Thursday, January 27, 2011
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
இந்தா தமிழா இவர் தான் உனது தேசத்தின் குரல்!
பேச்சுவார்த்தை!
பிரபாகரனின் கொலைகாரத் திட்டங்களை முறியடிக்க சர்வதேச சமூகம் அவருக்கு நெருக்கடி கொடுக்க வேண்டும்- அன்ரன் பாலசிங்கம்
பாலசிங்கத்தின் பிரபாகரன் பற்றிய கூற்றை இரகசியமாக வைக்கவேண்டும்- சொல்ஹெய்ம்
Solheim asked Lunstead to keep B’singham comment on Prabha confidential
The Island (SL) January 23, 2011, 9:44 pm
US Amb felt Tigers would come up with new conditions even if SLG agreed for talks on ISGA
One-time LTTE Chief Negotiator, Anton Balasingham, secretly expressed satisfaction over growing international pressure on LTTE leader, Velupillai Prabhakaran, for assassinations carried on his orders.
The former British High Commission employee (in Colombo) had felt that international pressure could force Prabhakaran to stop his murderous campaign. According to a leaked US diplomatic missive authored by the then US Ambassador in Colombo, Jeffrey Lunstead, in April 2004, the Chief Norwegian Peacemaker, Erik Solheim, had told him of Balasingham’s opinion, while insisting this shouldn’t be shared with other peace co-chairs. The US cable revealed that Solheim wanted Balasingham’s comment kept strictly private and confidential.
Balasingham had expressed the belief that the then US Deputy Secretary of State, Richard Armitage, had put pressure on Prabhakaran by a making a strongly worded statement in mid August 2004.
Solheim, addressing the Sri Lanka donor group in Colombo at the end of a four-day visit to Sri Lanka, had asserted that bold steps should have been taken by both parties to re-start talks. Solheim had believed talks could be resumed if the wording of the agenda regarding an Interim Self Governing Authority (ISGA) could be
resolved.
Solheim also noted that he saw no signal that either side wanted to go back to war. Obviously hostilities could resume through some inadvertent incident, but, Solheim had believed, there was no deliberate plan by either side to resume fighting. According to him, the bottom line was that the "no war/no permanent peace" situation was certainly preferable to a resumed war.
Solheim asserted that the ISGA was a ‘small issue’, though the government and the LTTE had been bogged down over it. The US cable quoted Solheim as having said that Thmailselvan told him (Solheim) the LTTE couldn’t be flexible on the formulation for talks. But once the talks began, the LTTE could be flexible flexible on the ISGA proposal, and were ready to discuss alternate proposals.
Interestingly, Thamilchelvan had felt that the government was now in a better position to enter talks based on the ISGA because of the entrance into the ruling coalition of the Ceylon Workers Congress, and because of statements by the opposition United National Party (UNP) that it would support the government if it entered negotiations based on the ISGA. The LTTE, Thamilchelvan said, would not put forward any further conditions.
The Tigers, Solheim said, were in no particular hurry, and saw no need to help any particular Southern political party.
On the status of the cease-fire, Solheim said that both parties were broadly adhering to it, but neither party was strictly following it. The government had tried to use Karuna to weaken the LTTE, while the LTTE continued its campaign of assassinations of its opponents. Hence both sides were playing with fire.
Ambassador Lunstead told Solheim that his (Solheim´s) emphasis seemed to be on resolving the agenda issue as the roadblock to resumed talks. However, many in the South were saying that the Tigers would not come back to the table until they were able to reassert their control in the East. Did he think that was the case? Solheim said he did not agree. If the President met the LTTE demands on the agenda and ISGA, he said, the Tigers will come to the table. Solheim also said that Balasingham would resume his role as chief negotiator for the Tigers.
Lunstead said that though the Tigers seemed to be feeling some international pressure, but it was not clear if it had actually changed their behavior in any way.
Solheim’s assessment that neither side wants or is planning for a return to war was hopeful —if it was accurate, the UN envoy said adding that the Norwegian’s assessment that only the ISGA formulation remained as a roadblock to new talks could only be tested if the Government came around on that point. The US official
went on to assert that it was quite possible that the Tigers would just come up with new conditions.
==================================
மே 18 2009
இத்தனை பக்கபலத்தோடும், கே. பத்மநாதன் உருத்திரகுமாரன் கும்பலின் காட்டிக்கொடுப்போடும், களமுனையில் நின்ற கருணாவுக்காதரவான தளபதிகளின் தகவல்களைத் திரட்டியும், அன்ரன் பாலசிங்கத்தைக் கொண்டு போராட்டத்தலைமையின் சிறுமுதலாளித்துவ ஊசலாட்டங்களின் விளைவான அரசியல் பலவீனங்களைப் பயன்படுத்தியும், ஒரு இனப்படுகொலையை நடத்தி விடுதலைப் புலிகளின் தனிநாட்டுக் கிளர்ச்சியை வெற்றி கொண்டுவிட்டதாக சிங்கள இனவெறிப் பாசிச சிறீலங்கா அரசு பிரகடனம் செய்திட்ட நாளாகும்.
முள்ளிவாய்க்கால் வீரகாவியம் படியுங்கள்! பரப்புங்கள்!
http://senthanal.blogspot.com/2010/05/18.html
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
அநுராதபுரச் சிறையில் கைதிகள் போராட்டம்
அநுராதபுரச் சிறைக் கைதிகளின் போராட்டம்
Prison incident: Rs 2 m damage
Bhakthi DARMAPRIYA MENDIS Daily News
The incident that took place at the Anuradhapura prison on January 24 had caused a Rs two million damage according to the prison officials and the police.
The inmates in the prison had set on fire many sections in the Anuradhapura prison such as the laundry, kitchen and library.
The Police said that the laundry and the library had been completely destroyed by the fire. The special police team appointed to probe the investigation started their work Sunday.
In addition to the police team, the prison's officials are also investigating.
-------------------------------
Six dead at Anuradhapura Prison incident
Tuesday, 25 January 2011 03:47 Geo
Digatha News
According to a very reliable source the clash that occurred at Anuradhapura Prison had been triggered off when prison officers shot at an agitation carried out since last evening by a group of prisoners. According to unconfirmed reports 6 prisoners have died in the shooting.
The agitation commenced yesterday evening against not allowing visitors of prisoners to bring more than one parcel of food, non availability of water service in the prison, detaining more than 300 prisoners in a hall that could hold only 150 people, allowing 70 LTTE suspects to move with ordinary prisoners and demanding
solutions to various other issues confronted by the prisoners.
About 150 prisoners climbed on to the roof of the prison to engage in the agitation. Today evening prison officers have shot at the agitators from the office of the prison inspector. Later, the prison officers have damaged the properties at the prison library and the kitchen and set fire to them. According to prison sources no action has been taken yet to put out the fire.
Monday, January 24, 2011
Sunday, January 23, 2011
Friday, January 21, 2011
ராஜ மரியாதை!
ஈழத்தமிழர் இனப்படுகொலைக்கு துணைநின்ற சீன அரசுத் தலைவருக்கு ஒபாமா நாட்டில் செங்கம்பள வரவேற்பு!
Unlike Mr. Hu’s previous trip five years ago, when he was not accorded full honors and a series of gaffes marred the visit, this one seems to have gone exactly according to script — which is how Beijing likes largely ceremonial events such as state visits. There was a 21-gun salute, a gala dinner, business deals signed, a small child hugged, a major speech given and a live press conference that went about as well as could be expected for the press-shy Mr. Hu.
From China, Almost a Sigh of Relief
By IAN JOHNSONNewyork Times Published: January 21, 2011
BEIJING — President Hu Jintao’s ground-breaking trip to the United States is not quite over, but the sense of relief here over how well it has gone is almost palpable. Unlike Mr. Hu’s previous trip five years ago, when he was not accorded full honors and a series of gaffes marred the visit, this one seems to have gone exactly according to script — which is how Beijing likes largely ceremonial events such as state visits. There was a 21-gun salute, a gala dinner, business deals signed, a small child hugged, a major speech given and a live press conference that went about as well as could be expected for the press-shy Mr. Hu.
From China’s point of view, the trip was designed to do two things: show Mr. Hu being accorded the respect he is due as head of a powerful country. That was the Washington part of the trip with all of its pomp and circumstance.
It was also meant to highlight China’s soft power by having Mr. Hu visit Chicago and inspect a Chinese company — to show that China is not just the world’s factory but an investor and job creator itself overseas. Also on the agenda was a Confucius Institute, one of the country’s new chain of cultural centers that Beijing is banking on to spread its influence in more subtle ways.
These goals contrasted with the more contentious concerns that Washington wanted to address, especially the tensions with North Korea, growing trade problems and the stubborn issue of human rights.
These issues could have made the trip much rockier than it was, especially since China today is more powerful than in visits past.
Meanwhile, perhaps reflecting its own weakened position, the United States also took a tough line in the lead-up to the meeting, with three top Obama administration officials issuing blunt statements about China’s need to change.
But in the end, harmony largely prevailed.
“China and the United States both had some doubts about the other in 2010, but this trip has successfully cleared people’s minds,” said Yuan Peng, a professor at the
China Institute of Contemporary International Relations in Beijing. “The Chinese media lavished attention on this trip.”
The latter was on full display on Thursday, when the ruling Communist party’s flagship newspaper, People’s Daily, did not appear as usual in the morning. In years past that would have been an epochal event, perhaps signaling to Sinologists an internal struggle over the wording of an editorial or the placing of a picture — so
carefully written and designed is the party mouthpiece.
Thursday’s delay was less mysterious, but did reflect the visit’s vital importance to Beijing. Leaders had held the presses until the end of the state dinner Wednesday night in order to get in Mr. Hu’s great moment. Given the 13-hour time difference between Washington and Beijing, that meant the Thursday paper only went to press late Thursday morning in Beijing and delivered Friday. Other top party newspaper followed suit.
Most accounts were fairly factual, detailed and dull. One article in People’s Daily was titled “To Open A New Chapter in the Sino-U.S. Cooperative Partnership.” The overall tenor was that the trip helped ease tensions and prevented a new Cold War from breaking out between the two powers.
Inasmuch as the American concerns were addressed in the media, it was to rebut them — for example, that China is a fair trader and doing its bit for the world economy by growing.
The one exception could have been human rights but it was dodged deftly. On Wednesday, two western reporters asked Mr. Hu about human rights. But Mr. Hu was well-prepared and had a stock answer at hand:
China values human rights but is a big, developing country and still needs to improve. The answer echoed the country’s official position paper on human rights and was not given much prominence in China. The press conference was not broadcast live on Chinese television but a video recording is available on major Chinese Web sites, like tudou.com.
“Hu’s comments reflect his nonconfrontational political style,” said Russell Leigh Moses, a Beijing-based political analyst. “He’s simply not going to get into a public debate with Obama on human rights, for he sees that as creating a poor atmosphere for other issues that Beijing deems more important to stabilizing the relationship.”
Ordinary people’s views of the visit were even harder to fathom. There are no major polls that track public opinion on matters such as this, leaving observers to rely on extremely selective sources, such as Internet chatrooms--which were under even tighter monitoring than usual--or casual chats with people on the street.
Most comments in chat rooms called the trip a success. One bellicose commentator in a military affairs chat room said the question about human rights was meant as a “provocation” to Mr. Hu because it was only brought up to embarrass him.
On the street, most people seemed concerned with the upcoming Chinese New Year holiday, the most important of the year when the country shuts down for nearly two weeks.
“I thought the visit looked good and Obama treated Hu very well,” said Li Tao, a 35-year-old storekeeper in Beijing. “But honestly I am paying more attention to the storms down south that might influence the transportation network. I need to get home for the holiday.”
Zhang Jing contributed research.
குறிப்பு:
மே 18 2009 முள்ளிவாய்க்கால் தேசிய இனப்படுகொலையின் முதலாண்டு நிறைவில் நாம் முன் வைத்த அரசியல் தீர்மானத்தில் சர்வதேச அரசியல் நிலைமை குறித்து பின்வரும் மதிப்பீட்டை முன்வைத்திருந்தோம்.
சர்வதேசிய அரசியல் நிலைமை
1) ஏகாதிபத்தியத்தின் ஏற்றத்தாழ்வான வளர்ச்சி காரணமாகவும், மூன்றாவது உலகப் பொதுப் பொருளாதார நெருக்கடியின் விளைவாகவும், இதனால் உருவான முரண்பாடுகளும் யுத்தங்களும், 21ம் நூற்றாண்டின் ஆரம்பத்தில்-மிகத் தெளிவாக- நான்கு புதிய ஆளும் வர்க்க சக்திகளை, ஒற்றைத்துருவ உலக ஒழுங்கமைப்பின் தலைவனாக இருந்த அமெரிக்க ஏகாதிபத்தியத்திற்கு சவாலாக உருவாக்கியுள்ளன.
அவையாவன: ஐரொப்பிய யூனியன், ரசியா, ஈரான், சீனா (Europian Union, Russia, Iran.,China, -ERIC) ஆகும்.வருங்காலத்தில் தென் அமெரிக்க நாடுகளின் ஒன்றியம் ஒன்று இவ்வணியில் இணையக்கூடும்.ஐரோப்பியன் யூனியன் இதர மூன்று நாடுகளுடனும் ஐக்கியப்படுவதற்கான அம்சங்களைக்காட்டிலும் அமெரிக்காவுடன் ஐக்கியப்படுவதற்கான அம்சங்களை அதிகம் கொண்டிருப்பது உண்மை.
2) இதனால் இது எந்தவகையிலும் ஒற்றைத்துருவ உலக ஒழுங்கமைப்பில் அடிப்படையான-தலைகீழான-மாறுதலை இன்னமும் கொணர்ந்துவிட வில்லையெனினும், ஒரு புதிய அணிசேர்க்கைக்கான ஆதாரக்கூறுகளைக் கொண்டிருக்கின்றன.அதை நோக்கி உலகம் நகரத்தொடங்கிவிட்டது. அணிசேர்க்கை துல்லியமாக எவ்வாறு அமையும் என்பதை இப்போது அநுமானிப்பது கடினமானதாகும்.
3) ரசிய சமூக ஏகாதிபத்தியத்தின் வீழ்ச்சிக்குப் பின்னால்- குறிப்பாக ஈராக் ஆக்கிரமிப்பு யுத்தத்துக்கு பின்னால்- உதயமான இத்தகைய ஒரு புதிய உலக சூழல் வரலாற்று வழியில் ஒரு திருப்பமாகும்.முந்தைய சூழலில் இருந்து வேறான ஒரு புதிய சூழலாகும்.
4) இச்சூழலை நகர்த்திச் செல்லும் ஆதிக்க சக்திகள் அடிப்படையில் செய்வது உலக மறு பங்கீடாகும்.இதனால் சுதந்திர தேசிய இயக்கங்களை நசுக்குவதை இவை தமது பொதுக்குறிக்கோளாகக் கொண்டுள்ளன.
5) இதற்கு யுத்தத்தையும், பாசிசத்தையுமே தமது ஆயுதமாக ஏந்தியுள்ளன.
6) இச் சூழல் அரைக்காலனிய ஆளும் கும்பல்களின் பேர "சுதந்திரத்தை'' அகலப்படுத்தியுள்ளது.
7) உள் நாடுகளில் ஜனநாயக, தேசிய சுதந்திர இயக்கங்களை நசுக்கும் பாசிச அரசுமுறையைப் பாதுகாத்துப் பலப்படுத்துகிறது. போசித்து வளர்க்கிறது.போற்றித் துதிக்கின்றது.
8) இப்பின்னணியில் தான் இலங்கையின் அரசியல், அதன் பல் முகங்களிலும் நகர்கிறது.இனிவருங் காலங்களில் இலங்கையின் அரசியல் திசைவழி இவ்வாறுதான் அமையப் போகின்றது.
எனவே மே 18 இற்குப் பிந்திய உள்நாட்டுச் சூழ்நிலையின் சாராம்சமான, தமிழ்த் தேசிய அழிப்புப் போக்கானது, சர்வதேச சூழ்நிலையை அநுசரித்து, ஆதரித்துச் செல்கிறது, என்பது குறிப்பான முக்கியத்துவம் உடையதாகும்.
இதன் நான்காவது அம்சத்தின் > 4) இச்சூழலை நகர்த்திச் செல்லும் ஆதிக்க சக்திகள் அடிப்படையில் செய்வது உலக மறு பங்கீடாகும்.இதனால் சுதந்திர தேசிய இயக்கங்களை நசுக்குவதை இவை தமது பொதுக்குறிக்கோளாகக் கொண்டுள்ளன.< சரியான தன்மையையே அமெரிக்க சீன உறவு வெளிப்படுத்துகின்றது.
படியுங்கள் பரப்புங்கள்: முள்ளிவாய்க்கால் வீரகாவியம் மே 18.
http://senthanal.blogspot.com/2010/05/18.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
"சயனைட்" நாவல் - ஒரு பார்வை
"சயனைட்" நாவல் - ஒரு பார்வை "தங்கமாலை கழுத்துக்களே கொஞ்சம் நில்லுங்கள்! நஞ்சுமாலை சுமந்தவரை நினைவில் கொள்ளுங்கள், எம் இனத்த...
-
தமிழகம் வாழ் ஈழத்தமிழர்களை கழகக் கண்டனப் பொதுக்கூட்டத்தில் கலந்து கொள்ளக் கோருகின்றோம்! -
சமரன்: தோழர்கள் மீது எடப்பாடி கொலை வெறித்தாக்குதல், கழகம்...
