SHARE

Monday, April 21, 2025

Pope Francis obituary

Pope Francis obituary: a pontiff who shook up the Catholic Church

By Philip Pullella - Reuters April 21, 2025

Summary

  • Inherited a deeply divided Church after Benedict XVI's resignation in 2013
  • Appointed 80% of cardinal electors, increasing chances of a progressive successor
  • Struggled to restore credibility amid clergy sexual abuse scandals
  • Sought to make Church more inclusive, championed the poor

VATICAN CITY, April 21 (Reuters) - Pope Francis changed the face of the modern papacy more than any predecessor by shunning much of its pomp and privilege, but his attempts to make the Catholic Church more inclusive and less judgmental made him an enemy to conservatives nostalgic for a traditional past.

The Vatican said on Monday in a video statement that he had died.

The Reuters Tariff Watch newsletter is your daily guide to the latest global trade and tariff news. Sign up here.

Francis inherited a deeply divided Church after the resignation in 2013 of his predecessor, Benedict XVI. The conservative-progressive gap became a chasm after Francis, from Argentina, was elected the first non-European pope in 1,300 years.

The polarization was fiercest in the United States, where conservative Catholicism often blended with well-financed right-wing politics and media outlets.

For nearly a decade until Benedict's death in 2022, there were two men wearing white in the Vatican, causing much confusion among the faithful and leading to calls for written norms on the role of retired popes.

The intensity of conservative animosity to the pope was laid bare in January 2023 when it emerged that the late Australian Cardinal George Pell, a towering figure in the conservative movement and a Benedict ally, was the author of an anonymous memo in 2022 that condemned Francis' papacy as a "catastrophe".

The memo amounted to a conservative manifesto of the qualities conservatives will want in the next pope.

Francis appointed nearly 80% of the cardinal electors who will choose the next pope, increasing, but not guaranteeing, the possibility that his successor will continue his progressive policies. Some Vatican experts have predicted a more moderate, less divisive successor.

Under his watch, an overhauled Vatican constitution allowed any baptised lay Catholic, including women, to head most departments in the Catholic Church's central administration.

He put more women in senior Vatican roles than any previous pope but not as many as progressives wanted.

Francis was 76 when he was elected to the post and his health was generally good for most of his papacy. He recovered well from intestinal surgery in 2021 but a year later a nagging knee problem forced him to slow down. He was never keen on exercise and the restriction of a wheelchair and a cane led to a visible increase in his weight.

His inability to help bring an end to the war in Ukraine was a great disappointment. From the day of Russia's invasion in February 2022, he made appeals for peace at nearly every public appearance, at least twice a week.

The conflict brought relations between the Vatican and the Russian Orthodox Church to a new low in 2022 when Francis said its Patriarch Kirill, who supported the conflict, should not act like "Putin's Altar Boy".

He made frequent appeals for the release of hostages taken by Hamas militants but increased criticism of Israel's military campaign in Gaza ahead of the January 2025 ceasefire agreement in the Israel-Hamas war that erupted in October 2023.


BESIEGED BY CONSERVATIVES

Conservatives were unhappy with the pope from the start because of his informal style, his aversion to pomp and his decision to allow women and Muslims to take part in a Holy Thursday ritual that previously had been restricted to Catholic men.

They balked at his calls for the Church to be more welcoming to LGBT people, his approval of conditional blessings for same-sex couples in December 2023 and his repeated clampdowns on the use of the traditional Latin Mass. He said conservatives had made themselves self-referential and wanted to encase Catholicism in a "suit of armour".

Their spiritual gurus were Pell and U.S. Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke, who once famously compared the Church under Francis to "a ship without a rudder".

In 2016 and in 2023, Burke and a handful of other cardinals lodged public challenges known as "Dubia" (doubts), accusing Francis of sowing confusion on moral themes, once threatening to issue a public "correction" themselves.

They spoke at conferences where participants openly referred to Francis as the precursor of the Antichrist and the end of the world.

"I don't feel like judging them," the pope told Reuters in 2018. "I pray to the Lord that He settles their hearts and even mine."

But a year after Benedict's death, Francis lost his patience with conservative ringleaders, stripping Burke, who was rarely in Rome, of his Vatican privileges, including a subsidized apartment and a salary.

Burke's punishment came days after Francis dismissed Bishop Joseph E. Strickland of Tyler, Texas, another of his fiercest critics among U.S. Catholic conservatives, after Strickland refused to step down following a Vatican investigation.

Conservatives were also rattled by his decision to declare capital punishment inadmissible in all cases, his frequent attacks on the arms industry, and his calls for the abolition of nuclear weapons.

But liberals were deeply disappointed in 2020 when Francis dismissed a proposal to allow some married men to be ordained in remote areas, such as in the Amazon, opens new tab.

SEXUAL ABUSE SCANDALS

Francis' papacy was also marked by his struggle to restore credibility to a Church rattled to its core by clergy sexual abuse scandals, even though the overwhelming part of the crimes took place before his election.

Francis summoned almost 200 Church leaders to a summit in February 2019 on child sex abuse by the clergy, issued a landmark decree making bishops directly accountable for sexual abuse or covering it up, and abolished "pontifical secrecy" for abuse cases. Victims' groups said this was too little, too late.

The COVID-19 crisis forced him to cancel all trips in 2020 and to hold virtual general audiences, depriving him of the contact with people that he thrived on.

But he also said the pandemic offered a chance for a great reset, to narrow the gap between rich and poor nations. "We can either exit from this pandemic better than before, or worse," he said often. He criticized "vaccine nationalism," saying poor countries should be given priority.

On March 27, 2020, when the whole world was in various forms of lockdowns and death tolls spiralled, he held a dramatic, solitary prayer service in St. Peter's Square, urging everyone to see the crisis as a test of solidarity and a reminder of basic values.

Francis moved to clean up the Curia, the staid central administration of the Roman Catholic Church that was held responsible for many of the missteps and scandals that marred Pope Benedict's eight-year pontificate.

Despite massive improvements compared to the past papacies, financial scandals still plagued the Vatican during Francis' pontificate.

In 2020, he took drastic action by firing Italian Cardinal Angelo Becciu, who was accused of embezzlement and nepotism and was also enmeshed in a scandal involving the Vatican's purchase of a luxury building in London. Becciu has denied any wrongdoing.

On July 3, 2021, Becciu was among 10 people sent to trial in the Vatican charged with financial crimes including embezzlement, money laundering, fraud, extortion and abuse of office. In December 2023 Becciu was found guilty on several counts of embezzlement and fraud and sentenced to five-and-a-half years in jail. He and others convicted are free pending appeal.

Francis brought the Catholic Church's dialogue with Islam to new heights in 2019 by becoming the first pope to visit the Arabian Peninsula, but conservatives attacked him as a "heretic" for signing a joint document on inter-religious fraternity with Muslim leaders.

A trip to Iraq in March 2021, the first ever by a pope, aimed to solidify better relations with Islam while also paying tribute to the Christians whose two millennia-old communities were devastated by wars and Islamic State.

FROM BUENOS AIRES TO THE VATICAN

Jorge Mario Bergoglio was born on December 17, 1936 into a family of Italian immigrants who had settled in Buenos Aires.

He attended a technical high school and worked for a while as a chemical technician at a food laboratory. After he decided to become a priest, he studied at the diocesan seminary and in 1958 entered the Jesuit religious order.

At about that time, when he was 21, he caught pneumonia and had to have the top part of one lung removed because of cysts.

While still in the seminary, his vocation was thrown into crisis when he was "dazzled" by a young woman he met at a family wedding. But he stuck to his plans and after studies in Argentina, Spain and Chile, he was ordained as a Jesuit priest in 1969, rapidly rising to head the order in Argentina.

That coincided with the 1976-1983 military dictatorship, during which up to 30,000 suspected leftists were kidnapped and killed.

The Vatican has denied accusations by some critics in Argentina that Francis stayed silent during the human rights abuses or that he failed to protect two priests who challenged the dictatorship.

As archbishop of Buenos Aires from 2001-2013, he clashed frequently with the Argentine government, saying it needed to pay more attention to social needs.

A SIMPLE START

Francis endeared himself to millions with his simplicity when he spoke minutes after his election as pope on March 13, 2013.

"Brothers and sisters, good evening," were his first words from the balcony of St. Peter's Basilica, departing from the traditional salutation "Praised be Jesus Christ!".

The first pope from Latin America and the first Jesuit to hold the post, Francis was also the first in six centuries to take over the Church after the resignation of a pope.

He took the name Francis in honour of Francis of Assisi, the saint associated with peace, concern for the poor, and respect for the environment.

In that first appearance, the new pope shunned the crimson, fur-trimmed "mozzetta", or cape, and also did not wear a gold cross but kept around his neck the same faded silver-plated one he used as archbishop of Buenos Aires.

Gone too were the plush red "shoes of the fisherman" used by his predecessors. He kept the same simple black shoes he always used and wore $20 plastic watches, giving some away so they could be auctioned off for charity.

In his first meeting with journalists three days later, Francis said: "How I would like a Church that is poor and for the poor."

MODEST LIVING

Inside the tiny city-state, where some cardinals lived like princes in frescoed apartments, Francis renounced the spacious papal apartments in the Apostolic Palace and never moved out of the Vatican hotel where he and the other cardinals who entered the conclave of 2013 were billeted in simple rooms.

The Santa Marta residence, a modern building with a common dining room, became the nerve centre of the more than 1.3 billion-member Roman Catholic Church.

"It (the decision to stay in Santa Marta) saved my life," he told Reuters in an interview in 2018, explaining that apartments used by his predecessors were like a "funnel" isolating inhabitants.

The bulletproof papal limousine was dispatched to the Vatican Museums and Francis took to being driven around Rome in a blue Ford Focus with no security features.

His first trip outside Rome was to the tiny Italian island of Lampedusa to pay tribute to the thousands of migrants who had drowned in the Mediterranean while trying to reach Europe and a better life.

"In this globalised world we have fallen into the globalisation of indifference. We have become used to the suffering of others. It doesn't regard us. It doesn't interest us. It's not our business," he said.

A TERRIBLE YEAR

The year 2018 was Francis' "annus horribilis" - chiefly because of the simmering crisis around Church sex abuse.

It began with a trip to Chile in January, where at first he strongly defended a bishop who had been accused of covering up sexual abuse, testily telling reporters that there was "not a single piece of evidence against him".

His comments were widely criticised by victims, their advocates and in newspaper editorials throughout Latin America.

Even key papal adviser Cardinal Sean O'Malley of Boston distanced himself, saying the pope had caused "great pain". Francis later apologised, saying his choice of words and tone of voice had "wounded many".

Soon after he returned, he sent the Church's top sexual abuse investigator to Chile.

The subsequent report by Archbishop Charles Scicluna of Malta accused Chile's bishops of "grave negligence" for decades in investigating the allegations and said evidence of sex crimes had been destroyed.

That May, all of Chile's 34 bishops offered their resignations en masse. The pope accepted seven resignations over the next few months. He later defrocked the two other bishops and the priest at the centre of the abuse scandal.

Theodore McCarrick, the former archbishop of Washington, D.C., stepped down as cardinal over sexual misconduct accusations in July and in August the U.S. Catholic Church was rocked by a grand jury report in Pennsylvania that detailed 70 years of abuse.

"With shame and repentance, we acknowledge as an ecclesial community that we were not where we should have been, that we did not act in a timely manner, realizing the magnitude and the gravity of the damage done to so many lives. We showed no care for the little ones; we abandoned them," Francis wrote in a letter to all Catholics on August 20, 2018.

Still, the topic of sexual abuse dominated his trip to Ireland in August 2018, during which a conservative Italian archbishop took advantage of the media's presence to issue an unprecedented broadside demanding that the pope resign over the McCarrick affair.

Francis defrocked McCarrick in February 2019, making him the highest-profile Church figure to be dismissed from the priesthood in modern times.

An institutional report on McCarrick in 2020 showed that Francis' two predecessors, John Paul II and Benedict XVI, knew about rumours of his sexual misconduct but promoted him or failed to discipline him anyway.

WORLDWIDE PRESTIGE

Francis enjoyed considerable prestige internationally, both for his calls for social justice as well as for risky political overtures.

He made more than 45 international trips including the first by any pope to Iraq, United Arab Emirates, Myanmar, North Macedonia, Bahrain and Mongolia.

In 2014, secret contacts mediated by the Vatican resulted in a rapprochement between the long-hostile United States and Cuba.

In 2018, he led the Vatican to a landmark deal on the appointment of bishops in China, which conservatives criticized as a sell-out by the Church to Beijing's communist government.

Under his watch, the Vatican and the United Nations teamed up to hold international conferences on climate change and in June 2015 he issued an encyclical in which he demanded "action now" to save the planet.

In the 2018 interview with Reuters, he said then U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to pull out of the 2015 Paris climate agreement had pained him "because the future of humanity is at stake". The pope and Trump were at odds over many issues, mostly immigration.

Throughout his pontificate, Francis spoke out for the rights of refugees and criticised countries that shunned migrants.

He visited the Greek island of Lesbos and brought a dozen refugees to Italy on his plane, and asked Church institutions to work to stop human trafficking and modern slavery.

He ordered his charity arm to help the homeless in the neighbourhood around the Vatican, opening a shelter and a place for them to have baths and haircuts and see foot doctors. He gave the homeless a private tour of the Sistine Chapel.

During a trip to Sicily in 2018, he appealed to "brothers and sisters of the Mafia" to repent, saying the island needed "men and women of love, not men and women 'of honour,'" using the term mobsters apply to themselves.

After a wave of Islamist militant attacks in France in 2015-2016, including the killing of an elderly priest who was saying Mass, the pope called on all religions to declare that killing in God's name was "Satanic".

THE FRANCIS EFFECT

Although his style was not welcomed by all members of the Church hierarchy, some of whom had become accustomed to the luxury of stately mansions and palaces, the "Francis Effect" began trickling down the ranks.

His desire to connect extended to telephone calls. He became known as the "cold call pope" for phoning people unannounced, usually after they had written to him about a problem or he had heard that they had been touched by tragedy.

"This is Francis," were the words incredulous people heard on the other end of the line. "Really, this is Pope Francis."

He also sought more openness with journalists. On one freewheeling encounter on the way back from Brazil in 2013, the pope, responding to a question about gay priests, offered an answer that made world headlines.

"If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge him?"

The comment did not mark a change in Church teaching that calls homosexual acts sinful, but it became emblematic of his preference for mercy over condemnation.

A CHURCH FOR THE POOR

From the start, Francis sent clear signals to priests and bishops about the type of Church he wanted.

He said there was no room for "careerists or social climbers" among the clergy, told cardinals they should not live "like princes," and said the Church should not "dissect theology" in lush salons while there were poor people around the corner.

"If investments in banks fall, it is a tragedy and people say 'what are we going to do?' but if people die of hunger, have nothing to eat or suffer from poor health, that's nothing. This is our crisis today. A Church that is poor and for the poor has to fight this mentality," he said early in his papacy.

Even as pope, Francis remained an ardent fan of the Buenos Aires San Lorenzo soccer team.

In the 2018 interview with Reuters, Francis said he did not miss Argentina. "I only miss the street. I am a 'callejero' (a man of the streets). I really would like to be able to do that again, but I can't now."🔺

Reporting by Philip Pullella and Joshua McElwee Editing by Frances Kerry

'Significant progress' in India-US trade deal

Modi, Vance welcome 'significant progress' in India-US trade deal

Subhayan Chakraborty New Delhi - business-standard.com/ Apr 21 2025

India and the United States have welcomed “significant progress” in ongoing negotiations for a mutually beneficial Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA), the government said following a meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and American Vice President J D Vance in New Delhi on Monday.

 Visiting India amid a globally unfolding trade war, Vance held detailed discussions with Modi, reviewing and positively assessing the progress in various areas of bilateral cooperation, the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) said in a statement.

 Both countries also noted continued efforts to enhance cooperation in areas such as energy, defence, strategic technologies, and other sectors, according to the PMO. The two leaders exchanged views on a range of regional and global issues of mutual interest, and called for dialogue and diplomacy as the preferred path forward.

 The Prime Minister conveyed greetings to US President Donald Trump, the PMO added, saying he looked forward to Trump’s visit to India later this year. The American president is expected to travel to India in September or October to attend the fifth Quad Leaders’ Summit.

 Both sides hope to conclude the first tranche of the BTA by the fall (September-October) this year. 

 Modi meets US Vice President Family in
New Delhi on Monday | Photo: PIB

India said the BTA would be centred on the “welfare of the people of the two countries”. The United States remains India’s largest export destination, with a trade surplus that widened to $41 billion in FY25, from $35 billion the previous year. While imports from the US grew 7.4 per cent to $45.3 billion, exports surged by 11 per cent to reach $86.5 billion -- a trade imbalance the Trump administration has frequently highlighted.

 Vance — accompanied by Second Lady Usha Vance and their children Ewan, Vivek, and Mirabel — was hosted at the Prime Minister's residence. Earlier in the day, the family visited the Akshardham Temple in Delhi.

 Vance's first official visit to India coincides with Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman’s five-day trip to the United States, where she will take part in the Spring Meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, along with several key G20 meetings. Sitharaman is also scheduled to hold bilateral talks with her counterparts from countries, including Argentina, Bahrain, Germany, France, Luxembourg, Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom and the United States.

 Later this week, a team of commerce department officials, led by chief negotiator and commerce secretary-designate Rajesh Agarwal, will hold discussions with their US counterparts in Washington DC. The meetings, which are set to begin on April 23, will continue for three days.

 Vance arrived in New Delhi on Monday morning after a three-day official visit to Italy. The four-day trip to India is expected to deepen the India–US Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said. The US Vice President will travel to Jaipur on Tuesday, followed by a visit to Agra on Wednesday to see the Taj Mahal.

India-US proposed trade pact's terms of reference include 19 chapters

The terms of references (ToRs) finalised by India and the US for the proposed bilateral trade agreement include around 19 chapters covering issues such as goods, services, and customs facilitation, official sources said.

To give further impetus to the talks, an Indian official team is visiting Washington next week to iron out differences on certain issues before formally launching negotiations for the proposed India-US bilateral trade agreement (BTA).

India's chief negotiator, Additional Secretary in the Department of Commerce Rajesh Agrawal, will lead the team for the first in-person talks between the two countries.

Agrawal was appointed as the next commerce secretary on April 18. He will assume office from October 1.

India to send delegation to US next week for key bilateral trade talks

The three-day Indian official team's talks with the US counterparts in Washington will start from Wednesday (April 23), the official said.

The visit, which comes within weeks of a high-level US team visiting India, indicates that the talks for the BTA are gaining momentum.

The visit follows senior official-level talks held between the two countries last month here.

Brendan Lynch, the Assistant US Trade Representative for South and Central Asia, was in India from March 25 to 29 for crucial trade discussions with Indian officials.

The two sides are keen to utilise the 90-day tariff pause, announced by US President Donald Trump on April 9.

On April 15, Commerce Secretary Sunil Barthwal had stated that India will try to close the negotiations as quickly as possible with the US.

He also stated that India has decided to follow the trade liberalisation path with the US.

India and the US have been engaged in negotiating a bilateral trade agreement since March. Both sides have targeted to conclude the first phase of the pact by the fall (September-October) of this year, with an aim to more than double the bilateral trade to USD 500 billion by 2030, from about USD 191 billion, currently.

In a trade pact, two countries either significantly reduce or eliminate customs duties on the maximum number of goods traded between them. They also ease norms to promote trade in services and boost investments.

While the US is looking at duty concessions in sectors like certain industrial goods, automobiles (electric vehicles particularly), wines, petrochemical products, dairy, and agriculture items such as apples, tree nuts, and alfalfa hay; India may look at duty cuts for labour-intensive sectors like apparels, textiles, gems and jewellery, leather, plastics, chemicals, oil seeds, shrimp, and horticulture products.

From 2021-22 to 2024-25, the US was India's largest trading partner.

The US accounts for about 18 per cent of India's total goods exports, 6.22 per cent in imports, and 10.73 per cent in bilateral trade.

With America, India had a trade surplus (the difference between imports and exports) of USD 41.18 billion in goods in 2024-25. It was USD 35.32 billion in 2023-24, USD 27.7 billion in 2022-23, USD 32.85 billion in 2021-22 and USD 22.73 billion in 2020-21. The US has raised concerns over the widening trade deficit.

To address the gap and boost manufacturing, the Trump administration announced sweeping tariffs on April 2, including 26 per cent on India. It was later suspended till July 9.

In 2024, India's main exports to the US included drug formulations and biologicals (USD 8.1 billion), telecom instruments (USD 6.5 billion), precious and semi-precious stones (USD 5.3 billion), petroleum products (USD 4.1 billion), gold and other precious metal jewellery (USD 3.2 billion), ready-made garments of cotton, including accessories (USD 2.8 billion), and products of iron and steel (USD 2.7 billion).

Imports included crude oil (USD 4.5 billion), petroleum products (USD 3.6 billion), coal, coke (USD 3.4 billion), cut and polished diamonds (USD 2.6 billion), electric machinery (USD 1.4 billion), aircraft, spacecraft and parts (USD 1.3 billion), and gold (USD 1.3 billion).

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

We hope to sign first phase of bilateral pact with US by Oct: FM Sitharaman

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Sunday said India is "actively engaging" with the new US administration and hopes to conclude the first tranche of the bilateral trade agreement "positively" by fall (September-October) this year.

"We are one of the countries which is actively engaged with the new administration of the United States of America to see how best we can get a bilateral trade agreement done," he said during an interaction with the Indian diaspora here.

Earlier this year, US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi agreed to launch talks for a bilateral trade deal amid the lurking fear of reciprocal tariff being imposed by Washington.

"Equally, the priority that we gave to engage with the government here is more than obviously seen with the Prime Minister himself visiting the United States in February. You had the Commerce and Trade Minister come. I have come here because I also have the IMF and World Bank meeting.

"I am scheduled to meet the treasury secretary, my counterpart here. So the keenness with which we are engaging with the US administration, even as I talk, I think the US vice-president is in India. He will be engaging with the Prime Minister hopefully this evening or tomorrow," she said.

The US and India have aimed for a bilateral trade agreement (BTA), which is a kind of free trade pact. The two have decided to conclude the proposed BTA in two tranches or phases.

"So, the long and short of engaging with the US is not just reciprocal tariff-related matter but in the interest of keeping an agreement in mind and in the interest of one of the largest trading partners with whim we need to have agreement we are working in order that by the fall this year we should have first phase of agreement signed," she said.

The US President announced sweeping reciprocal tariffs (or import duties) on a number of countries, including India and China, on April 2.

However, on April 9, he announced a 90-day suspension of these tariffs until July 9 this year, except for those on China and Hong Kong, as about 75 countries approached America for trade deals. China is facing up to 245 per cent duty on its goods entering the US.

"In between all this, the Assistant USTR (US Trade Representative) had visited India to see the progress or to engage with the negotiating team who is dealing with the tariff-related negotiation and the bilateral trade agreement that we want to sign. In fact, the progress of the agreement, or the trade agreement that we are working on, at least a first tranche is something which we hope to conclude positively by the fall this year," she said.

Responding to a query on India's future global leadership and how the current budget supports this ambition, Sitharaman highlighted India's progress in critical areas like semiconductors, renewable energy -- including modular nuclear energy -- digital infrastructure, and artificial intelligence (AI).

She further said the government at the Centre is working with the objective to make India a developed nation by 2047.

"Our government's primary focus is Viksit Bharat by 2047 and Prime Minister Narendra Modi has emphasised that it can be achieved by looking after the four main 'castes' -- Women, Poor, Youth and Farmers," she said.

India's focus is also on the 'Sunrise Sectors' which are important to build our capacities and areas such as Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) where India has emerged as a global leader, she said.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.) 🔺

Defence Pacts with India and Need for Openness

Defence Pacts with India and Need for Openness

Daily Mirror 21 Apr 2025    

The two leaders after signing the MoU

In April 2025, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Sri Lanka resulted in the signing of seven Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) between New Delhi and Colombo. These agreements, particularly the Defence Cooperation MoU, have sparked significant debate about transparency, sovereignty, and the historical context of Indo-Lanka relations.

The Recent MoUs and Their Significance


Among the seven agreements signed during Modi’s visit, three stand out as especially consequential: the MoU on implementing HVDC Interconnection for power import/export, the MoU on cooperation between India, Sri Lanka, and the UAE to develop Trincomalee as an energy hub, and most controversially, the MoU on defence cooperation. The defence cooperation agreement has drawn particular scrutiny because neither the Sri Lankan public nor Parliament has been informed about its contents. President Dissanayake justified this cooperation by stating: “We need security in this region... We should secure the assistance of those who have greater technological capacities in defence... We must secure the assistance of states which have accepted new science and technology.”

Past Events and Their Ironies

The timing of these agreements carries deep historical irony. The Defence Cooperation MoU was signed on April 5th, the anniversary of the JVP’s first attempted insurrection in 1971. At the time, the JVP indoctrinated its recruits with warnings about “Indian expansionism” before sending them into what became a failed revolutionary effort. Even more striking is the transformation of the JVP from a fiercely anti-Indian movement into a political party now willingly entering strategic agreements with India. In the late 1980s, the JVP resorted to violence to oppose the Indo-Lanka Accord, which it viewed as a threat to national sovereignty. Now, as the leading party in the ruling NPP coalition, it has signed a defence pact with the very nation it once depicted as an existential threat.

Rajiv Gandhi and J. R. Jayawardhane

The present situation echoes the circumstances surrounding the Indo-Lanka Accord of 1987, signed under curfew on July 29 in Colombo after 137 demonstrators—mostly JVPers—were shot dead. That agreement followed India’s direct interference, including the dramatic airdrop of supplies to LTTE-held areas on June 4, 1987, under the guise of “humanitarian assistance.” President Jayewardene condemned this as “a naked violation of our sovereignty,” but found no international backing. During the Vadamarachchi Operation, Indian High Commissioner Dixit bluntly told Jayewardene, “India will not allow you to take over Jaffna.” Isolated and without Western support, Jayewardene had little choice but to capitulate. In hindsight, he admitted: “It is a lack of courage on my part, a lack of intelligence on my part, a lack of foresight on my part.”

The historical record shows that the accord failed to bring peace when the LTTE turned against the Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF). After losing over 1,200 personnel, India withdrew prematurely at President Premadasa’s request, allowing the LTTE to redirect Indian-supplied weapons against Sri Lankan forces. This ultimately led to Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination by the LTTE in 1991.

One of the fundamental issues raised by the current Defence Cooperation MoU is the apparent abandonment of the principle of self-reliance, which has been central to Sri Lanka’s identity for centuries. Throughout its nearly 2,500-year history, Sri Lanka has relied primarily on its own strengths and abilities to create a unique civilization.

Previous experiences teach a sobering lesson: whenever Sri Lankan rulers sought external military assistance, it often led to prolonged foreign domination. When rulers sought Dutch assistance against the Portuguese, it resulted in nearly 150 years of Dutch colonisation, followed by 150 years of British rule. The current defence cooperation agreement risks repeating this pattern, potentially compromising Sri Lanka’s autonomy.

IPKF in Jaffna

The Transparency Deficit

The NPP government has violated one of the fundamental tenets of good governance – transparency. When in opposition, the JVP/NPP routinely criticised previous governments for signing important agreements without public disclosure. Now in power, they have kept Parliament in the dark about these significant international commitments.

President Dissanayake’s statement about “safeguarding regional security” raises critical questions about Sri Lanka’s role in this arrangement. Given the power disparity, India would likely dictate how regional security is exercised, potentially forcing Sri Lanka under Indian influence. This could severely compromise Sri Lanka’s strategic autonomy and ability to pursue its interests independently.

India has demonstrated remarkable skill in transforming Sri Lankan political forces. Prime Minister Modi can rightfully claim success in bringing the once staunchly anti-Indian JVP into a cooperative relationship. During 2024, the Modi administration provided crucial diplomatic support to the JVP/NPP, facilitating its emergence as a nationally recognised political entity with international backing.

The transformation in the JVP’s stance is particularly striking when viewed in light of past statements by its leadership. In October 2015, the current President, Anura Kumara Dissanayake, alleged in Parliament that Jaffna had become a center for RAW operatives, claiming that attempts were being made to create political instability in the region and that such efforts should be halted. Similarly, notable is the case of Dr. Nalinda Jayatissa, who in 2021 suggested that India was behind the 2019 Easter Sunday attacks. Dr. Jayatissa now serves as the media minister in the present government.

For a small nation like Sri Lanka, developing superior military capabilities to match global powers is unrealistic. As Sun Tzu noted in “The Art of War”: “To overcome others’ armies without fighting is the best of skills.” Effective intelligence gathering and appropriate strategy are far more relevant for Sri Lanka’s security than unrealistic reliance on military technology.

Rather than binding itself exclusively to India through secretive agreements, Sri Lanka would be better served by developing its intelligence and strategic capabilities while maintaining a balanced foreign policy. The wisdom of the ages suggests that “efficiency of knowledge and strategy” is more effective than hardware-dependent approaches, as demonstrated by the failure of America’s superior military technology in Vietnam.

The Imperative of Transparency

The ongoing controversy over the Indo-Lanka MoUs underscores the vital need for transparency in international agreements. When decisions affecting national sovereignty and security are made behind closed doors—without parliamentary oversight or public engagement—they weaken democratic governance and risk compromising national interests.

The secrecy surrounding the recent Defence Cooperation MoU has raised concern among civil society, legal experts, and political observers. Citizens deserve clarity on military agreements with foreign powers, particularly when national security is involved.

Sri Lanka’s experience with the 1987 Indo-Lanka Accord remains a stark reminder. That agreement, signed under pressure and in secrecy, sparked unrest, foreign military presence, and deepened conflict instead of resolving it. The lessons from that era remain painfully relevant. What is especially troubling is the shift in position by the current NPP government. 

Once vocal critics of opaque deals and champions of transparency in opposition, they now face similar criticism for the very practices they condemned. This reversal casts doubt on their consistency and commitment to democratic values. If the government is to regain public confidence and ensure that Sri Lanka’s democratic traditions remain intact, it must uphold the principles of transparency, consultation, and accountability in all international engagements.

For Indo-Lanka relations to develop in a manner that respects both countries’ interests, transparency must be the guiding principle. Only through open dialogue, parliamentary oversight, and public awareness can Sri Lanka ensure that its relationships with regional powers enhance rather than diminish its sovereignty and autonomy.🔺

லெனினியம்; இன்று மாலை இணைய வழிக்கூட்டம்.

 

மாமேதை லெனின் 22 April 1870 அன்று ரசியாவில் பிறந்தார்.இன்று அவரது 155வது பிறந்த தினமாகும். அப் பெருநாளுக்கு மெருகூட்டும் பொருட்டு இந்திய-தமிழக மக்கள் ஜனநாயக இளைஞர் கழகம் இணையவழி பிரச்சாரக் கூட்டமொன்றை ஏற்பாடு செய்துள்ளது. இக்கூட்டம் "லெனினியத்தின் இன்றைய பொருத்தப்பாடு" எனும் தலைப்பில் இன்று பிற்பகல் 14.30 ஐரோப்பிய மணிக்கு நடைபெறவுள்ளது.தோழர் ஆறுமுகம் தலைமையில் ஆறு தோழர்கள் பங்கேற்கும் இக் கூட்டத்தில் பொதுமக்களும் பங்கு கொள்வர். தோழர் ஜெயந்தி நன்றியுரை வழங்குவார்.

ஏப்ரல் 22 செவ்வாய் இரவு 7 மணி 

(14.30 GMT)

இணைய வழிக் கூட்டம்: 

Google Meet

https://meet.google.com/mjj-rdtk-yvk

பங்கேற்பீர்!            விவாதிப்பீர்!!


தகவல்: வேந்தன் ம.ஜ.இ.கழகம், நன்றி.

Sunday, April 20, 2025

Vice President JD Vance in New Delhi

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, left, and Vice President JD Vance at an artificial intelligence summit in Paris on Feb. 11. (Leah Millis/Reuters/Pool/AP

 NEW DELHI — Vice President JD Vance and his wife, Usha, are set to arrive in New Delhi on Monday as U.S.-India relations enjoy a period of relative calm.

The Washington Post 20-04-2025

The Trump administration has so far appeared less concerned than its predecessors about India’s close ties with Russia, allegations of Indian involvement in an assassination plot on American soil or accusations of fraud against billionaire Gautam Adani, a close ally to Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

As the country prepares to receive an American vice president for the first time in more than a decade, the mood in New Delhi has been markedly optimistic.

“On the larger ideological plan, we are closer than we were with the previous administration,” said Harsh Shringla, a former Indian foreign secretary. “There is a fair amount of confidence.”

Vance is set to meet with Modi and other Indian leaders. Some in New Delhi, like Shringla, have noted that Usha Vance, whose parents are from India, is making the effort to come to the country, while Vice President Kamala Harris — who had an Indian mother — never visited.

Discussions are expected to focus on trade liberalization, defense cooperation, civil nuclear agreements and boosting Indian investment in the United States — priorities the Trump administration has stressed in its engagement with New Delhi.

Second lady Usha Vance with her husband and their daughter, Mirabel, as they arrive in Rome on Friday. (Kenny Holston/Pool/New York Times/AP)
“The vice presidency has become more significant than in the recent past,” Shringla said. “It is critical we establish a separate and close line of engagement with him. He is able to articulate the vision and the point of view of the administration very well.”

A bygone bear hug

The Biden administration tried to strengthen relations with New Delhi, largely as a counterweight to China. But several incidents complicated the effort.

As NATO leaders were to gather in Europe in July to mark the alliance’s 75th anniversary, senior Biden administration officials, including Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell, scrambled to dissuade Modi from visiting Moscow the same week.

The Indians didn’t listen.

Modi’s trip, which included a warm embrace with Russian President Vladimir Putin hours after Russian missiles struck a children’s hospital in Kyiv, was viewed in Washington as an affront. India had already been reluctant to side with Ukraine and was increasingly purchasing Russian oil at discounted prices because of U.S. sanctions.

Russian President Vladimir Putin hugs Modi before a 2021 meeting in New Delhi. (Manish Swarup/AP)

“It was a slap in the face,” said a former senior Biden administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the sensitive discussion.

But those concerns have little relevance in Washington today.


“India can now inject some warmth into their relationship with Russia,” said Nandan Unnikrishnan, who studies Indian-Russian relations at the Observer Research Foundation.

Some Indians argue that New Delhi’s ties to Moscow help keep the Kremlin at a distance from Beijing.

“The Biden administration did not buy into that argument,” Unnikrishnan said. “Life was becoming difficult. But luckily, because of [President Donald] Trump, there is a certain buy-in to that argument now.”

Sanctions that targeted the flow of technology to Russia under the Biden administration also ensnared some Indian entities.

But Trump announced in February plans to “pave the way” for India to acquire F-35 stealth fighters. Previous administrations hesitated to share such technology, citing the risk that it could be exposed to adversaries. India already uses Russian-made S-400 missile systems.

The breathing room could allow India to continue some long-standing collaborations with Russia, including on civilian nuclear energy. “It is better to have a bird in hand than a pie in the sky,” Unnikrishnan said.

But some warn that inattention to India’s ties with Russia could have consequences. “We invariably lose an opportunity to bring India closer into the fold of like-minded countries,” said Siddharth Iyer, a former Defense Department director for South Asia policy and special adviser to Harris for Indo-Pacific affairs in the Biden administration.

From espionage charges to economics

In 2023, the Justice Department charged an Indian government official with orchestrating a murder-for-hire plot on American soil against a U.S. citizen and Sikh man. The plot was foiled, but the incident became the most serious test of relations between the Biden and Modi administrations.

“We should assume the public attention around that caused some hard thinking in their system,” Iyer said.

In a sign of the lingering sensitivity, Indian national security adviser Ajit Doval, who frequently travels with Modi, was absent from the prime minister’s visit with Biden in Washington in September. In a civil case, the Sikh man has accused Doval directly.

The Washington Post reported last April that U.S. spy agencies tentatively assessed that Doval was probably aware of the attempted murder, but they had found no proof.

After Trump’s election, Doval joined Modi on his February visit to Washington. Attempts to serve him with a legal summons in the civil case on that trip were unsuccessful, court records show.

Sikh separatist leader Gurpatwant Singh Pannun in his New York City office in 2023. (Ted Shaffrey/AP)

In another hit to relations under Biden, Adani was indicted in November on charges of fraud and bribery, drawing scrutiny to a tycoon whose financial rise has paralleled Modi’s political ascent.


The charges briefly cast a shadow over U.S.-Indian relations — Adani withdrew a loan request from the U.S. government for a port terminal in Sri Lanka — but it was short-lived. Adani’s firms are now preparing to invest heavily in American infrastructure.

“The issue is not a top priority for this administration and is unlikely to be discussed in any conversations,” said Aparna Pande, a research fellow at the Hudson Institute. “It will not, however, disappear completely as it will stay in a file and may come up, when the administration changes or some incident occurs.”

Once sensitive issues under Trump have also withered away for now. Indians are the third-largest group of undocumented immigrants in the U.S., the Pew Research Center estimated for 2022.

The Trump administration’s deportation flights carrying shackled Indian citizens drew some anger in India, but they have not caused significant friction between the administrations. Many of the foreign students whose visas are now being revoked are Indian, but the Modi administration has chosen to remain silent.

Billionaire Trump aide Elon Musk meets with Modi in Washington in February. (@narendramodi via X/Reuters)

Meanwhile, Trump and his allies’ commercial links to the country are steadily growing. Trump Towers has announced at least two new real estate projects. Companies run by top Trump aide Elon Musk, including Tesla and Starlink, are making inroads into sales and government permissions in the country. After a phone call with Modi, Musk announced on Saturday a trip to India later in the year.

Some former Biden officials and analysts stress his administration’s effort to keep frictions from getting in the way of the broader strategic convergence against China. But despite that effort, they acknowledge, Indian officials have displayed greater comfort with Republican administrations.

Now some worry that strategic concerns are being overshadowed by a more transactional relationship.

“The center of gravity in the relationship has moved to trade, which has never really been a strong suit in the U.S.-India relationship,” said Anthony Renzulli, a former director for India at the National Security Council. “You have moved from defense technology to something that is on thinner ice.”

Indian officials appear unfazed. From immigration enforcement to energy purchases, New Delhi has signaled a proactive compliance with the Trump administration’s demands.

“There is no alternative for India’s development project without the United States,” Unnikrishnan said. “And at the highest levels, we determined that if this means there are some unpleasant compromises, they will be made.”

That posture has led to greater confidence. “I know, today, a lot of countries are nervous about the U.S.,” Indian Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar told reporters after Trump defeated Harris in November. “Let’s be honest about it: We are not one of them.”🔺

Sri Lanka-India MoUs and their implications

மோடியின் இலங்கை விஜயத்தில் அனுரா அணிவித்த நவரத்தின விருது.

Sri Lanka-India MoUs and their implications

The Island 2025/04/18

Of the several MOUs signed by the President of Sri Lanka during Prime Minister Modi’s visit to Sri Lanka, the most consequential in respect of implications to Sri Lanka is the one associated with the Defence Cooperation.  Neither the public nor the Parliament is aware of its contents. What the public could glean about the scope of this vital MOU are from articles written by concerned citizens, like the one by Dr. Dayan Jayatilleka in the Daily FT of April 10, 2025. The source of his material is from statements made by the President during political rallies relating to the Defence Cooperation MOU. One such statement is cited below. This reflects a seismic shift in respect of Sri Lanka’s relations not only with India, but also with other Nation-States, that is disturbing to say the least, because of its implications on Sri Lanka’s autonomy to act independently as a sovereign Nation-State and define its own destiny; a status Sri Lanka defended for nearly 2500 years despite repeated interruptions over the years.

SECURING ASSISTANCE

Justifying the need for Defence Cooperation with India, President Dissanayake is reported to have stated the following at an election meeting in Galle:

“We need security in this region.  We need to safeguard the security of this region. We should secure the assistance of those who have greater technological capacities in defence, greater skills in defence. If not, how can a country move forward? …. For 76 years the world developed rapidly in science and technology. The world developed rapidly in military science.  Now, what should we do? We must secure the assistance of those states which have accepted new science and technology. Don’t we have to do that”? (Ibid).

There are two pivotal issues that arise from the President’s comments. The first is discarding the principle of SELF-RELIANCE (SR). SR is the bedrock of Sri Lanka’s civilizational values. The inspiration to rely on one’s SELF to evolve answers to inscrutable questions or to challenges that present themselves as insurmountable comes from the single-minded approach adopted by Lord Buddha in his search for liberation. His attempts to seek the assistance of others failed him. It was the relentless determination to find the answers himself to what he was looking for, that enabled him to realise his goal; a goal that has benefited mankind.

The role model set by him was what inspired the spirit of SELF RELIANCE that enabled Sri Lanka to create a civilisation that was unique over millennia. It was not created by military conquest. It was not created by developing “military science”. The monuments left behind are a testimony to the ingenuity and skills of the People of Sri Lanka. It was they, who developed the technologies needed for the Sri Lankan nation to lead a life of peace and contentment.

Throughout Sri Lanka’s history, its sovereignty has been repeatedly violated and its territory vandalised by invading armies. Whenever such invasions occurred, liberation and freedom came from military strategies developed and adopted by those within by relying on SR. They did not go running to sign MOUs seeking assistance from militarily powerful nations. On the other hand, whenever our Rulers sought the assistance of external powers, such as the Dutch, to get rid of the Portuguese who had invaded the country, the Dutch ended up colonising the whole country for nearly 150 years until they lost it to the British, who in turn colonised for a further 150 years. The Defence Cooperation MOU with India has the potential to repeat that history.

SAFEGUARDING REGIONAL SECURITY

The President has stated: “We need security in this region. We need to safeguard the security of this region”. If this is a policy of this government, in what way could Sri Lanka contribute towards the “security of this region”? Is there a clear understanding as to how Sri Lanka and India are going to undertake safeguarding the security of the region?  Whatever it may be, there is no doubt that the contribution Sri Lanka can afford to make is insignificant compared with what India would be making because it is in India’s self-interest as an aspiring Global Power to make the region secure. Furthermore, because of this disparity, the MOU would entitle India to enforce its will as to how regional security is exercised. Does this not amount to sacrificing Sri Lanka’s strategic autonomy?

If it did, would it not compel Sri Lanka to be under the hegemony of India; a condition that would only bolster the security of India based on India’s notion that the security of India depends on the security of Sri Lanka, meaning a weakened Sri Lanka under the control of India? On the other hand, if Sri Lanka exercises its independence and acts in pursuit of its own self-interests, and such actions do not mesh with that of India in its pursuit of becoming a global power, there would be consequences.

Therefore, any arrangement that compromises the independence of Sri Lanka and its ability to exercise its Self- Reliance has to be mindful of India’s interests.  This does not mean that Sri Lanka should not heed India’s concerns and interests.  Instead, it only means pursuing Sri Lanka’s interests while being conscious of India’s sensibilities, as it was with the Chinese “research vessel”. However, under a Defence Cooperation MOU, it would be India that would decide the parameters as to whether to permit entry of foreign vessels or not; a constraint that would compromise Sri Lanka autonomy to pursue its self-interests.

IMPACT on FOREIGN POLICY

An alignment with a power that the President describes as: “We sincerely applaud the way India has positioned itself not only as a regional power, but also as global power” (Ibid), means Sri Lanka has decided to disassociate itself with its long cherished position of being Non-Aligned as a founding member of Non-Aligned Movement, that morphed recently into being Neutral in the context of emerging Great Power rivalries in this region.    By aligning exclusively with a country that is positioning itself to be a global power and at the cost of distancing itself in its relations with other Global Powers, comes not only at a cost that Sri Lanka cannot afford to bear in the background of overdue debt to them, but also a degree of dependence that is unknown and unfamiliar to independent Sri Lanka.

The need to seek exclusive relations with India is in the hope that India would assist Sri Lanka in case such a need arises because Sri Lanka does not have the needed “military science” to defend itself, not realising that there is no free lunch; a fact attested by Sri Lanka’s own history.  The President and this Government must accept the hard reality that Sri Lanka or any other small country can ever hope to match the degree of “military science” capabilities that Global Powers possess. At the end of the day, it is a smart strategy that matters more than the stacks of military hardware by countries such as Sri Lanka; a fact demonstrated by David’s sling shot against the might of Goliath.

For instance, Sun Tzu, in “The Art of War”, states: “What is essential for leaders, generals, and ministers in running countries and governing armies is no more than … peak efficiency of knowledge and strategy is to make conflict altogether unnecessary. To overcome others’ armies without fighting is the best of skills”. It is clear from the wisdom of the ages that effective intelligence gathering and appropriate strategy is far more relevant for the security of a Nation such as Sri Lanka than relying on the unrealistic notion of military science to ensure its security.

CONCLUSION

During an election rally, the President is reported to have stated that there is a need not only to “safeguard security for the region”, but also that Sri Lanka “must secure the assistance of those states which have accepted this new military science technology” if Sri Lanka is to move forward. These objectives are to be incorporated in a Defence Cooperation MOU with India.

How Sri Lanka is to contribute to “safeguarding the security of the region”, or what form and type of the assistance Sri Lanka expects from India, is not made public. Despite such lacunae, the implication of any form of Defence Cooperation exclusively with a country such as India that is “positioning” itself to be a global Power or one that is already recognised as a Global Power, is bound to affect Sri Lanka’s relations not only with other Global Powers but also with other countries as well.

Furthermore, exclusive alignment with one Power means that Sri Lanka has decided to ditch not only the principle of Non-Alignment and its concepts that it championed for decades, but also, more appropriately, Neutrality, in the emerging context of Great Power rivalries in the region. Such exclusive arrangements for assistance with one country compel Sri Lanka to be in the vortex of India and its interests, the consequence of which for Sri Lanka is to be a vassal State of India.

The nearly 2,500-year old history of Sri Lanka has been to resist and defend such attempts. Throughout its history Sri Lanka has relied on its own strengths and abilities and created the spirit of Self-Reliance modeled on the example set by the founder of the religion of the majority of Sri Lanka. That is to develop its own strategies to create a unique civilization in which its People enjoyed peace and contentment. However, there were occasions when weak leaders abandoned the rewards of Self-Reliance and sought the assistance of the Dutch to overcome the threat of Portuguese occupation, and ended up being colonized for over nearly 150 years. The planned Defence Cooperation MOU with India could very well be a repeat of that history; an outcome that would permanently ensure India’s security.

The attempt to seek external assistance to “move forward” is founded on the misguided concept that without the military and technological strength of external agents, Sri Lanka cannot move forward. In view of the fact that countries such as Sri Lanka cannot ever hope to match the capabilities of those who have advanced military technologies, the choice left to Sri Lanka is to be guided by the wisdom of the ages cited above, and develop “efficiency of knowledge and strategy”.

That means, the compelling need for Sri Lanka to develop its Intelligence and strategic capabilities to a very much higher level than what exists today so that Sri Lanka is in a position to make conflict both internal or external unnecessary. The importance of strategy over Military capabilities is starkly made evident by the experience of the US in Vietnam. Notwithstanding the fact that the US possesses the most advanced military hardware in the world, the US lost the war in Vietnam because of a wrong strategy. The US relied totally on the capabilities of their military hardware and forgot the strategy of David’s slingshot. The hope is that the President is made aware of these lessons of history.🔺

by Neville Ladduwahetty

காலநிலை அறிவிப்பு-பேராசிரியர் நா.பிரதீபராஜா

https://www.facebook.com/Piratheeparajah 03.12.2025 புதன்கிழமை பிற்பகல் 3.30 மணி விழிப்பூட்டும் முன்னறிவிப்பு இன்று வடக்கு மற்றும் கிழக்கு ம...