SHARE

Monday, March 07, 2011

PFLP Comrade Jamal: Recent events in Libya mean the fascist dictatorship will soon fall


Recent events in Libya mean the fascist dictatorship will soon fall
PFLP Comrade Jamal:

Comrade Hussein al-Jamal, member of the Central Committee of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine said on February 24, 2011 that what is happening now in Libya demonstrates that the official Arab regimes, and specifically, the rule of the fascist dictatorship in Libya, have nothing to do with the masses of the Arab people while exploiting the capabilities and wealth of the masses.

Comrade al-Jamal spoke with the Voice of the People radio station in Gaza, saying that the fascist dictatorship in Libya is attempting to defend its authority and protect its private interests, using the most powerful weapons against the proud masses of the Libyan people in revolt. The masses of the Libyan people, he said, are engaged in an ongoing revolution, determined to achieve victory and complete its objectives in bringing down the regime.

Furthermore, he called for this expired fascist dictatorial regime to be brought before the Libyan people and international criminal courts to be tried for the heinous crimes committed against the heroic Libyan people.
Furthermore, he expressed his salute to the masses of our Arab people, and to the Libyan martyrs who were killed in brutal massacres committed by the dictator Muammar Gaddafi, his gang and his mercenaries, emphasizing that these systems and services and security battalions have been sponsored by the Mossad, Western intelligence services and the U.S. intelligence community. He said that these systems will not be stronger than the voice of the revolutionary Arab masses who are sweeping aside the weak thrones of all corrupt and dictatorial Arab regimes, particularly Gaddafi's dictatorship.

Comrade al-Jamal said that the spread of awareness among the Arab people which has led to the uprising and revolt against injustice in Tunisia, Egypt, now Libya, and throughout Arab countries reflects the historical development of the revolutionary process among the Arab people, saying that this process may be long or short and that the Arab people have accumulated revolutionary experience since before the last explosion in the mid-twentieth century. He noted that these revolutions had been delayed, in particular by the subordination of Arab officialdom to colonialism and imperialism, disengaging from the Palestinian national cause, and looting the wealth of the masses to their own benefit, leading to the absence of the Arab role in global political, cultural and scientific levels.

Furthermore, said Comrade Jamal, there is no Arab regime that creates any budget item that receives as high an allocated budget as the "security" services, including training and arms for the police and security services, overseen by the U.S. and Western intelligence servives. There is no Arab regime, said Comrade Jamal, allocating budgets for scientific research; these regimes have squandered Arab history and civilization and exploited the vast capacities of the Arab people in order to remain on their flimsy thrones based on the accumulation of stolen wealth in their hands, and the hands of their families and courtiers. Comrade Jamal pointed to Tunisia's ruling family and their vast wealth and corruption, and Egypt, where Mubarak and his family have become a gang of thieves and looters who took over the riches and fortunes of the Arab world.
In response to a question about the impact of these events on Palestine, Comrade al-Jamal stressed that these developments are positive, saying that imperialism in the U.S. and Europe has been sent reeling by the rapid development of revolutionary change in the Arab world, noting that Arab popular power will dramatically affect the relationship between Arab countries and the Zionist entity.

Comrade al-Jamal emphasized that these revolutionary transformations will lead to increased national attention to the Palestinian cause at the political level, as well as to action on the domestic Palestinian level. He pointed to Palestinian youth mobilizing through social media, including Twitter and Facebook, seeking tools and mechanisms to end the division and weakness that has brought the Palestinian cause to a deeply weak state of division and fragmentation.

He noted that these young people have raised the slogan, "The People Want to End the Division," and more than 500 Palestinian and Arab youth groups have arisen to communicate through digital media in order to struggle for Palestinian national unity. He pointed to the fact that the Arab revolutions have inspired Palestinian youth to break the barriers of fear in order to call for an end to division and the restoration of the Palestinian cause.

Comrade al-Jamal noted that the Front calls upon all Palestinian youth to invest their energy in building the Palestinian community and cause and to take initiatives, and that it supports all such efforts to end the division and protect the national cause.

நம்பாதீர்கள் இந்த நயவஞ்சகர்களை!

Wednesday, March 02, 2011

அமெரிக்க ஐரோப்பிய ஏகாதிபத்தியமே லிபிய மக்கள் விவகாரத்தில் தலையிடாதே!

கடாபியின் சர்வாதிகார அரசை எதிர்த்த லிபிய மக்களின் ஆயுதக்கிளா்ச்சியை ஆதரிப்போம்!

அமெரிக்க, ஐரோப்பிய, ஐ.நா அந்நியத் தலையீட்டை எதிர்ப்போம்!!


* மத்திய கிழக்கு, வட அமெரிக்க நாடுகளில் எண்ணெய்ப் பிரபுக்களினதும், குலக்குழு மன்னர்களதும், குடும்ப சர்வாதிகார அரசுகளை ஊன்றி, ஊட்டி வளர்த்து பாதுகாத்தவர்கள் ஐரோப்பிய அமெரிக்க ஏகாதிபத்தியவாதிகளே!

* அந்நாடுகளின் ஏற்றத்தாழ்வுக்கும், வறுமைக்கும், வேலையின்மைக்குமான ஊற்றுமூலம் ஏகாதிபத்திய பொருளாதார உலகமயமாக்கல் திட்டமே! ஊழலின் ஊற்றுவாய் உலகமயமாக்கலே!

* மத அடிப்படைவாத, பயங்கரவாத, சிந்தனைப்போக்கு அரசியலில் செல்வாக்குச் செலுத்துவதற்கான அடிப்படை, உலகமயமாக்கலின் விளைவாக உள்நாட்டு உபரி மூலதனத்தை ஏகாதிபத்தியவாதிகள் அபகரித்துக்கொள்வதால், உள்நாட்டுப் பொருள் உற்பத்தி முறை முதலாளித்துவத்துக்கு முந்திய நிலையில் நீடிப்பதாகும்!

* மேலும் இஸ்ரேல் என்கிற அமெரிக்க இராணுவத்தளம் இப்பிராந்தியத்தில் தொடர்ந்து மூட்டிக் கொண்டிருக்கும் யுத்த ஆக்கிரமிப்பு நெருப்பு நாசகாரத்தனமானதாகும்!

* எனவே மத்தியகிழக்கு, வட அமெரிக்க நாடுகளின் பின்தங்கிய நிலைக்கு நேரடிப்பொறுப்பாளிகள் ஏகாதிபத்தியவாதிகளே!

* இன்று மூண்டுள்ள நெருப்பு இதற்கு முடிவுகட்டுமா என்பது இத் தேசிய ஜனநாயக இயக்கத்தின் ஏகாதிபத்திய எதிர்ப்பு நிலையின் உறுதிப்பாட்டிலேயே முற்றும் தங்கியுள்ளது.

* இதற்கு முதல்படி இத் தேசிய ஜனநாயக இயக்கத்திற்குள் ஏகாதிபத்தியவாதிகளின் அனைத்து ஊடுருவலையும் முளையிலேயே கிள்ளி எறிவதாகும்.

வரலாற்றுப் படிப்பினைகள்:

1) முதலாவது ஏகாதிபத்திய உலக மறுபங்கீட்டு உலகப் போரின் உடனடி விளைவாக 1917 ஒக்ரோபர் ரசிய சோசலிஸப் புரட்சி உலகத்தில் முதல் தடவையாக ஒடுக்கப்பட்ட பாட்டாளி வர்க்கத்தின் சர்வாதிகார அரசை உருவாக்கியது.இதன் தலைமையில் ஒரு சோசலிச உலகம் உருவாகியது.

மனித சமுதாயத்தின் நவீன - முதலாளித்துவ- வரலாற்றில், இது முதலாவது மாபெரும் புரட்சியாகும்.

(உள்நாட்டு சர்வதேச ஏகாதிபத்திய சதியால் இப் புரட்சி முறியடிக்கப்பட்டது)

2) முதல் உலக சோசலிசப் புரட்சியைத் தொடர்ந்து நேரடிக் காலனியாதிக்கம் முறியடிக்கப்பட்டு காலனி நாடுகள் ‘சுதந்திரம்’ பெற்றன.

இது இரண்டாவது மாபெரும் புரட்சியாகும்.

(எனினும் முன் கதவால் வெளியேறிய ஏகாதிபத்திய சுரண்டல் பின்கதவால் வந்து நிலை கொண்டது.)

3) திரிபுவாத சோவியத் சமூக ஏகாதிபத்தியம் வீழ்ந்து நொருங்கியது.அதன் ஆதிக்கத்தின் கீழ் இருந்த நாடுகள் சிதறுண்டன.

இது மூன்றாவது திருப்புமுனையான நிகழ்வாகும்.

(எனினும் இந்நாடுகள் ஏகாதிபத்திய உலக மறுபங்கீட்டின் ஏதோ ஒருவகைத் தளங்களாகின,)

4) இதன் தொடர்ச்சியாக ஏகாதிபத்தியத்தையும் அதன் காவல் நாய் அரசுகளையும் எதிர்த்து, மக்கள் பிரதிநிதித்துவ குடியாட்சிக்கான
தேசிய ஜனநாயக இயக்கம் மத்திய கிழக்கு, வட அமெரிக்க நாடுகளில் தற்போது (2011) மூண்டுள்ளது.

இது நான்காவது மாபெரும் புரட்சிகர மக்கள் இயக்கமாகும்.

* முதல் மூன்று புரட்சிகளும் முற்றுப்பெறாதபோதும், ஏகாதிபத்தியத்தை எதிர்த்த சோசலிச தேசிய ஜனநாயக இயக்கங்களை அவை உந்தித்தள்ளின.

* இந்த நான்காவது புரட்சி அவ்வியக்கத்திற்கு புதிய வல்லமைகளை வழங்கும் ஆற்றல் கொண்டதாக உள்ளது. அத்திசைவழியில் பயணிக்க ஆரம்பித்துள்ளது.

**அதனால் அவற்றை ஏற்று ஆதரிப்போம்! அந்நியத் தலையீட்டை எப்போதும் எதிர்ப்போம்!

** மத்திய கிழக்கு, வட அமெரிக்க நாடுகளின் தேசிய ஜனநாயக இயக்கங்கள் ஓங்குக!

** அமெரிக்க ஐரோப்பிய ஏகாதிபத்தியவாதிகளே அவர்கள் தலைவிதியில் தலையிடாதீர்!

** லிபிய மக்களின் எண்ணெய்வளத்தைக் கொள்ளையிட அந்நாட்டைத் துண்டாட கனவு காணாதீர்!

** ஆபிரிக்க அரசுகளே, லிபிய மக்களின் விடுதலை வேட்கையை நசுக்கும் கடாபி பயங்கரவாதிக்கு, கூலிப்படைகளை கொடுத்து அரசபயங்கரவாதத்துக்கு துணை போகாதீர்!

** எகிப்திய, துனூசிய இளம் மக்களே லிபிய மக்களைத் தாக்கியழிக்க ஏகாதிபத்தியவாதிகள் உங்கள் நாடுகளில் தளம் அமைக்க அநுமதியாதீர்!

ஐ.நா.ஒழிக!   நேற்றோ ஒழிக!

லிபிய மக்களின் ஆயுதக் கிளர்ச்சி வெற்றிபெறுக!

தேசிய ஜனநாயக சோசலிசப் புரட்சிகள் ஓங்குக,

உலகத் தொழிலாளர்களே ஒடுக்கப்பட்ட தேசங்களே ஒன்று சேருங்கள்!

=======  புதிய ஈழப்புரட்சியாளர்கள் =======

Tuesday, March 01, 2011

கடாபியின் ஆபிரிக்க கூலிப்படைகளைக் காப்பாற்றும் ஒபாமா!


In UN Libya Resolution, US Insistence on ICC Exclusion Shields Mercenaries from Algeria, Ethiopia
By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, February 26 -- After passage of a compromise Libya resolution by the UN Security Council on Saturday night, Inner City Press asked French Permanent Representative Gerard Araud if mercenaries aren't let off the hook by the sixth operative paragraph, exempting personnel from states not members of the International Criminal Court from ICC prosecution.

Araud regretted the paragraph, but said the the United States had demanded it. He said, “No, that's, that was for one country, it was absolutely necessary for one country to have that considering its parliamentary constraints, and this country we are in. It was a red line for the United States. It was a deal-breaker, and that's the reason we accepted this text to have the unanimity of the Council.”

While a Bush administration Ambassador to the UN in 2002 threatened to veto a UN resolution on Bosnia if it did not contain a similar exclusion, the Obama administration has maintained this insistence on impunity, which in this case applies to mercenaries from Algeria, Tunisia and Ethiopia, among other mercenary countries. (In the case of Algeria, there are allegations of official support for Gadhafi).

While Inner City Press was able to ask UK Ambassador Mark Lyall Grant about the exclusion for mercenaries from non ICC countries, US Permanent Representative Susan Rice did not take a question from Inner City Press, and none on this topic, despite having mentioned mercenaries in her speech.

When Libya, but no longer Gadhafi, diplomat Ibrahim Dabbashi came out to take questions, Inner City Press asked him which countries the mercenaries used by Gadhafi come from.

He mentioned Algeria, Tunisia and Ethiopia -- highlighted by NGOs as non ICC members -- as well as Chad, Niger, Kenya and Guinea. So some mercenaries could be prosecuted by the ICC, and not others, under language demanded by the US Mission to the UN. (Watch this site.N/A)

Here is the US-demanded paragraph:

6. Decides that nationals, current or former officials or personnel from a State outside the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya which is not a party to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of that State for all alleged acts or omissions arising out of or related to operations in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya established or authorized by the Council, unless such exclusive jurisdiction has been expressly waived by the State.

Footnote: Araud blaming the US position on "parliamentary constraints" seemed to some a way to try to blame a decision by Obama's executive branch on the Republicans who recently took over the House of Representatives. But it was an Obama administration decision. More nuanced apologists blame the Defense Department for pulling rank on State. But the result is mercenaries firing freely.

Source: Inner City Press

Monday, February 28, 2011

U.S. and Allies Weigh Libya No-Fly Zone

* “There hasn’t been discussion that I’m aware of related to military intervention beyond that, and a discussion of that nature would have to begin at the U.N.,” a senior administration official said. But, the official added, “I wouldn’t say we’ve ruled anything out, either.”

* But the(Italys) treaty{with Libya) also contains a nonaggression clause that some analysts said complicated Italy’s position in the event of international military intervention in Libya. In it, Italy pledges not to use “direct or indirect” military force against Libya, or to allow the use of its territory “in any hostile act against Libya.”



* An Italian Foreign Ministry spokesman, Maurizio Massari, noted that Italy had suspended the treaty, not revoked it, and would evaluate how to proceed as the conflict in Libya evolved.

* “We signed the friendship treaty with a state, but when the counterpart no longer exists — in this case the Libyan state — the treaty cannot be applied,” Italy’s foreign minister, Franco Frattini, said Sunday in a television interview.

* There are several United States and NATO bases in Italy that presumably would be staging areas for any action against Libya, including the United States Sixth Fleet base near Naples.


=====================================================
U.S. and Allies Weigh Libya No-Fly Zone

By JOHN M. BRODER
The New York Times February 27, 2011

WASHINGTON — Obama administration officials held talks on Sunday with European and other allied governments as they readied plans for the possible imposition of a no-fly zone over Libya to prevent further killings of civilians by forces loyal to Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi.

Further increasing international pressure on Colonel Qaddafi, the Libyan leader, Italy suspended a 2008 treaty with Libya that includes a nonaggression clause, a move that could allow it to take part in future peacekeeping operations in Libya or enable the use of its military bases in any possible intervention.

“We signed the friendship treaty with a state, but when the counterpart no longer exists — in this case the Libyan state — the treaty cannot be applied,” Italy’s foreign minister, Franco Frattini, said Sunday in a television interview.

White House, State Department and Pentagon officials held talks with their European and NATO counterparts about how to proceed in imposing flight restrictions over Libya. A senior administration official said Sunday that no decision had been made, and expressed caution that any decision on a no-fly zone would have to be made in consultations with allies.

A diplomat at the United Nations said that any such action would require further debate among the 15 nations of the Security Council, which was unlikely to act unless there was a significant increase in state-sponsored violence in Libya, including the use of aircraft against civilians.

Ban Ki-moon, the United Nations secretary general, was scheduled to meet with President Obama on Monday afternoon at the White House to discuss the deteriorating situation in Libya.

Obama administration officials said Sunday that they were also discussing whether the American military could disrupt communications to prevent Colonel Qaddafi from broadcasting in Libya. In addition, the administration was looking at whether the military could be used to set up a corridor in neighboring Tunisia or Egypt to assist refugees.

“There hasn’t been discussion that I’m aware of related to military intervention beyond that, and a discussion of that nature would have to begin at the U.N.,” a senior administration official said. But, the official added, “I wouldn’t say we’ve ruled anything out, either.”

Italy’s treaty with Libya, signed by Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi in August 2008, calls on Italy to pay Libya $5 billion over 20 years in reparations for its colonial past there. In return, Libya pledged to help block the flow of illegal immigrants to Italy and grant favorable treatment for Italian companies seeking to do business in Libya.

But the treaty also contains a nonaggression clause that some analysts said complicated Italy’s position in the event of international military intervention in Libya. In it, Italy pledges not to use “direct or indirect” military force against Libya, or to allow the use of its territory “in any hostile act against Libya.”

There are several United States and NATO bases in Italy that presumably would be staging areas for any action against Libya, including the United States Sixth Fleet base near Naples. After the treaty was signed, Italy had to explain to NATO that it would respect its multilateral international treaties.

An Italian Foreign Ministry spokesman, Maurizio Massari, noted that Italy had suspended the treaty, not revoked it, and would evaluate how to proceed as the conflict in Libya evolved.

At the United Nations, there was no formal discussion about Libya on Sunday, as diplomats weighed possible next steps and digested the Security Council resolutions passed Saturday night that imposed an arms embargo and economic sanctions on Libya.

An American official, who discussed United Nations deliberations on the condition that he not be identified, said the Security Council had moved more quickly on Libya than on almost any issue in recent years. The body is poised to take further steps, if warranted, like “a rapid deterioration, a significant uptick in violence,” he said. “In terms of big ideas like a no-fly zone, if the international community is ready, and there is a need to impose a no-fly zone or authorize use of force, that would require another whole debate and resolution.”

Helene Cooper contributed reporting from Washington, and Rachel Donadio from Rome.

UN: Why Libya? Why not Sri Lanka?

லிபியாவில் அமெரிக்கத் தலையீட்டிற்கு தயாரிப்புச் செய்யும் ஐ.நா.சபை!

லிபியாவில் கடாபி எதிர்ப்பு வன்முறைக் கிளர்ச்சியை ’ஆதரிக்கும்’ ஏகாதிபத்தியவாதிகள்!

These are some shots that show the types of weapons used against the battalion in the city of Misurata. Sent in through Sharek, Al Jazeera's citizen journalist portal.



A defected army officer teaches the use of an anti-aircraft gun to civilians who have volunteered to join the rebel army in Benghazi February 27, 2011. The rebel army is preparing to fight Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi's forces in Tripoli if necessary, an official in the rebel army said. Via Reuters.

UN Refers Libya to the ICC
Libya 27-02-2011.Timestamp: 10:20pm
Media advisory issued by the Coalition for the International Criminal Court (CICC) - a civil society network in 150 countries advocating for a fair, effective and independent ICC and improved access to justice for victims of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity – issued in relation to the referral by the Security Council of the United Nations (UNSC) of the situation in Libya to the ICC.
Sri Lanka commends EU decision to re-list LTTE ban .
Ban on the terrorist outfit
27 February 2011 11:56
Sri Lanka today welcommed the European Union’s (EU) decision to re-list the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) as a banned terror outfit. The EU’s decision came after a comprehensive review of listed terrorist groups. Government sources said the EU’s decision show’s its commitment to eliminate international terrorism and that Sri Lanka would extend its fullest support in this endeavour

The EU’s announcement was made through Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 83/2011 of 31 January 2011, published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The EU terrorist listings made in terms of article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism, proscribes organizations listed operating in EU member countries and freezes their assets.

The LTTE is re-listed among 26 Groups and Entities, on the determination that they “have been involved in terrorist acts within the eaning of Article 1(2) and (3) of Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, that a decision has been taken with respect to them by a competent authority within the meaning of Article 1(4) of that Common Position, and that they should continue to be subject to the specific restrictive measures provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001.”

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Find a new global financial order says President Rajapaksa


Post-Global Financial Crisis: Find a new global financial order says President Rajapaksa
By Janaka Alahapperuma
Info Lanka News

The global economic crisis taught the world many lessons. Those lessons varied across nations. But all countries learnt common as well as individual lessons, from this crisis. In general, the crisis left behind, a trail of serious damage across nations and shook the very foundations of the financial structure of the world. However, historians would record that Asian economies came out of this painful era in better shape than their western counterparts. President Mahinda Rajapaksa made these observations addressing the 49th South East Asian Central Bank Governors’ (SEACEN) Conference which was held in Colombo (today) on 25 February.

In his inaugural speech President Rajapaksa said a lot of attention has been paid to regulate and supervise financial institutions which are considered to be too big to fail. Since the fall of major global financial institutions, they have damaged the international financial structure in a permanent manner. By the same token, it is also necessary for the worldwide financial community to focus upon the management of economies that have a global impact, and therefore have become too big to fail. We all know that certain national economies are so large and wide, their financial well-being is vital for the global economic health. In that context, it is essential that such globally influential economies should act in globally responsible manner, so as to not place themselves and indeed others, with whom they have dealings, in danger, he further added.

President Rajapaksa said the SEACEN group has become a highly influential group in the world economy today and underlined the necessity to have a coordinated approach in consultation with multi lateral institutions and other key players rather than unilateral intervention on the part of a single nation. Commenting on the theme of the conference - "Post-Global Financial Crisis: Issues and Challenges for Central Banks of Emerging Markets", the President said the blatant application of double standards; the obvious policy contradictions and inconsistencies; the stubbornness of large economies to face realities; the unfortunate attempts to politicize multi-lateral financial organizations; and the lethargy in handling urgently needed financial bail-outs, will probably surface as distinct causes that aggravated the crisis.

Deputy Minister of the Finance and Planning Geethanjana Gunawardena, Governor of Central Bank Ajith Nivard Cabraal, Deputy Managing Director of International Monetary Fund Naoyuki Shinohara, Governor National Bank of Cambodia Dr. Chea Chanto were also present.

Following is the full text of the Address made by President Mahinda Rajapaksa:

Your Excellencies, Governors, ladies and gentlemen,

At the outset, let me thank the Board of Governors of SEACEN for inviting me to inaugurate the 46th SEACEN Governors’ Conference and High Level Seminar. It is indeed a pleasure and privilege for me to do so, and I must thank all of you for selecting Sri Lanka as your host country for this most important event. I see your presence here today as a celebration of the 60th Anniversary of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, and as an acknowledgement of the elimination of terrorism from our midst. In this background, we do hope you have an excellent conference and fruitful meetings so that you may carry wonderful memories of our people’s progress, ability and friendship.

It is clear that the SEACEN group has become a highly influential group in the world economy today. With the very recent entry of the People’s Bank of China to this group, it has further strengthened its reach and impact across the world, and I believe SEACEN’s voice would now be even stronger.

My dear Governors, you have selected “Post-Global Financial Crisis: Issues and Challenges for Central Banks of Emerging Markets” as the theme for your deliberation at this year’s Board of Governors’ Conference. As we all know, the serious studies that have taken place on this broad topic among many central bankers, economic stakeholders, analysts and others have been extensive and wide. I believe the main reason for such in-depth attention on the subject has been that, almost all nations have suffered immensely through the crisis. Many would also carry the scars of this massive financial disaster, for many years to come.

At the same time, historians would record that Asian economies came out of this painful era in better shape than their western counterparts. Perhaps the Asian crisis in the late 90s and the subsequent counter measures implemented by the Asian economies enabled them to develop the resilience, strength and wisdom to face the new crisis in an appropriate manner. This ground reality then suggests that a better prepared country with sound macro-economic fundamentals and a strong financial system would be able to face shocks in a more successful manner, than those who may be less prepared.

My dear friends, the global economic crisis taught us many lessons. The lessons varied across nations. But all countries learnt common as well as individual lessons, from this crisis. In general, the crisis left behind, a trail of serious damage across nations and shook the very foundations of the financial structure of the world. It is therefore, clear that if we are to safeguard the world economy in the future, we would need to build a new financial order and a model that will better equip us to face crises of this nature.

In this endeavour, a lot of attention has been paid to regulate and supervise financial institutions which are considered to be “too big to fail”. This is indeed commendable, since the fall of major global financial institutions damages the international financial structure in a permanent manner. By the same token, it is also necessary for the worldwide financial community to focus upon the management of economies that have a global impact, and therefore have become “too big to fail”. We all know that certain national economies are so large and wide, their financial well-being is vital for the global economic health. In that context, it is essential that such globally influential economies should act in globally responsible manner, so as to not place themselves and indeed others, with whom they have dealings, in danger.

We may perhaps reflect on a recent case study which illustrates this position clearly.

Of late, many economic analysts have pointed out as to how the world has been anxiously watching while massive quantities of new money were injected by certain advanced nations into their economy, and through such infusion, into the entire world. It is widely expected that such infusion, while possibly stimulating growth and employment within the issuing nation, would have a massive negative impact on the rest of the world in time to come. Hence, they argue that it may have been more appropriate, if such intervention was done in consultation with multi-lateral institutions and other key players. It would have ensured that a coordinated approach could have been agreed upon, rather than being a unilateral intervention on the part of a single nation. A similar approach in relation to currency values, trade practices, country bail-outs and other structural interventions are also being advocated for the greater health of the world economy.

Your Excellencies, my dear Governors, a deep study of the crisis would reveal many defects and inconsistencies in the world economic system. The blatant application of double standards; the obvious policy contradictions and inconsistencies; the stubbornness of large economies to face realities; the unfortunate attempts to politicize multi-lateral financial organizations; and the lethargy in handling urgently needed financial bail-outs, will probably surface as distinct causes that aggravated the crisis.

We must also not be fooled into thinking that the crisis is now over. What we see at the moment is perhaps a relative calm in the world’s financial landscape, as a result of the interventions of multi-lateral organizations such as the IMF, many Governments and Central Banks. It is vital that this “calm” be made use of to implement sustainable and carefully thought-out policies to avoid a repeat of a similar or any other crisis. In my view, the highly eminent group of very senior leaders of multi-lateral institutions and influential Governors such as yourselves, would be the proper forum to deliberate such matters. The economic world therefore looks to you to propose a satisfactory way forward in the future, and we are very confident you will deliver.

My dear friends, at the end of World War 2, the IMF and the World Bank were created to safeguard the world economy and the economies of member countries in the event of an economic crisis, and to stimulate development. At the same time, nations created Central Banks in their respective countries as key financial and economic policy institutions to guide the respective countries towards stability and growth while dealing with shocks that may affect the economy. In that context, we welcome the recent efforts of the IMF to enhance the role of Special Drawing Rights (SDR) as a major reserve asset, in order to enhance worldwide currency stability

The recent crises also taught us that existing global currencies in the SDR basket such as the US Dollar, Euro, Sterling and Yen were probably insufficient to play the role of reserve currency in turbulent times. The search for alternatives led to the price of gold and other commodities rising, creating a new set of challenges. In that scenario, we welcome the suggestion by the IMF of including emerging market currencies such as the Chinese Renminbi in the SDR basket. However, given the distinctive nature of emerging markets, which are still to reach near optimum levels of development, it may be wise to approach this issue without pre-conditions, so as to fast track these necessary reforms in the global financial architecture.

Your Excellencies, my dear Governors, it is very refreshing that we are all here in Colombo to search for ways to manage the current turmoil in the world economic environment in a sustainable manner. In order to be truly successful, we have to solve the economic problems of our people, who are our ultimate stakeholders. The people of our respective nations have entrusted their Governments with authority and resources to provide them with a safe economic environment where they can achieve their economic hopes and aspirations. When a country establishes a Central Bank, the people transfer a significant part of that duty and responsibility to you as well. Accordingly, as Governors, you are also responsible to the people of your respective countries.

At the same time, when sovereign nations subscribe to the collective objectives of a multi-lateral financial institution that pledges to maintain global economic and financial stability, a part of the sacred trust of billions of human beings, pass onto those multi-lateral institutions as well. Hence, such organizations too, shoulder a great responsibility towards the billions of people who indirectly rely upon them to make the right decisions to improve their lives. We all know that within these multi-lateral organizations whose decisions affect the entire world, those with a larger investment wield greater authority and power. Accordingly, in an indirect manner, the entire world places great trust in large powerful economies. Hence, it is perhaps time for the world economic community to remind such powerful economies that with such authority and rights, onerous duties and responsibilities also arise.

My dear friends, as the SEACEN group, it is our wish that you will be at the forefront to rebuild the world economy and proactively reform the international monetary system. Our region offers a wealth of experience and knowledge to the world. Let us get together and deliver upon the expectations placed upon us. Let us pledge to do all in our power to ensure that this world, with all its knowledge, technology and understanding, will never have to experience another economic crisis of this magnitude or nature again.

May the Blessings of the Noble Triple Gem, be with you always.

Thursday, February 24, 2011

அம்மாவுக்கு அஞ்சலி!

மயானகாண்டம்

காடையன் டக்ளஸும் காட்டுமிராண்டி ராஜபக்ச ராணுவமும் பார்வதி அம்மா மயானத்தில் பாசிச வெறியாட்டம்.
ENB
=====================================================================
Occupying SL military desecrates ashes of Parvathi Amma
[TamilNet, Wednesday, 23 February 2011, 08:53 GMT]

The ashes of Parvathi Amma cremated Tuesday and waiting for ritual collection were desecrated by occupying SL military in Jaffna Tuesday night. Three dead dogs with gun shot injuries were put on the cremation spot and the ashes were scattered by running over the spot by military vehicles. Local people witnessed the movement of military vehicles in the location Tuesday night. Former TNA parliamentarian, Mr. MK Sivajilingam, guardian to the interests of Parvathi Amma, came out with strong condemnation of the desecration.
In Saiva tradition, the ashes are ritually collected the day following the cremation, to dissolve them in waters such as sea, river etc.
======================================================================
தமிழீழ தேசத்தின் தேசிய அன்னையின் அஸ்தி இனந்தெரியாதோரால் நாசம்


பார்வதியம்மாளின் அஸ்தி நேற்று இரவு இனந்தெரியாதோரால் மிகவும் கேவலமான முறையில் நாசமாக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது. அவரை எரியூட்டிய இடத்தில் நாய்களை சுட்டுப் போட்டதுடன் அவரது அஸ்தியும் தாறுமாறாக அள்ளி வீசப்பட்டிருந்தது.

இதுகுறித்து மேலும் தெரியவருவதாவது,

நேற்று மாலை பார்வதியம்மாளின் பூதவுடல் அஞ்சலி நிகழ்வுக்குப்பின்னர் ஊறணி மயானத்தில் தகனம் செய்யப்பட்டது. இரவு 7 மணிக்குப்பின்னர் அங்கு கூடியிருந்த மக்கள் கலைந்து சென்றனர். இன்று காலை மயானத்துக்குச் சென்று பார்த்தவேளை அவரது அஸ்தி எரியூட்டப்பட்ட இடத்தில் இருந்து அள்ளி தாறுமாறாக வீசப்பட்டிருந்தது. அத்துடன் மூன்று நாய்கள் சுடப்பட்டு அரைகுறையாக எரிக்கப்பட்ட நிலையில் அவரது அஸ்தியுடன் போடப்பட்டும் இருந்தது.

அதேவேளை நேற்று மாலை மயானத்திற்கு வந்த சிலர் இறுதிக்கிரியைகளை நடத்திய ஐயர் யார் என சிங்களத்தில் மிரட்டும் தொனியில் விசாரித்திதாகவும் தெரிவிக்கப்படுகிறது

பதிவு Feb 23, 2011 / பகுதி: முக்கியச் செய்தி

"சயனைட்" நாவல் - ஒரு பார்வை

  "சயனைட்" நாவல் - ஒரு பார்வை "தங்கமாலை கழுத்துக்களே கொஞ்சம் நில்லுங்கள்! நஞ்சுமாலை சுமந்தவரை நினைவில் கொள்ளுங்கள், எம் இனத்த...