இனப்படுகொலை-`காமன் வெல்த்`எதிர்ப்பு கழக கண்டன ஆர்ப்பாட்டம். வள்ளுவர் கோட்டம்-சென்னை 08-11-2013

பொலோனியம் அணுக்கதிரியக்க விசம் பாய்ச்சி அரபாத் படுகொலை செய்யப்பட்டார்.

சுவிஸ் மருத்துவ ஆய்வுக்குழுவினரின்  ஆராய்ச்சி அறிக்கையின் இறுதி முடிவு:

பொலோனியம் அணுக்கதிரியக்க விசம் பாய்ச்சி அரபாத் படுகொலை செய்யப்பட்டார்.

Swiss Forensic Report

http://www.aljazeera.com/investigations/killing-arafat/swiss-forensic-report-arafat-death-201311671255163780.html

நவம்பர்7 தர்மபுரி சாதிக்கலவர நாள்! தாழ்த்தப்பட்ட மக்களின் உரிமைகளைக் காக்க சூளுரைப்போம்!

கழக காமன்வெல்த் கண்டன ஆர்ப்பாட்டம் வள்ளுவர் கோட்டத்துக்கு இடமாற்றம்

குறிப்பு: சென்னை மெமோரியல் ஹோலில் ஒன்று கூடத் திட்டமிடப்பட்டிருந்த இந்த ஆர்ப்பாட்டம் வள்ளுவர் கோட்டத்துக்கு இடமாற்றம் செய்யப்பட்டுள்ளது என்பதை தோழர்கள் கவனத்தில் கொள்ளவும்.

இசைப்பிரியா: சனல்4 போர்க்குற்ற ஆவண ஆதாரப்படம்

வடக்கு மாகாணசபையே மாவீரர் துயின்ற இல்லங்களை மீளக்கட்டியமை!

சிங்களத்தால் நொருக்கப்பட்ட தரைக் கரும்புலி மாவீரன் மில்லரின் தரைமட்டமான சிலை

விடுதலைப் புலிகளுக்கு கல்லறை கட்டக் கோரினால் கைது – கோத்தா எச்சரிக்கை
[ ஞாயிற்றுக்கிழமை, 27 ஒக்ரோபர் 2013, 00:24 GMT ] [ கார்வண்ணன் ]

உயிரோடு வாழும் எந்தவொரு முன்னாள் விடுதலைப் புலிகள் இயக்க போராளியும் முப்பதாண்டுப் போரில் இறந்தவர்கள் நினைவாக கல்லறைகளை அமைக்கக் கோரினால், கைது செய்யப்படுவார் என்று சிறிலங்கா பாதுகாப்புச்செயலர் கோத்தாபய ராஜபக்ச எச்சரித்துள்ளார்.

மாவீரர் துயிலுமில்லங்களைப் புனரமைக்க சாவகச்சேரிப் பிரதேசசபையில் நிறைவேற்றப்பட்ட தீர்மானம் குறித்து கருத்து வெளியிட்டுள்ள சிறிலங்கா பாதுகாப்புச் செயலர் கோத்தாபய ராஜபக்ச, “விடுதலைப் புலிகள், உள்நாட்டிலும் அனைத்துலக அளவிலும் தடைசெய்யப்பட்ட ஒரு இயக்கம். அவர்கள் சட்டபூர்வமாக முன்னிலைப்படுத்தப்படும் இடத்தில் இல்லை.

அவர்கள் நினைவாக போர் நினைவுச் சின்னங்களை அமைக்க எவருக்கும் உரிமை இல்லை.

யாரேனும் அதைச் செய்வார்களேயானால், கைது செய்யப்படுவர்.

இளைஞர்களுக்குத் தவறாக வழிகாட்ட முற்படும் இவர்கள், ஏனைய முன்னாள் விடுதலைப் புலிகளைப் போலவே, கைது செய்யப்பட்டு புனர்வாழ்வுக்கு உட்படுத்தப்படுவர்.

வடக்கு மாகாணம் காணி, காவல்துறை அதிகாரங்களைப் பெறவே முடியாது. அது நடைமுறைச்சாத்தியமற்றது.

மாகாணங்களுக்கு காணி அதிகாரங்கள் இல்லை என்று உயர்நீதிமன்றம் கூறியுள்ள நிலையில்,வடக்கு மாகாண முதல்வரும், மாகாணசபையும், காணி அதிகாரங்களைப் பெறுவது சாத்தியமில்லை என்பதை உணர வேண்டும்.

ஏனைய மாகாணங்களுக்கு தனியான காவல்துறை அதிகாரங்கள் வழங்கப்படாத நிலையில், எதற்காக வடக்கு மாகாணசபைக்கு மட்டும் தனியான சிறப்பு காவல்துறை அதிகாரங்களை வழங்க வேண்டும்?

வடக்கு மாகாணசபைக்கு காவல்துறை அதிகாரங்கள் வழங்கப்படாது என்று சிறிலங்கா அதிபரே கூறியுள்ளார்.

காவல்துறை அதிகாரங்களில் எதற்கு வடக்கு மாகாணசபைக்கு முன்னுரிமை கொடுக்க வேண்டும்?

சட்டம் ஒழுங்கு, காவல்துறையை கையாளும் பொறுப்பு மத்திய அரசுக்கும், சிறிலங்கா அதிபருக்குமே உள்ளது.

சட்டம் ஒழுங்கை பேணுவதற்கும் குற்றச்செயல்களைத் தடுப்பதற்கும் வடக்கு மாகாணசபை காவல்துறைக்கு உதவலாம்.

ஆனால், வடக்கு மாகாணசபைக்குத் தனியான காவல்துறை தேவையில்லை” என்றும் அவர் தெரிவித்துள்ளார்.

Germany to send spymasters to U.S. over Merkel allegations

Germany to send spymasters to U.S. over Merkel allegations

(Reuters) - Germany will send its top intelligence chiefs to Washington next week to seek answers from the White House on allegations that U.S. security officials tapped the mobile phone of Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Merkel has demanded action from President Barack Obama, not just apologetic words, following the accusations that the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) accessed tens of thousands of French phone records as well as monitoring her own private phone.

"A high level delegation will travel for talks with the White House and National Security Agency to push forward the investigation into the recent allegations," he told a news conference.

Berlin will dispatch the heads of its foreign intelligence agency BND and of its domestic counterpart, the BfV. Merkel's chief of staff Ronald Pofalla, who is responsible for the intelligence services, may also join them.

Speaking at an EU summit on Thursday, Merkel said the alleged bugging had shattered trust with the United States. She demanded Washington agree a "no spying" deal with Berlin and Paris by the end of the year, saying alleged espionage against two of Washington's closest EU allies had to be stopped.

The White House has denied the United States is bugging Merkel, but Washington officials have refused to say whether it did so in the past.

Members of the European Parliament's civil liberties committee said they will also fly to Washington for talks on Monday and explore "possible legal remedies for EU citizens".

The rift over U.S. surveillance tactics first emerged earlier this year and had appeared close to resolution, but Berlin said on Wednesday it has obtained information that the United States may have monitored Merkel's phone.

Earlier this week French newspaper Le Monde reported the NSA had collected tens of thousands of French phone records between December 2012 and January this year.

Only three months ago Merkel's Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich made a similar visit to demand answers in Washington. The need for another trip has left Germany looking like it was duped and brought fierce criticism of Merkel for not taking a tough enough stance.

"In the summer, we received explanations and assurances," Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said on Thursday. "Whether we can trust these explanations and assurances, that must be examined again."

SENSITIVE SUBJECT

State surveillance is a highly sensitive subject in a country haunted by memories of eavesdropping by the Stasi secret police in communist East Germany, where Merkel grew up.

The European Parliament has already opened an inquiry into the effect on Europe of U.S. intelligence activities revealed by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden. It has also led a push for tougher data protection rules and the suspension of a transatlantic data-sharing deal.

The Parliament, with 766 members directly elected from the EU's 28 member states, voted this week in favour of an amended package of laws that would greatly strengthen EU data protection rules that date from 1995.

The rules would restrict how data collected in Europe by firms such as Facebook, Yahoo! and Google is shared with non-EU countries, and impose fines of 100 million euros (85 million pounds) or more on rule breakers.

(Additional reporting by Charlie Dunmore in Brussels; editing by Luke Baker and David Stamp)

USA's unlawful Drone killings in Pakistan could amount to war crimes, Amnesty International

A 68-year-old grandmother killed whilst picking Okra - just one of the incidents we've documented of civilian deaths by drone strikes in Pakistan. The US could be guilty of war crimes and must be held to account. 

Amnesty International 

Drones: Major new report says USA must account for Pakistan killings

Posted: 22 October 2013

The USA has carried out unlawful killings in Pakistan in its drone attacks, some of which could amount to war crimes, Amnesty International said in a major new report released today (Tuesday 22 October).

The report 'Will I be next?’ US drone strikes in Pakistan', one of the most comprehensive studies of the US drones programme from a human rights perspective, documents recent killings in Pakistan’s north-western tribal areas, where most drone strikes have taken place. The report condemns the almost complete absence of transparency around the US drone programme. 

Meanwhile Amnesty is calling on the UK government to refrain from participating in any way in US drone strikes that violate international law, including by the sharing of intelligence or facilities, or the transfer of specialist components.

Amnesty International’s Pakistan Researcher Mustafa Qadri, the author of the report, said:

“Secrecy surrounding the drones programme gives the US administration a license to kill beyond the reach of the courts or basic standards of international law. It’s time for the USA to come clean about the drones programme and hold those responsible for these violations to account.

“What hope for redress can there be for victims of drone attacks and their families when the USA won’t even acknowledge its responsibility for particular strikes?”

International law prohibits arbitrary killing and limits the lawful use of intentional lethal force to exceptional situations. In armed conflict, only combatants and people directly participating in hostilities may be directly targeted. Outside armed conflict, intentional lethal force is lawful only when strictly unavoidable to protect 

against an imminent threat to life. In some circumstances arbitrary killing can amount to a war crime or extrajudicial executions, which are crimes under international law.

The USA continues to rely on a “global war” doctrine to attempt to justify a borderless war with al-Qa’ida, the Taliban or other “enemies” of the USA. The USA’s promise to increase transparency around drone strikes, underscored by a major policy speech by President Barack Obama in May, has yet to become a reality 

and the USA still refuses to divulge even basic factual and legal information. This secrecy has enabled the USA to act with impunity and block victims from receiving justice or compensation. As far as Amnesty is aware, no US official has ever been held to account for unlawful killings by drones in Pakistan.

Amnesty reviewed all 45 known drone strikes that took place in North Waziristan in north-western Pakistan between January 2012 and August this year. Contrary to official claims that those killed were “terrorists”, Amnesty’s research indicates that in a number of cases the victims were not involved in armed activity and 

posed no threat to life. 

In October 2012, 68-year-old grandmother Mamana Bibi was killed in a double strike - apparently by a Hellfire missile - as she picked vegetables in the family’s fields while surrounded by her grandchildren.

In July 2012, 18 labourers, including a 14-year-old boy, were killed in multiple strikes on an impoverished village close to the border with Afghanistan as they were about to eat an evening meal at the end of work.  

Amnesty also documented cases of so-called “rescuer attacks” in which those who ran to the aid of the victims of an initial drone strike were themselves targeted in a rapid follow-on attack. 

In addition to the threat of US drone strikes, people in North Waziristan are frequently caught between attacks by armed groups and Pakistan’s own armed forces. The local population lives in constant fear of violence by all sides, and the US drone programme has added to local suffering, with people in the region now also living in terror of death from US drones hovering in the skies.

Mustafa Qadri, said:

“The authorities of Pakistan, Australia, Germany and the UK must also investigate all officials and institutions suspected of involvement in US drone strikes or other abuses in the tribal areas that may constitute human rights violations.”

The report was released in a joint news conference with Human Rights Watch, which issued its own report on drone and other air strikes in Yemen. Amnesty and Human Rights Watch are jointly calling on the US Congress to fully investigate cases documented by the two organisations, as well as other potentially 

unlawful deaths, and to disclose any evidence of human rights violations to the public.

Amnesty International is calling on:

The US authorities to:

Publicly disclose the facts and legal basis for drone strikes carried out in Pakistan and information about any investigation into killings by US drones.

Ensure prompt, thorough, independent and impartial investigations into all cases where there are reasonable grounds to believe that drone strikes resulted in unlawful killings. 

Bring those responsible for unlawful drone strikes to justice in public and fair trials without recourse to the death penalty. 

Ensure that victims of unlawful drone strikes, including family members of victims of unlawful killings, have effective access to justice, compensation and other remedies. 

The Pakistani authorities to:

Provide adequate access to justice and reparations for victims of US drone strikes and attacks by Pakistan forces, and seek reparations and other remedies for drone strikes from the US authorities.

Bring to justice, in fair trials without recourse to the death penalty, individuals responsible for unlawful killings and other human rights abuses in North Waziristan. This should include US drone strikes, attacks by the Pakistan armed forces, or groups like the Taliban and al-Qa’ida.

Publicly disclose information on all US drone strikes of which the Pakistani authorities are aware, including casualties and all assistance provided to victims.

The UK authorities to:

Lift the veil of secrecy surrounding UK involvement in the use of drones, including by revealing the rules of engagement for drone strikes and declaring what assistance the UK currently offers to the USA.

Immediately stop the transfer of any specialist components for use in the US drone programme where it is likely they might be used for unlawful killings

All governments, including the UK, who use armed drones must give details of casualties resulting from drone use.

The UK should urge the USA and Pakistan to take the measures outlined above and officially protest and pursue remedies under international law, when lethal force is unlawfully used by the USA.

Ref: ''Will I be Next'' ?

US Drone strikes in Pakistan

http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/ASA33/013/2013/en/041c08cb-fb54-47b3-b3fe-a72c9169e487/asa330132013en.pdf

Republicans Back Down, Ending Crisis Over Shutdown and Debt Limit

House votes 285 to 144 to end government shut down, raise debt ceiling
October 16, 2013

Republicans Back Down, Ending Crisis Over Shutdown and Debt Limit

By JONATHAN WEISMAN and ASHLEY PARKER

WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans conceded defeat on Wednesday in their bitter budget fight with President Obama over the new health care law as the House and Senate approved last-minute legislation ending a disruptive 16-day government shutdown and extending federal borrowing power to avert a financial default with potentially worldwide economic repercussions.

With the Treasury Department warning that it could run out of money to pay national obligations within a day, the Senate voted overwhelmingly on Wednesday evening, 81 to 18, to approve a proposal hammered out by the chamber’s Republican and Democratic leaders after the House on Tuesday was unable to move forward with any resolution. The House followed suit a few hours later, voting 285 to 144 to approve the Senate plan, which would fund the government through Jan. 15 and raise the debt limit through Feb. 7.

Mr. Obama signed the bill about 12:30 a.m. Thursday.

Most House Republicans opposed the bill, but 87 voted to support it. The breakdown showed that Republican leaders were willing to violate their informal rule against advancing bills that do not have majority Republican support in order to end the shutdown. All 198 Democrats voting supported the measure.

Mr. Obama, speaking shortly after the Senate vote, praised Congress, but he said he hoped the damaging standoff would not be repeated.

“We’ve got to get out of the habit of governing by crisis,” said Mr. Obama, who urged Congress to proceed not only with new budget negotiations, but with immigration changes and a farm bill as well. “We could get all these things done even this year, if everybody comes together in a spirit of, how are we going to move this country forward and put the last three weeks behind us?”

After the House vote, officials announced that the federal government would reopen on Thursday and that federal employees should return to work.

The result of the impasse that threatened the nation’s credit rating was a near total defeat for Republican conservatives, who had engineered the budget impasse as a way to strip the new health care law of funding even as registration for benefits opened Oct. 1 or, failing that, to win delays in putting the program into place.

The shutdown sent Republican poll ratings plunging, cost the government billions of dollars and damaged the nation’s international credibility. Mr. Obama refused to compromise, leaving Republican leaders to beg him to talk, and to fulminate when he refused. For all that, Republicans got a slight tightening of income 

verification rules for Americans accessing new health insurance exchanges created by the Affordable Care Act.

“We fought the good fight,” said Speaker John A. Boehner of Ohio, who has struggled to control the conservative faction in the House, in an interview with a Cincinnati radio station. “We just didn’t win.”

In a brief closed session with his Republican rank and file, Mr. Boehner told members to hold their heads high, go home, get some rest and think about how they could work better as a team.

Two weeks of relative cohesion broke down into near chaos on Tuesday when Republican leaders failed twice to unite their troops behind a last-gasp effort to prevent a default on their own terms. By Wednesday, House conservatives were accusing more moderate Republicans of undercutting their position. 

Representative Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania, a leading Republican voice for ending the fight, said Congress should have passed a bill to fund the government without policy strings attached weeks ago.

“That’s essentially what we’re doing now,” Mr. Dent said. “People can blame me all they want, but I was correct in my analysis and I’d say a lot of those folks were not correct in theirs.”

Under the agreement to reopen the government, the House and Senate are directed to hold talks and reach accord by Dec. 13 on a long-term blueprint for tax and spending policies over the next decade. Mr. Obama said consistently through the standoff that he was willing to have a wide-ranging budget negotiation once the government was reopened and the debt limit raised.

Mr. Boehner and his leadership team had long felt that they needed to allow their restive conference to pitch a battle over the president’s health care law, a fight that had been brewing almost since the law was passed in 2010. Now, they hope the fever has broken, and they can negotiate on issues where they think they have the upper hand, like spending cuts and changes to entitlement programs.

But there were no guarantees that Congress would not be at loggerheads again by mid-January, and there is deep skepticism in both parties that Representative Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin and Senator Patty Murray of Washington, who will lead the budget negotiations, can bridge the chasm between them.

“This moves us into the next phase of the same debate,” said Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the second-ranking Democrat. “Our hope is now that Speaker Boehner and his caucus have played out their scenario with a tragic outcome, perhaps they’ll be willing to be more constructive.”

As Republican lawmakers left the closed meeting Wednesday, some were already thinking of the next fight.

“I’ll vote against it,” said Representative John C. Fleming, Republican of Louisiana, referring to the Senate plan. “But that will get us into Round 2. See, we’re going to start this all over again.”

Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader who was instrumental in ending the crisis, stressed that under the deal he had negotiated with the majority leader, Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the across-the-board budget cuts extracted in the 2011 fiscal showdown remained in place over the objections of some Democrats, a slim reed that not even he claimed as a significant victory.

The deal, Mr. McConnell said, “is far less than many of us hoped for, quite frankly, but it’s far better than what some had sought.”

“Now it’s time for Republicans to unite behind other crucial goals,” he added.

Chastened Senate Republicans said they hoped the outcome would be a learning experience for the lawmakers in the House and the Senate who shut down the government in hopes of gutting the health law, Mr. Obama’s signature domestic achievement. Instead of using the twin issues of government funding and borrowing authority to address the drivers of the federal deficit, conservatives focused on a law they could never undo as long as Mr. Obama is president, several lawmakers said.

“Goose egg, nothing, we got nothing,” said Representative Thomas H. Massie, Republican of Kentucky.

Senator Richard Burr of North Carolina took a swipe at his fellow Republican senators Ted Cruz of Texas and Mike Lee of Utah, as well as House members who linked government financing to defunding the health care law, which is financed by its own designated revenues and spending cuts.

“Let’s just say sometimes learning what can’t be accomplished is an important long-term thing,” Mr. Burr said, “and hopefully for some of the members they’ve learned it’s impossible to defund mandatory programs by shutting down the federal government.”

While Mr. Cruz conceded defeat, he did not express contrition.

“Unfortunately, the Washington establishment is failing to listen to the American people,” he said as he emerged from a meeting of Senate Republicans called to ratify the agreement.

For hundreds of thousands of federal workers across the country furloughed from their jobs, the legislative deal meant an abrupt end to their forced vacation as the government comes back to life beginning Thursday.

In a statement late Wednesday, Sylvia Mathews Burwell, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, made the reopening official.

“Employees should expect to return to work in the morning,” she said, adding they should check news reports and the Office of Personnel Management’s Web site for updates.

For Mr. Boehner, who had failed to unite his conference around a workable plan, Wednesday’s decision to take up the Senate bill proved surprisingly free of conflict. Hard-line Republican lawmakers largely rallied around the speaker.

Representative Raúl R. Labrador of Idaho, said he was “really proud” of how Mr. Boehner had handled the situation. “I’m more upset with my Republican conference, to be honest with you,” he said.

Michael D. Shear contributed reporting.

சிங்களத்தின் தமிழீழ ஆக்கிரமிப்பு, தமிழ் நாடாளுமன்ற ஜனநாயகத்தை படுத்தும் பாடு!

``சிறீதரன் எம்.பி`` க்கு நாவற்குழி அத்துமீறல் குடியேற்றக் காரர்கள் விடுத்த சவால்!

அதிகப்பெருவாக்கால் ``வெற்றி பெற்ற`` கூட்டமைப்புக்கு பொதுபல சேன விடுக்கும் சவால்!

வடக்கு, கிழக்கை இணைப்பதற்கு கூட்டமைப்பு முயன்றால் பதிலடி!- பொதுபலசேனா எச்சரிக்கை

[ புதன்கிழமை, 16 ஒக்ரோபர் 2013, 02:01.55 PM GMT ]

தமிழ்த் தேசியக் கூட்­ட­மைப்பின் வெற்­றி­யா­னது வர­வேற்­கத்­தக்­கது. ஆனால் இவ் வெற்­றியை வைத்து பிரி­வி­னை­வாதம் பேசு­வது தவ­று. வடக்­கையும் கிழக்­கையும் ஒன்­றி­ணைக்க முயன்றால் அதற்கான பதி­ல­டியை நாம் கொடுப்போம் என பொது­ப­ல­சேனா அமைப்பு எச்சரிக்கை விடுத்துள்ளது.

நாட்டை சீர­ழிக்கும் விட­யத்தை யார் செய்­தாலும் அதற்கு நாம் எதிர்ப்­பி­னையே தெரி­விப்போம். கசினோ சூதாட்ட விட­யத்தில் அர­சாங்­கத்தை கடு­மை­யாக எச்­ச­ரிக்­கின்றோம்.

தமிழ்த் தேசியக் கூட்­ட­மைப்பு வட­மா­கா­ணத்தில் வர­லாற்று வெற்­றி­யினைப் பெற்­றுள்­ளமை வர­வேற்­கத்­தக்­கது. ஆனால்,தமது வெற்­றி­யினை தவ­றாக பயன்­ப­டுத்­து­கின்­ற­மை­யா­னது ஏற்­றுக்­கொள்ள முடி­யாது.

வடக்கில் ஆட்­சி­ய­மைத்து மக்­க­ளுக்­காக சேவை­யாற்­றாது அவர்­களின் சுய­ந­லத்­திற்­காக மக்­களை கொல்ல நினைப்­பது தமிழ்த் தேசியக் கூட்­ட­மைப்­பி­னதும் சர்­வ­தே­சத்­தி­னதும் சதித்­திட்­ட­மாகும்.

இதைத் தொடர்ந்தும் நடை­மு­றைப்­ப­டுத்­தினால் தற்­போது வடக்கில் வாழும் மக்­களும் இறக்க நேரிடும் என அவர் சுட்டிக்காட்டியுள்ளார்.

தமது சுய விருப்­பிற்­காக மத்­திய அர­சாங்­கத்தை கட்­டுப்­ப­டுத்த முடி­யாது. இலங்­கையைப் பொறுத்­த­வ­ரையில் அனைத்து மாகா­ணங்­க­ளுக்கும் அனைத்து இன மக்­க­ளுக்கும் ஒரே சட்­டமே செயற்­ப­டு­கின்­றது.

இதில் வட மாகா­ணத்­திற்கு ஒரு மாதி­ரியும் ஏனைய மாகா­ணங்­க­ளுக்கு வேறு மாதி­ரியும் சட்­டத்தை பிர­யோ­கித்தால் அது இறுதியில் சட்டச் சிக்­க­லி­னையும் பிரி­வி­னை­யி­னை­யுமே ஏற்­ப­டுத்தும் எனவும் அவர் குறிப்­பிட்டார்.

இது தொடர்­பாக பொது­ப­ல­சேனா அமைப்பின் பொதுச்­செ­ய­லாளர் கல­கொட அத்தே ஞான­சார தேரர் குறிப்­பி­டு­கையில்,

வடக்­கையும் கிழக்­கையும் ஒன்­றி­ணைத்து தனி நாட்டுக் கோரிக்­கை­யினை நடை­மு­றைப்­ப­டுத்த தமிழ்த்­ தே­சி­யக்­ கூட்­ட­மைப்பு நினைத்தால் அதற்­கான தகுந்த பதி­ல­டி­யினை நாம் கொடுப்போம்.

கிழக்கில் முஸ்லிம் தீவி­ர­வாத சக்­தி­களும் வடக்கில் புலித்­தீ­விர வாதி­களும் ஒன்­றி­ணைந்து வடக்­கிலும் கிழக்­கிலும் வாழும் தமிழ், முஸ்லிம் மக்­களை கொன்று குவிக்­கவே திட்டம் தீட்­டு­கின்­றனர். இதை நடை­மு­றைப்­ப­டுத்த விடக்­கூ­டாது.