AKD Govt. faces ground realities in governance and economic recovery while chaos reigns in Opposition

06 Oct 2024 | Black Box By Capt. Vasabha The Morning

• AKD tells IMF third review can be after Parliamentary Polls; Jaishankar told project discussions also after polls
• Next tranche under IMF’s EFF likely to be delayed till 2025; Govt. seeks some changes within existing parameters 
• IMF and Paris Club OCC consultations on debt restructuring conclude; approval granted to ISB holders’ deal
• AKD’s meetings with foreign envoys witness issues in translations; Govt. yet to formulate foreign policy direction 

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake (AKD) and his Government were no doubt awakened to the ground realities in governance as well as the country’s precarious economic situation following the many meetings held by the new President last week with India’s External Affairs Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar, members of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and envoys representing several key foreign nations. 

The one thing that all these meetings highlighted was that Sri Lanka was at an economic crossroads and that the new President would have to tread carefully to ensure recovery and not let Sri Lanka slide back to 2022.

The AKD Government will definitely have to give prominence to foreign policy, given the increasing engagements required in Sri Lanka’s recovery path. Geopolitical sensitivities will also have to be given special focus, given the preconceived notion that being a Leftist Government, there could be more alignment with the Chinese, while neighbouring India keeps a close watch after playing a significant role in assisting Sri Lanka’s economic recovery programme by way of financial aid as well as intervening to secure the IMF programme for Sri Lanka and the debt restructuring programme.

Unfortunately, it is reliably learnt that there have been concerns over translations during the President’s meetings with the foreign envoys last week. Several foreign envoys had realised that what they were articulating to AKD had not been fully translated to the President. A continuation of such a scenario could lead to complications in foreign relations. It is also learnt that the AKD Government is yet to grasp the need for a foreign policy direction, relying mostly on the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) for current engagements.

However, there was also good news that came out on Friday (4) night: the announcement of the successful completion of the IMF and Official Creditor Committee (OCC) of the Paris Club consultation process on Sri Lanka’s debt restructuring programme.

Accordingly, the Government on Friday night announced: “The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka (‘Sri Lanka’) is pleased to announce that, following the Agreement in Principle (AIP) reached with representatives of its international and local holders of International Sovereign Bonds (ISBs) on 19 September 2024, the Sri Lankan authorities have now completed their consultations with Sri Lanka’s OCC and the IMF regarding the compliance of the AIP terms with the Comparability of Treatment (CoT) principle and the parameters of Sri Lanka’s IMF-supported programme.”

The Sri Lankan Government had also received confirmation from the IMF staff that the AIP terms met programme parameters under the Extended Fund Facility (EFF) arrangement second review macro framework, when considered in conjunction with the restructuring of official claims in line with the terms agreed with the OCC and China’s Export-Import (Exim) Bank in June.

The Government’s announcement also notes: “Following the Presidential Election held in Sri Lanka on Saturday, 21 September, and the appointment of the new Government on 25 September, the Sri Lankan authorities confirm their endorsement of the programme debt targets and the AIP terms as announced on 19 September and confirm their intention to expedite the implementation of the ISBs’ restructuring transaction in line with these terms.”

It is however learnt that the AKD Government is looking at the possibility of revisiting Sri Lanka’s deal on debt treatment with ISB holders. Although a final decision has not been reached on the matter, President AKD’s Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP)-led National People’s Power (NPP) was critical of the deal reached between the ISB holders and the then Ranil Wickremesinghe Government just days before the September Presidential Election.

Also of concern would be the delay in conducting the third review of Sri Lanka by the IMF team until after the 14 November Parliamentary Election. This will effectively mean a delay in the disbursement of the next tranche under the EFF programme to Sri Lanka until next year.

In the event the IMF review is carried out towards mid- to end-November, the report might not be included in the IMF Executive Board schedule for December, before the holiday season. The review report will then be taken up by the Executive Board in January 2025.

Meanwhile, the AKD Government’s economic team that met with the IMF team last week is also expected to travel to Washington, DC towards the end of this month to discuss the changes being proposed by the new Government within the parameters of the ongoing programme.

An IMF delegation led by Asia Pacific Department Director Krishna Srinivasan met with President AKD on Thursday (3) and Friday to discuss the ongoing EFF programme. An IMF team led by Peter Breuer met with AKD’s economic team that will spearhead the negotiations with the fund from now on. This team will however include two members from the previous team – Central Bank Governor Dr. Nandalal Weerasinghe and Finance Ministry Secretary Mahinda Siriwardana. 

In all these meetings, the new Government emphasised the need for the inclusion of welfare schemes and reducing the tax burden on the masses within the existing parameters of the programme. The IMF, it is learnt, had agreed that the proposals could be looked at while giving priority to State revenue targets.

The IMF meanwhile has warned there are important vulnerabilities and uncertainties in Sri Lanka. IMF Communications Department Director Julie Kozack said that sustaining the reform momentum in Sri Lanka was critical.

தினப்பொறி12: IMF இன் Austerity உம், அநுரா அரசின் நிவாரணமும்!

 

IMINT: Iran’s Strike on Nevatim Airbase

IMINT: Iran’s Strike on Nevatim Airbase

By Decker Eveleth    October 4, 2024

On October 1st, Iran launched another ballistic missile attack on Israel, and unlike last time, this time a large number of Iranian ballistic missile systems appear to have impacted various target areas in Israel. Here is what we know so far: Iran launched around 180 ballistic missiles, and this time they used some of their most advanced designs. Unlike the strikes in April, which appear to have been conducted mainly using older, liquid-fueled Scud derivatives like the Emad missile, Iran launched a large number of their more modern solid-fueled systems as well. My former colleague Sam Lair over at CNS has been going around looking at Iranian missile bases for evidence of launches, and so far we know that Iran launched solid-fueled missiles from several bases including Tabriz and liquid-fueled missiles from their missile base in Shiraz. The targets, according to Iran, included various Israeli air defense radar installations, two airbases (Nevatim Airbase and Tel Nof Airbase) and Mossad headquarters in Glilot. Of these it seems the strike on Mossad headquarters in Glilot was the least successful. We only saw two impacts, and the one impact that landed even remotely near the headquarters building did so about 520 meters away from the building itself.

The strikes at Tel Nof and Nevatim seem to have been much more successful. We don’t have imagery of Tel Nof yet, but there is social media footage of warheads raining down on the base, and some seemed to have caused secondary explosions, which is good evidence that they likely hit something worth hitting. As soon as we have imagery of Tel Nof myself and the crew at CNS will start counting.

We got some high resolution imagery of one of the targets, Nevatim Air Base, that our friends at Planet Labs snapped on October 2nd. Its worth talking about the imagery at length. Yesterday Jeffrey, his crew over at CNS, and myself conducted a battle damage assessment on Nevatim Air Base, and we count at least 33 likely impact craters, with likely more impacts currently obscured by clouds. It may shake down that Iran hit the base with something like 40 warheads. Big shout out to Sam Lair, Michael Duitsman, and the rest of the crew for doing some good geospatial work on this problem.

Here’s the image Jeffrey posted. Before going further it’s worth pausing on this for a moment. Last time Iran tried to hit Nevatim back in April, they only got 5 warheads through, and those warheads were pretty spread out and didn’t hit much of interest. I had an argument with Jeffrey at the time about what sort of target points they would be aiming at. Jeffrey, under the reasonable assumption that the liquid-fueled missiles like Emad that Iran uses aren’t that accurate (an assessment I think I agree with) made the argument that likely Iran aimed a single target point. I disagreed with him at the time about the number of target points, and the slightly clustering effect here seems to support the tentative conclusion that Iran probably aimed at multiple points. There is a slight clustering effect at several important targets, like the airborne refueling aircraft hangars and the F-35 shelters. But more data is needed to come to a specific conclusion. It’s possible that Iran aimed at a single aim point back in April, but this time had multiple aim points because they were using different missiles. Iran used more modern systems for this strike – they appear to have used their latest Fattah and Kheibar Shekan missiles, which are solid-fuel and have maneuvering warheads. The Fattah is especially sophisticated as it has a powered warhead. There are some people attempting to use this analysis to claim that Iranian missiles have an accuracy of 500 meters, and I would hold off on that given how much we don’t know about what they targeted.

Another important thing to note is that airbases are really hard targets. The vast majority of an airbase is empty land and most of the things you probably wanna hit are pretty spread out. The Russians didn’t have all that much luck hitting Ukrainian airbases for much the same reason. In order to be very effective at destroying aircraft, you have to be very, very precise, and most missiles simply don’t have that accuracy.

So what did they hit? Well, not much. Most of the impact zones either missed entirely or simply hit the taxiways around the base, most of which has now been repaired. They did score some hits on one refueling aircraft hangar and a couple buildings.

There’s a slight cluster effect in this area where Israeli stores a large number of aircraft unprotected, which again may be an indication that Iran aimed at this area specifically, or Iran simply got very lucky that they had such good cluster in such a high value area.

One support building at the south end of the base took a hit from a missile, but the hit wasn’t centered on the building, and only part of the building was destroyed.

Lastly, the 3 meter imagery shows likely serious damage to a building on the eastern side of the base, likely used for something like maintenance. The damage to those three structures are the most obvious pieces of serious damage Iran’s strike inflicted. From there we move on to the F-35 shelters, which appear to have mainly weathered the storm.

Two near misses here, with impact craters apparent on either side of one of the rows of F-35 shelters. A third hit a little further away off the image. Should demonstrate that the lack of serious damage to the facilities here at Nevatim was as much luck as it was due to the relative inaccuracy of Iranian missiles.

Jeffrey pointed out that one of the F-35 shelters does appear to have sustained some damage, perhaps even a direct hit. There’s what might be a small hole in the roof of the shelter, and a large amount of concrete dust on the roof. But the shelter itself seems to still be intact. It could either be that the warhead that landed here was a dud and didn’t explode or Israeli aircraft shelter construction techniques contain explosions really well. It is notable that this shelter still has its doors closed, unlike most of the other shelters, possibly because its damaged and not in use.

The rest of the impacts did not hit much of anything, and many landed further down the runway. A friend is working on a theory as to why this is that I will talk about next time when its a little fleshed out.

So what does all this tell us? There’s still a lot we don’t know about the overall strike, but I think some data can be pulled from this. We cannot state much about the overall effectiveness of Israeli air defense. We know Israel launched a large number of interceptors, and we can see footage of those interceptors intercepting SOMETHING beyond the atmosphere, but we don’t know how effective they were as a whole system. But the fact remains that over 30 missiles impacted Nevatim, and I don’t think that’s because Israel did not intercept missiles they thought were going to miss. As the imagery of the F-35 shelters show, many of the misses here at Nevatim were only meters away from something worth hitting, and it seems unlikely that Israel can determine the impact points of maneuvering missiles while they are still traveling through the mid-course down to 5 meters.

We also don’t know much about the specific capabilities Iranian missiles have at maneuvering to defeat Israeli missile defense. Perhaps some of the Iranian missiles did manage to bamboozle Israel’s missile defense grid, but without hard data on that, there’s not much we can say.

We also don’t know why Nevatim was hit much harder than Glilot. It’s possible that Israel prioritized intercepting missiles heading for Glilot as Glilot is within an urban area. This if true lends credence to the idea that Israel was either genuinely overwhelmed by missiles, or they simply chose to conserve their interceptors for another day. Both may be true.

Regardless of which may be true or truer than the other, the core fact remains that Iran has proven it can hit Israel hard if it so chose. Airbases are hard targets, and the sort of target that likely won’t produce many casualties. Iran could choose a different target – say, a densely packed IDF ground forces base, or a target within a civilian area – and a missile strike there would produce a large number of causalities.

There’s also the long term conflict problem Israel has now. Interceptors are more expensive than ballistic missiles, and Iran is dramatically expanding their production facilities for ballistic missiles at all three sites they produce missiles at. The disparity between the rate at which Israel can produce interceptors and the rate at which Iran can produce ballistic missiles will likely swing in Iran’s favor, which suggests that Iran could, in a longer missile campaign or a protracted war, simply continually spit missiles at Israel until Israel does not have any interceptors left.

This has always been the enduring problem with missile defense – once you build up a defensive shield and identify the number of missiles you want to intercept, your adversary is going to simply build more missiles. I’ve been convinced that theater missile defense generates off-ramps in conflicts, but this argument only works in conflicts where the actors CAN back away, which is why I still think the argument doesn’t really work at the nuclear strategic level. It also depends on the personality in question at the head of a state wanting to take an off-ramp, and unfortunately, we’re talking about Israel here.

So despite the mockery of Iran’s missile accuracy, my personal takeaway is the opposite of what people seem to be concluding about this whole episode: Iran has proven that its missiles are effective and that they can indeed hurt Israel. No one should be fooled that Iranian missile accuracy (or lack thereof) means the Iranian missile force is some sort of paper tiger. A different target would produce different results. Whether or not Israel will feel deterred by this revelation is another story that depends on the Israeli domestic political climate and the personalities within the Israeli government. Given that Israel seems to have already publicly committed to striking Iran, this is likely not the last time we will see exchanges of missiles. My concern is that this will be, in the long term, an exchange that Israel won’t be able to afford to make if this becomes a protracted conflict⍐.

Iranian missiles hit Israeli military sites

Satellite © Planet Labs 2024

Iranian missiles hit Israeli military sites, visuals show

Some missiles broke through air defenses to strike or land near at least three Israeli military and intelligence installations.

By Meg Kelly, Imogen Piper and Evan Hill

October 4, 2024 at 6:00 a.m. EDT

At least two dozen long-range Iranian ballistic missiles broke through Israeli and allied air defenses on Tuesday night, striking or landing near at least three military and intelligence installations, according to a review of videos and photos of the attack and aftermath.

Videos verified by The Washington Post showed 20 missiles striking the Nevatim air base, in the southern Negev desert, and three striking the Tel Nof base, in central Israel. Analysts told The Post the visuals were consistent with direct impacts on the bases rather than debris from intercepted missiles. Other videos showed that at least two missiles landed near Tel Aviv in Cinema City Glilot, Hod Hasharon, close to Israel’s Mossad spy agency headquarters, leaving at least two craters.

People take shelter in central Israel on Tuesday. (Ronen Zvulun/Reuters)

The findings raise questions about the full scope of the damage to Israeli military bases and suggest that Iran was more successful in evading Israel’s defenses than in April, when only two munitions eluded air defenses and impacted Israel, according to Post reporting.

The Israeli military said air defense systems identified 180 missiles fired from Iran but did not respond to questions about the number of locations affected by the strikes. The United States and Israel have said that there was minimal damage on the ground, and the Israeli military said Wednesday that its bases were fully operational.

The Pentagon declined to comment on The Post’s findings. The Israeli military did not respond to a request for comment.

A man holds children as people take cover in central Israel on Tuesday. (Ronen Zvulun/Reuters)

Three videos synchronized by The Post show a cascade of missiles streaking toward Nevatim air base. A bright flash is seen midair where an Israeli interceptor appears to stop an incoming missile. Fireballs and plumes of smoke rise above the horizon in at least 20 locations where missiles struck the ground, according to a Post analysis of the 30-second videos, which begin after the missiles are in the sky.

“The further away the missile is launched, the greater the margin of error,” said Jeffrey Lewis, director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Program at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies in California. He added that when Iran previously launched missiles at Nevatim air base in April, half fell within three-quarters of a mile of the base and half fell outside that radius, according to his team’s calculations.

 

The Israeli military has two missile defense systems — Arrow II and Arrow III — that are designed to defend against long-range ballistic missiles like those used by Iran in Tuesday’s attack. Arrow II works after the missile has entered the final phase of its flight, inside the atmosphere, while Arrow III aims to intercept missiles still in space, said Fabian Hinz, an Iran analyst at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in Berlin who follows the missile program closely.

Medium-resolution satellite imagery collected by Planet Labs on Wednesday shows what appears to be at least one destroyed building at Nevatim. A high-resolution image of another part of the base shows a large hole in the roof of an aircraft hangar and several impact craters.

Lewis said his team counted 32 strikes on Nevatim alone.

Israeli rescue force members inspect the site where a missile fired from Iran hit a school
building in central Israel on Tuesday. (Amir Cohen/Reuters)

North of the Nevatim air base, a video filmed on the balcony of the Hilton hotel in Tel Aviv shows two missiles speeding through the sky from the east toward Cinema City Glilot, Hod Hasharon, close to Mossad headquarters. One hits the ground, emitting a large flash of light. The other falls into the sea.

A video filmed in the immediate aftermath and published to social media on Tuesday shows a sprawling crater in the middle of a highway, stopping traffic completely. The vehicles closest to the impact are coated in a thin layer of dirt. Some appear to have had their windows blown out.

The missile hit the median of the highway, creating a crater that appears to be roughly 20 feet wide and more than a dozen feet deep, an analysis of video shows. A Post journalist saw a second crater on the same highway.

It was not immediately clear what kind of missiles were used in the attack.

Iran’s state-run Mehr News Agency reported that Ghadr and Emad missiles were used, adding that 90 percent of the missiles hit their targets. The Ghadr and Emad are among the longest-range missiles in Iran’s arsenal. Iran also said it used a Fattah-1 missile for the first time, which it has said can maneuver at high speeds to avoid interceptors.

Another video, first geolocated by open-source researchers and independently confirmed by The Post, shows multiple towers of smoke floating above the horizon line from another barrage of missiles that struck the Tel Nof air base. Bright flashes following a missile impact appear to be a secondary explosion.

A crater is visible on the grounds of a school not far from the base in Gedera, video published to X and confirmed by The Post shows. The school’s wall has pulled away, exposing empty classrooms inside⍐.

Adam Taylor, Missy Ryan, Jarrett Ley and Nilo Tabrizy contributed to this report.

Iran warns Israel’s backers against involvement in Tehran-Tel Aviv escalation

 Iran warns Israel’s backers against involvement in Tehran-Tel Aviv escalation

Press TV Friday, 04 October 2024

Iran's ambassador and permanent representative to the United Nations has warned the Israeli regime’s Western and regional supporters against any involvement in the escalation between the Islamic Republic and the illegal entity.

Amir Saeid Iravani made the statement in response to a question by the American media regarding the scope of Iran’s retaliation against the Israeli regime’s possible attack on the country after Tehran showered the occupied territories with a massive salvo of missiles in reprisal for the assassination of the resistance front’s top leaders and commanders.

“Our response will solely be to the aggressor. If a country helps the aggressor, that country will be considered as a complicit in the crime and a legitimate target,” Iravani said.

“Our advice is that they do not enter into the conflict between the Israeli regime and Iran and stay away from the battle.”

Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) launched on Tuesday night hundreds of missiles at targets in the Tel Aviv area as part of a daring military campaign, dubbed Operation True Promise 2.

The IRGC said it targeted “the heart of the occupied territories” in response to the Israeli assassinations of Hamas political bureau chief Ismail Haniyeh, Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah and IRGC general Abbas Nilforoushan.

The IRGC said the operation was in line with the country’s right to legitimate self-defense as per the United Nations Charter, and in response to the regime's escalating crimes — backed by the United States — against the people of Lebanon and Gaza.

A number of air and radar bases, as well as centers for conspiracy and assassination planning against resistance leaders and IRGC commanders were targeted in the operation, according to the force. 

U.S., Jordan, U.K. and France Help Israel Repel Iranian Missile Attack

The United States, Jordan, Britain and France helped repel the Iranian ballistic missile attack on Israel, Israeli officials said on Wednesday.

One Israeli official said the U.S. had provided the most important assistance, with its forces dispersed across the Middle East intercepting many of the missiles.

The American effort was managed by the U.S. Army's Central Command and included the use of both aircraft and naval vessels. CENTCOM had received reinforcements over the previous several days amid the escalation in fighting between Israel and Hezbollah and growing expectations of an Iranian attack in response to the assassination of the group's secretary-general, Hassan Nasrallah.

"The Americans worked in very close coordination with us," an Israeli official told Haaretz. "They tried to deter the Iranians and prevent an attack, but from the moment it became clear that the message hadn't convinced the Iranians, we got help in defense as well."

_________________________________________________________________________

Israeli officials say the U.S. Navy and Air Force provided the most important assistance, with one official saying other Middle Eastern countries also helped, but 'not everyone wants to talk about it'

HAARETZ Oct 2, 2024 

__________________________________________________________________________ 

France and Britain officially announced on Wednesday that they said their forces had helped in repelling Iranian missiles. "I want to thank all British personnel involved in the operation for their courage and professionalism," British Defense Minister John Healey said in a social post. He added that "the U.K. stands fully behind Israel's right to defend its country and its people against threats."

A statement from the French government said its forces in the Middle East had assisted in Israel's defense.

Jordan didn't issue an official statement, but Jordanian officials told CNN that the kingdom had helped intercept many of the Iranian ballistic missiles. Israeli officials confirmed Amman's assistance but provided no further details. 

"There were other Middle Eastern countries that helped, but it's a sensitive topic and not everyone wants to talk about it in this attack," said a senior Israeli official. In Iran's April attack using ballistic missiles and drones, Israel was assisted by several countries, including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

Initial estimates are that on Tuesday evening, Tehran fired approximately 180 ballistic missiles at Israel, most of which were either intercepted or landed in open areas. It was half the number of projectiles fired in April, but this time the proportion of ballistic missiles was higher, inflicting greater damage⍐.

U.S. Navy Destroyers “Successfully Engaged” Iranian Ballistic Missiles On Their Way To Israel

“Multiple” Iranian missiles heading toward Israel on Tuesday were “successfully engaged” by two U.S. Navy destroyers, a Navy spokesman said in a statement Wednesday morning. 

U.S. Sixth Fleet Arleigh Burke class guided missile destroyers USS Cole (DDG 67) and USS Bulkeley (DDG 84) “engaged multiple Iranian ballistic missiles in defense of Israel from the Eastern Mediterranean Sea October 1, 2024,” Navy Capt. Bill Urban, lead spokesman for U.S. Naval Forces Europe/Africa said in a statement Wednesday morning. “Multiple missiles are believed to have been successfully engaged at this time.” 

US Navy Screen Cap

Both destroyers have “the Aegis weapons system designed for ballistic missile defense and were stationed in the Eastern Mediterranean by the United States in advance of the Iranian launch as a part of U.S. Naval Forces Europe/Africa,” Urban added. 

The Navy released two videos showing interceptors being launched from the Bulkeley. The statement did not say what kind of interceptors or how many missiles were engaged.

As we reported yesterday, about a dozen interceptors were launched against the Iranian missiles according to Air Force Gen. Pat Ryder, the Pentagon’s top spokesman. He declined to confirm if they were Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) anti-ballistic missile interceptors. We reached out to the Navy for more details about the kind of interceptors launched and how many Iranian missiles were destroyed as a result.

While it is possible the destroyers fired multi-purpose SM-6 missiles to engage the targets, that seems unlikely given where the Iranian missiles landed. SM-3s are used for midcourse engagements, while the targeted missile is flying outside the earth’s atmosphere. SM-6s are used for more localized defense as the weapon is careening down toward the atmosphere during its terminal phase of flight.

SM-3s were used in combat for the first time back in April during the first Iranian barrage against Israel. As we previously reported, they performed well enough that Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro said his service wants more even though the Pentagon’s Missle Defense Agency (MDA) wants to end procurement of SM-3 Block IB variants by the end of this year and limit its buy of the follow-on Block IIAs to 12 per year through Fiscal Year 2029.

On Wednesday, the Chief of Staff of the Israeli Armed Forces said that about 200 Iranian missiles were launched against Israel but caused “relatively minor” damage.

“Iran attacked civilian areas and endangered the lives of many citizens,” said Lt. Gen. Herzi Halevi. “Thanks to proper civilian behavior and high-quality defenses, the damage was relatively minor. We will respond, we know how to locate important targets, we know how to strike with precision and power.”

Still, there were a number of targets hit, including the Tel Nof Air Base south of Tel Aviv, home to Israeli fighter aircraft, including  F-15C/Ds, known locally as Baz. You can see video of that strike below.

Despite the strikes, operations at the base are ongoing, Halevi said.

“I visited Tel Nof Airbase before the holiday began,” he explained. “The base is fully operational, it has not ceased to operate for a moment, and continues to carry out strikes wherever required. We have the capabilities to reach and strike any point in the Middle East. And those of our enemies who have not yet understood this, will soon understand.”

U.S. officials have been working behind the scenes to get Israel to temper its response to the latest Iranian barrage. Given comments from top leaders there like Halevi however, it seems that Israel is considering a large-scale retaliation. We should know more in the coming hours as Israel celebrates Rosh Hashona, the start of the high holy days⍐.

---------------------------------------------

A VIDEO

OSINTtechnical

@Osinttechnical

Absolutely incredible footage of the ballistic missile engagement over Jordan and Israel, as filmed by Zaid Al-Abbadi from Amman during last night’s Iranian ballistic missile attack.

ENB Can't verify it's authentication.

________________________________________