SHARE
Wednesday, February 04, 2015
Tuesday, February 03, 2015
U.S.-India nuclear 'breakthrough' could be finalised within year
U.S.-India nuclear 'breakthrough' could be finalised within year
BY DOUGLAS BUSVINE AND DAVID BRUNNSTROM
NEW DELHI/WASHINGTON Tue Feb 3, 2015 3:27am EST
(Reuters) - A "breakthrough understanding" to open India's nuclear power sector to U.S. firms reached during President Barack Obama's visit to New Delhi last month could be finalised this year, Indian officials say.
The Jan. 25 announcement by Obama and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi followed six weeks of intensive talks, but few details were released beyond a framework based on India's acceptance of the principle that plant operators should bear primary liability in the event of a nuclear disaster.
Significant work remains on the fine print of a deal aimed at unlocking projects worth tens of billions of dollars that have been stuck the drawing board for years. India wants to nearly treble its installed nuclear capacity, which would make it the world's second biggest market after China.
U.S. officials say details of an insurance scheme to protect suppliers from crippling lawsuits need to be thrashed out and India still has to ratify a U.N. nuclear convention. Indian officials do not rule out completing the process this year.
"We are committed to moving ahead on all implementation issues at an early date," said Syed Akbaruddin, chief spokesman at India's Ministry of External Affairs. "There are no policy hurdles left."
General Electric and Westinghouse, a unit of Japan's Toshiba, were fully briefed on the meetings of a nuclear "contact group" that hammered out the nuclear compromise in London, say sources with direct knowledge of the talks.
Bringing them into the mix was crucial because the prospect of huge lawsuits, like those against Union Carbide [DOWUNB.UL] over the 1984 Bhopal gas disaster, has until now kept U.S. and other foreign firms on the sidelines.
India and the United States signed a landmark agreement to cooperate on nuclear power back in 2008. Yet an expected bonanza never materialized because India later passed a law that would expose reactor makers to liability if there was an accident.
The liability issue has became a metaphor for the unrealized potential of the bilateral business relationship and a question mark against Modi's "Make in India" mantra.
"NOT INCOMPATIBLE"
As the days counted down to Obama's visit, Indian officials persuaded their U.S. counterparts that their law was "not incompatible" with international standards that place the burden of liability on the operator, said one senior U.S. official.
New Delhi also proposed setting up an insurance pool with a liability cap of 15 billion rupees ($244 million). The state-run Nuclear Power Corporation of India would pay premiums to cover its liability. Suppliers would take out separate insurance against their secondary liability - which could not exceed that of the operator - at a "fraction" of the cost.
India must still ratify the International Atomic Energy Agency's Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (CSC), which requires signatories to channel liability to the operator and offers access to relief funds.
"We would be looking at how quickly we can ratify the CSC - this is part of our assurance to the suppliers, along with the insurance pool," said an Indian member of the contact group, set up by Obama and Modi at a Washington summit last year.
The U.S. official said Washington expects the Indians to ratify with the IAEA in the near future, along with documentation "stating what their law intends" on the issue of liability, which should offer further reassurance to U.S. firms.
A QUESTION OF DETAIL
The U.S. industry would have preferred the issue to be settled by amending the liability law, something considered politically impossible for Modi to achieve at the moment.
"We want to see all the detail before we say: 'Yes, it works for us'," Westinghouse President and CEO Daniel Roderick, who joined Obama's delegation, told Reuters.
That note of caution, however, masks the extent to which negotiators engaged with the industry to address fears that it could end up on the hook in a disaster on the scale of the 2011 reactor blasts at Tepco's plant in Fukushima, Japan.
"For the first time, we had a comprehensive inventory of concerns," said the Indian negotiator.
Westinghouse has been granted land in Modi's home state of Gujarat to build six reactors, while GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy is eyeing a similar project in Andhra Pradesh. The liability roadblock has prevented commercial talks from starting on the projects, with a combined capacity of 10,000 megawatts.
India has 21 nuclear reactors with an installed capacity of 21,300 MW. It plans to launch construction of 40,000 MW of capacity in the next decade.
(Additional reporting by Sanjeev Miglani and Tommy Wilkes in New Delhi, Lewis Krauskopf in New York, Krista Hughes in Washington and Fredrik Dahl in Vienna; Editing by John Chalmers and Alex Richardson)
BY DOUGLAS BUSVINE AND DAVID BRUNNSTROM
NEW DELHI/WASHINGTON Tue Feb 3, 2015 3:27am EST
U.S. President Barack Obama and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi (R) shake hands after giving opening statements during a at Hyderabad House in New Delhi January 25, 2015. REUTERS/Jim Bourg |
(Reuters) - A "breakthrough understanding" to open India's nuclear power sector to U.S. firms reached during President Barack Obama's visit to New Delhi last month could be finalised this year, Indian officials say.
The Jan. 25 announcement by Obama and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi followed six weeks of intensive talks, but few details were released beyond a framework based on India's acceptance of the principle that plant operators should bear primary liability in the event of a nuclear disaster.
Significant work remains on the fine print of a deal aimed at unlocking projects worth tens of billions of dollars that have been stuck the drawing board for years. India wants to nearly treble its installed nuclear capacity, which would make it the world's second biggest market after China.
U.S. officials say details of an insurance scheme to protect suppliers from crippling lawsuits need to be thrashed out and India still has to ratify a U.N. nuclear convention. Indian officials do not rule out completing the process this year.
"We are committed to moving ahead on all implementation issues at an early date," said Syed Akbaruddin, chief spokesman at India's Ministry of External Affairs. "There are no policy hurdles left."
General Electric and Westinghouse, a unit of Japan's Toshiba, were fully briefed on the meetings of a nuclear "contact group" that hammered out the nuclear compromise in London, say sources with direct knowledge of the talks.
Bringing them into the mix was crucial because the prospect of huge lawsuits, like those against Union Carbide [DOWUNB.UL] over the 1984 Bhopal gas disaster, has until now kept U.S. and other foreign firms on the sidelines.
India and the United States signed a landmark agreement to cooperate on nuclear power back in 2008. Yet an expected bonanza never materialized because India later passed a law that would expose reactor makers to liability if there was an accident.
The liability issue has became a metaphor for the unrealized potential of the bilateral business relationship and a question mark against Modi's "Make in India" mantra.
"NOT INCOMPATIBLE"
As the days counted down to Obama's visit, Indian officials persuaded their U.S. counterparts that their law was "not incompatible" with international standards that place the burden of liability on the operator, said one senior U.S. official.
New Delhi also proposed setting up an insurance pool with a liability cap of 15 billion rupees ($244 million). The state-run Nuclear Power Corporation of India would pay premiums to cover its liability. Suppliers would take out separate insurance against their secondary liability - which could not exceed that of the operator - at a "fraction" of the cost.
India must still ratify the International Atomic Energy Agency's Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (CSC), which requires signatories to channel liability to the operator and offers access to relief funds.
"We would be looking at how quickly we can ratify the CSC - this is part of our assurance to the suppliers, along with the insurance pool," said an Indian member of the contact group, set up by Obama and Modi at a Washington summit last year.
The U.S. official said Washington expects the Indians to ratify with the IAEA in the near future, along with documentation "stating what their law intends" on the issue of liability, which should offer further reassurance to U.S. firms.
A QUESTION OF DETAIL
The U.S. industry would have preferred the issue to be settled by amending the liability law, something considered politically impossible for Modi to achieve at the moment.
"We want to see all the detail before we say: 'Yes, it works for us'," Westinghouse President and CEO Daniel Roderick, who joined Obama's delegation, told Reuters.
That note of caution, however, masks the extent to which negotiators engaged with the industry to address fears that it could end up on the hook in a disaster on the scale of the 2011 reactor blasts at Tepco's plant in Fukushima, Japan.
"For the first time, we had a comprehensive inventory of concerns," said the Indian negotiator.
Westinghouse has been granted land in Modi's home state of Gujarat to build six reactors, while GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy is eyeing a similar project in Andhra Pradesh. The liability roadblock has prevented commercial talks from starting on the projects, with a combined capacity of 10,000 megawatts.
India has 21 nuclear reactors with an installed capacity of 21,300 MW. It plans to launch construction of 40,000 MW of capacity in the next decade.
(Additional reporting by Sanjeev Miglani and Tommy Wilkes in New Delhi, Lewis Krauskopf in New York, Krista Hughes in Washington and Fredrik Dahl in Vienna; Editing by John Chalmers and Alex Richardson)
கொபானி: அமெரிக்க வான் தாக்குதலில் நரகமாக்கப்பட்ட நகரம்!
Kobani is Falling to ISIS in Syria. October 2014 |
Kobani – free but in ruins!
January 2015
January 2015
Emma Graham-Harrison Report on Kobani
Photographer David Gill and Bulent Kilic/AFP captures details from Kobani after Isis left from the Syrian city
Kurdish forces triumphed over Isis in Kobani but the Syrian town is devastated. Emma Graham-Harrison was one of the first reporters on the scene
‘It was beautiful. Now it’s like a destroyed city’Kobani residents return after Isis retreat: Emma Graham-HarrisonSaturday 31 January 2015 20.09 GMT
The concrete eagle in what used to be Freedom Square still surveys Kobani imperiously. But around it almost nothing stands. Buildings have vanished during months of heavy shelling, replaced by snarls of steel and rubble, and the yawning craters left by US air strikes.
A child’s toy lies amid the ruins |
One side street is blocked by the bodies of Isis fighters, rotting where they fell – a pile of bones marked only by a foul smell. On the muddy track that marks where another road led, a series of tattered sniper screens veils the destruction of the schools and homes where sharpshooters had sheltered.
A tray of biscuits lies dirty and unsold |
The Kurdish forces’ unexpected victory in this north Syrian town marked a huge strategic and propaganda loss for Isis, which once seemed unstoppable in their rampage across the region.
Kurdish fighters have taken full control of the city and pushed Isis forces into the countryside, where the battle continues |
“There are no words coming back to a destroyed city that was your home,” said Shamsa Shahinzada, an architect who fled Kobani days before Isis arrived and who was our guide to the shattered remains – still off-limits to most of its former inhabitants.
Everywhere the shutters are down |
An unexploded bomb by an abandoned car |
An unexploded mortar shell |
Even on the streets that still look like streets, there is an eerie silence – broken only by the crackle of distant gunfire, the pop of a nearby shot from training grounds and the echoing blast of air strikes and attacks by Isis tanks – a constant reminder that while the militants have been kicked out of the city the frontline is still just a few kilometres away.
A Kurdish fighter on the phone near the Turkish border (Forget the AMBULANCE!- ENB) |
“As you can hear our villages are still fighting, and we will only have finished our work after we free all our countryside,” he told the Observer.
“We, here in Kobani, are on the frontline, fighting against terrorists on behalf of all the people of the world … you can see here the cost of asking for freedom.”
Burnt-out cars lie on an unusable road |
Many no longer have homes to return to, and the town is far too dangerous and unsanitary to house them all. “We know people are waiting for us but we can’t bring them back here because there will be disease – because of the bodies – and because there is no kind of service,” Anwar Muslim said.
Musa, a 25-year-old Kurdish marksman, looks at the bodies of alleged IS militants in the village of Halimce, east of Kobani(Bulent Kilic/AFP) |
Certainly Kurdish officials are not taking their victory for granted, at a time when there is still a steady flow of casualties into the field hospital from the nearby frontline.
Destroyed town of Kobani(Bulent Kilic/AFP) |
“We are so happy, as if we were flying through the sky. As if God had created us again,” said 35-year-old Mahir Hamid. “But we can’t celebrate because we had so many martyrs.”
Destroyed town of Kobani(Bulent Kilic/AFP) |
The victory was as epic as it was unexpected – to everyone except perhaps the Kurdish fighters themselves. Kobani had been all but written off by the outside world last autumn. The US came to its aid with air strikes in late September but officials in Washington warned the bombs were not enough to save it, and Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan also forecast collapse.
Kurdish vows to hold on to their base were dismissed as poignantly, but tragically, naive. Isis was well-armed, and its fighters eager to die in battle. They poured resources and men into taking the town, and even took hostage John Cantlie there to make a propaganda video claiming that Isis was just “mopping up” the last Kurdish fighters.
Instead they were being slowly driven back by outnumbered, outgunned but disciplined forces whom the city’s leader compared to heroes of ancient Greece in their ingenuity and bravery.
Destroyed town of Kobani(Bulent Kilic/AFP) |
“We bow down before these fighters, who were like the legions of ancient Sparta, holding off terrorism, fighting Daesh against the odds,” said the city president Anwar Muslim, using another name for Isis.
He has set up a committee of architects, doctors, lawyers, engineers and other experts to look at the massive task of clearing and then rebuilding Kobani, which will take years, perhaps decades. For now, they cannot even get heavy moving equipment across the Turkish border and fear a simple clearance of the ruins would be too risky.
Destroyed town of Kobani(Bulent Kilic/AFP) |
“There is no food, no medicine, no children’s milk. If our people come back now, there will be a humanitarian crisis on this victory ground.”
Rebuilding will inevitably be slow because even if the military campaign is entirely successful, it will stop at Kobani’s borders, so Isis will still surround its people on three sides.
The Turkish border is the only route with safe passage, so the government is lobbying for a humanitarian corridor, and the creation of new refugee camps inside Syria, where they can help with rebuilding.
They are hoping for help from the allies who sent military aid, and benefited indirectly from the blow dealt to Isis. The priority is funds for reconstruction, experts in bomb clearance to help dismantle the ruins, and pressure on Turkey to open up a humanitarian corridor into Syria.
The damage is so bad that some have questioned whether Kobani should be rebuilt on a new site, but Nassan said that would be emotionally devastating.
“Unfortunately the city is destroyed, but people have memories here and this is our land. We don’t want to move everything from here,” he told the Observer near the ruins of an institute where he once taught English, before Syria’s convulsions propelled him into another life.
Abandoned vehicles form part of a barricade |
The city is still full of evidence of lives dramatically interrupted by the speed of Isis’s ferocious advance; tiny children’s clothes hanging to dry on a washing line months after their owners fled to Turkey, shelves stacked with food in areas where Kurdish discipline stopped looting.
The front wall of a nearby house was ripped off by an explosion, but a display cabinet in one of the rooms sat pristine – with television and a wedding photo in pride of place and untouched stacks of china tea cups and plates, as if the owner had just popped out. Some civilians are starting to filter back despite the risks. Most are fed up with terrible conditions across the border.
“I was in Turkey four months but, for me, it felt like four years. I am taking my family and coming back,” said Fatima, queueing in the dusk to pass through the Kurdish border gates with her five children. “If we have to die here that’s OK.”
Destroyed town of Kobani(Bulent Kilic/AFP) |
There are perhaps 400 families in the western part of town, estimates Azad, a cook for the Kurdish YPG – People’s Protection U – fighters. His home survived undamaged apart from a hole torn in one wall to allow food deliveries without risking Isis snipers in the street.
He brought his family back a month ago, including 10-month-old son Fouad. With a well, a generator and rations distributed by the military, he says they are living well, even though Kobani is a virtual ghost town without shops, neighbours or any communal life.
Two ducks, rescued from an abandoned village, quack happily in their small yard and the soundtrack of battle no longer bothers even the baby.
“He is used to it now,” he says. “My wife was frightened at first but now it’s normal for her, too. We are upset about the destruction but happy we got Isis out. At least we have that.”
The only person leaving Kobani permanently was a Turkish member of Isis, returning to his family in a coffin after dying on the front line.
“We are telling the world those people came to kill our children, take our women. But if they ask for their bodies, we will give them,” said Kobani defence minister Ismet Sheikh Hasan as the coffin was carried through the steel border gate into Turkey.
It passed beside a crowd of fresh-faced recruits for the Kurdish forces, shuffling with nervous excitement. They clapped and sang until the door swung open, then raced into their battered home town with shouts of joy.
They had come from refugee camps to carry on the fight against Isis, and must have known that many of them would fall in battle, but just then, elated with victory, no one seemed to care.
(Kurdish people) flash the V for victory sign during a celebration rally near the Syrian border at Suruc, in Sanliurfa province, Turkey(Bulent Kilic/AFP) |
Sunday, February 01, 2015
Saturday, January 31, 2015
போர்க்குற்றம் தொடர்பில் உள்ளக விசாரணைகள் இடம்பெறும்: ஜயந்த தனபால
போர்க்குற்றம் தொடர்பில் உள்ளக விசாரணைகள் இடம்பெறும்: ஜயந்த தனபால
ஐக்கிய நாடுகள் மனித உரிமை ஆணையாளர் நாயகம் செயித் ரா´அத் அல் ஹுஸைனை ஜனாதிபதியின் வெளிநாட்டு விவகாரங்களுக்கான சிரேஸ்ட ஆலோசகர் ஜயந்த தனபால சந்தித்து கலந்துரையாடியுள்ளார்.
மேலும் புதிய அரசாங்கத்தின் 100 நாள் வேலைத் திட்டத்திற்கு அமைய ஐ.நா மற்றும் மனித உரிமை பேரவையுடன் இணைந்து செயற்படத்தயார் என அவர் ஐ.நா மனித உரிமையாளர் நாயகத்திடம் எடுத்துரைத்துள்ளதாகவும் தெரிவிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது.
இதேவேளை பேச்சுவார்த்தைகளை முன்னெடுக்கவும் இணைந்து செயற்படவும் இரு தரப்பினரும் இணக்கம் தெரிவித்துள்ளதாக ஜெனீவாவில் உள்ள இலங்கையின் நிரந்தர வதிவிடப் பிரதிநிதி அலுவலகம் விடுத்துள்ள அறிக்கையில் தெரிவிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது.
மாற்று அரசாங்கம் சர்வதேச விசாரணைகளுக்கு ஒத்துழைக்கும்
புதிய அரசு சர்வதேச விசாரணைகளுக்கு ஒத்துழைக்கும் என பான் கீ மூனின் பேச்சாளர் ஸ்டீபன் டுடாஜரிக் நம்பிக்கை வெளியிட்டுள்ளார்.
உள்ளூர் விசாரணைக்கு அப்பால் போர்க்குற்றங்கள் தொடர்பில் இலங்கையின் புதிய அரசு இந்நடவடிக்கையில் ஈடுபடும். புதிய அரசு ,ஐக்கிய நாடுகளுடன் எவ்வாறு ஒத்துழைக்கும் என்பதை தாம் அறிந்து கொள்ள முயற்சிப்பதாகவும்.
இலங்கையின் போர்க்குற்றம் தொடர்பில் உள்ளக விசாரணைகள் இடம்பெறும் என்றும் தேவையேற்படின் வெளிநாட்டு நிபுணர்களின் உதவிகள் பெற்றுக் கொள்ளப்படும் என்று இலங்கையின் புதிய அரசாங்கம் அறிவித்துள்ளதன் பின்னணியில், இது தொடர்பிலேயே டுடாஜிரிக் இந்தக் கருத்தை வெளியிட்டுள்ளார்.
========================== ``ஊடகச் செய்திகளில் இருந்து...
ஐக்கிய நாடுகள் மனித உரிமை ஆணையாளர் நாயகம் செயித் ரா´அத் அல் ஹுஸைனை ஜனாதிபதியின் வெளிநாட்டு விவகாரங்களுக்கான சிரேஸ்ட ஆலோசகர் ஜயந்த தனபால சந்தித்து கலந்துரையாடியுள்ளார்.
மூன்றுநாள் பயணமாக ஜெனீவாவிற்கு விஜயம் செய்திருந்த ஜயந்த தனபால மனித உரிமை பேரவைக் குழு உறுப்பினர்களை சந்தித்து புதிய ஜனாதிபதி மற்றும் அவரது அரசாங்கத்தின் கொள்கைகள் குறித்து விளக்கமளித்துள்ளதாக தெரிவிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது.
மேலும் புதிய அரசாங்கத்தின் 100 நாள் வேலைத் திட்டத்திற்கு அமைய ஐ.நா மற்றும் மனித உரிமை பேரவையுடன் இணைந்து செயற்படத்தயார் என அவர் ஐ.நா மனித உரிமையாளர் நாயகத்திடம் எடுத்துரைத்துள்ளதாகவும் தெரிவிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது.
இதேவேளை பேச்சுவார்த்தைகளை முன்னெடுக்கவும் இணைந்து செயற்படவும் இரு தரப்பினரும் இணக்கம் தெரிவித்துள்ளதாக ஜெனீவாவில் உள்ள இலங்கையின் நிரந்தர வதிவிடப் பிரதிநிதி அலுவலகம் விடுத்துள்ள அறிக்கையில் தெரிவிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது.
மாற்று அரசாங்கம் சர்வதேச விசாரணைகளுக்கு ஒத்துழைக்கும்
புதிய அரசு சர்வதேச விசாரணைகளுக்கு ஒத்துழைக்கும் என பான் கீ மூனின் பேச்சாளர் ஸ்டீபன் டுடாஜரிக் நம்பிக்கை வெளியிட்டுள்ளார்.
உள்ளூர் விசாரணைக்கு அப்பால் போர்க்குற்றங்கள் தொடர்பில் இலங்கையின் புதிய அரசு இந்நடவடிக்கையில் ஈடுபடும். புதிய அரசு ,ஐக்கிய நாடுகளுடன் எவ்வாறு ஒத்துழைக்கும் என்பதை தாம் அறிந்து கொள்ள முயற்சிப்பதாகவும்.
இலங்கையின் போர்க்குற்றம் தொடர்பில் உள்ளக விசாரணைகள் இடம்பெறும் என்றும் தேவையேற்படின் வெளிநாட்டு நிபுணர்களின் உதவிகள் பெற்றுக் கொள்ளப்படும் என்று இலங்கையின் புதிய அரசாங்கம் அறிவித்துள்ளதன் பின்னணியில், இது தொடர்பிலேயே டுடாஜிரிக் இந்தக் கருத்தை வெளியிட்டுள்ளார்.
========================== ``ஊடகச் செய்திகளில் இருந்து...
பிற்குறிப்பு: செய்தியகம்போர்க்குற்றம் தொடர்பான குறிப்பான பிரச்சனையில் மைத்திரி ஆட்சி போர்க்குற்றவாளிகளின் கூட்டரசாங்கமாகும்.பக்ச பாசிச ஆட்சியைக் காட்டிலும், மைத்திரி ஆட்சி இதில் பல படி மேலானதாகும்.பக்ச பாசிசம் தன்னை `குடும்பத்துக்குள்` சுருக்கிக் கொண்டது, மைத்திரி பாசிசம் அனைத்துக் கட்சிகளையும், இந்திய அமெரிக்க ஆட்சிக்கவிழ்ப்பு ஆதரவில்,விலைக்கு வாங்கி பாசிச ஆதிக்கத்தின் பரப்பை விரிவாக்கிக் கொண்டுள்ளது.
ஐ.நா நீதிக்குப் போராடும் தமிழனுக்கு இரும்பு மூக்கு இருக்க வேண்டும்!==================================================================
Tuesday, January 27, 2015
Sunday, January 25, 2015
Tuesday, January 20, 2015
Open to new approach in Geneva: Sri Lanka
Open to new approach in Geneva: Sri Lanka
SUHASINI HAIDAR
The new Sri Lankan government will take a different position from the Rajapaksa regime when it comes to dealing with the international community on allegations of human rights violations, visiting Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera has told the Indian government.
“Our government will take a new approach to the U.N. Human Rights Council process in Geneva. We will offer a domestic mechanism for this, which could be supported by international agencies,” he said.
Mr. Sirisena is expected to visit India in February, his first international visit after taking over. Mr. Modi will visit Colombo in March, which would be the first state visit by an Indian Prime Minister to Sri Lanka since 1987. External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj will travel to Sri Lanka ahead of that and also chair the India-Sri Lanka Joint Commission meeting at the time.
In the new Sri Lankan government’s most detailed explanation so far of its reconciliation policy for the Tamil-majority provinces, Mr. Samaraweera told Indian journalists that the government had already moved on two demands of the TNA government. To begin with, Mr. Sirisena replaced the military governor of the Northern Province with former U.N. official and diplomat H.M.G.S. Palihakkara, a promise the former President, Mahinda Rajapaksa, had made but never delivered.
The government was also identifying people whose land had been in military use. It would reverse their relocation, he said. While ruling out an international inquiry of the kind pushed for by the U.S., and cleared by the UNHRC in 2014, Mr. Samaraweera hoped that some middle ground would be worked out during this year’s meeting in Geneva in March. Much of the acrimony towards Sri Lanka at the UNHRC was “brought upon Sri Lanka by the previous government’s position,” he said. He also said the government was committed to implementing the contentious “13th amendment” of the Constitution on devolution of powers to Tamil-majority areas, but would start discussions with all parties after the next parliamentary elections.
While downplaying concerns about the resurgence of the LTTE among the Tamil diaspora, Mr. Samaraweera said the new government would welcome back all Sri Lankans who had fled the country over the past few years.
SUHASINI HAIDAR
Prime Minister Narendra Modi with Foreign Minister of Sri Lanka Mangala Samaraweerain New Delhi on Monday.— PHOTO: PTI |
The new Sri Lankan government will take a different position from the Rajapaksa regime when it comes to dealing with the international community on allegations of human rights violations, visiting Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera has told the Indian government.
“Our government will take a new approach to the U.N. Human Rights Council process in Geneva. We will offer a domestic mechanism for this, which could be supported by international agencies,” he said.
Asked if President Maithripala Sirisena, who was the acting Defence Minister for a short period during the end of the LTTE war when most of the atrocities are believed to have occurred, would himself explain the Army’s actions, Mr. Samaraweera said: “My President will cooperate fully with a domestic investigation into the issue.” Speaking to a group of media organisations after his meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Monday, Mr. Samaraweera said his meetings in Delhi had been “warm and fruitful,” even as the leaders announced a host of upcoming bilateral meetings.
Mr. Sirisena is expected to visit India in February, his first international visit after taking over. Mr. Modi will visit Colombo in March, which would be the first state visit by an Indian Prime Minister to Sri Lanka since 1987. External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj will travel to Sri Lanka ahead of that and also chair the India-Sri Lanka Joint Commission meeting at the time.
In the new Sri Lankan government’s most detailed explanation so far of its reconciliation policy for the Tamil-majority provinces, Mr. Samaraweera told Indian journalists that the government had already moved on two demands of the TNA government. To begin with, Mr. Sirisena replaced the military governor of the Northern Province with former U.N. official and diplomat H.M.G.S. Palihakkara, a promise the former President, Mahinda Rajapaksa, had made but never delivered.
The government was also identifying people whose land had been in military use. It would reverse their relocation, he said. While ruling out an international inquiry of the kind pushed for by the U.S., and cleared by the UNHRC in 2014, Mr. Samaraweera hoped that some middle ground would be worked out during this year’s meeting in Geneva in March. Much of the acrimony towards Sri Lanka at the UNHRC was “brought upon Sri Lanka by the previous government’s position,” he said. He also said the government was committed to implementing the contentious “13th amendment” of the Constitution on devolution of powers to Tamil-majority areas, but would start discussions with all parties after the next parliamentary elections.
While downplaying concerns about the resurgence of the LTTE among the Tamil diaspora, Mr. Samaraweera said the new government would welcome back all Sri Lankans who had fled the country over the past few years.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
A surprise assault on Syria, but can it last?
A surprise assault on Syria, but can it last? The wave of enemy destabilization ploys jumped from Lebanon to Syria this week, with a swarm o...
-
தமிழகம் வாழ் ஈழத்தமிழர்களை கழகக் கண்டனப் பொதுக்கூட்டத்தில் கலந்து கொள்ளக் கோருகின்றோம்!
-
சமரன்: தோழர்கள் மீது எடப்பாடி கொலை வெறித்தாக்குதல், கழகம்...