SHARE

Wednesday, October 23, 2024

The Existence Of Israel’s Secret Stealth Drone Should Come As No Surprise

Another satellite image taken in August 2023 showing the revamped and expanded look of the segregated area at Ramon Airbase, which is largely as it still appears today. Google Earth

The Existence Of Israel’s Secret Stealth Drone Should Come As No Surprise

The apparent existence of such an aircraft points to a highly logical capability requirement, especially in regard to Israel's long stand-off with Iran.

Joseph Trevithick Posted on Oct 22, 2024  The War Zone

The existence of a secret Israeli drone, referred to as RA-01 and used for covert missions, has emerged from an unauthorized disclosure of U.S. intelligence documents which have now been posted all over social media. Israel’s possession of at least a pocket fleet of long-range stealth drones capable of gathering intelligence and possibly conducting strikes is extremely logical to the point of it being a bit odd if they never pursued such a capability. Israel is home to an extensive and often pioneering uncrewed aviation industry and drones of this kind would be very well suited to supporting the country’s ongoing stand-off with Iran. During a major Israeli operation to strike targets in that country, they would likely play an indispensable role, as well.

Mention of RA-01 is found in classified documents from the U.S. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), the authenticity of which U.S. officials have not disputed and that first emerged online last week via a pro-Iran channel on the Telegram social network. An investigation into whether this unapproved release was the product of a hack or a leak is ongoing. The documents could still be disinformation or feature inaccurate info by design, so we cannot indepedently confirm their authenticity, but at this time, there is no indication that they are not legitimate and there are many indications that they are.

The NGA documents center on observations from October 15-16 of an Israeli Air Force (IAF) large force exercise, which is viewed as part of preparations for retaliation primarily for Iran’s ballistic missile barrage at the beginning of this month. In addition to talk about RA-01, there is a discussion about Israel’s air-launched ballistic missile capabilities, including Rocks and the previously undisclosed Golden Horizon, which have been employed in previous Israeli retaliatory strikes on Iran, as you can read more about here. There is also talk of Israel’s nuclear arsenal, which the country has never publicly acknowledged, and that NGA does not expect to be used in any near-term operations against Iran, as well.

When it comes to the RA-01, no details are provided about its design or capabilities, or the size of the fleet, in the NGA documents. What significance the RA-01 nomenclature might have is unknown. “RA” could imply a reconnaissance and attack capability. Its basic structure is also in line with alpha-numeric designations Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI) has used for drone designs in the past. The designation could be one the U.S. Intelligence Community uses internally to refer to this platform and that does not reflect in any way what the Israelis call it, as well. One of the NGA documents also refers to the Rocks air-launched ballistic missile as the IS02, which could also be another internal U.S. designation.

The only known picture of the Rocks air-launched ballistic missile, under the wing of an IAF F-16I wearing a rare gray scheme. IAF

NGA’s report also does not say any RA-01s were actually observed, just that there were signs that they were operating during the period in question from a restricted area at Ramon Airbase in the Negev desert in southern Israel. Ramon, which was among the targets of Iran’s missile and drone attacks on Israel back in April, primarily hosts F-16I Sufa fighters and AH-64 attack helicopters, but has also been home to various secretive and specialized units over the years.

Experts and observers have already identified a pair of secluded fence-off areas at the northeastern end of Ramon with shared direct access to one of the base’s two runways, which could house the RA-01s.

Work on this segregated area of the base dates back to at least the 2007-2008 timeframe from what can seen in available satellite imagery. A significant redevelopment and expansion of this section, including the construction of an entirely new taxiway, more hangars, and other facilities, occurred in the mid-2010s.

A satellite image of the segregated area of Ramon Airbase taken in 2010, which offers a good view of its original layout. Google Earth

A general look at Ramon Airbase in Israel in 2023. Google Earth

Each of the current fenced-off areas has a pair of semi-circular hangars that are approximately 80 feet long and 64 feet wide. One of the sections also has a rectangular hangar, which dates back to the original construction in this part of the base, and that is some 120 feet long and 60 feet wide. Both areas have 70-foot by 70-foot open-ended sunshade-style enclosures leading to the shared taxiway, which is just over 70 feet wide. This might point to the maximum length of the RA-01’s wingspan.

White triangles painted on the tarmac extending to one side of both of the sunshades look to be engine backblast warning areas, which could point to jet propulsion. This also points to these structures being scoot-and-hide shelters where ground personnel can load munitions and other stores, as well as conduct various other kinds of last-minute checks, away from prying eyes, including satellites above.

A closer look at the hangars, sunshades, tarmac markings, and other features at the segregated section of Ramon Airbase as of August 2023. Google Earth

The presence of two distinct fenced-off areas may also point to one or more other secretive drone types being housed in this part of Ramon Airbase beyond the RA-01s. This, in turn, could mean the hangar and taxiway dimensions, as well as the triangles on the tarmac, and not reflective of the RA-01’s design, at least exclusively. Hangars can be used to hold multiple assets at once, too. The possibility remains that the RA-01s operate from elsewhere within the base, as well, and these facilities are used for other platforms entirely.

It is worth noting in this context that U.S. drones designed for covert and clandestine missions, including ones deep inside denied areas, dating back to the height of the Cold War and that have now emerged into the light, range widely in size, complexity and configuration. Prominent examples of this diversity of designs (and specific intended mission profiles) include the stealthy flying wing RQ-170 Sentinel and the RQ-29, a converted civilian light sport aircraft.

As noted earlier, Israel’s aerospace sector has an established history of pioneering uncrewed aviation developments. Furthermore, though Israeli companies have not publicly demonstrated a flying stealth aircraft, crewed or uncrewed, it should be within their technical grasp. IAI, specifically, is known to have reached at least the wind tunnel testing phase of development on one high-altitude long-endurance drone concept with radar and infrared signature-reducing features, called the HA-10, in the 1990s. The HA-10 has been linked to the Israeli Boost Intercept System (IBIS) missile defense project, which envisioned a missile-armed drone to shoot down enemy ballistic missiles in their initial boost phase of flight.

“The UAV [uncrewed air vehicle] would have cruised at between 7 and 15 km [approximately 23,000 to 49,000 feet] altitude, and would carry an IRST [infrared search and track system], laser range-finder, datalinks and two to four [Python-series air-to-air] missiles,” according to an archived digital edition of Jane’s Strategic Weapon Systems from 2002. “HA-10 was designed with low IR and radar signatures, and was planned to loiter for up to 24 hours on station with a payload of 1,000 kg [approximately 2,200 pounds].”

A rendering of the HA-10 design. IAI

A paper that members of IAI presented at the 24th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences in 2004 describes the HA-10 as one of “a number of additional high altitude advanced configurations” the company had previously examined “within the framework of the advanced design activity.” IAI’s “HA” series does also include another non-stealthy design, the HA-13, that the company proposed together with TRW in the United States to meet the U.S. Air Force’s Tier II+ drone requirements that ultimately led to the fielding of the Global Hawk.

The possibility that the RA-01 is close in form and/or function to something like the HA-10 or the RQ-170, or even to a flying wing UCAV, would align well with the other details about the large force IAF exercise, as well as Israel’s general operational considerations, especially with regard to Iran. Though the current Iranian regime is prone to sometimes absurd hyperbole, it has air defense capabilities that present real threats. Iran’s shootdown of a U.S. Navy RQ-4 drone over the Strait of Hormuz in 2019 prompted notable discussions about the survivability of non-stealthy uncrewed aircraft in future conflicts that have had clear impacts on subsequent U.S. military planning. The RQ-170 has also notably been sent over Iran in the past, with authorities there recovering a largely intact example that went down inside the country in 2011.

The RQ-170 Sentinel Iran recovered in 2011 on display. Iranian State Media

It is also interesting to note here that initial work on the segregated section at Ramon airbase in the late 2000s came at a time when concerns about Iran getting more capable S-300 surface-to-air missile systems from Russia were growing. Those same concerns reportedly helped drive the IAF’s decision to purchase F-35 stealth fighters. Iran also finally sealed the deal to acquire S-300s around the time that the work was being done to revamp and expand the fenced-off areas of Ramon.

The construction of the initial segregated portion of Ramon also came around the time, broadly speaking, of Israel’s covert 2007 strike on a secret nuclear reactor in Syria that Bashar Al Assad’s regime had built with help from North Korea. F-16Is from Ramon were among the aircraft involved in that operation. The Syrian armed forces also have an air defense network that presents real threats, as exemplified by the shootdown of an Israeli F-16 in 2018.

Other incidents over the years, including strikes against Iranian-backed militias in Iraq in 2019, have raised questions about possible secret Israeli drone capabilities. Advanced uncrewed aircraft operated by Israel and others might also, in part, help explain claimed incidents involving unexplained aerial objects over Iran in recent decades, which also often come with reports of heavy electronic attacks on perusing fighters and radar stations.

Overall, for Israel, with its long and still expanding history of very long range and often covert and/or clandestine strikes on high-value targets in foreign countries, a drone just having the ability to persistently surveil far-flung and denied areas would be of great value. Stealthy uncrewed aircraft capable of conducting intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) missions could also provide important pre and post-strike intelligence.

A penetrating uncrewed ISR platform could also help provide early warning about potential threats and otherwise monitor areas of interest, all with a lower chance of an opponent like Iran even detecting their presence. As The War Zone has highlighted in the past, persistent surveillance that can help establish so-called ‘patterns of life’ in a target area from which various kinds of useful intelligence can be gleaned. Doing this while deep in denied airspace without the enemy even knowing they are being watched can result in much higher-fidelity intelligence products.

As relevant examples, the RQ-170 reportedly helped keep tabs on Osama Bin Laden’s compound in Pakistan before and during the U.S. raid that led to his death and the U.S. Air Force has at least explored using the Sentinel to help with bomb damage assessment. In the latter case, a test was conducted involving an RQ-170 assessing the impact of a GBU-57/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bunker buster, a weapon specifically designed to be employed against deeply buried facilities like those housing much of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.

An RQ-170 at Andersen Air Force Base on Guam. USAF

There is also a question to be raised here about whether Israel might be a partner of some kind when it comes to the RQ-170 and/or related developments. The Sentinel has had its own role in keeping tabs on Iranian, North Korean, and Pakistani nuclear and ballistic missile programs.

A true stealthy UCAV capable of prosecuting long-range kinetic strikes or launching non-kinetic attacks (such as electronic or cyber warfare ones) would give Israel further options for targeting high-value assets and penetrating into densely defended areas to get to them, as well as doing so in covert and clandestine ways. Even just having the ability to deliver a small munition for a ‘hammer toss’ against a singular high-value target would be a major capability for a platform of this kind.

In addition, UCAVs typically have combat radii that are multiple times greater than that of a fighter. For Israel, this could enable them to conduct entire missions into Iran and back without any need to refuel in mid-air. The IAF has notably limited aerial refueling capabilities to support long-range penetrating missions by its known crewed combat aircraft fleets. Israel does also have means of conducting long-range stand-off strikes, including with air-launched ballistic missiles like Rocks.

The War Zone has reported in detail in the past how there is evidence of the U.S. military and/or the U.S. Intelligence maintaining a pocket fleet of stealthy General Atomics Avenger drones for the same kinds of reasons.

In many ways, it is surprising that evidence like this that could point to an Israeli force of stealthy drones, and possibly UCAVs, has not emerged before now. The absence of such a capability within the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) would be equally curious in much the same way that it is odd that the U.S. military has abandoned interest, at least publicly, in stealthy flying wing UCAVs. The continues to be substantial work on developing and fielding UCAVs elsewhere in the world, from France to Turkey to Russia to India. China has made especially significant strides in this field in recent years.

So, while these documents certainly do offer some insights into what was previously an unconfirmed capability, their contents should be of little surprise⍐.

An Appeal for Brazil’s Forests, Painted 11 Stories Tall



An Appeal for Brazil’s Forests, Painted 11 Stories Tall

in News DNYUZ

Two weeks ago, on a rooftop 11 stories above São Paulo, a popular Brazilian street artist, Mundano, sat on an overturned bucket, mixing water, varnish and ash collected from fires that had ripped through a Brazilian rainforest to create a palette of gray tones.

Over the ledge awaited a newly whitewashed, 15,000-square-foot wall of an elegant apartment building in plain view of the buses and cars heading down a main artery leading to the city center.

That evening, he and five assistant artists would start painting a massive mural of an Indigenous leader, Alessandra Korap, in a scorched Amazonian landscape, holding up a sign urging Cargill, the Minnesota-based agricultural giant, to rid its supply chain of crops grown on recently deforested land.

The project is a collaboration with the conservation nonprofit Stand.Earth, which is funding the mural as part of a campaign targeting Cargill.

The final result is to be officially unveiled on Wednesday, though it is hardly a secret to the supermarket shoppers, passers-by and those who work in the small shops that surround a parking lot below the mural.

“I’m already tired and we haven’t started yet,” said Mundano, whose (rarely mentioned) first name is Thiago.

Over long days and some nights, Mundano and his assistants worked from eight suspended scaffolds (like the ones window-washers use).

They used paints made with ash from fires in the Atlantic Rainforest in Brazil, mud from floods that destroyed swaths of the southern Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul, charcoal from charred Amazonian trees and clay from drought-plagued river basins across the country.

“I’m connecting the droughts and the floods and the fires because it’s all linked,” said Mundano, who claims this will be Brazil’s largest mural painted with only natural materials (plus a water-based acrylic varnish), a style that has become his trademark.

The final step was to fill in the six-story-high sign held in the mural by Ms. Korap, a member of the Munduruku tribe who was raised in Pará state. It reads: “Stop the destruction” in English and Portuguese, with the hashtag #KeepYourPromise.

The “promise” refers to a pledge Cargill made in November 2023, setting 2025 as a deadline “to eliminate deforestation and land conversion from its direct and indirect supply chain” of soy and other crops in Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay. Cargill is one of the largest exporters of Brazilian soy.

“I want to show an image of our struggle, of this fearless warrior woman” said Ms. Korap, who was one of six winners of the prestigious Goldman Environmental Prize in 2023. “It says we’re alive, we’re fighting every single day.”

In an April report, Stand.Earth cited 18 companies with “confirmed or suspected links” to Cargill that have deforested or converted wild land to soy production. The environmental advocacy group covered the mural’s cost, around $80,000, according to Mathew Jacobson, the Cargill campaign’s director.

In a statement, Cargill said it was “on track to deliver” on its commitment “to eliminate deforestation in soy supply chains’’ in the region.

It also accused Stand.Earth of misrepresenting Cargill’s work.

Of the companies listed in the April report, Cargill said, two are not in its supply chain, three have been removed and four have not done business with Cargill for years. Cargill said it had investigated the others and cleared them of using deforesting land for crops.

Earlier this week, Mundano and his crew methodically painted, filmed and then used brooms and water-filled fire extinguishers to erase 21 versions of the sign calling out members of the billionaire Cargill-MacMillan family, who together control the company.

The versions were based on paintings made by members of the Munduruku community at a workshop Mundano held with Ms. Korap in July. They will be delivered by Mr. Jacobson to the Cargill families’ homes in the United States.

“We see them as the leaders and the driving force of the industry that’s most responsible for the destruction of the forests and other landscapes as well,” Mr. Jacobson said, noting that Cargill’s private ownership avoids accountability to shareholders.

“Because of the amount of resources the owners have, the idea of putting in place systems to monitor those things is incumbent on them,’’ he added, “instead of continuing to profit from the destruction.”

Cargill more than doubled its profit in Brazil from 2022 to 2023, the company reported in April.

The campaign is also targeting a long-planned and much-delayed 580-mile railway known as the Ferrogrão, or Grain Rail, which is meant to make it easier to transport agricultural and mining products to the Amazonian river port of Miritituba.

Parts of the planned route of the privately financed government project slice through protected lands.

Cargill said it was “not part of the consortium that was formed to build’’ the railway, but said that increasing transportation capacity while protecting the environment was vital to feeding the world.

By last week, the artists at the mural site had their routines down. An artist known as Hullk (whose real name is André França), a native of Manaus, a city in Amazonas State, grated dried guaraná fruit into water to make a natural stimulant commonly used in his region.

Daniel Wera, smoked a petyngua, a ceremonial pipe used by the Guarani people he has worked with in the São Paulo region. “I use it so I don’t forget why I’m here,” he said. “I’m here to represent the forest.”

Two sheets of paper displayed over 20 earth and ash tones and their “recipes.” Mundano sat on a varnish bucket, grating clay collected from a drought-stricken region near Ms. Korap’s home in Pará state.. The resulting shade would be used for the traces of smoke floating by trees in the mural’s background.

“Is there any Atlantic rainforest left?” said another artist, André Firmiano, referring not to the fast-disappearing Brazilian ecosystem but to the dark gray tone used to outline the trees.

“No,” someone said.

“So let’s make some more.”

Later, Mr. Wera and Mr. Hullk hung from one of the eight scaffolds, adding detail to the feathers that make up Ms. Korap’s towering tiara, checking their work against a laminated photo of her.

Down below, shoppers and workers regularly looked up, curious and mostly admiring.

“This mural was a gift,” said Frankie Medici, 46, who runs the XBull Grill burger stand next to the lot and had grown accustomed to the drab gray paint that preceded the mural.

“Customers have taken so many photos and wondering what’s going in the sign,’’ he said. “It will be a jab at someone, at the very least.”

A few shoppers made pointed jokes, wondering if taxpayer money was financing the art (it was not) and whether the warning to “stop the destruction” was directed at Brazil’s leftist president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. (It wasn’t).

Ms. Korap will not be at the mural’s unveiling; she is back home, but plans to visit next month and has already posted drone footage of the in-progress artwork on Instagram.

“Whether we are rich or poor, whether we live in the forest or in the city,” she said, “if we don’t protect our Mother Earth, we will all crumble.”

The post An Appeal for Brazil’s Forests, Painted 11 Stories Tall appeared first on New York Times.

North Korea sent 3,000 troops to Russia for Ukraine war, South says

 North Korea sent 3,000 troops to Russia for Ukraine war, South says

Xi, Modi and Putin discuss Ukraine war amid BRICS expansion talks

 

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping attend
a family photo ceremony prior to the BRICS Summit plenary session in Kazan, Russia, Wednesday,
Oct. 23, 2024. Alexander Zemlianichenko/Pool via REUTERS

Xi, Modi and Putin discuss Ukraine war amid BRICS expansion talks

Sound and steady growth of China-Russia relations benefits BRICS and the world

 Sound and steady growth of China-Russia relations benefits BRICS and the world: 

Global Times editorial


On Tuesday local time, Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived in Kazan, Russia, by special plane to attend the 16th BRICS Summit at the invitation of President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin. On the afternoon of the same day, President Xi held talks with President Putin in Kazan. This year marks the 75th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and Russia, coinciding with the inaugural year of "Greater BRICS Cooperation." The third meeting between the two heads of state within this year has garnered global attention. Kazan, a city rich in history and culture, will not only witness the first leaders' meeting following the historic expansion of the "BRICS family," but will also add a new chapter to China-Russia friendship.

During the meeting with President Putin, President Xi stated that the world is undergoing profound changes unseen in a century, and the international situation is chaotic and intertwined; however, the profound friendship between China and Russia, built on generations of mutual support, will remain unchanged, as will our great power responsibilities to benefit our peoples. There are high expectations that, under the strategic guidance of head-of-state diplomacy, the comprehensive strategic partnership of coordination for a new era between China and Russia will continue to progress steadily, and that our cooperation will enhance the practical cooperation of BRICS, injecting more stability and certainty into the turbulent global situation.

This is President Xi's tenth visit to Russia in his capacity as President. Since 2013, President Xi and President Putin have met over 40 times in various settings, establishing a strong working relationship and a deep personal friendship. The two leaders have maintained close communication on strategic issues such as bilateral relations, international situations and global governance, providing relentless momentum for the high-level development of China-Russia relations and setting a global example for major power interactions.

The summit in Kazan is the first meeting of BRICS leaders following the expansion of the group and is also the largest and highest-level diplomatic event hosted by Russia this year. The Chinese side actively supports the Russian side in fulfilling its duties as the rotating chair. This aligns with the expectations of "Global South" countries. 

With the cooperation of China and other BRICS partners, Russia has held over 200 events to help new members integrate more quickly into the BRICS family. This is a natural reflection of the strategic trust and traditional friendship between China and Russia, sending a positive signal of the independence of their relationship, free from external interference. It also demonstrates China's responsible role as a major power.

We have noticed that some Western media outlets have extended their hostility toward Russia to this Kazan Summit, repeating their old tactics of smearing China-Russia cooperation and creating external noise by hyping bloc confrontations. 

The new paradigm of major-country relations established by China and Russia plays a positive role in various multilateral platforms, including BRICS, and this is an undeniable fact. For instance, China and Russia promoted the historic expansion of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and BRICS mechanisms, strengthening the unity of developing and "Global South" countries and contributing to improving the global governance system. This has been clearly recognized by the international community.

Amid the complex and turbulent international situation, the stable development of China-Russia relations, as two major developing countries and permanent members of the UN Security Council, not only meets the needs of both nations but also helps maintain the unity and overall interests of "Global South" countries. Furthermore, as the two largest neighboring countries in the Eurasian continent, the harmonious relationship between China and Russia is good news for the region and the world. 

It is important to emphasize that the China-Russia relationship is characterized by non-alliance, non-confrontation and not targeting any third party, which forms the foundation of cooperation between the two nations. This nature of the China-Russia relationship has not changed across various cooperation mechanisms, including BRICS. In this sense, it can be said that while the BRICS mechanism is a non-Western cooperation framework, it is not an "anti-Western alliance." It does not pursue narrow camp confrontations and is fundamentally different in nature from "small circle diplomacy," such as the Five Eyes Alliance and the G7. Only those who still harbor Cold War mentality would view the independent and autonomous cooperation between China and Russia, as well as multilateral cooperation like BRICS, as a "counterattack against the West." In fact, they have already fallen behind the times.

China and Russia are good neighbors and good friends, and they are also important partners within the BRICS nations. In the face of the current complex and intertwined international situation, an increasing number of countries have come to recognize the importance and necessity of openness, inclusiveness, and win-win cooperation. On the path toward a more equal and orderly multipolar world and inclusive economic globalization, China and Russia have many partners. The countries of the "Global South" are moving forward together, and the winds of the "Greater BRICS Cooperation" are stirring up infinite possibilities for South-South cooperation. 

The BRICS countries, including Russia, are like-minded friends and partners who stand together through thick and thin. China sincerely hopes that the Kazan Summit will be a complete success and is committed to promoting consensus among all parties, conveying positive signals of unity and cooperation, and advancing strategic collaboration and practical cooperation in various fields among BRICS nations. This will create more new opportunities for the "Global South" and make greater contributions to building a community with a shared future for mankind. In this sense, the connotation of the new type of international relations between China and Russia, as well as their relationship as neighboring major powers, will become even richer.⍐

பயங்கரவாத எதிர்ப்பு சட்டத்தை இரத்துச் செய்வதை ஆராய விசேட குழு

  பயங்கரவாத எதிர்ப்பு சட்டத்தை இரத்துச் செய்வதை ஆராய விசேட குழு மே முற்பகுதியில் பொதுமக்கள், சிவில் அமைப்புகளிடம் கருத்து April 14, 2025 தின...