SHARE

Thursday, December 18, 2025

Washington now ‘largely aligns’ with Moscow’s vision, Kremlin says

Washington now ‘largely aligns’ with Moscow’s vision, Kremlin says

Tension between the United States and Ukraine, laid bare in the Oval Office meeting of Trump and Zelensky, is seen in Moscow as a “gift.”

March 2, 2025 


Nikolskaya Tower, the Historical Museum and the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour in Moscow. (Yuri Kochetkov/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock)

By Francesca Ebel

MOSCOW — The Trump administration’s rewrite of decades of U.S. foreign policy on Russia, laid bare in the Oval Office confrontation between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, is bringing Washington into alignment with Moscow, the Kremlin said Sunday — a shift that could upend the geopolitics that have governed international relations since World War II.

“The new administration is rapidly changing all foreign policy configurations,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said, state television reported Sunday. “This largely aligns with our vision.”

Moscow’s vision, which has focused on a push to reclaim influence over much or all of the former Soviet Union and defeat liberal democracy, has made Russia a pariah to the West. The United States has given over a hundred billion dollars in arms and aid to Ukraine since Russia’s unprovoked invasion in 2022. Washington led allies in imposing new sanctions on Moscow; the International Criminal Court issued a warrant against Russian President Vladimir Putin on charges of war crimes.

But on Sunday, as European leaders rallied behind Zelensky in London, Peskov said the administration’s new approach could herald a new thaw between Washington and Moscow.

“There is a long way to go because a lot of damage has been done to the whole complex of bilateral relations,” he said. “But if the political will of the two leaders, President Putin and President Trump, is maintained, this path can be quite quick and successful.”

The Oval Office blowup last week, in which Vice President JD Vance accused Zelensky of insufficient gratitude for U.S. support and Trump warned that his refusal to compromise with Putin was “gambling with World War III,” has been seen here as a “gift” to the Kremlin.

President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky meet in the Oval Office at the White House on Friday. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)

Putin has long worked to drive wedges between the United States and its allies. On Friday, Trump echoed his accusations that Zelensky was obstructing peace efforts.

The performance stunned Russian leaders. Kirill Dmitriev, the chief of Russia’s sovereign wealth fund and a lead negotiator in preliminary U.S.-Russia talks, called it “historic.” Propagandist Margarita Simonyan, the editor of Russia Today, wrote that “the Oval Office has seen a lot, but never this.”

Others were gleeful. Former president Dmitry Medvedev gloated over the “proper slap down” of “the insolent pig” Zelensky, and Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova marveled at Trump and Vance’s “restraint” in not punching him in the face. Zelensky’s “outrageously boorish behavior,” she wrote, “confirmed that he is the most dangerous threat to the world community.”

The meeting fit Russia’s narrative perfectly, Konstantin Remchukov, the well-connected editor of Nezavisimaya Gazeta, told The Washington Post.

“We don’t even have to step in — we can just retransmit what the Americans are saying,” Remchukov said. He noted that Putin had “smartly” withheld comment on the meeting, and could afford to stay silent for now.

“The public will conclude that our leaders were correct in their assessment of Zelensky as a leader of Ukraine,” Remchukov said. “This is a huge gift for them.”

But amid the official euphoria lies a degree of caution. Many here are waiting to see results, and are tempering expectations.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, second from left, meets with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, right, and other U.S., Russian and Saudi officials at Diriyah Palace in Riyadh on Feb. 18. (Evelyn Hockstein/AP)

The United States and Russia last month held their first talks since the Russian invasion of Ukraine. After the meetings in Saudi Arabia wrapped up, Secretary of State Marco Rubio extolled the “potentially historic economic partnerships” that Washington and Moscow could seize once the war was over. Trump has since spoken of “trying to do some economic development deals” with Moscow. Putin has signaled that Russia is open to economic cooperation, including in developing the Arctic and mining rare earth minerals.

A senior Kremlin official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, told The Post that Moscow had been astonished by the “tremendous change” since Trump’s inauguration and welcomed his “pragmatic, rather than enemy-like approach.” But he warned that such deals were “potential possibilities rather than imminent plans.”

“Trump has said that America will be potentially ready to talk about lifting sanctions,” he said. “But only after the peace settlement.”

The head of state-owned banking giant Sberbank, a close associate of Putin, said he did not anticipate a swift end to Western sanctions.

“We’re working from a scenario in which no sanctions are lifted and, more likely, they are toughened,” German Gref told reporters Thursday. Trump last week extended U.S. sanctions against Russia for another year.

A Russian academic close to senior Russian diplomats told The Post that the Foreign Ministry is currently split between those who won’t ever trust the Americans and those who see “a historic opportunity to restore dialogue, quickly prepare a summit and get results.” The academic spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.

Not everyone here is ready to celebrate the thaw.

“Trump apparently has decided to be friends with Putin no matter what, and this will not lead to anything good,” said Vlad, a 23-year-old human rights lawyer. Like many interviewed for this article, he spoke on the condition of anonymity out of concern for reprisals.

“Personally, I find this terrible,” he said. “It is more confirmation for Putin that he can do whatever he wants.”

Remchukov, the editor, said officials are conscious that the U.S. midterm elections next year could mean that the chance to end the war on terms favorable to Russia is fleeting.

“At the top [of government] I have not seen anyone who is too optimistic about ending the conflict,” he said. “Even though Trump’s position seems anti-Zelensky, nobody thinks he is pro-Russian entirely — or for good.”

The major reaction within the government that is not transmitted publicly, he said, is that Russia should be prepared to keep fighting.

“Things are continuing seriously, furiously, mercilessly,” he said. “The main task for the Russian authorities is to blow away the euphoria that may have overcome those in the trenches, and the hope that soon there will be peace after Trump’s promises — and tell them that they need to get ready for a hard job,” he said.

Russian military bloggers this weekend heralded the coming spring.

“It will soon get warmer, green shoots will begin to emerge, and it will become a little easier to fight,” one wrote on Telegram. “For the youth of Ukraine, I have bad news: You will soon be sent to the front … and we will tighten our belts and continue to fight.”

Supporters of the late opposition leader Alexei Navalny gathered over the weekend at his gravesite in the Moscow suburb of Marino to mark the first anniversary of his funeral. Navalny, regarded by many as Russia’s last democratic hope, died unexpectedly in an Arctic prison colony last year in what family and supporters have called a state-sponsored execution.

On Sunday, a handful of people wept, hung their heads in solemn silence and lit candles. Some expressed doubt about a meaningful change in U.S.-Russian relations or an imminent end to the conflict with Ukraine.

“Trump is so unpredictable,” said Svetlana, 59, who had come to the grave to lay some white carnations.

Others said Zelensky had carried himself “with dignity,” and that they were waiting to see what came of European security summits.

“I don’t see this war ending while Putin is still in power,” said Alexei, 29. “Putin wanted to take Kyiv in three days, and now Trump wants peace in a day. But look where we are, three years in. … Our losses are gigantic. I do not see a quick or easy way out of this.”

Catherine Belton in London contributed to this report.





















காலநிலை அறிவிப்பு 18-12-2025 கலாநிதி நா.பிரதீபராஜா

 18.12.2025 வியாழக்கிழமை இரவு 8.00 மணி.

விழிப்பூட்டும் முன்னெச்சரிக்கை!

வங்காள விரிகுடாவில் இலங்கைக்கு தென்கிழக்காக உருவாகிய காற்றுச் சுழற்சி மேற்கு வட மேற்கு திசை நோக்கி நகர்ந்து தற்போது இலங்கைக்கு தெற்கு தென்மேற்கு திசையில் நிலை கொண்டுள்ளது.

இதன் நகர்வு வேகம் எதிர்பார்த்ததை விட குறைவாகவே உள்ளது. இதன் நகர்வு வேகம் குறைவென்பதால் அது மழைவீழ்ச்சி நாட்களை நீடிக்கும் என எதிர்பார்க்கப்படுகிறது.
அதேபோல இலங்கையின் தென்பகுதியில் ஒரு வளிமண்டல உறுதியற்ற தன்மையும் நீடிக்கின்றது.
இதன் காரணமாக மட்டக்களப்பு, அம்பாறை, கண்டி, மாத்தளை, நுவரெலியா, பதுளை, பொலன்னறுவை, அனுராதபுரம், இரத்தினபுரி, கேகாலை, காலி, மாத்தறை, அம்பாந்தோட்டை மற்றும் மொனராகலை மாவட்டங்களுக்கு எதிர்வரும் 20ம் திகதி இரவு வரை கனமான மழை கிடைக்கும் வாய்ப்புள்ளது.
நாளை முதல் (19.12.2025) வடக்கு மாகாணத்திற்கு மழை படிப்படியாக குறைவடையும் என எதிர்பார்க்கப்படுகின்றது.
1. தொடர்ச்சியாக மழை கிடைத்து வருவதாலும்;
2. கனமான மழை கிடைத்து மண் முழு ஈரக் கொள்ளளவை எட்டியுள்ளதாலும்;
3. கொத்மலை, விக்டோரியா, ரந்தெனிகல, ரந்தெம்ப போன்ற நீர்த்தேக்கங்கள் வான் பாய்வதாலும்;
4. மகாவலி, மாதுறு ஓயா, கல்லோயா, போன்ற ஆறுகள் அவற்றின் முழுக்கொள்ளளவோடு பாய்வதாலும்;
5. காற்றுச்சுழற்சி இலங்கைக்கு தெற்கு தென்மேற்கு திசையில் நிலை கொண்டிருப்பதனாலும்;
6. இலங்கையின் தென்பகுதியில் நிலவும் வளிமண்டல உறுதியற்ற தன்மையினாலும், குறிப்பாக இரத்தினபுரிக்கும் மாத்தறைக்கும் இடையிலேயே இரண்டு மில்லிபார் அமுக்க வேறுபாடு உள்ளமையினாலும்;
நுவரெலியா, கண்டி, மாத்தளை, பதுளை மற்றும் கேகாலை மாவட்டங்களில் கனமழையோடு இணைந்த நிலச்சரிவு அனர்த்தங்களுக்கான வாய்ப்புக்கள் அதிகமாக உள்ளன.
எனவே அன்புக்குரிய மலையக உறவுகள் நிலச்சரிவு தொடர்பில் மிக மிக எச்சரிக்கையாகவும் அவதானமாகவும் இருப்பது அவசியமானதாகும்.
மழை எதிர்வரும் 20.12.2025 அன்று இரவு முதல் படிப்படியாக குறைவடைந்தாலும் நிலச்சரிவு அபாயம் எதிர்வரும் 23.12.2025 வரை நீடிக்கும் என்பதனை நினைவில் கொள்ளுங்கள்.
அதேவேளை

1. மகாவலி, மாதுறு ஓயா, கல்லோயா போன்றன அதிக நீரை கொண்டு வருவதாலும்;
2. ஏனைய சிறிய மற்றும் நடுத்தர ஆறுகளின் நீரேந்து பிரதேசங்களான பொலன்னறுவை, கண்டி, போன்ற பிரதேசங்களில் தொடர்ந்து மழை கிடைத்து வருவதாலும்;
3. கிழக்கு மாகாணத்தில் குறிப்பாக மட்டக்களப்பு மற்றும் அம்பாறை மாவட்டங்களின் பல பகுதிகளுக்கும் மழை தொடர்ந்து கிடைத்து வருவதாலும்;
4. கிழக்கு மாகாணத்திற்கு எதிர்வரும் 20ம் திகதி இரவு வரை மழை கிடைக்கும் என்பதனாலும்;
கிழக்கு மாகாணத்தின் தாழ்நிலப் பகுதிகளில் வெள்ள அனர்த்தத்தை உருவாக்கும் வாய்ப்புள்ளது. திருகோணமலை மாவட்டத்திற்கு மழை குறைவாக இருந்தாலும் மகாவலி கங்கையின் நீர் மட்டம் அதிகரித்துள்ளமை குறிப்பிடத்தக்கது.
ஆகவே கிழக்கு மாகாணத்தின் தாழ்நிலப் பகுதிகளில் உள்ள மக்களும், மகாவலி, கல்லோயா, மாதுறு ஓயா, முந்தெனியாறு, நவகிரி ஆறு போன்றவற்றின் கரையோரப்பகுதிளில் உள்ள மக்களும் வெள்ள அபாயம் தொடர்பாக அவதானமாக இருப்பது சிறந்தது.
அதேவேளை நாளை முதல் (19.12.2025- வடக்கின் சில பகுதிகளுக்கு இன்றிலிருந்து) குளிர் அதிகரிக்கும் என்பதோடு இந்த குளிரான வானிலை 27 ஆம் தேதி வரைக்கும் தொடரும் என எதிர்பார்க்கப்படுகின்றது.
  • நாகமுத்து பிரதீபராஜா

Can Maduro survive Trump's oil blockade?

Can Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro survive Donald Trump’s oil blockade?

US president is unlikely to oust long-ruling Caracas strongman without military muscle, experts say

 
Venezuela’s leader Nicolás Maduro faces his biggest challenge yet after US President Donald Trump announced a blockade of the South American nation’s sanctioned oil exports, but Washington will probably need military action to oust the long-ruling autocrat, experts said. 
 
Trump declared Maduro’s revolutionary socialist government a foreign terrorist organisation on Tuesday and vowed “a total and complete blockade” of oil tankers subject to US sanctions heading to or from Venezuela. 

To enforce it, he pointed to US warships in the Caribbean, calling the deployment the “largest armada ever assembled in the history of South America”. 
 
Trump’s latest move followed a dramatic raid by US forces last week to storm and seize a tanker off the Venezuelan coast carrying oil valued at about $100mn, part of which was for Maduro’s ally Cuba.  

“We’re not going to let anybody going through that shouldn’t be going through,” Trump said on Wednesday. In an apparent reference to the nationalisation of Venezuela’s oil industry by Maduro’s predecessor Hugo Chávez, Trump added: “They took all of our energy rights. They took all of our oil from not that long ago, and we want it back”. 
 
Other oil tankers heading for Venezuela have turned around mid-voyage, and vessels waiting to leave its waters have delayed their departure, ship-tracking companies reported. 


US forces seized a large oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela last week © US Attorney General Pam Bondi’s X account/AFP/Getty Images 

Roughly 11 per cent of American warships deployed globally were in the Caribbean as of December 15, according to a fleet tracker from the US Naval Institute. US forces have blown up more than 20 speedboats that Washington says are smuggling drugs, and have buzzed the Venezuelan coastline with bombers and fighters. 

Trump’s chief of staff Susie Wiles said in an interview with Vanity Fair published this week that the president “wants to keep on blowing boats up until Maduro cries ‘uncle’” — a comment widely interpreted to mean that regime change is the US president’s real objective. 

On Wednesday, the House of Representatives narrowly defeated two Democratic-led resolutions that would have required Congress to authorise Trump’s Caribbean campaign, one covering the boat strikes and the other “hostilities within or against Venezuela”. 
 
Edward Fishman, a former US official and author of Chokepoints, a book on economic sanctions, said Trump’s latest move marked a fundamental change of strategy. 

“Enforcing a naval blockade and interdicting most, if not all, of Venezuela’s oil cargos, that strikes me as an act of war,” he said. A blockade “is typically a prelude to war, this is not a tool of statecraft”. 

Venezuela’s bond prices have jumped as investors price in a higher chance that Maduro may fall. Daniel Lansberg-Rodríguez at Aurora Macro Strategies, an advisory firm, said the Trump administration had “got Maduro more off-balance” than ever. 

Still, he added: “Maduro’s sitting on a giant pile of damp gunpowder. You’re just making the pile that much bigger. But sooner or later you need something to ignite it. I don’t think this ignites it.” 

Maduro survived sanctions, including on Petróleos de Venezuela SA (PDVSA), Venezuela’s state oil company, imposed during the first Trump administration and still has a few lifelines. 

Some oil is still flowing. Chevron, which accounts for about a quarter of Venezuela’s 1mn barrels a day of oil production, still has a licence to pump and sell oil. The company said its operations in Venezuela “continue without disruption and in full compliance with laws and regulations applicable to its business, as well as the sanctions frameworks provided for by the US government”. 

Nor are all tankers carrying Venezuelan oil subject to US sanctions, though officials are working to add more to the list maintained by the US Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. Samir Madani, chief executive of tracking website TankerTrackers.com, estimated that 60 per cent of the “dark fleet” operated with Russian and Iranian help was not yet on the list. 

 “A few tankers turned around in both the Indian and Atlantic Oceans but many more are still under way because it seems unlikely that the United States will go after any vessels that aren’t on the Ofac list,” Madani said. 

One question is how long Venezuela can continue oil production if exports are blocked. PDVSA said in a statement on Wednesday that crude exports “are continuing as normal” but a source in the company was less optimistic. 

“We have an onshore storage capacity of approximately five days and in the best-case scenario, with an additional seven days at sea, depending on the operability of our fleet,” said the person, who was not authorised to speak to the media. Guillermo Arcay, research fellow at the Harvard Growth Lab, said PDVSA would probably build up large inventories before having to halt production because of a lack of the imported petrochemicals needed to thin its heavy crude. 

A tanker carrying Russian naphtha, a diluent, turned around last week, according to trade intelligence company Kpler, although two vessels carrying the substance docked in Venezuela on December 13 and 14. 
 
Beyond oil, Maduro also has other sources of hard currency that do not appear in Venezuela’s official statistics. Illegal gold mining, drug smuggling on planes and contraband all generate dollars that help sustain the loyalty of the regime’s enforcers in the military and the security police. 

But the US has already warned airlines against operating in Venezuelan airspace because of heightened risks from military activity. 

In Caracas, Maduro’s regime is maintaining a defiant stance. 
But in the streets, the bolívar is devaluing faster than ever and dollars are scarce, while economists say inflation is heading for more than 500 per cent this year. And while Cuba has held out against US economic sanctions for more than 60 years, there are important differences.  

Venezuela’s population is nearly three times bigger and its regime-friendly elites have grown accustomed to a much higher standard of living than Cuba’s revolutionaries. 

Havana remains Maduro’s most important and reliable ally — supplying his personal bodyguard and counter-intelligence officers — but other international allies, Russia, Iran and China have not offered strong support. 

Trump’s oil blockade was “not only a game-changer for the Maduro administration, which now faces becoming completely bankrupt, but is also important for the enforcement of US sanctions”, said Christopher Sabatini, a Latin America expert at Chatham House. 

“I can’t see how Maduro makes up this huge gap in revenues with gold, drugs and money laundering.” 

But given that the “Bolivarian Revolution” started by Chávez has survived for a quarter of a century, few are willing to bet on the Venezuelan regime collapsing without US military pressure — something Trump may be reluctant to use. Recommended Francisco Rodríguez Trump needs an off-ramp in Venezuela A former US official said Trump wanted “maximum optics and minimum risk” with his Venezuela policy, but added: “The risk increases significantly if they do a regime change operation.” 

Fishman, the sanctions expert, said military pressure was the key to ousting Maduro. “Regime change is not a viable goal for sanctions,” he said. “There are very few examples in history where non-violent economic pressure led to regime change . . . But when the US has sought to use military force to change regimes, whether it’s Afghanistan or Iraq, they’ve done it. The harder part is: can you then control the aftermath?” 

Additional reporting by James Politi in Washington and Ana Rodríguez Brazón in Caracas

வேள்வி அமைப்பின் மலையக நிவாரணம்

 டிட்வா மலையக அனர்த்தம்- அம்பாறை மாவட்டத்தில் உதவி நிவாரணம். டிட்வா சூறாவளியால் பாதிக்கப்பட்ட மலையக மக்களுக்காக அம்பாறை மாவட்டத்திலிருந்து ந...