant than the one last April.
Howard Altman Oct 2, 2024 The War Zone
With Israeli leaders vowing to strike back strongly against Iran for Tuesday’s massive missile barrage, the world awaits Jerusalem’s response. Fears are growing that continued escalation on both sides could lead to an all-out war in the region and possibly drag the U.S. into the fray.
As we noted earlier today, the Chief of Staff of the Israeli Army said there will be retribution.
“We will respond, we know how to locate important targets, we know how to strike with precision and power,” said Lt. Gen. Herzi Halevi. “We have the capabilities to reach and strike any point in the Middle East. And those of our enemies who have not yet understood this, will soon understand.”
On Tuesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Iran would “pay for” the attack, which officials claim caused minimal damage.
“The regime of Iran does not understand our determination to defend ourselves,” Netanyahu said in a statement delivered shortly after the attack, which came on the eve Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year. “They will understand. We will stand by the rule we established: Whoever attacks, we will attack them.”
Many Israeli officials “point to Iran’s oil facilities as a likely target, but some say targeted assassinations and taking out Iran’s air defense systems are also possibilities,” Axios reported. “The Israeli response could include airstrikes from fighter jets as well as clandestine operations similar to the one that killed Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran two months ago.” This largely matches our analysis from yesterday.
Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces, Maj. Gen. Mohammad Bagheri, said his country’s next response will be “even more devastating” should Israel retaliate.
One of the Iranian missile that were fired at Israel yesterday |
Maj. Gen. Sayyed Abdolrahim Mousavi, Commander-in-Chief of Iran’s Army, said his forces “will respond more harshly” to any Israeli retaliation and may “decide to destroy their infrastructure.” Iran claims they only targeted military and national security targets with their previous missile barrage.
Meanwhile, U.S. President Joe Biden said he does not approve of any Israeli strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities, “signaling a renewed effort by his administration to seek restraint from Israel in the hopes of avoiding a wider, regional war in the Middle East,” The New. York Times reported.
Biden told reporters that leaders of the Group of 7 countries had agreed in a call Wednesday morning to impose new sanctions on Iran and agreed that Israel had the right to respond to Iran’s military assault.
Matthew Miller, the State Department spokesman, said the United States continues discussions with Israel on its looming response, the Times reported. “But ultimately, it’s up to them — as it is for any sovereign country — to make their own decisions.”
There is also a concern that the U.S., with 40,000 troops in the region, could become involved should any of its naval, air, or ground forces come under attack.
The U.S. has bolstered its presence in the Middle East since the Oct. 7, 2023 surprise Hamas attack on Israel that killed about 1,200 Israelis. Tens of thousands of Palestinians in Gaza have been killed in Israel’s ensuing response.
One open-source intelligence researcher offered a breakdown of the various missiles on Twitter based on videos of the strikes and images of the recovered missile remains. Among them were Kheiber Shekan medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBM). It is a two-stage, solid-propellant, vehicle-launched MRBM that Iran first unveiled on Feb. 9, 2022. A third generation of the Fateh family of ballistic missiles, Iran claims it has a maximum range of 1,450 kilometers (900 miles). It was first used in combat in January,..
Israelis also encountered a largely intact Iranian ballistic missile booster in the Negev desert, some 700 miles west of Iran. These components will likely prove valuable for intelligence personnel that keep a close eye on Iran’s missile and rocket programs.
Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces, Major General Mohammad Bagheri, said that the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) chose Mossad headquarters, Nevatim Airbase, and Hatzerim Airbase as the primary targets in Tuesday’s attack
“The first was chosen because the spy center has been found responsible for several assassinations, the second because F-35 jet fighters are stationed there, and the third because it was used to assassinate Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah in a devastating attack in Beirut on Friday,” he said, according to the official Iranian news outlet Press TV.
Meanwhile, three days into Israel’s limited ground invasion of southern Lebanon, its troops have engaged in “close-range” combat with Hezbollah forces, both sides say. So far, at least eight Israeli soldiers have been killed in the fighting, according to the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF).
The IDF did not say how those troops died, but most of the casualties took place in the eastern sector of southern Lebanon, according to a Twitter dispatch from the Israeli YNET media outlet.
A half-dozen Israeli troops were killed and 30 more wounded in a battle in a Lebanese village, according to YNET reporter Yoav Zitun.
The village, which he didn’t name, was struck 650 times in the past months by Israeli forces in anticipation of a looming ground incursion, Zitun stated. The casualties occurred after Israeli forces ambushed Hezbollah fighters in a building “during heavy fog…and in total darkness.”
An assault “by dozens of [Hezbollah] terrorists began from every direction and in poor visibility with low cloud cover that made it difficult for air cover,” Zitun explained. “That was followed by “a barrage of anti-tank and paramilitary fire on the rescue forces that arrived to evacuate the first victims.”
Zitun claims that 30 Hezbollah fighters were killed in that battle, another 30 wounded and 50 killed overall since the start of the invasion.
“Fighting is expected to intensify,” he posited.
Hezbollah said in one battle, it detonated “a pre-prepared explosive device by an Israeli force that infiltrated a house in the outskirts of the town of Kfar Kila, then rained a barrage of machine guns and rockets on it, killing and wounding its members,” the Hezbollah-affiliated Al Mayadeen Telegram channel claimed. It did not offer any details on the casualty count.
In another fight, Hezbollah said it detonated an explosive device on Israeli forces as they were “trying to bypass the town of Yaroun from the forest side,” according to Al Mayadeen. An unspecified number of Israeli troops were killed and injured, the outlet claimed.
The War Zone cannot independently confirm these claims. Video emerged on social media showing Israeli helicopters evacuating casualties from the Lebanese border village of Adaisseh, where Hezbollah reportedly claimed to have staged an ambush today.
To help bolster its fight against Hezbollah, the IDF said the 36th Division, including soldiers of the Golani Brigade, 188th Armored Brigade, 6th Infantry Brigade, and additional forces are joining troops already in Lebanon.
The death of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah’s in an Israeli air strike on Sept. 27 has “prompted Iranian authorities to thoroughly investigate possible infiltrations within Iran’s own ranks, from the powerful Revolutionary Guards to senior security officials, a second senior Iranian official said,” according to Reuters. “They are especially focused on those who travel abroad or have relatives living outside Iran, the first official said.”
“Tehran grew suspicious of certain members of the Guards who had been traveling to Lebanon,” said a source, according to Reuters. “Concerns were raised when one of these individuals began asking about Nasrallah’s whereabouts, particularly inquiring about how long he would remain in specific locations, the official added.”
Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei “no longer trusts anyone,” Reuters added, citing a source “who is close to Iran’s establishment.”
Speaking of assassinations, the IDF announced on Tuesday it “killed the commander of Hezbollah’s Unit 4400, which is tasked with delivering weapons from Iran and its proxies to Lebanon in its latest strike targeting the terror group’s top leadership,” the Times of Israel reported.
Muhammad Ja’far Kasir “was killed in a strike carried out by fighter jets in Beirut, according to the military,” the publication stated.
The IDF said that it “also killed the commander of the Imam Hossein Division, an Iranian militia which operates alongside Hezbollah, in the same strike,” the Times of Israel added. “The military named the commander as Daw Alfakher Hinaw.”
Israel also took out Nasrallah’s son-in-law Hassan Qassir in an airstrike in Damascus.
As of 7 PM Eastern, which is 2 AM Tel Aviv time, there has been no Israeli retaliation toward Iran. After Iran delivered its first direct attack against Israel in April, Jerusalem responded with limited missile strikes but none against Iran’s nuclear facilities. The question about how Israel reacts this time will likely be answered in the coming hours⍐.
Howard Altman Oct 2, 2024 The War Zone
UK cedes Chagos Island sovereignty to Mauritius, retains Diego Garcia airbase
REUTERS/HO/U.S. Navy/File Photo |
UK cedes Chagos Island sovereignty to Mauritius, retains Diego Garcia airbase
Israeli military deaths in Lebanon raise questions over war’s scope
Israeli military deaths in Lebanon raise questions over war’s scope
Eight Israeli soldiers were killed Wednesday in Lebanon, deaths that could shape the depth and scope of an Israeli ground offensive against Hezbollah.
If the pace of Israeli casualties continues in Lebanon, experts say, it could shape the depth and scope of the offensive, which the IDF announced early Tuesday, saying the aim was to destroy Hezbollah infrastructure near the border. For Israel, the deaths will revive difficult memories of the invasion of Lebanon in 2006, when the first tank to cross the border hit a roadside bomb and four soldiers were killed. “What will be the depth of the invasion? How much will be cleared? We don’t know,” said Yaakov Amidror, a former major general and Israeli national security adviser. “It will be decided depending on the achievements on the ground.” |
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has given little away in terms of plans, other than vowing to keep striking Hezbollah with “full force” until it is possible for the more than 60,000 residents displaced along Israel’s northern border to return home. Hezbollah began firing rockets into northern Israel last Oct. 8, a day after the Hamas-led attack in southern Israel that killed about 1,200 people and saw more than 250 taken hostage.
Since then, Israel has embarked on a sweeping push against Iran-backed proxies on its borders and beyond, in an effort to restore deterrence, shift regional power dynamics and prevent further attacks.
But as Netanyahu weighs future moves, he will need to navigate domestic calls for decisive military action in Lebanon, while also addressing concerns that troops could get bogged down in skirmishes with fighters, and struggle to achieve the offensive’s bigger aims.
Far-right hawks, including in the government, have called for a more permanent “buffer zone” to be established on Lebanese territory. At the same time, the United States and other allies have tried to deter Israel from a large-scale war, amid fears of regional spillover and a worsening humanitarian crisis. In Lebanon, the Israeli military has already carried out more than 3,600 airstrikes and displaced as many as 1 million people, according to Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati.
Limited border operations
People holding a photo of Hezbollah commander Mohammed Qassem al-Shaer attend his funeral procession in southern Lebanon on Sept. 11. (Str/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock) |
Israeli military officials have said their key objective is to prevent Hezbollah from carrying out an Oct. 7-style attack in northern Israel, something the group has openly threatened for a decade.
It is unclear whether the group had imminent plans to launch an assault, but its fighters have spent years building military infrastructure, including attack tunnels, along Lebanon’s border with Israel.
The IDF assessed that Hezbollah had 2,000 to 3,000 elite fighters, known as the Radwan Force, operating roughly two miles from the border. An additional 6,000 to 8,000 militants were stationed six miles from the frontier, according to an Israeli military official who spoke on the condition of anonymity, in line with IDF protocol.
Israeli forces would need “a few weeks” to destroy infrastructure in the area, the official said.
Some of Hezbollah’s attack tunnels and materiel were already dismantled, according to the military, which said Tuesday that Israeli commandos had staged more than 70 raids in Lebanon in recent months, with some forces staying for several nights undetected.
But the ground forces going in now are part of “a different phase” and could do more “damage” to the group, the official said.
According to Miri Eisin, a former senior intelligence officer in the Israeli military who has been briefed on security deliberations, the military is aware it could get stuck battling militants in southern Lebanon, “where Hezbollah are the locals, they know where their booby traps are, where they can hide.”
As the operation moves forward, she said, the military will probably pivot to fighting at night, when it has the most advantage. And unlike in Gaza, where the IDF was tasked with eliminating Hamas as both a government and military force, in Lebanon it has more clearly defined tasks and goals by which it can measure progress, Eisin said.
A deeper push
“We’re not going to Beirut. We’re not going to the cities in southern Lebanon,” Israeli military spokesman Daniel Hagari said in a briefing Tuesday when asked by The Washington Post about the operation’s scope.
Over the past year, Israel has been clear that it expects Hezbollah to pull back behind Lebanon’s Litani River, which is about 18 miles north of the border and lies at the northern edge of what is supposed to be a U.N.-monitored demilitarized zone in southern Lebanon. Those boundaries were drawn up in a U.N. Security Council resolution at the end of the 2006 war.
And while the military has insisted it won’t stage a full-scale invasion, it has also ordered residents of 30 villages in southern Lebanon to move even farther north. In orders posted to X on Tuesday, the Israeli military said people should move above the Awwali River, more than 30 miles from the demarcation line.
Then, on Wednesday, the IDF announced that infantry and armored units were joining the fight, indications the military is preparing for a much larger ground campaign.
“The IDF and Israeli political echelons do not want to get stuck in a protracted operation that could boost Hezbollah, after it suffered several significant blows,” said Michael Horowitz, head of intelligence at Le Beck, a risk consultancy. “But that’s easier said than done.”
While the military may want to focus on the “first-line” villages located within six miles of the border, Horowitz said, there is always a risk the fighting could spread. “What happens if the IDF troops get fired upon from positions north of that, for instance?”
There is historical precedent for mission creep in southern Lebanon. The first time Israel invaded, in 1978, in a bid to destroy bases set up by Palestinian militants, it initially sought to occupy six miles of territory, according to the IDF. But three days in, the military decided to advance as far as the Litani River. Troops did not leave for another 22 years.
Buffer zone
But how will Israel hold on to any gains against Hezbollah? A “buffer zone” inside the border would leave its troops vulnerable, and be a “gift” to the militant group, Horowitz said. But as time goes on, there will be more pressure inside Israel to establish one, he added.
The calls for a buffer zone are already coming from Israel’s far right.
“A renewed buffer zone, free of enemy population, is the order of the hour and it is the right and most just thing to do both from a security point of view, both from a political and moral point of view,” Israel’s far-right minister of diaspora affairs, Amichai Chikli, posted on X late last month. He attached several maps showing what he described as a “renewed border” slicing into Lebanese territory.
Last week, Itamar Ben Gvir, Israel’s far-right national security minister, threatened to withdraw from the government if Netanyahu agreed to a cease-fire in Lebanon, repeating a threat he has made regarding negotiations with Hamas.
Eyal Zisser, a Middle East expert at Tel Aviv University, said many Israelis doubt the operation will compel Hezbollah to agree to Israel’s terms: Halt fire into northern Israel and recommit to the 2006 agreement that required them to retreat.
“We have got to this certain point, but after a few weeks of raids, then what?” Zisser said.
Israel is no stranger to occupying ground in Lebanon. In 1982, Israel launched a second invasion of Lebanon that reached the capital, Beirut, withdrawing three years later to a broader “security zone” along the border that ranged from three to 12 miles and covered about 10 percent of Lebanon’s territory.
But not everyone believes Israel needs to occupy the buffer zone to maintain it. The zone could instead be enforced by a “very strict Israeli policy” that targets anyone who enters the designated area, said Ephraim Sneh, a former Israeli defense minister and commander of Israeli forces in the “security zone” in southern Lebanon in the early 1980s.
Ideally, an effective Lebanese or international force would be deployed on the ground to keep Hezbollah from rebuilding its military capabilities, Sneh said.
Still, as long as Israel pursues military options with no political or diplomatic tracks in place, it risks getting pulled into to a longer campaign, Horowitz said.
“Eventually, whatever Israel does militarily, a diplomatic resolution will be needed if Israel wants to avoid being stuck in Lebanon,” Horowitz said.⍐
India, Sri Lanka head to a win-win relationship
India, Sri Lanka head to a win-win relationship 《 Asian Age 17 Dec 2024 》 All the signs are pointing to the possibility of a major win for...
-
தமிழகம் வாழ் ஈழத்தமிழர்களை கழகக் கண்டனப் பொதுக்கூட்டத்தில் கலந்து கொள்ளக் கோருகின்றோம்!
-
சமரன்: தோழர்கள் மீது எடப்பாடி கொலை வெறித்தாக்குதல், கழகம்...