SHARE

Wednesday, September 16, 2015

கழகக் கண்டனம்: ஈழத் தமிழருக்கு எதிரான அமெரிக்காவின் துரோகம்

ஈழத் தமிழருக்கு எதிரான அமெரிக்காவின் துரோகம்

ஈழத் தமிழின அழிப்புப் போரின் இறுதி யுத்தத்தில் இராஜபட்சே கும்பலுக்கு அமெரிக்காவும், இந்தியாவும் துணைபோயின. ஆனால் போர் முடிந்த பிறகு இன அழிப்புப் போர்க் குற்றவாளி இராஜபட்சேவை தனது மேலாதிக்கத்தின் கீழ் கொண்டுவர ஐ.நா. மனித உரிமை ஆணையத்தில் போர் குற்றத்திற்கான சர்வதேச விசாரணையை அமெரிக்கா கோரியது.

ஆரம்பத்தில் இக்கோரிக்கையை ஏற்க மறுத்த இந்தியா பின்னர் அமெரிக்காவுடன் சேர்ந்து கொண்டு சர்வதேச விசாரணை கோரியது.

தற்போது இராஜபட்சே ஆட்சி வீழ்ந்த பிறகு, இலங்கையில் அமெரிக்கா மற்றும் இந்தியாவிற்கு ஆதரவாக சிங்கள இன வெறிக் கட்சிகளின் கூட்டணி ஆட்சி அமைந்த பிறகு, அமெரிக்க ஏகாதிபத்தியம், இராஜபட்சே மீதான போர்க்குற்றத்திற்கு சர்வதேச விசாரணை தேவையில்லை என்றும் இலங்கை அரசே அந்த விசாரணையை நடத்திக் கொள்ளலாம் எனவும் போர்க்குற்றவாளி இராஜபட்சே கும்பலுக்கு ஆதரவாகச் செயல்படுகிறது.

மேலும் இலங்கையில் ரணில் விக்கிரமசிங்கே தலைமையிலான கூட்டணி ஆட்சி அமைந்ததாலோ, தமிழர் கூட்டணித் தலைவர் (தமிழ்த் தேசிய கூட்டமைப்பு- TNA தலைவர்-ப-ர்) சம்பந்தன் எதிர்க்கட்சித் தலைவராகப் பதவி ஏற்றதாலோ சிங்கள இனவெறி அரசின் இன அழிப்பு நடவடிக்கைகள் தடுக்கப்படவில்லை. இன அழிப்பு நடவடிக்கைகள் தொடர்கின்றன. எனவே, அமெரிக்க இந்திய அரசுகளின் துரோகத்தை எதிர்த்து போர்க்குற்றவாளி இராஜபட்சே மீது சர்வதேச விசாரணை கோரியும், கருத்துக் கணிப்பு வாக்கெடுப்பின் மூலம் ஈழத் தமிழின அழிப்புக்கு நிரந்தரத் தீர்வுகாண வேண்டியும் தமிழ் மக்கள் குரல் எழுப்ப வேண்டும்.

                                           ( கழக தியாகிகள் தின பிரசுரத்தில் இருந்து)

By R. Hariharan Ranil​’s Agenda In New Delhi

ஐ நா அறிக்கைச் சூழ் நிலையில் இந்திய இலங்கை உறவு:

Ranil​’s Agenda In New Delhi
September 15, 2015 |Telegraph,Opinion | 
by: COLOMBO_TELEGRAPH     By R. Hariharan


Col. R Hariharan, a retired Military Intelligence officer,
is associated with the South Asia Analysis Group,
 and the Chennai Centre for China 
Studies.
Sri Lanka Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe is neither a stranger to the inner circle of New Delhi polity nor an unfamiliar personality in the North Block. However, during the last one year his profile has undergone a welcome make over. The fortunes of this seasoned political leader, known more for his failures than successes in his repeated forays for power, pulled a political coup of sorts. In league with Maithripala Sirisena, another political veteran though from the opposition, he thwarted former president Mahinda Rajapaksa’s bid for power twice!

The duo defeated Rajapaksa’s electoral bid for a third term as president in January and seven months later they outsmarted Rajapaksa’s attempt to comeback to power using his loyalists in the seemingly more powerful coalition – the United Peoples Freedom Alliance (UPFA), in the recently held general election.

Ranil Modi As a result Prime Mininister Wickremesinghe now enjoys power with a public endorsement of his political agenda twice within a year. Despite political obstacles the Wickremesinghe-Sirisena duo had made some progress in living up to the expectations of the public. Their promises include increasing the accountability of the executive president to the parliament, empowerment of the prime minister and cleaning up the administration of corruption and cronyism. Their work done so far, though still not completed, has restored Sri Lanka’s credibility which
was eroded both at home and abroad by former president Rajapaksa’s autocratic style of governance.

Wickremesinghe is heading a national alliance government, the first since 1977, in which the ruling United National Party (UNP) and the main opposition the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) have come together.

This has increased the chances of promoting a national agenda to focusing on development in an environment of unity, peace and harmony.

Former president Rajapaksa, failed to do just that despite his singular success in getting rid of the LTTE once and for all. He frittered away five years of peace that followed the military victory in May 2009 by focusing on strengthening his support base. As a result the socio-political
environment was vitiated by acrimony, distrust, religious and ethnic polemics and strife.

This has increased the chances of the present government making further progress in its reform agenda despite the widespread cynicism in the political milieu. But Wickremesinghe would be more confident than ever before when he visits New Delhi today for the first time after becoming prime minister.

There is a lot of convergence between the leadership in India and Sri Lanka in their outlook than before. Wickremesinghe’s agenda to correct Sri Lanka’s tilt towards China after Rajapaksa had succumbed to its “fatal” charm in the areas of strategic security and trade was one such area. So it was not surprising to find the Ranil- Maithripala duo welcomed Prime Minister Modi’s renewed efforts to build a broadened and enduring relationship with Sri Lanka when he visited the island nation some months back. They reciprocated his desire to get rid of other kinks in the relations between the two countries that had appeared during the earlier regime. This makes the Sri Lankan leader’s New Delhi visit a special one as Sri Lanka government probably enjoys greater credibility in the corridors of North Block than Rajapaksa ever did.

Both Prime Minister Wickremesinghe and President Sirisena have also shown their readiness to act upon the concerns of both India and the West including the US, which were dealt with superficially during ten years of Rajapaksa rule. These issues are sure to be included in Modi-
Wickremesinghe talks even if they are not aired in public due to national sensitivity over some of them in both countries.

Both India and the West were irritated by Rajapaksa’s ploy to twist their concerns over his government’s dismal human rights record during and after the ethnic conflict to whip up Sinhala nationalism and encourage xenophobia for his political advantage. Similarly, he distorted their
insistence on resuming the political dialogue process with Tamil polity to resolve their long standing demand for equity with Sinhala majority as encouragement to Tamil separatism.

This had created problems for India as its negative fallout in Tamil Nadu politics adversely affected the fortunes of successive governments in New Delhi. This had cramped India’s efforts to meaningfully contribute to build a win-win relationship with Sri Lanka. This weakness was
exploited by China to enter Sri Lanka in a big way.

Though the coalition era has ended in New Delhi, ethnic amity in Sri Lanka will continue to influence India’s policy not only due to its impact on Tamil Nadu politics, but also in the interest of national security. India and Sri Lanka are geographically too close to each other making their
national security interests complimentary than contentious. This makes it necessary for them to build a mutually reinforcing relationship, notwithstanding their unequal sizes and strengths.

Political dispensation for Sri Lanka Tamils will continue to remain one of lynchpins to progress India-Sri Lanka realtions. The Wickremesinghe government had tried to break the impasse in resuming the dialogue process with Tamils within the ambit of 13th Amendment (13A) to the
Constitution which is supported by India. However, it will be politically difficult for the Sri Lanka government to grant land and police powers envisaged in the 13A to the provincial councils. We can expect this issue to come up when Modi and Wickremesinghe meet, though it is a moot
point whether it would go beyond making cordial statements.

For both India and the West, Rajapaksa reneging on his promises to them attend their concerns went beyond matters of Sri Lanka’s internal politics; it became a challenge to their strategic power assertion particularly after he got cozy with China and provided a welcome strategic foothold
for China in Sri Lanka in India’s close proximity and midway in the Indian Ocean sea lanes through which bulk of global maritime trade is conducted.

This assumes special significance in the light of China increasing assertion of is naval power in Asia- Pacific region, particularly in the Indian Ocean.From the Sri Lankan perspective, there are some issues where it needs India’s help and understanding. The UN Human Rights Council Rights
Council (UNHRC) discussion on Sri Lanka’s follow up actions taken on the US-sponsored resolution passed session three years back would come up on Friday, after the report of the UN Human Rights Commissioner is presented. Though the US is likely to modify its insistence on a UN sponsored international inquiry by accepting a domestic inquiry with the assistance of the UNHRC, Sri Lanka needs Indian support to broaden its support base. Though the US move has met with some political criticism in Tamil Nadu and agitation by fringe elements egged on by the Sri Lanka Diaspora, India had always supported domestic inquiries in preference to international ones. In view of this the compromise solution suggested by the US would probably be supported by India.

The second issue is Indo-Sri Lanka trade. During his Colombo visit, Prime Minister Modi had revived the idea of a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) between India and Sri Lanka.

India had mooted the idea and it almost came through in 2008. However, in the face of protest from local business, the Rajapaksa government developed cold feet and gave it up after that. Sri Lanka is facing exceptional economic crunch and problems of debt servicing for the servicing the loans it had incurred.

Even the IMF had been lukewarm to the idea of lending more to Sri Lanka to service Chinese loans.

So Sri Lanka urgently needs India’s hand holding to see it through its crisis. However, it will be difficult for Sri Lanka government to openly support CEPA as it is probably a no-go area in Sri Lanka politics.

However, it appears Sri Lanka would not be averse to work out an economic arrangement similar to CEPA though it may be called by a different name.

This was indicated in a report in Sunday Times, Colombo which quoted Sri Lanka Deputy Foreign Minister Harsha de Silva as saying that CEPA issues were likely to be among other important issues during the bilateral talks between the two leaders. He added, “We must push for such agreements with countries like India.

However, we must not blindly enter into such agreements. We must study in detail our own experiences and that of other similar countries to negotiate the best deal for us. Any bilateral or multilateral trade agreement that benefits Sri Lanka must be pursued.”

*Col. R Hariharan, a retired Military Intelligence officer, is associated with the South Asia Analysis Group, and the Chennai Centre for China Studies. E-mail:colhari@yahoo.com Website: www.col.hariharan.info

ஐ.நா.அறிக்கைச் சூழலில் இந்திய இலங்கை உறவு

ஐ.நா.அறிக்கைச் சூழலில் இந்திய இலங்கை உறவு

Indo-Lanka relations today
September 16, 2015, 7:29 am
I also hope and pray that our Prime Minister will not pursue the matter of establishing a land bridge to India, we don't need one to promote trade and Commerce with India, there are many other avenues for that.
By K. Godage  Former Ambassador

No international relationship is more important to Sri Lanka than is that with India, and it is therefore most appropriate that Prime Minister Ranil Wicremesinghe should be paying his first overseas visit to India.

Our relations with India extend to more than 2500 years and is firmly entrenched, for we do share cultures, cemented by Buddhism. Our history is linked to that of India and today we do have a close economic relationship too that makes us two peas in a pod; but we need to retain and respect each other’s Independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Sadly, perhaps our relationship has had its ups and downs but the people to people relationship has always remained strong, though we for our part, need to strengthen it further, by having consulates not only in Tami Nadu but also in all the States of South India and also in West Bengal and cultivating relations with these states and their legislatures.

We need to relate to India’s principal concern, which is its security ---
with the Increase of Chinese and Japanese interest in the Indian Ocean along with the continuing interest of the US. We need to ensure that we give India no cause to fear, for her security. We have today only a few issues to sort out.

I would list the fisheries issue as being more than an irritant. It is indeed ironical that the leaders of Tamil Nadu, who are expressing concern about the Tamil people in Sri Lank’s North, are the very people who, with their trawlers are denying northern Tamil fishermen their livelihoods. The Indian Navy that MUST also ensure that their fishing boats do not enter Sri Lankan waters.

As for the vital area of economic relations, we need to be careful about what Pannikar, and other imperialists sought to achieve by interfering in our internal affairs and failed. New imperialist are said to be seeking to use the new economic weapon, the CEPA, to swamp our small economy. Though we do need to plug into the booming Indian economy we need to be careful. The CEPA can indeed be abused. Another matter which we should take note of is the red tape of the state administrations.

India and Sri Lanka should now sign a new treaty of peace, friendship and cooperation and replace the treaty that was imposed upon us during the Jayawardene era and assure us that India would never interfere again in our internal affairs and also solemnly accept to respect the unity and territorial integrity of our country. India, the regional superpower, should accept the responsibility that goes with that status and incorporate the Gujral Doctrine into her Constitution. We for our part should support India becoming a Permanent Member of the UN Security Council. She is indeed qualified to accept that responsibility.

As for our ethnic problem, and the insurgency which India helped to transform into a huge military offensive by arming and training the Tamil militants (please read Shekar Gupta’ account captioned "Ominous Presence in Tamil Nadu" in ‘India Today’—pages 88 to 94, of March 31st 1984); we of course need to reach out to our Tamil brethren and ensure that they too feel that they are also Sri Lankans with equal rights and opportunities as all those who live in our blessed land, but putting an end to this problem must be a matter for us the people of this country; we initially created the problem by shutting out the Tamils in 1956 and thereafter though SWRD and Dudley attempted to reach out to the Tamils they were thwarted by so called Nationalists who were actually racists;

we have paid a heavy price for our folly but today this government is seeking sincerely to make up with the Tamil people and put the problem behind us and to get on with developing our country, therefore neither India nor any other country or countries should be allowed to intervene on any excuse.

As for our foreign relations, this government has embarked on a scrupulous non aligned policy but certain relationships are naturally more important than others, the West is where almost all our exports go and our relations with the West stretch for four hundred years and more and should be carefully nurtured and preserved; our relations with China goes back to over one thousand years and in the post Korean War period, when we gave China Rubber which no other country was prepared to provide our relations, they have not forgotten that; the relationship has become very special both to China and to us for they have been most helpful to us particularly during the war when others
were not prepared to help us and China has also helped us in the UN.

We need to manage that relationship carefully and have them agree to revising certain agreements entered during the period last administration, both in China’s interest and ours too. We should not give India or any other country cause to worry about our relationship with China. The late
Lakshman Kadirgamar and I were, when we had discussions with the then Chinese Prime Minister, he assured us that China would never do anything which would give any other country cause for concern or an excuse to destabilize us.

I do hope and pray that Prime Minister Ranil will lay the foundation for a relationship with India similar to that which we had with India when Sirimavo Bandaranaike was our PM and when India not only conceded Katchchativu to us but also agreed to take back over five hundred thousand  Indian nationals from this country.

In conclusion I also hope and pray that our Prime Minister will not pursue the matter of establishing a land bridge to India, we don't need one to promote trade and Commerce with India, there are many other avenues for that.

Source: The Island LK

The Island Editorial: Geneva Report

Geneva Report
September 15, 2015, 7:53 pm

The much-awaited UNHRC probe report on alleged war crimes in Sri Lanka is scheduled to be released today in Geneva. UNHRC Chief Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein has said its findings are of serious nature. One is not surprised. It can’t be different from the Darusman report prepared by a
panel of experts appointed by UNSG Ban Ki-moon on Sri Lanka’s accountability issues.

The delayed release of the report which was scheduled to be presented last March was politically motivated. The UNHRC obviously yielded to pressure from the US-led western countries which thought the report might help the Rajapaksas regain public sympathy ahead of the August 17 general election.

The US has undertaken to move a resolution in Geneva to pave the way for a domestic probe. It will do so because it has to defend those who came forward to effect a regime change here which has helped safeguard its geo-strategic interests. However, the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe government won’t be free from trouble, given the political fallout of the report.

No small country can conduct a domestic probe into a heavily internationalised issue flogged vigorously by influential pressure groups capable of swaying western governments. The Tamil National Alliance (TNA) has already called for foreign judges in case of a domestic war
crimes investigation being conducted. If the government accedes to the TNA’s demand, then it will be a misnomer to call the investigation ‘domestic’; foreigners will be calling the shots! Those who are campaigning for an international war crimes probe know more than one way to shoe a horse!
It is being claimed in some quarters that the war crimes allegations to be probed are against the Rajapaksa government and the LTTE. But, they are against the Sri Lankan troops who fought terrorism, political leaders who prosecuted the country’s war and the LTTE whose military leaders are now long dead.
 Among the politicians who were responsible for the country’s war effort is incumbent President Maithripala Sirisena, who declared before the last presidential election that he had functioned as Acing Defence Minister during the critical stages of the conflict.
Others are former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, former Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa and former Army Commander Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka.

Interestingly, the TNA, which is at the forefront of the on-going campaign for a war crimes probe, threw in its lot with Sirisena and Fonseka at presidential elections in 2010 and 2015 respectively and the people in the former war zone overwhelmingly backed those two candidates.

In a turn of events replete with irony, the TNA, which declared Prabhakaran as the sole representative of the Tamils and acted as his mouthpiece in Parliament during the conflict, strove to have as President cum Commander-in-chief a person who had led the army it accused of having committed
war crimes!

Fonseka became the darling of the western governments all out to have an international war crimes probe against Sri Lanka because he challenged the pro-Chinese Rajapaksa government. Thereafter, they threw their weight behind Sirisena, who had acted as the Defence Minister during the final stages of the war! Would those governments championing human rights have done so if they had been convinced that war crimes had actually been committed? Or, is it that their geo-political interests took precedence over their human rights concerns?

It behoves the government to critically examine the UNHRC report to be issued without rushing to take any action to please the international community.

The Darusman report was riddled with flaws; it was mostly based on information provided by sources who took cover behind a wall of secrecy. The identities of those who testified won’t be revealed until 2031!

Today, we will see whether those who prepared the new report have borrowed from or been influenced by the Darusman report. If so, it will be a case of circular logic.

Note: High Lights ENB

US backs call for credible process in Lanka

US backs call for credible process in Lanka
September 15, 2015 23:55

UNHRC The United States today noted the need for credible justice processes when addressing incidents related to the war.

Responding to comments made at the 30th session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva today by the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion of Truth, Justice, Reparation and Guarantees of Non-Recurrence, Pablo de Greiff, the US said that it is in the government’s interest to establish justice processes that have the confidence of the international community.

“We express deep appreciation for Mr. de Greiff’s observations from his visits to Sri Lanka and Burundi. We also welcome the chance to engage the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances. We thank the Special Rapporteur for your comments on Sri Lanka, and agree that that it is in the government’s interest to establish justice processes that have the confidence of the international community and will be credible to all the affected communities in Sri Lanka,”

Michele Roulbet from the US delegation at today’s session said. (Colombo Gazette)

அமெரிக்க பாணிச் சட்டத்தைக் கோரும் Pivithuru Hela Urumaya (PHU)


Gammanpila wants Indemnity Act to protect soldiers from war crimes allegations
Nushka Nafeel

An Act seeking indemnity will be presented in Parliament to protect soldiers if allegations are raised at the United Nations against the soldiers
indicating that war crimes and crimes against humanity were committed, Pivithuru Hela Urumaya (PHU) General Secretary MP Udaya Gammanpila said.

Addressing the media at the party headquarters yesterday, he said it was the soldiers who brought sustainable peace to the country and they should be protected from international threats.

An Act of Indemnity was passed in Sri Lanka on three occasions to retain the peace and harmony. Soldiers need not fear about those allegations imposed, the Act of Indemnity will protect them from being subjected to legal penalties, he added.

Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera called for new a Constitution to help resolve the ethnic conflict while Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe earlier expressed that the 13th Amendment will be a solution to end the ethnic conflict involving the Tamil minority. They have produced two contrary opinions, Gammanpila said.

Pivithuru Hela Urumaya (PHU) General Secretary MP Udaya Gammanpila 

Minister Samaraweera should make a special statement in Parliament and the people on the issue faced by Tamils in Sri Lanka which cannot be solved under the present constitution, Gammanpila said.

Sri Lanka has not signed any agreements on devolution of power. The minister’s statement makes the point that power will be devolved by introducing a new constitution. He has taken a domestic issue to the international stage, he said.

Gammanpila said the CEPA agreement is signed between two countries which has equal living standards to exchange the skills and talents.

The economic standards of Sri Lanka and India are different. Ministers Harsha de Silva and Malik Samarawickrama said two different things with regard to the CEPA agreement. If the agreement is signed Sri Lankans will lose many job opportunities, he added.

Responding to a question by a journalist about the status of their alliance, Gammanpila said a decision will be taken after September 22.

The decision depends on the number of SLFP parliamentarians who have decided to remain with the party in the opposition, he added.

Gammanpila said discussions are on to form a new coalition party as well. 

யுத்தக் குற்றச்சவாரி!


இன்று வெளியாகப்போகும் ஐ.நா.அறிக்கையை இங்கு பெறலாம்.

UN Media Release

(தலைப்பில் அழுத்துக)

UNHR Report Sri Lanka 2015

(தலைப்பில் அழுத்துக)




UN Human Rights Office report on Sri Lanka to be published Wednesday ((Today)

GENEVA/COLOMBO (14 September 2015) – The report of the UN Human Rights Council-mandated investigation on Sri Lanka will be made publicly available on Wednesday, 16 September at 10h30 CET time and 14h00 UTC time.

The report will then be posted online on:

http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/Pages/OISL.aspx.

http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/Pages/OISL.aspx. 

A press release accompanying the report will also be posted online and disseminated to the media.

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein will hold a press conference to discuss the findings of the report, including recommendations for the way forward, at 10h30 CET in Geneva. The press conference will be webcast live on http://webtv.un.org.

The OHCHR* Investigation on Sri Lanka was mandated by the Human Rights Council in Resolution 25/1** in March 2014.

The resolution requested the High Commissioner to
“undertake a comprehensive investigation into alleged serious violations and abuses of human rights and related crimes by both parties in Sri Lanka during the period covered by the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC), and to establish the facts and circumstances of such alleged violations and of the crimes perpetrated with a view to avoiding impunity and ensuring accountability, with assistance from relevant experts and special procedures mandate holders.” 

For more information about how the investigation was conducted, please visit: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/Pages/OISL.aspx

ENDS

ENB Note: GENEVA Time is 1 hour plus GMT

Sunday, September 13, 2015

“We fundamentally believe that you’re going to have a more durable outcome if there is a very strong and credible domestic process'' US

“We fundamentally believe that you’re going to have a more durable outcome if there is a very strong and credible domestic process'' US

UNHRC report: No names but strong indictment

Sri Lanka faces tough international challenge as Geneva sessions begin, Govt. to propose two-year road map

The biggest international challenge for Sri Lanka will unfold in the coming week as the UN Human Rights Council receives the findings of the probe into alleged war crimes by troops and Tiger guerrillas.

A copy of the report, which has already been provided to the Government of Sri Lanka, is being kept a close secret until it is formally placed on the UNHRC’s official website anytime next week. However, diplomatic sources say the probe team has made strong indictments against both the troops and the guerrillas over purported war crimes.

Though no politicians or those who were in combat have been named, these sources said, identification of those involved was not difficult since reference was being made in the findings to the chain of command with the identification of areas where violations occurred.

According to some sources, the previous Government has also been strongly indicted for what they call systematically denying or depriving food and medicine to civilians in war-affected areas. It has taken note of reports by the Government Agent for Wanni that some 350,000 civilians were affected by this move, the sources added.

Even before some of the allegations became the specific subject of a probe titled “OISL” under the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, the sponsor of the resolution as well as countries that backed it called for an international investigation. However, the new Government that took office in January succeeded in persuading them to agree to a “credible domestic inquiry” after the OISL findings are made known.

The United States’ position was articulated in Colombo by Nisha Biswa, Assistant Secretary in the Department of State. Addressing an “invitees only” news conference at the American Center — the Sunday Times was not an invitee — Ms. Biswal said, “We fundamentally believe that you’re going to have a more durable outcome if there is a very strong and credible domestic process that actually brings communities together in the country. As Secretary Kerry reiterated during his visit, we fundamentally support efforts to create a credible domestic process for accountability and for reconciliation.”

Tom Malinowski Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights and Labour, who accompanied Ms. Biswal declared, “We have said that we support a domestic mechanism that will be credible to all of the affected communities in Sri Lanka. I would also add that international support for this process has been, and will continue to be important to building trust and confidence….”

Notwithstanding the public statements for Sri Lankans during the Colombo news conference, Mr. Malinowski has been more pointed in the tweets he made on the issue. A sampling: “US will back the Sri Lanka Accountability process if it’s credible, done in consultation with the victims and in co-operation with the United Nations.” – “When UN report comes hope Sri Lanka Government will continue defending the country without being defensive, accepting the need to fully, honestly confront past.”

That the US position has not helped one of the stakeholders in the issue – the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) – became clear yesterday. Its leader Rajavarothayam Sampanthan was busy with the draft of a letter he is sending to the UN Human Rights High Commissioner Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, seeking a meeting with him in Geneva.

The TNA wants to impress on him the need for an international investigation. The TNA also has another unenviable issue – different groups, some hardliners who support Chief Minister C.V. Wigneswaran, want to be in Geneva to push their different campaigns.

However, other Tamil sources in Colombo, not aligned to the TNA, held a different view. They claimed that a “credible domestic inquiry” mechanism, which would “satisfy all stakeholders”, would have expert foreign technical assistance, the oversight of the UNHRC and be based on a two-year road map Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera would present. Such a road map, these sources said, would mean that Sri Lanka would have to keep the UNHRC briefed at its every session on the progress in the “domestic inquiry”. “All that would make it function much the same as an international inquiry,” a source pointed out.

In June 2014, the High Commissioner for Human Rights appointed three experts — Martti Ahtisaari, a former President of Finland, Silvia Cartwright, a former High Court judge of New Zealand, and Asma Jahangir, former President of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, to play a supportive and advisory role, as well as independent verification throughout the investigation.

Saturday, September 12, 2015

Labor Shortage: Germany Needs More Immigrants

WORLD

Labor Shortage: Germany Needs More Immigrants

Germany needs to add 400,000 skilled immigrants to its workforce every year to maintain its economic strength.
BERLIN, Germany — Yves Pierre, 34, traveled around the world for over a decade looking for a land of opportunity - a place to live where he could have steady work in order to support his family back in Haiti. When he found a job with a multinational cruise line based in Berlin, he embraced Germany as his new home.
He’s now been here for five years. He has an apartment in a neighborhood he loves, and German friends he hangs out with on weekends.
“I really like it here - the social life, the arts,” says Pierre, who speaks five languages, including German. “I find it [very] international.”
He also sees career opportunities. He just established a small fashion company, and he dreams of expanding to New York and Paris. But wherever his work may take him, he says, he knows that he wants Berlin to remain his home.
Facing an enormous demographic shift, with an aging population and a low birthrate, Germany is taking new measures to open its doors to immigrants like Pierre, with the hope that they’ll bolster the workforce and help maintain Germany’s status as an economic powerhouse within the European Union.
Two years ago, the German government enacted the “blue card” system for non-EU nationals who are willing to stay and live permanently in Germany to replenish its dwindling labor force. Similar to a green card in the United States, an immigrant is eligible to apply for a blue card if he or she has a confirmed job offer or a valid work contract with a sponsoring employer, holds a university degree, and earns an annual salary of at least 35,000 euros.
Pierre holds a blue card and is currently applying for German citizenship.
Der Spiegelrecently reported that over half a million immigrants with college degrees came to Germany in the first half of 2012 - the largest number since the 1990s. But this may not be enough. According to a 2011 study conducted by the Nuremburg-based Institute for Employment Research, given the current shortage of skilled labor and the shrinking German population, the country’s labor force is expected to drop by almost 7 million by 2025.
The study estimated that Germany would need to add about 400,000 skilled immigrants to its workforce every year to maintain its economic strength.
“Some of my friends have asked me, ‘Why do you want to work in Berlin? Why do you want to live in Germany?’“ Pierre says. “[But] my life here has been great. I don’t feel different because of the color of my skin. For me, [Berlin] is a small world of communities where you find a lot of welcoming people.”
Other immigrants, though, haven’t felt as welcome as Pierre has.
More refugees
In the early 1970s, the German economy collapsed and the government froze recruitment for foreign guest workers, known as gasterbeiter, mostly from neighboring European countries. But the effort didn’t quite achieve its aims. Many guest workers who had already entered the country not only maintained their residence permits, but also brought their families into the country to be with them.
So, despite Germany’s resistance to immigration at the time, there was a major influx of immigrants who joined their families that were already in the country. Germany became the world's third largest immigrant country in the 1990s, after the U.S. and Russia, with almost 11 million immigrants.
To date, according to the German Federal Statistical Office, about 15 percent of the German population has a migrant background. A large number of them are second- and third-generation offspring of former guest workers. Of these, 8 million are German citizens.
And, in recent years, the number of refugees who flee wars, famine, and political unrest in their home countries has increased. In 2012 alone, the number of refugee applications rose to over 100,000. The majority are from Syria, though about a fifth come from the Balkan states, such as Serbia and Bosnia.
But as German cities struggle to find housing for these refugees, others look on in horror at what they see as a growing burden on the government that is at the same time fueling the “Islamisation” of their home country.
The ‘outsiders’
With the steady growth of immigrant communities, the question of what constitutes a true German identity has become yet more sensitive and contentious.
“It’s easy to feel like an outsider,” says Gokai Dobak, a 32-year-old German who was born and raised in Berlin but has a Turkish background. He says that while few would openly say it, many Germans don’t consider him to be a fellow German because of his ethnic background.
Dobak drives a taxi five days a week to support his wife and their five-year-old daughter. He says that he got married early and did not finish college.
“Here, they will always think of me as a Turk. It sounds crazy if I say ‘I am German,’” he says. “[But] when my family visits Istanbul, our relatives there do not consider me like one of them.”
Dobak says that he and his wife decided to send their daughter to a school where the students are primarily from migrant backgrounds, hoping that in this way she will feel less isolated. “[But] I am afraid she won’t be able to speak Turkish anymore,” he says.
In Cologne, Tanchanok Blattman, 55, works as a maid for a prestigious hotel that faces the iconic Cologne Cathedral. “It can be difficult here,” she says, almost in a whisper, standing next to a housekeeping cart in a hallway.
After emigrating from Thailand in 1996 to join her younger sister, she studied German in a government-subsidized language school for eight hours a day. She is now married to a German and they have a son who is in college.
“Sometimes I get a different treatment, but Germans are good people,” she says.
An identity - hyphenated
Officials here say that government integration efforts will help alleviate the stigma associated with immigrants, refugees and ethnic Germans.
In recent years, says Honey Deihimi, a federal commissioner for migration, refugees, and integration, millions of euros have been allocated for services like language courses and employment programs.
“The majority of [immigrant] Germans go into labor, they pay taxes, they contribute to the social system,” Deihimi says.
She notes that it’s flawed to assume that refugees are not highly skilled. The majority of Syrian refugees, she says, are highly educated, many of them doctors.
“I am always optimistic,” she says. “If the nation becomes a more welcoming state, we can increase the current positive environment towards integration in this country.”
According to Dr. Ulf Rinne, deputy director of research at the Institute for the Study of Labor, Germany is more than ready to become an ethnically diverse nation “because it is such a nation already.” But, he says, “Discrimination is still relevant. For example, foreign-sounding names matter in access to jobs.”
Yves Pierre, for his part, has found not only material success, but also happiness and acceptance in Berlin.
“This is the city and country where I want my 10-year-old son to grow up,” he says. “I have already started processing his papers so we will be reunited again. I would like him to be a Haitian-German someday.”
This story was produced as part of the RIAS and RTDNA German/American Exchange Fellowship for Journalists in October 2014.

"சயனைட்" நாவல் - ஒரு பார்வை

  "சயனைட்" நாவல் - ஒரு பார்வை "தங்கமாலை கழுத்துக்களே கொஞ்சம் நில்லுங்கள்! நஞ்சுமாலை சுமந்தவரை நினைவில் கொள்ளுங்கள், எம் இனத்த...