SHARE

Friday, November 24, 2017

The World's 8 Richest Men Are Now as Wealthy as Half the World's Population





 The eight individuals named in the report are Gates, Inditex founder Amancio Ortega, veteran investor Warren Buffett, Mexico’s Carlos Slim, Amazon boss Jeff Bezos, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Oracle’s Larry Ellison and former New York City mayor 
The World's 8 Richest Men Are Now as Wealthy as Half the World's Population

According to Oxfam's annual report.

By Reuters January 16, 2017

Just eight individuals, all men, own as much wealth as the poorest half of the world’s population, Oxfam said on Monday in a report calling for action to curtail rewards for those at the top.

As decision makers and many of the super-rich gather for this week’s World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos, the charity’s report suggests the wealth gap is wider than ever, with new data for China and India indicating that the poorest half of the world owns less than previously estimated.

Oxfam, which described the gap as “obscene,” said if the new data had been available before, it would have shown that in 2016 nine people owned the same as the 3.6 billion who make up the poorest half of humanity, rather than 62 estimated at the time.

In 2010, by comparison, it took the combined assets of the 43 richest people to equal the wealth of the poorest 50%, according to the latest calculations.

Inequality has moved up the agenda in recent years, with the head of the International Monetary Fund and the Pope among those warning of its corrosive effects, while resentment of elites has helped fuel an upsurge in populist politics.

Concern about the issue was highlighted again in the WEF’s own global risks report last week.

“We see a lot of hand-wringing – and clearly Trump’s victory and Brexit gives that new impetus this year – but there is a lack of concrete alternatives to business as usual,” said Max Lawson, Oxfam’s head of policy.

“There are different ways of running capitalism that could be much, much more beneficial to the majority of people.” Oxfam




குறிப்பு: மேற்காணும் இணைய சுவரொட்டி 2014 இல்Oxfam அறிக்கைக்கு விமர்சனமாக  ENB  ஆல் வெளியிடப்பட்டது.



SUPER-CHARGED CAPITALISM

Oxfam called in its report for a crackdown on tax dodging and a shift away from “super-charged” shareholder capitalism that pays out disproportionately to the rich.

While many workers struggle with stagnating incomes, the wealth of the super-rich has increased by an average of 11% a year since 2009.

Bill Gates, the world’s richest man who is a regular at Davos, has seen his fortune rise by 50% or $25 billion since announcing plans to leave Microsoft (MSFT, +0.19%) in 2006, despite his efforts to give much of it away.

While Gates exemplifies how outsized wealth can be recycled to help the poor, Oxfam believes such “big philanthropy” does not address the fundamental problem.

“If billionaires choose to give their money away then that is a good thing. But inequality matters and you cannot have a system where billionaires are systematically paying lower rates of tax than their secretary or cleaner,” Lawson said.

Oxfam bases its calculations on data from Swiss bank Credit Suisse and Forbes. The eight individuals named in the report are Gates, Inditex founder Amancio Ortega, veteran investor Warren Buffett, Mexico’s Carlos Slim, Amazon boss Jeff Bezos, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Oracle’s Larry Ellison and former New York City mayor

Michael Bloomberg.

Super rich hold $32 trillion in offshore havens 2012

Super rich hold $32 trillion in offshore havens 2012
Reuters Staff



LONDON (Reuters) - Rich individuals and their families have as much as $32 trillion of hidden financial assets in offshore tax havens, representing up to $280 billion in lost income tax revenues, according to research published on Sunday.

The study estimating the extent of global private financial wealth held in offshore accounts - excluding non-financial assets such as real estate, gold, yachts and racehorses - puts the sum at between $21 and $32 trillion.

The research was carried out for pressure group Tax Justice Network, which campaigns against tax havens, by James Henry, former chief economist at consultants McKinsey & Co.

He used data from the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, United Nations and central banks.

The report also highlights the impact on the balance sheets of 139 developing countries of money held in tax havens by private elites, putting wealth beyond the reach of local tax authorities.

The research estimates that since the 1970s, the richest citizens of these 139 countries had amassed $7.3 to $9.3 trillion of “unrecorded offshore wealth” by 2010.

Private wealth held offshore represents “a huge black hole in the world economy,” Henry said in a statement.

Reporting by Chris Vellacott
Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
SPONSORED

முதலாளித்துவ உச்சக்கட்ட ஏகாதிபத்தியத்தின் இடைக் கட்டங்கள்?


Tax Haven Cash Rising, Equal To At Least 10% Of World GDP

Cross-border wealth management first developed in Switzerland in the 1920s, but until the 1980s there was no other country where one could easily hide assets.

Tax Haven Cash Rising, Now Equal To At Least 10% Of World GDP


Kenneth Rapoza , CONTRIBUTOR
I cover business and investing in emerging markets. 
Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are 
their own.
The Russians and Arabs prefer Switzerland. The Americans prefer the Caribbean. While not illegal, tax havens are now stores of greater financial assets than ever imaged. The world's one percenters, therefore, own a larger percentage of global wealth than we thought.

That's because the equivalent of at least 10% of the world's GDP is in offshore banks, and that number is probably higher due to the opaqueness of the world's global tax havens, according to a research report release this month by the National Bureau of Economic Research. In other words, there is much more money out there than economists thought, and it is increasingly concentrated in the hands of the world's richest people.

The percentage of household wealth held in offshore accounts ranges widely from country to country from the equivalent of a couple points of GDP in China, to about 15% in Europe, and as high as 60% in some Persian Gulf and Latin American countries, report authors found. The study uses these estimates to construct a revised series of top wealth percentage holders in 10 countries, which has their net worth equal to about half of the world's GDP, the NBER study states.

"Because offshore wealth is very concentrated at the top, accounting for it increases the top 0.01% wealth share substantially in Europe, even in countries that do not use tax havens extensively," the report abstract says. Offshoring is huge in Russia, where the vast majority of wealth is held in foreign bank accounts. The paper suggests national economists look beyond tax and census survey data to truly understand wealth accumulation among the world's one-percenters.




The data is not entirely complete.

Offshore banks and countries known as tax havens rarely publish informative statistics about their account holders. It is not entirely clear if most of the wealth held offshore is owned by rich Westerners, or if it belongs to rich people from developing countries with a history of economic instability and high inflation. If so, as last year's Panama Papers data dump revealed, the question is how much of it belongs to corrupt politicians and is derived from criminal sources? How much belongs to a broader segment of the population just looking for tax relief? Is most of it off shore just to hide it from tax authorities, or are people setting up these accounts for non-tax reasons, such as preparing to set up a presence in another country, or for buying real estate.

For the report's authors, tax haven wealth is a key issue that helps understand the rise of income inequality. It is likely to become even more important in the future, as trends in global wealth and stateless entities are rising. As these trends increase, so will the use of off shore banking.

After the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in the U.S., President George W. Bush and congress signed the USA Patriot Act to crack down on offshore tax havens. It had some impact on traditional shelters that did not report account holders assets to tax authorities: Switzerland is not as big as it once was, as other offshore centers provide it with ample competition. The Patriot Act has not put a dent in off-shoring capital.


National Bureau of Economic Research. 
The gulf states prefer Switzerland due to historical factors. During the early discovery of oil there, Switzerland was the only European market that had a welcome mat out for foreign clients looking for professional money management. Russia NEO is an alternative estimate by NBER report writers, accounting for the possibilities of net errors and omissions in the balance of payments as calculated by other economists.

Switzerland And Beyond

The Swiss central bank has been publishing a country-by-country breakdown of the wealth owned by foreigners in Swiss banks annually since the 1970s. The data cover all the banks located in Switzerland, including the subsidiaries of foreign banks, but excluding the subsidiaries of Swiss banks abroad. But they only provide information on a specific type of account, known as fiduciary deposits. These are large accounts and believed to be representative of the offshore wealth managed by Swiss banks.

The problem with cracking this number is that a large fraction of the money held in Switzerland belongs on paper to shell companies, trusts, foundations, and personal holding companies incorporated in other tax havens. A significant percentage of the offshore wealth managed by Swiss banks belongs to people whose primary accounts, or entities, are based in the British Virgin Islands, Panama, or Jersey.

The use of shell companies increased after 2005 following the EUs Savings Tax Directive, a tax on interest income earned by EU residents in Switzerland and other tax havens. Because the tax did not apply to accounts nominally owned by shell companies, savvy investors were advised to shift their assets into shell companies.

The biggest Swiss bank account holders are nationals of: Russia, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Spain, France, Belgium, Argentina, Venezuela, Egypt and Jordan.

Most tax havens compile statistics on who owns the money. For instance, Switzerland worked with Brazil law enforcement to provide evidence that accounts held in family names belonged to a top congressman named Eduardo Cunha. He had lied about having $5 million in that account, money that was earned through a bribe scandal. He is now in prison.

In 2016, many off-shore centers authorized the Bank for International Settlements to disseminate bilateral banking statistics -- like the amount of deposits owned by Brazilians in Switzerland. This series of data is retrospective, and goes back in most cases to the early 2000, giving researchers enough evidence now as to how much the rich own in terms of world wealth.

As of August 2017, Guernsey, Hong Kong, the Isle of Man, Jersey, Luxembourg, Macao, and Switzerland reported bilateral current and historical banking statistics through the BIS. A number of offshore centers still did not, most notably the Bahamas, Singapore, and the Cayman Islands.

National Bureau of Economic Research. 
Despite the USA Patriot Act trying to put a dent in tax havens due to money laundering, use of tax shelters has increased. Having an offshore bank account is not illegal. "Our estimate" refers to NBER report authors. And BCG stands for Boston Consulting Group.

Cayman is a favorite of U.S. high net worth individuals, and is used as a holding company base for U.S. companies, the NBER report states.

Taking offshore wealth into account increases the rise in inequality seen in tax data. All the available evidence suggests that once offshore wealth is factored in, the top one percent of wealth share is now significantly higher than previously thought.

The NBER report was conducted by three professors from the University of California at Berkeley, the University of Copenhagen and the Norwegian University of Life Sciences.

Tax havens barely existed before World War I, when the direct taxation of income and wealth was in its infancy and top marginal tax rates did not exceed a few percentage points. Cross-border wealth management first developed in Switzerland in the 1920s, but until the 1980s there was no other country where one could easily hide assets. Now there are many, and all of them are flourishing despite the political rhetoric, and even political will, to at least crack down on money laundering and
serial tax evaders.

Find me on Twitter at @BRICBreaker 

Monday, November 20, 2017

கபடதாரி சீமானின் ஈழத் தமிழ் ஆதரவு அரசியல் வேடம், அம்பலம்!



 Seemans political cheekiness                                குட்டான்களின் குரல்

         -----------------------------               தொடர்ந்து ஒலிக்கும்          ---------------------------





Friday, November 17, 2017

Israel and Saudis: Best of Friends?

Israel and Saudis: Best of Friends?

By Stephen Lendman
Global Research, November 17, 2017

They’re strange bedfellows, allies of convenience against a common adversary – Iran for its sovereign independence and opposition to their hegemonic ambitions.

In an unprecedented interview with London-based, Saudi-owned Elaph.com, IDF chief of staff Gadi Eizenkot said Israel is willing to share intelligence with Riyadh.

He claimed with Trump as US president,

“there is an opportunity for a new international alliance in the region and a major strategic plan to stop the Iranian threat.”

“We are ready to exchange experiences with moderate Arab countries and exchange intelligence to confront Iran.”

Riyadh and Tel Aviv share “many common interests,” he added, calling Tehran the region’s “biggest threat.”

Eisenkot lied claiming Tehran aims “to control the Middle East by means of two Shiite crescents. The first from Iran through Iraq to Syria and Lebanon, and the second from Bahrain through to Yemen until the Red Sea.”

“This is what must be prevented in the region. In this matter, there is complete agreement between us and the kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which has never been our enemy. It has not fought us nor have we fought it.”

இந்திரா பாசிசம்

Israel admits to a working relationship with Saudi Arabia




Israel admits to a working relationship with Saudi Arabia
It turns out that something can bring two adversaries together: Iran

JEREMY BINCKES 11.17.2017•2:55 PM

The political situation in the Middle East is now, officially, a lot more complex than initially thought.
Israel is openly admitting that the country has been working with Saudi Arabia in military matters. The two countries, which don't have diplomatic ties, have found that there's a common adversary to deal with: Iran.

Israel's military chief told a Saudi newspaper that Israelis and Saudis were in agreement that Iran was the "largest threat to the region," per the Israeli newspaper Haaretz.

The news isn't surprising to anyone who has closely followed Middle East politics. Israel and Saudi Arabia both have a common enemy in Iran. Israel has claimed that Iran causes an existential threat to its existence — Iran has funded the anti-Israel group Hezbollah, which the U.S. considers a terrorist organization — while Saudi Arabia has been fighting a proxy war with Iran in Yemen, which until recently, has had American consent.

For two countries that have had a long history of tensions between them, notice of an alliance, no matter how small, represents a big step. As NBC noted, there's significant risk of blowback, especially for Saudi Arabia, which has claimed to be the standard-bearer for a strain of Islam that has spread through the world:

An Israeli-Saudi alliance would also be vastly unpopular on the Arab street given the ongoing occupation of the West Bank and Gaza.

"An alliance with Israel will definitely hurt the Saudis and their allies," said Hassan Hassan, an author and Middle East expert with the Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy in Washington. "It makes sense for them on the geopolitical level but not internally or on the social level."

"The paradox is that Saudi Arabia and others want to counter Iran through an alliance with Israel, but failing to stand up to Iran and then align with Israel is ticking all the boxes of a bad policy" . . .

The stakes are much higher for Saudi Arabia than Israel. The Saudis remain reluctant to publicly acknowledge or accept that relations are, indeed, improving. It's unlikely that any relationship will be formalized in the absence of Palestinian statehood — a condition the Saudis have demanded for years. But under the table, both sides agree that the enemy of your enemy is your friend.

Indian farmers bury themselves to protest land acquisition deal


Indian farmers bury themselves to protest land acquisition deal
Nita Bhalla

READNEW DELHI (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - Scores of farmers in western India have buried themselves neck-deep in the ground or are sitting in trenches to protest against what they say is meager financial compensation from authorities keen to build housing on their land.

More than 50 farmers - men and women - from the desert state of Rajasthan began their protest two days ago, claiming local authorities had forcibly acquired their land at rates dating back to 2010 and called for increased compensation.



Television pictures from Nindar village, about 15 km (10 miles) from the fort city of Jaipur, showed about a dozen men standing in narrow pits dug up to their necks, and scores of women sitting in trenches as crowds gathered round.

“We are here to demand (a) better rate for our land. What the government is offering us is not enough. The cost of land is much higher than it was before,” an elderly farmer, wearing a colorful turban and standing in a narrow pit, told the NDTV news channel on Wednesday.

Officials from the Jaipur Development Authority, which has acquired the land to build a housing project as part of the expansion of the popular tourist city, were not immediately available to comment on the protest.

The villagers have been holding demonstrations for better compensation since mid-September, but there has been no response from the government, they said.


This is not the first time farmers have staged dramatic protests to draw attention to their plight.

In March, drought-hit and debt-ridden farmers from the southern state of Tamil Nadu traveled to New Delhi in a protest where they displayed the skulls of fellow farmers believed to have committed suicide, and placed live rats in their mouths.

Reporting by Nita Bhalla @nitabhalla, Editing by Lyndsay Griffiths. Please credit the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, that covers humanitarian news, women's rights, trafficking, property rights, climate change and resilience. Visit news.trust.org Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

"சயனைட்" நாவல் - ஒரு பார்வை

  "சயனைட்" நாவல் - ஒரு பார்வை "தங்கமாலை கழுத்துக்களே கொஞ்சம் நில்லுங்கள்! நஞ்சுமாலை சுமந்தவரை நினைவில் கொள்ளுங்கள், எம் இனத்த...