SHARE

Saturday, December 21, 2024

Palestinian Authority, seeking Gaza role, takes on West Bank militants

Palestinian Authority, seeking Gaza role, takes on West Bank militants

The Palestinian Authority and the militants who control Jenin camp are locked in a rare, open battle.

Palestinians react during clashes between Palestinian Authority security forces and the militants who control the Jenin refugee camp Monday in the Occupied West Bank. (Photos by Heidi Levine for The Washington Post)
《 
By Miriam Berger
Heidi Levine
 and 
Sufian Taha The Washington Post
 》

JENIN, West Bank — The black-clad militants of Jenin refugee camp raced through sewage-filled alleyways to dodge gunfire echoing all around. “Quickly,” a Palestinian fighter urged as they weaved through a network of armed patrols and improvised barricades. “Watch out,” another warned at a juncture where an improvised explosive was being set.


The action witnessed by Washington Post reporters on Monday could have been the response to an Israeli military raid on this northern West Bank city, the epicenter of a new generation of Palestinian militancy.

But for the past two weeks, the militants of Jenin have been locked in a rare, open battle with an internal foe: the Palestinian Authority.


In Jenin, the authority, which is backed by the West, has launched its largest and most heavily armed operation in its three decades to thwart a growing West Bank insurgency against the Palestinian leadership and Israeli occupation. It’s trying to prove it can manage security in the limited areas of the West Bank it controls as it seeks to also govern a postwar Gaza Strip.


Authority vehicles block the camp entrance.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has ruled out the authority’s return to Gaza. Key figures in his far-right coalition have pushed to annex part or all of the Palestinian territories. But in the latest round of ceasefire negotiations, Israel has agreed to let the authority take over administration of the Rafah border between Gaza and Egypt for a short period, according to a former Egyptian official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.


The authority launched Operation Protect the Homeland this month to retake control of Jenin camp by targeting “outlaws” and those “spreading chaos and anarchy and harming civil peace,” security forces spokesman Anwar Rajab told The Post. “All these actions and policies undermine the work of the PA, and these groups give Israel an excuse to implement its plans in the West Bank.”


The operation’s “achievements” have included arresting more than two dozen wanted militants, wounding others, dismantling dozens of explosives and “advancing on important axes” into the refugee camp, Rajab said. Security forces have killed three people: a fighter, a 19-year-old passerby on a motorcycle and a 14-year-old boy.


Authority security personnel take up positions to prevent protesters from entering the camp.

Both sides appear to be showing relative restraint. Israel’s days-long raid in Jenin in September killed at least 21 people, according to the authority’s health ministry, which does not distinguish between fighters and civilians. The Israel Defense Forces said it killed 14 militants.


Anger against the Palestinian Authority is growing


  Followi


The authority also clashes periodically with militants; security forces have killed 13 Palestinians, including eight in Jenin, since Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, according to local reports.


“We don’t want to see a single drop of blood being shed,” Sabri Saidam, an adviser to PA President Mahmoud Abbas and a member of Fatah’s central committee, told The Post. “What we would like to achieve is a state of calm, to sit down with different factions and agree on the way forward.”


Abbas has decided that the PA “will impose its authority and there is no turning back,” said a Palestinian official close to the president who spoke on the condition of anonymity to disclose private discussions.

But two weeks into the crackdown, militants still roam freely in the Jenin camp. Gunfire rings out day and night. The U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees has suspended schools. Businesses are shut. In the Damaj and Hawashin neighborhoods, heavily damaged in the Israeli raid in September, some families have been without electricity and water for days.


Camp militants.

Masked authority security forces patrol the Jenin governmental hospital at the camp’s edge and snipers are positioned on the roof to prevent militants from entering to hide, according to a hospital official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.

Post reporters heard what sounded like gunfire coming from the roof. Bullets have hit the emergency entrance and pierced an office window, he said, and patients and staff are too afraid to come.


Women and children hold Palestinian flags and wear face masks against tear gas.

Anger at the security forces in the West Bank is already high. Hemmed in by the Israeli occupation, they operate in ever-shrinking territory and, under security agreements, may not intervene to stop Israeli settler violence or deadly military raids. Many Palestinians see the forces as Israel’s subcontractors and Abbas’s tool for corruption and suppressing internal dissent.


“The people want ‘law and order’, but apply the law right and people will stand with you,” said Arwad, 35, who spoke on the condition his last name be withheld out of concern for reprisal from Palestinian and Israeli authorities. “When the Israeli soldiers and jeeps come here, where is the law?”


Arwad’s brother and father are in an Israeli jail, he said, and other relatives have been killed fighting Israeli forces. Even if the authority arrests wanted militants, he said, “the resistance will continue. Twenty-four hours later there will be someone new in their place.”


Authority security personnel.

Anger against the Palestinian Authority is growing


The security forces are among the last threads holding together the Oslo accords, signed in the 1990s to create a Palestinian state out of the Israeli-occupied West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem. In the decades since, Israel has expanded and entrenched its control of the West Bank, eroding the authority’s jurisdiction.


The last time Palestinian factions faced off in the streets was 2007, when Hamas, Fatah’s Islamist rival, ousted the authority in Gaza and set up its own government. Since then, the United States and the European Union have invested heavily in reforming and training the Palestinian security forces. Former militants were offered positions in the security forces if they turned in their guns.


Nonetheless, the security forces remain chronically underfunded and ill-equipped to take on the responsibilities that Washington envisions for the West Bank and postwar Gaza Strip.


A masked militant sits behind sandbags and a tank trap.

New militant groups attracting poor and politically disaffected men have cropped up in West Bank cities and refugee camps in recent years. They fight back against Israeli raids and attack Israeli soldiers and civilians. Some have ties to Iran-backed Hamas and the smaller Islamic Jihad.


Israel’s war on Hamas, launched after the militant group killed more than 1,200 on Oct. 7, 2023, has devastated Hamas’s fighting and governing force. Israeli attacks in Gaza have killed more than 45,000 Palestinians, according to the health ministry there.


In Gaza, public anger is growing against Hamas, too. But its popularity in the West Bank, where people are fed up with Abbas and the occupation, has risen.


Indentations made by bullets pepper the wall around a poster of physician Abdullah Abu Tin near the government hospital at the edge of the camp.

The Jenin operation, Rajab said, was aimed at suspects wanted for criminal charges, including shooting at hospitals and preparing explosive devices. But it escalated when militants stole and burned two security forces vehicles and a car bomb exploded near a police station.

Community leaders, including fathers of Jenin fighters killed by Israeli forces, tried to mediate a truce between the fighters and the security forces, according to Firas Abu al-Wafa, the secretary general of Fatah Jenin, but the authority refused to compromise.


Saidam said talks continue but “the security apparatus is adamant to impose law and order.”


Wafa called Jenin “the start and the finish.”


“If the situation in Jenin stabilizes, then the whole West Bank will be stable,” he said. But if it doesn’t, “there will not be stability across the West Bank.”



Palestinians mourn Islamic Jihad militant Yazid Jaayseh, killed by authority security forces, during a funeral procession through the camp on Tuesday.

Shedding blood


For a few hours on Tuesday, the guns in Jenin fell silent.


Shortly before 2 p.m., the PA and Jenin Brigade agreed to a pause in fighting. Authorities released the bodies of the militant Yazid Ja’aysa and 14-year-old Mohammed Amer, both killed on Dec. 14. Men carried the bodies of Ja’aysa, shrouded in the flag of Islamic Jihad, and Amer, in the Palestinian flag, to a cemetery adorned with oversize portraits of fighters, most of them killed in clashes with Israeli forces.


As the sun set, gunmen emerged from the alleys to resume positions.


Mourners carry the bodies of Yazid Ja’aysa, 29, and Mohammed Amer, 14, also killed in the clashes, to the cemetery.

Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine called on the authority Saturday “to immediately halt the security campaign in Jenin, which serves only the Israeli enemy.”


Tahani Mustafa, a Palestine analyst with the Brussels-based International Crisis Group, said the operation “will definitely delegitimize the PA and its grassroots Fatah” base, but the authority’s existence isn’t threatened, because it relies on the West, not its people, for funding.

Jenin is unique, she said, because there are no illegal Jewish settlements in the immediate vicinity. Elsewhere, she said, “you have pockets of Palestinian populations but no place to physically mobilize [the security forces] in mass clusters. …

“It is very unlikely Israel will allow this to escalate.”


Women wave flags and chant in protest of the authority crackdown.

The militants racing through the camp Monday were headed toward a standoff with security forces.


Two security forces vehicles stood at one end of a road. They fired sound bombs in warning. Then they switched to live fire. An Israeli drone hummed above.


Militants and camp residents gathered at the other end. Women, many dressed conservatively in black, and cheering children waved Palestinian flags. They wore face masks. The sting of tear gas lingered.

“We hope that the security forces leave the camp, because it’s forbidden to shed blood,” said Kifah Al Amouri. Both her children were fighters, she said; one was killed by Israel soldiers.


The militants, she said, were “defending their country.”⍐

India, Sri Lanka head to a win-win relationship

India, Sri Lanka head to a win-win relationship

《 Asian Age 17 Dec 2024 

All the signs are pointing to the possibility of a major win for India’s foreign policy as the meeting between Sri Lankan President Anura Kumara Dissanayake and Prime Minister Narendra Modi went off swimmingly. Far from the rancour of the days when Sri Lankan leaders viewed India suspiciously and, to compensate, walked into a Chinese embrace willingly, there was genuine warmth to be seen in the new President who chose to make his first foreign trip to New Delhi rather than Beijing.

From the bitter experience of the time of crisis post-Covid when the economy tanked, Sri Lanka had been seeking change, which it embraced in installing a completely new leadership while steering away from older, dynastic and family-led political parties. The island nation may have learnt who its true friend is though the realisation may have come in the form of a harsh lesson. 


The swivel away from China and a new direction in restoring old civilisational ties with India may have come not only because of the leadership change but also with the genuineness of India’s outreach in its neighbourhood first foreign policy, not to forget the $5 billion-plus aid to get over the meltdown in what was the worst financial crisis in the island’s modern history. 

 Mr Dissanayake’s assurance that he would not allow Sri Lanka’s territory to be used against India in any way affecting its security comes as sweet music to Indian ears from a time when the Rajapaksas flirted with China and were led up the debt trap garden path ending in the island signing away the rights to the Hambantota port. Chinese naval vessels that were being allowed free access to its ports for pit stops while on their spying missions will not have as smooth a passage now. 

Considering China’s economic heft despite the internal problems it faces now, its influence with Sri Lanka will not fade away. India’s position vis-a-vis Sri Lanka has, however, been cleared of the old baggage. India may not be able to compete with China in terms of offering funds but a range of promising pacts in defence — besides an FTA that will be furthered by settlements in the two national currencies — solar and wind hybrid energy and digital connectivity — will be key initiatives.

The readiness with which it has decided to finalise an MoU on debt restructuring is also part of a measured investment in creating win-win situations for both countries. A sticking point in ties will remain the Tamil Nadu fishermen’s problems in their forays into Sri Lankan waters in search of a better catch and their treatment at the hands of their navy. The issue was brought up along with the need for Sri Lanka to fulfil the aspirations of the Sri Lankan Tamils. It was no one’s expectation that Indian fishermen poaching in Sri Lankan waters and using bottom-trawling fish catching methods off mechanised boats would be solved in the meeting of the leaders. The improved outlook of overall ties could, however, lead to more acceptable outcomes. A total of 537 fishermen were arrested this year alone. A diplomatic approach to the problem in more extensive talks with Sri Lanka might help New Delhi show it appreciates the Chennai point of view.⍐

Sri Lanka walks a tightrope between India and China

Sri Lanka walks a tightrope between India and China

《 Murali Krishnan in New Delhi 12/16/2024 
December 16, 2024

Sri Lankan President Anura Kumara Dissanayake is embarking on his first overseas visit to India, navigating a complex geopolitical landscape shaped by China's growing influence.

Sri Lankan President Anura Kumara Dissanayake met India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Droupadi Murmu in New Delhi on Monday to bolster ties between the neighboring countries.

Dissanayake said India's economic support is critical in realizing his vision of a prosperous Sri Lanka, as the island nation emerges from the worst economic crisis in its independent history.

"Our conversations focused on strengthening Indo-Sri Lanka economic cooperation, enhancing investment opportunities, fostering regional security, and advancing key sectors such as tourism and energy," Dissanayake, who is popularly known as AKD, said in a statement.

"These engagements reaffirm the commitment to deepening the partnership between our two nations."

New Delhi's support amid geopolitical tensions

Modi announced on Monday that India plans to supply liquefied natural gas to Sri Lanka's power plants and will work on connecting the power grids of the two countries.

Many analysts expect AKD's government to come under pressure amid growing geopolitical competition, especially as India and China vie for influence in the region.

Srikanth Kondapalli, an expert on China studies at New Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University, said that Dissanayake's move to prioritize India as a strategic partner is influenced by their shared geographical proximity. India has long shared close political, cultural, economic and military ties to Sri Lanka.

"Unlike Nepal's Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli, who broke with the usual practice of making India the first destination in the neighborhood, AKD's strategy aligns with India's interests in promoting stability and democratic governance," Kondapalli told DW.

Sri Lanka's strategic shift

New Delhi's support amid geopolitical tensions

Modi announced on Monday that India plans to supply liquefied natural gas to Sri Lanka's power plants and will work on connecting the power grids of the two countries.

Many analysts expect AKD's government to come under pressure amid growing geopolitical competition, especially as India and China vie for influence in the region.

Srikanth Kondapalli, an expert on China studies at New Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University, said that Dissanayake's move to prioritize India as a strategic partner is influenced by their shared geographical proximity. India has long shared close political, cultural, economic and military ties to Sri Lanka.

"Unlike Nepal's Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli, who broke with the usual practice of making India the first destination in the neighborhood, AKD's strategy aligns with India's interests in promoting stability and democratic governance," Kondapalli told DW.

Sri Lanka's strategic shift

Earlier this month, Nepal's Oli, who was appointed prime minister in July, went on a four-day trip to Beijing to expand cooperation on China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), a massive infrastructure plan that aims to smooth Chinese trade links with dozens of countries.

"This is also informed [by] the much-needed assistance of nearly $4 billion (€3.8 billion) that India extended after Sri Lanka's meltdown in 2022 and the failure of China to bail out Colombo," he added, referring to the country's 2022 economic crisis.

Kondapalli noted that China's aggressive maritime activities and alleged predatory fishing operations in the Indian Ocean have raised concerns for Sri Lanka.

"The loss of Hambantota port for 99 years and extra-constitutional provisions on Colombo's port project to China has sapped Sri Lanka," said Kondapalli.

The port of Hambantota has been a Chinese-run facility since 2017, when Sri Lanka and China signed a 99-year lease after Colombo struggled to repay debt from the port's construction.

"Dissanayake is righting the wrongs done by his predecessors who provided unprecedented space for China and is resetting relations with India," Kondapalli added.

Relations with China under scrutiny

As Sri Lanka comes to terms with its economic realities and seeks to redefine its relationship with its influential neighbors, it faces critical decisions that will shape its economic future and sovereignty.

Dissanayake's visit to New Delhi is crucial for setting the tone of the island nation's foreign policy, especially considering his upcoming trip to China planned for early 2025.

"Sri Lanka has indeed decided to balance India and China and Dissanayake's government will be keen to show some gains while also appearing even-handed," Anil Wadhwa, a former Indian diplomat, told DW.

"The Chinese military presence will, however, continue to grow with the ships equipped with radars and sonography equipment now paying regular visits to Sri Lankan ports," he added.

Sri Lanka's balancing act between India and China

The strategic location of Sri Lanka along vital maritime routes makes it an essential asset for China as it seeks to secure its maritime interests and enhance its geopolitical leverage.

"On the other hand, allowing these visits for other ships, including Indian, gives them the leeway to avoid a confrontational situation," Wadhwa said.

"Playing off India and China could continue but nonetheless, the fact that Dissanayake's first official visit is to neighboring India is good optics and will help move the stalled issues forward."

It is still unclear how Dissanayake will navigate the India-China rivalry or if he will choose one over the other.

Shanthie Mariet D'Souza, president of the Mantraya Institute of Strategic Studies, an independent research forum, noted that Sri Lanka is not trying to distance itself from China and rely solely on India for all its economic needs.

"It needs assistance from both countries and would like to cultivate both to fulfil its distinct needs. Assurance that Sri Lanka would not allow its territory to be used by China for anti-India activities would be the minimum requirement of New Delhi," D'Souza told DW.

"India would also need specifics about the steps Sri Lanka would take to prevent this. However, an aid-dependent Sri Lanka, already deep under the Chinese debt trap, may not be fully in control to assuage Indian concerns," she added.

Recently, Dissanayake expressed his intention to boost ties with both China and India, and he made it clear that Sri Lanka's assets — including its land, sea and airspace — are not up for grabs.

This stance was evident when he opposed India's Adani Group gaining control over key economic sectors like Sri Lankan ports and renewable energy, citing environmental concerns.

"The fact that he is going to China after the India trip underscores how heavily China hangs in Dissanayake's vision and policy," said D'Souza.

"He could be seeking more relaxed and restructured loan repayment terms from Beijing. The fact also remains that Sri Lanka under Dissanayake is neither inclined nor in a position to look for an alternative to China."⍐

Friday, December 20, 2024

China’s New Era Mechanism for Common Prosperity

 

President Deng Xiaoping opening the Common Prosperity plan of China

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to visit China in January:

China’s New Era Mechanism for Common Prosperity

Signaling a balanced approach to managing ties with both Asian giants, Sri Lankan President Anura Kumara Dissanayake is set to visit China in January 2025, within weeks after his official visit to India in the third week of December 2024.

China being Sri Lanka’s reliable economic partner, the visit reflects his strategy to strengthen bilateral relations and seek support for Sri Lanka’s economic recovery. Dissanayake’s aim to secure foreign investment, technology, and tourism support while addressing Sri Lanka’s debt challenges. China, a significant investor in Sri Lanka’s infrastructure, has expressed its willingness to deepen cooperation under Dissanayake’s leadership. Analysts suggest that the President’s leftist ideology aligns with fostering closer ties with China, but his pragmatic stance seeks to maintain a balance with India’s strategic interests in the region.

Dissanayake’s diplomatic approach is seen as crucial to navigating the economic and geopolitical pressures facing Sri Lanka. The outcomes of these engagements with India and China will shape the country’s recovery path and its role in regional dynamics.

China’s push for “common prosperity” under the leadership of President Xi Jinping reflects the nation’s resolve to address income inequality, foster equitable growth, and modernise its economic model. As part of this vision, the government has introduced a range of policies, mechanisms, and reforms to promote wealth redistribution, social equity, and sustainable development. This policy shift represents a key element of China’s “New Era” strategy, aiming to balance rapid economic growth with inclusivity and fairness. This is an area Sri Lanka could get huge benefits from the Chinese experience.

Sugeeswara Senadhira Daily News December 20, 2024》

Economic reforms

Common prosperity is not a new concept in China; it was first articulated by Deng Xiaoping during the era of economic reforms in the late 1970s. Deng’s vision emphasised that “some people and regions can get rich first” to spur overall development. However, after decades of rapid growth, income disparities between rural and urban areas, as well as between regions and social classes, have become a pressing issue. Xi Jinping has revived and redefined this goal, focusing on reducing inequalities while maintaining economic stability.

For the National People’s Power (NPP) Government which emphasises the imperative of equal distribution of wealth and upliftment of rural and urban poor, the Chinese concept for achieving Common Prosperity will be a solid path to emulate. The core mechanisms adopted to implement this concept include wealth redistribution through taxation and transfers, tax reforms targeting high-income earners and corporations to address the growing wealth gap, enhanced progressive taxation, property taxes, and measures to curb tax evasion among the wealthy and social safety nets, such as improved pensions, healthcare, and education subsidies, aim to uplift low-income groups.

Major steps taken for rural revitalisation and regional development are measures to close the urban-rural divide, investments in infrastructure, agricultural modernisation, and rural industries seek to increase rural incomes and enhance quality of life and targeted funding and policy support to reduce geographic disparities in least developed provinces.

To fast track the Concept of Common Prosperity, Chinese government has encouraged philanthropy and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The government encouraged wealthy individuals and corporations to contribute to social causes. Tech giants and private enterprises are being urged to support social programmes, invest in community development, and promote inclusive hiring practices. They also introduced additional distribution mechanisms existing primary (market-based) and secondary (taxation and redistribution) income distributions such as voluntary contributions through charity, foundations, and social initiatives.This mechanism emphasises moral responsibility and societal values over mere profit-making.

Another crucial step was to reform the private sector by implementing policies to regulate monopolies and ensure fair competition aim to create a level playing field.The crackdown on tech firms and real estate developers reflects a broader goal of curbing excessive corporate influence and prioritizing social good over profit.

Sustainable programmes

Together with these steps, sustainable programmes were launched to boostemployment and education through vocational training programs and reforms in the education system are designed to enhance skills and create more equitable opportunities for upward mobility.Policies promoting job creation, particularly in green industries and high-tech sectors, help address unemployment and underemployment.

While taking lessons from the successful Common Prosperity programme of China, it is advisable to take safeguards against possible pitfalls that could adversely impact economic growth. Over-regulation of the private sector risks stifling innovation and slowing GDP growth. And businesses may become cautious about investments due to perceived unpredictability in policies. The scale and complexity of addressing entrenched inequalities pose significant challenges. Excessive state intervention could harm market dynamics, leading to inefficiency. Hence, balancing redistribution with economic liberalisation remains a delicate task.

China’s pursuit of common prosperity also has international ramifications. As a major global economy, its policies can influence trade, investment, and global inequality discourse. The emphasis on reducing disparities aligns with global calls for sustainable and inclusive development, offering a potential model for other nations grappling with similar challenges.

China’s “New Era” mechanism for common prosperity marks a significant shift in the country’s developmental priorities. While challenges remain, the initiative underscores the government’s commitment to addressing inequality and fostering a more inclusive society. If implemented effectively, it has the potential to serve as a blueprint for balancing growth with equity in a rapidly changing world.

President Dissanayake is in a position to get every possible support from President Xi Jinping for implementing a comprehensive prosperity package in Sri Lanka designed under the Chinese leader’s concept of ‘New Era Mechanism for Common Prosperity’.⍐

NPP’s ‘New Era’ with China and India


NPP’s ‘New Era’ with China and India

The grand and ostentatious Indian tour, hosted by India for President Anura Kumara Dissanayake and Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath following their sweeping victories in the recent Presidential and Parliamentary Elections, concluded successfully. However, it prompted numerous questions from various political parties regarding the assurances exchanged between India and Sri Lanka, which the NPP government has sought to clarify over the past few days.

Most of the meetings with Indian officials were described as ‘Discussions’ by Foreign Minister Herath. Nonetheless, the tour ended on a positive note, with heightened optimism about the potential mutual benefits of the relationship between Sri Lanka and India.

Interestingly, upon their return to Sri Lanka, two delegations from the ruling Communist Party of China (CPC) were seen at the doors of both the JVP headquarters and the Presidential Secretariat, adding further intrigue to the evolving diplomatic dynamics. Although these visits were prearranged, their timing—immediately after the Indian tour—suggested an air of haste and secrecy on the part of the Chinese.

One delegation met with the General Secretary of the ruling leftist Janata Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP), Tilvin Silva, while the other engaged directly with the President. These meetings appear to set the stage for another grand reception in China for the NPP leader, Dissanayake, reportedly scheduled for the second week of January 2025.

At this juncture, the Sri Lankan government has reiterated its commitment to preserving the country’s territorial integrity and safeguarding India’s national security interests, assuring that it would avoid actions detrimental to India. However, the presence of the CPC delegations has sparked speculation about the foreign policy direction of the NPP, which appears to be ambiguous at this stage. These developments underscore the critical need for a coherent and well-defined policy, as the lack of clarity could pose governance challenges.

Foreign Minister Herath has argued that a comprehensive foreign policy is not immediately necessary, suggesting that traditional non-aligned approaches or generic strategic ties may no longer suffice in an era where nations demand bespoke partnerships. This perspective holds some validity. Powerful nations have crafted their own strategic frameworks—such as America’s Indo-Pacific and Quad initiatives, India’s SAGAR vision, China’s Belt and Road Initiative, France’s maritime strategy, and the Middle East’s focus on oil and gas interests—that countries like Sri Lanka must navigate carefully.

Although the NPP government has been warmly received by countries such as Russia, the United States, India, Cuba, and China, aspects of its policies remain misaligned with the expectations of these nations. There were noticeable omissions on key issues, such as the Russia-India discussions on the Mattala Airport or Adani’s renewable energy project, during the Indian visit. This highlights the geopolitical balancing act Sri Lanka must undertake to ensure these proposals and development initiatives align with its national interests.

The issue of Chinese research vessels docking in Sri Lanka, a longstanding point of contention in Sri Lanka-India relations, will test President Dissanayake’s diplomatic skills. With the current agreement prohibiting Chinese research ships set to expire on 31 December 2024, Foreign Minister Herath has announced the establishment of a committee to draft a policy framework for research vessels visiting Sri Lanka. He believes this framework could help resolve conflicts and differences. Until the policy is finalised, permissions for research vessels will remain on hold, with the new framework expected to take effect on 1 January 2025.

Tilvin and CPC Meeting

The CPC delegation met Tilvin Silva at the JVP headquarters on Wednesday morning (18). They together with several JVP office- bearers, participated in a meeting as part of an exchange programme, during which the CPC shared insights into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s ‘Common Prosperity’ initiative and its potential to support rural development in Sri Lanka, according to the JVP.

Tilvin Silva, a Marxist politician and founding member of the NPP, has been instrumental in shaping the JVP’s policies within the current government. Following the meeting, Silva remarked, “The Chinese delegation, comprising around 12 members, expressed their willingness to support Sri Lanka’s development through expertise and technology, particularly in the agricultural sector. They emphasised that they sought nothing in return and were committed to assisting us.”

The meeting appeared to reflect a tripartite agenda involving the CPC, Sri Lanka, and Singapore. Silva highlighted the long-standing ties between the JVP and the CPC stating, “We have maintained close ties with the CPC since earlier times. Now, as two governments, we will continue to nurture these ties for the benefit of Sri Lanka’s development and economic growth.”

Addressing the media about the JVP’s stance on foreign assistance, Silva clarified, “We are open to strengthening relationships with countries like China, India, Russia, and America. There is no longer a defined ‘opposition party’ in the country, and as a government, we are committed to building these partnerships without hesitation.”

Silva also dismissed speculation that the discussions included topics such as rice and fertiliser imports. “This meeting was not intended for such negotiations. Their primary focus was on offering support, and we agreed to continue discussions on various aspects of cooperation in the future,” he said.

After the meeting with Silva, the CPC delegation proceeded to the Prime Minister’s office, where they met with the PM’s Secretary, Pradeep Saputhanthri.

The CPC delegation highlighted China’s focus on ‘Common Prosperity’ under President Xi Jinping’s leadership, expressing its relevance for Sri Lanka. They explained that the initiative reflects China’s determination to address income inequality, foster equitable growth, and modernise its economic model. In separate meetings with the JVP leader and the PM’s Secretary, the delegation outlined how the Chinese government has introduced a range of policies, mechanisms, and reforms to promote wealth redistribution, social equity, and sustainable development. This policy shift, they noted, is central to China’s ‘New Era’ strategy, which seeks to balance rapid economic growth with inclusivity and fairness. They emphasised that Sri Lanka could benefit significantly from the ‘Chinese experience’ in this regard.

The concept of ‘Common Prosperity’ is not new in China, first articulated by Deng Xiaoping during the economic reforms of the late 1970s. Deng’s vision proposed that ‘some people and regions can get rich first’ to drive overall development. However, decades of rapid growth have led to significant income disparities between rural and urban areas, as well as between regions and social classes. Xi Jinping has revived and redefined this goal, focusing on reducing inequalities while maintaining economic stability.

The CPC delegation noted that the NPP government’s emphasis on equal wealth distribution and uplifting both rural and urban poor aligns with China’s ‘Common Prosperity’ objectives. They suggested that Sri Lanka could adopt similar mechanisms, such as wealth redistribution through taxation and transfers, tax reforms targeting high-income earners and corporations to address the wealth gap, enhanced progressive taxation, property taxes, and measures to curb tax evasion. Additionally, they highlighted the importance of social safety nets, including improved pensions, healthcare, and education subsidies, as essential tools to support low-income groups.

President AKD and CPPCC from China

On the same day, another CPC delegation, the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), met with President Dissanayake along with the Chinese Ambassador to Sri Lanka. The President held discussions with Qin Boyong, Vice Chairperson of the CPPCC, at the Parliamentary Complex.

What is CPPCC?

The CPPCC National Committee comprises representatives from the Communist Party of China (CPC), other political parties, non-affiliated individuals, people’s organisations, ethnic minorities, compatriots from Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan, returned overseas Chinese, and various societal sectors, alongside specially invited individuals. In response to economic and social developments and internal structural changes within the United Front, the CPPCC has revised and enhanced the categorisation of societal sectors.

The CPPCC represents a significant achievement by the CPC in integrating Marxist-Leninist theories on the united front, political parties, and democratic politics with the unique realities and rich traditional culture of China. Under the leadership of the CPC, it is a groundbreaking initiative that unites various political parties, prominent non-affiliated individuals, people’s organisations, and individuals from all ethnic groups and sectors of society within the political system. The Constitution of the People’s Republic of China enshrines the long-term existence and development of the CPC-led system of multiparty cooperation and political consultation.

The CPPCC serves as an organisation of the Chinese people’s patriotic united front. It is a key mechanism for multiparty cooperation and political consultation under the CPC’s leadership, playing a pivotal role in promoting socialist democracy and practising whole-process people’s democracy in China. As a specialised body and an essential channel for socialist consultative democracy, the CPPCC is a vital component of the state governance system and a uniquely Chinese political institution.

During discussions with the NPP government and President Dissanayake, the Chinese delegation elaborated on the overarching goals for the CPPCC’s work in the ‘new era’ of China. These goals emphasise adherence to the guidance of President Xi Jinping’s Thoughts on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era. This includes upholding CPC leadership and implementing the principles set forth at the 20th National Congress of the CPC and the Central Conference on CPPCC Work.

The delegation outlined the importance of deeply understanding the decisive significance of establishing Comrade Xi Jinping’s core position within the Party and recognising the guiding role of his thought. Additionally, the objectives call for heightened political integrity, alignment with the Party’s broader vision and leadership, and strengthened confidence in the path, theory, system, and culture of socialism with Chinese characteristics. Moreover, they stressed maintaining General Secretary Xi’s core position in the Party and ensuring the authority and centralised, unified leadership of the CPC Central Committee.

Since its establishment, the CPPCC has played a significant role in the founding and development of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). It has been instrumental during historical periods of socialist revolution, development, and reform. On 30 April 1948, on the eve of the final victory in the People’s War of Liberation, the CPC issued the ‘May 1st’ slogan, calling for “all democratic parties, mass organisations, and community leaders to immediately convene a political consultative conference to discuss the convening of a conference of people’s representatives and the establishment of a democratic united government.” This call received enthusiastic support, marking a crucial moment in the establishment of the PRC.

China asks to restart stalled marine research activities in Sri Lanka

During the meeting, Vice Chairperson Qin Boyong expressed her expectation to further strengthen the longstanding relationship between China and Sri Lanka while collaborating with the new government in the future.
At the meeting, President AKD stressed the continued need for Chinese assistance and also highlighted the necessity of completing the Chinese-funded section of the Central Expressway, which remains incomplete. He also noted plans to expedite the initiation of supply hubs and institutional projects centred around the Colombo Port City and the Hambantota District.
Vice Chairperson Qin pointed out her plans to restart stalled marine research activities and to commence pending projects for various reasons. This comes in the wake of India’s calling to be cautious about entertaining Chinese vessels. This matter has been now taken up at the State level to hold discussions, according to Foreign Minister Herath.

Qin also expressed expectations of establishing Chinese companies within the Hambantota Investment Zone to provide Sri Lanka with better global access. Moreover, preparations are in place to welcome President Anura Kumara Dissanayake during his upcoming visit to China.

Minister of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Employment, and Tourism, Vijitha Herath, Deputy Speaker Dr. Rizvie Salih and CPPCC committee member Ma Youxiang, among others, were present at the occasion.

Joint Statement and MoUs

The official statement by the AKD and the joint statement were issued after the conclusion of the Indian tour. These statements primarily emphasised strengthening the ties between Sri Lanka and India. Meetings were held with the Ministry of Health, as well as with Prime Minister Modi and the President. Visits included the Bodhgaya site and the India Foundation.

During the tour, the NPP signed two MoUs for public servants, one focusing on a two-week training programme and the other for training 1,500 public servants. Another one was for revoking double taxation while trading between India and Sri Lanka.

Regarding research ships entering Sri Lanka’s territorial waters, the government explained its approach to national security in relation to this issue. Though It was noted that no harm would stem from this, the need for a national policy on research was identified.  A discussion is being held to appoint a special committee, which will not only focus on research ships but also address the flow of ships coming to Sri Lanka. A proper implementation framework is to be established, and a report on this will be prepared. Minister Herath noted that a decision has already been made to appoint a special committee for this purpose.

At the outset, India raised concerns regarding research ships and land. They will follow the standard operating procedure (SOP), and the ban imposed last year will remain in effect. “We are preparing a new SOP, and there are proposals that need to be updated. The ban has not been relaxed, and the committee will make a decision after 31 December.”

Noticing the juggernauts of India and China navigating their own dynamics and settling their scores on Sri Lankan soil, it becomes increasingly challenging—and potentially traumatic—for Sri Lanka to sideline either of them.

The CPC’s presence and its BRI strategy, alongside India’s Neighbourhood First Policy and its ties with the Quad, will continue to shape their dynamics, with the NPP closely observing and experiencing the unfolding developments, having given assurances to both sides.⍐

Thursday, December 19, 2024

The US-Israeli monster is ripping Syria to pieces. Part II

The US-Israeli monster is ripping Syria to pieces. 

Part II. Israel’s policy vis-à-vis Syria is malice and revenge

NEO Viktor Mikhin, December 19, 2024 》

Israel’s nefarious plans for Syria, based on hatred, malice and revenge, are becoming clear days after the fall of the country’s government. Since Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham* (HTS) and other rebel groups took control of Damascus and overthrew President Bashar al-Assad, Israel has intensified its unprecedented attacks on Syrian territory.

The US-Israeli monster

What is Israel bombing?

Israel does not strike militants and jihadists and their positions. The Pentagon is shamefully hiding behind the notion of ‘striking terrorist organisations’, whereas the IDF explicitly states that its main task in Syria is to destroy the country’s military structure and weapons. The Israeli military reported that it has carried out about 480 strikes on strategic military infrastructure in Syria in just 48 hours. “Over the past 48 hours, the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have attacked most strategic weapons depots in Syria, preventing them from falling into the hands of terrorist elements”, the military said in a statement, adding that the targets were 15 warships, anti-aircraft batteries and weapons factories in several cities. At the same time, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said that the military “will destroy heavy strategic weapons throughout Syria, including air defence systems, surface-to-air, surface-to-surface, cruise, long-range and coastal missiles”. A senior Israeli official said the airstrikes would continue in the coming days.

Israel’s policy vis-à-vis Syria is hatred, malice and revenge

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights added that Israel “destroyed critical military infrastructure in Syria, including Syrian airports and their depots, aircraft squadrons, radars, military radar stations, as well as a multitude of weapons and ammunition depots in various locations in most Syrian provinces”. At this point, it is quite clear that Israel is seeking to destroy Syria’s defences and expand its presence in the Golan Heights – and possibly beyond – forever.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has brazenly declared that the Golan Heights, occupied by Israel almost 60 years ago, will remain Israeli “forever”. Speaking at a press conference in Jerusalem, Netanyahu thanked US President-elect Donald Trump for recognising Israel’s annexation of the Golan Heights (1981) during his first term as president and stated that “the Golan will be part of the State of Israel forever”. Israel occupied the Syrian Golan Heights after the 1967 Six-Day War. In 1981, Tel Aviv annexed the Golan Heights – a step not recognised by the international community. Netanyahu said that Israel’s control over the territory “ensures our security and sovereignty”. He personally ordered troops to occupy the UN-controlled buffer zone and move beyond it after rebels overthrew Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Now Israeli troops are only 25km from Damascus and could quickly ‘talk some sense’ into the new Syrian government.

The United Nations and Israel’s neighbours condemned the move. A UN representative stated that Israel’s actions are a “violation” of the 1974 agreement on the separation of forces between Israel and Syria. Netanyahu cynically replied that the collapse of the al-Assad government and the retreat of the Syrian army from their positions “annulled the agreement”. Earlier, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar, in trying to sugar-coat another blatant injustice, said that the seizure of the buffer zone was “a limited and temporary measure that we took for security purposes”. US State Department spokesman Matthew Miller expressed understanding regarding Israel’s actions, which, in his words, “are not permanent” and “we ultimately want to see long-term stability in relations between Israel and Syria, which means that we support all parties that comply with the 1974 disengagement agreement”.

Israeli campaign aimed at eliminating scientists

Dr. Hamdi Ismail Nadi, scientist and former head of the research centre of the Syrian Ministry of Defence, located near Damascus, was found dead in his house. Dr. Nadi was a chemist and participated in chemical weapons development programmes. Zahra Hemsiya, a microbiologist involved in nuclear research programmes, was killed. She was found in her home with several bullet wounds. Dr. Shadia Habal, a physicist who participated in a number of international programmes, was killed in her home. The killers shot her and her husband and all of Dr. Habal’s research was stolen.

The deaths of Nadi, Zahra Hemsiyah and Shadia Habal are reminiscent of the murders of Iraqi scientists committed by the Israeli spy agency after the overthrow of Saddam Hussein more than two decades ago. After the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, hundreds of Iraqi scientists, academics and intellectuals were either kidnapped or killed in the chaos caused by the US war against the Arab country. The killings are believed to have been a systematic attempt to eliminate or expel a group crucial to the reconstruction of Iraq.

At that time, according to reports, the Israeli Mossad, in cooperation with the United States, killed more than 500 Iraqi scientists and professors. They claimed that Israeli special forces operating against Iraqi scientists were active in the country after the fall of Saddam. On June 14, 2005, the Palestinian Information Centre reported that Israeli and foreign agents sent by Mossad to Iraq, in cooperation with the United States, killed at least 350 Iraqi scientists and more than 200 university professors and academics. It quoted a report compiled by the US State Department for then-US President George W. Bush. According to the report, Mossad agents operated in Iraq to eliminate Iraqi nuclear scientists and biologists, as well as other scientists and prominent university professors.

“Israeli special forces have been operating in Iraq for more than a year and the main purpose of their activities was to kill Iraqi scientists and intellectuals. The Zionists resorted to a large-scale campaign of assassinations after the failure of American efforts, which began immediately after the US occupation of Iraq and were aimed at attracting a number of Iraqi scientists to cooperate and work in the United States”, the Palestinian Information Centre reported.

Now it seems that Israel has similar plans for Syria. Currently, the nature of Israeli activities in Syria are like a scorched earth policy in the face of the inaction of the armed groups (as well as regional and extra-regional countries) that overthrew al-Assad. HTS* leader Abu Mohammed al-Jolani said that the Syrian people are the “rightful owners” of the country, calling the fall of al-Assad “a victory for the Islamic nation”. For now, though, he remains silent about the escalation of Israeli aggression against Syria. The newly created ‘salvation government’ in Syria, to which Prime Minister Assad Mohammad Ghazi al-Jalali agreed to transfer power, also did not comment on the increased ground and air attacks by Israel. Türkiye, which is considered the main sponsor of HTS*, also remains silent. Several Arab countries have expressed their disapproval of Israel’s military activities in Syria in recent days, but have not taken any concrete measures in response. Western countries are also looking the other way, as they are the sponsors of all these terrorist organisations.

It is now quite obvious that the current rulers of Syria, as well as the countries of the region, have given Israel carte blanche to continue its scorched earth strategy in Syria. This is consistent with Israel’s expansionist ambitions in the region. That is why Foreign Minister Sa’ar bluntly and cynically stated in an interview with the Times of Israel newspaper, which took place after Israel launched airstrikes on targets in Syria, that “the only thing we are interested in is the security of Israel and its citizens … that’s why we attacked strategic weapons systems, destroying the military structure”. This statement is, as they say, clear as day.⍐

*organisation banned in the Russian Federation

The US-Israeli monster is ripping Syria to pieces (Part 1)

The US-Israeli monster is ripping Syria to pieces (Part 1)

The US-Israeli monster is ripping Syria to pieces. 

Part 1. The US’ unprincipled policy of force in Syria

NEO Viktor Mikhin, December 16, 2024 》

US troops are remaining in Syria, as they have an ‘important mission’ there, stated US Deputy National Security Advisor Jon Finer in an interview at the Reuters NEXT conference in New York. He did not, though, specify the nature of this important mission.

US soldiers in Syria


In the Kurdish region, in the north of the country, there are about 10 US bases that control almost all of the sizeable oil production there. The black gold is then delivered by oil trucks to Türkiye, where it is quickly sold at discounted prices. The same oil supplies the needs of US bases in the north and 2 more in the south of Syria, near the city of al-Tanf. The money gathered from oil – or rather stolen from the Syrian people – is happily distributed among the ‘democratic’ US officers. Officially, the Pentagon states that there are only 900 military personnel in Syria, but this is hard to believe, as this would mean that only 75 military personnel service one base. Experts estimate the number of US military personnel to be more than three times as large and their number is constantly growing, taking into account the situation.

All of these terrorist groups and the United States are two sides of the same coin

The presence of a significant US military contingent is also indicated by the fact that the United States Central Command (CENTCOM) announced a massive number of airstrikes in the central regions of Syria. CENTCOM stated that on December 8 alone, as a result of a series of precision airstrikes, more than 75 military facilities were destroyed, which housed military equipment left there by the retreating Syrian army. In the largest operation in recent years, the US Air Force, including advanced B-52s, F-15s and A-10s, was deployed to “disrupt, weaken and defeat in order to prevent terrorist groups, including ISIS*, from conducting external operations and to ensure that these groups do not try to take advantage of the current situation for reconstruction in the central part of Syria”, CENTCOM said in a statement.

General Michael Erik Kurilla stressed that CENTCOM “will not allow terrorist groups to recover and take advantage of the current situation in Syria”, warning that any organisations cooperating with or supporting terrorists will be punished. The US was not able to provide any reliable evidence that the targets of the strikes were ‘camps and militants of terrorist groups’. Numerous US Air Force raids began immediately after the rapid overthrow of the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad by various groups, led by the terrorist Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham*.

A little about al-Jolani

Before launching his jaw-dropping offensive, Abu Muhammad al-Jolani was known in the West as the head of a terrorist organisation, recognised as such by the United Nations, and a $10 million bounty was placed on his head. However, the unexpected success of his attacks turned the situation upside down; now Western media presents him as a changed man who preaches pluralism and tolerance and wants only peace for the Syrian people.

The abrupt change in the tone of Western media vis-à-vis al-Jolani, on top of evidence that HTS* and allied groups are using modern Turkish and US weapons to capture cities abandoned by the Syrian army, indicates preliminary planning and coordination between the West and the new de facto rulers of Syria.

The leader of this group, Abu Muhammad al-Jolani (real name Ahmed Hussein al-Shar’a), was born in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in 1982 to a Syrian engineer. His family returned to Syria in 1989 and settled in Damascus. In 2003, Ahmed Hussein al-Shar’a went to Iraq, where he joined forces fighting against the United States. In 2006, he was arrested and spent five years in prison. After that, having reached an agreement with the Americans and received appropriate instructions from them, he returned to Syria, where he gathered fighters under the brand ‘Jabhat al-Nusra’*. In Syria, al-Jolani met the terrorist al-Baghdadi, the infamous leader of ISIS*. He was later accused of involvement in the September 9, 2001, conspiracy against the United States and a $10 million bounty was placed on his head. It turns out, though, that he was just quietly sitting in Idleb and enjoying the protection of the US military – funny.

Thus, it turns out that it was the ‘democratic’ United States that became the midwife of all active terrorist organisations, starting from al-Qa’eda*, ISIS* and ending with Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham*. And after that, who will believe General Michael Erik Kurilla and other long tongues in Washington that they are allegedly fighting against terrorist organisations? These terrorist groups and the United States are two sides of the same coin. 

The real motive of the US bombings 

Analysts questioned the timing of the attacks, saying that if the US mission in Syria is aimed at preventing ISIS* from coming to power, then why were these airstrikes against terrorists not carried out earlier? Small cells of the terrorist group have established themselves in the central part of Syria near areas under US control. Previously, the world accused the US of protecting terrorists in order to maintain instability in Syria and now, it turns out, the Americans have seen the light and have begun quietly destroying the military structure of Syria.

In May of last year, the Director of the Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation, Sergey Naryshkin, accused the United States of preparing ISIS* terrorists to engage in sabotage and carry out terrorist attacks both in Syria and in Russia. Then Naryshkin said that the US-occupied al-Tanf base on the border of Syria, Jordan and Iraq was used to train ISIS* terrorists. CENTCOM’s statement adds fuel to the widespread rumours that the US kept ISIS* under its control during the era of former President Bashar al-Assad to serve Washington’s security interests.

Critics of the occupation accuse the United States of denying Syrian government institutions access to fertile lands and oil fields in the northeast of the country. In addition to the sanctions imposed against Damascus, these measures have put Syrians in a difficult humanitarian situation, depriving government agencies of much-needed oil revenues for the reconstruction of the country, humanitarian assistance to households and salaries for civil servants, as well as the Syrian army. Experts say that most of Syria’s oil revenues are spent by Washington to finance the US military presence in Syria.

It is estimated that the amount of oil revenues appropriated by the United States amounts to billions of dollars. In other words, the United States is brazenly and by force plundering the peoples of the world anywhere they are allowed to do so. This greedy American robbery will progress, only on a larger scale, taking advantage of the current complete confusion and lack of power in Syria.⍐

*organisations banned in the Russian Federation

The US-Israeli monster is ripping Syria to pieces. Part II

காலநிலை அறிவிப்பு-பேராசிரியர் நா.பிரதீபராஜா

https://www.facebook.com/Piratheeparajah 03.12.2025 புதன்கிழமை பிற்பகல் 3.30 மணி விழிப்பூட்டும் முன்னறிவிப்பு இன்று வடக்கு மற்றும் கிழக்கு ம...