Monday 29 January 2018

Will China BRI Cause East West Rupture in EU?

29.01.2018 Author: F. William Engdahl
Will China BRI Cause East West Rupture in EU?

On 27 November Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, already at odds with the unelected bureaucrats of the European Union over his insistence on the right to decide whether Brussels or national elected governments shall be allowed to become citizens in Europe’s ongoing refugee crisis, waved another red flag, this potentially a future game-changer for the EU as it exists today. Orbanhosted the 6th annual meeting of the China- Central and Eastern European Countries (CEEC) “16+1” summit in Budapest with China’s Prime Minister Li Keqiang. The event got barely a mention in western mainstream media despite the fact that it may have set the seeds for a divide within the EU within the coming months between a French-German-dominated federal EU run by Brussels and a more free, nation-based EU on the model of Hungary, Austria, Poland, the Czech republic and other east members of the EU.



In his opening keynote speech, Hungary’s Viktor Orban noted that Europe’s most competitive investment environment has come into being in Central and Eastern Europe. Noting that not too long ago Asia depended on the west for investment in modernization, that today, “the star of the East is now in the ascendant”, and we live in an era marked by the rise of Asia – and within it China. “We are at the beginning of a period in which the further development of Europe will be dependent on the technological and financial involvement of the East.”

Orban stressed the summit was not against the EU. He stressed that the “16+1” format not only serves the best interests of China and the sixteen Central and Eastern European countries, but also the whole of Europe and the European Union. He then announced Hungary would begin public procurement tender for upgrading the Budapest–Belgrade railway line – including funding from China.The cost of the project is 2.4billion Euros, with 85% to be provided by Export-Import Bank of China. The project is the first European project involving an EU member, Hungary, a non-EU member Serbia and China. It will create a major modern freight route to Western Europe through Central Europe. Strangely enough this is not being greeted with joy in Brussels, rather the opposite.

The China-CEEC or 16+1 annual summit was launched in 2012 before formal inauguration of the Belt, Road Initiative by China in late 2013. Until this year it had little to present in terms of results. It served as a vehicle for China and the countries of Central and East Europe, the newest EU member states as well as applicant non-members to exchange information but little concrete. The BRI developments over the past year are beginning to radically change that.

In his speech to the summit Prime Minister Li Keqiang proposed more rail lines be launched by China Railway Express and more direct flights between China and Europe. He declared that China would like to set up a logistic center in the CEE region, likely in Hungary, a main China investment focus to date. He also announced the establishment of China-CEEC Inter-Bank Association and the second phase of China-CEEC Investment Cooperation Fund. The China Development Bank will provide funds equivalent to 2 billion euros ($2.4 billion) through development-oriented loans to the China-CEEC Inter-Bank Association, which was officially established at the summit, Li said. And he announced that the second phase of the China-Central and Eastern Europe Investment Cooperation Fund, totaling $1 billion, will be mainly spent in the 16 European countries. Li noted the strong growth of agriculture imports from the region to China, rising by 14% this year. Then he called for a feasibility study on extending to Austria a railway line linking the Greek port of Piraeus with Budapest.

Since 2012 China investment in the 16 countries rose by 300% from $3 billion to over 9 billion US dollars.

One-on-one economic diplomacy

The focus on the countries of Eastern and Central Europe by Beijing is a result of the ice-cold response to date of the EU in Brussels and especially by the German and French governments. For them China’s Belt, Road Initiative, sometimes called the New Silk Road, is a threat to their domination of the EU. The recent railroad by the decision of the German Agriculture Minister, to grant a new 5-year approval for the toxic glyphosate against the wishes of the majority of EU states is but an example of the heavy-handed Brussels methods, becoming more rigid as the resistance against heavy-handed Brussels refugee policies and countless other issues grows.

The 16 countries in the China-CEC group after the latest meeting all have formally signed on to participate in the China BRI on a one-be-one basis. The countries include Poland, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Montenegro, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia and Slovenia, Albania and Bulgaria.

Greece, not formally a member of the 16+1 is already a major infrastructure focus of Chinese state investment in the EU. While Brussels and especially Germany offer Greece only more savage austerity demands since the Greek crisis in 2010, China offers investment. China has invested more than $500 million in the privatized Greek Port of Piraeus using the state shipping group, COSCO, turning it into the busiest Mediterranean port today. China has been operator of the Piraeus Port since 2008 and this April bought 67% ownership for $8 billion to the Greek government including the $500 million for modernization. The China Piraeus Port will serve as the gateway for Chinese seaborne freight into the EU, China’s largest trade partner. Now with the agreement by Hungary to complete the Belgrade-Budapest rail linkthe trade flows could become major for both China and EU countries of the CEE.

Greece took part in the founding meeting in May, 2017 of the Belt, Road Initiative and signed major economic agreements with Beijing.

EU Begins Counter-offensive

Rather that greet the Chinese investment in the ailing economies of Eastern and Central Europe, the Brussels EU Commission, dominated by Germany, is preparing to pass strict new investment rules. In September EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, one who owes his job to Germany’s Angela Merkel, announced a proposal for a new EU rule to centrally control foreign investments into EU member states, another attempt to rob what little remains of member national sovereignty over their national economic development. The Juncker proposal, titled “Investment Screening”, if passed by member states, would require special scrutiny and approval from Brussels when a foreign state-owned enterprise wants to invest in EU ports, energy infrastructure or defense industries. Germany, France and Italy immediately praised the Juncker proposal. Here we see the fault lines that will only become more obvious as EU economic strains grow in coming months.

Austria could play a determining role in such a shift. In October the conservative Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) won a victory making Sebastian Kurz prospective Chancellor in a coalition with the euro-skeptic anti-refugee Freedom Party (FPÖ). Hungary’s Orban has welcomed Kurzas a “close ally.” For the Austrian economy, to orient towards the neighboring countries of Eastern Europe, especially Hungary now that the two are closer on resisting forced refugee policies and other heavy-handed moves of Brussels, could initiate a major tectonic shift in the political weight inside the EU.

For Austria the cooperation with China’s Belt, Road Initiative makes huge sense.  For Austria, engagement with China and the BRI is clear given the country’s strong economic relations with Eastern Europe and the Western Balkans. The countries of CEEC have major infrastructure deficits and Austrian industry could play a constructive partner role to the Chinese investment, what the Chinese like to call win-win. Clearly the present direction of the German-French-domination of the EU cannot continue as it has. The fault lines are too great.

The Danish Saxo Bank head of macro-analysis, Christopher Dembikin a recent assessment of these growing fault lines predicts “The divide between old core EU members and the more sceptical and newer members of the bloc will widen to an impassable chasm in 2018 and will shift the center of gravity from the Franco-German axis to Visegrad-and-friends (Hungary, Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia-w.e.).”

Dembik suggests that the French Macron “EU reform” plans to integrate further and create a joint treasury and a common defense budget, more top-down rule, will push the countries of the CEEC, and likely Austria and also Italy to create a new blocking minority coalition of 13 EU countries to form a blocking minority at the European Council within the EU states that will push the EU to abandon the disruptive German refugee policies and austerity in favor of economic stimulus. That indeed would be a refreshing change for millions of Europeans. An outrageous prediction?Perhaps not so unlikely at present.

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”

https://journal-neo.org/2018/01/29/will-china-bri-cause-east-west-rupture-in-eu/

No political solution for Tamil grievances in sight – Ananthy



Q: You have on many occasions said that even the international community had let the affected people down. However, initially you were one of those who claimed that only the International Community could solve such humanitarian issues. Why have you taken a completely opposite stand now?

A: All the affected people including me expected the UN and the International Community to find a suitable solution to our humanitarian issues. We believed that the Human Rights Commissioner will somehow help us to find a suitable solution for our grievances. However, his recent stand and statements were completely different to the promises he previously gave. Therefore, I now feel the International Community has taken a different stand over humanitarian issues in Sri Lanka. I am of the view that further expectations will not result in any positive result.

Ananthi Sasitharan addresses OHCHR meeting with NGOs
No political solution for Tamil grievances in sight – Ananthy Sasitharan
Published by : CT WEB

BY Mirudhula Thambiah

Northern Minister of Women Affairs, Ananthy Sasitharan said the International Community had taken a different stance over humanitarian issues in Sri Lanka, thus letting down the war-affected people.

"We were under the impression that United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Prince Zeid bin Ra'ad Zeid al-Hussein, would somehow help us to find a solution to our grievances. However, his recent stand and statements were in total contrast to the promises he previously made. I am of the view that further expectations will not result in anything fruitful," she said in an interview with Ceylon Today.

Following are excerpts

It has been more than 300 days since relatives of missing persons began the protest urging a solution to find their loved ones. You have initially engaged in such protests as your husband was one of them. How do you view the current situation in this regard?

A: One of the primary reasons for my political entry is that more than 1,000 persons including my husband had gone missing during and in the post war period; a lasting solution is a much-needed concern.

From provincial to international level, we have addressed grievances of missing persons and their families. However, the Government and the International Community have ignored the claims of relatives of missing persons who had continuously protested urging to find the whereabouts of their loved ones.

International agencies that meet the relatives of missing persons, listen to their stories as if it is a new story, which they have never heard before. These are only moves and agendas to safeguard the Lankan Government.

The TNA hierarchy had failed to sincerely look at the issue of missing persons. From the day members of the LTTE surrendered during the end of the war to date, the TNA has failed to find a lasting solution even after the change in government; they have failed to take up the issue in a proper manner to the Government. The Government will never solve this issue. The Government feels they are not answerable as long as they have the support of the TNA. Even at international level, it seems the Government is now eased from the pressure and shows innocence.

Therefore, there seems to be no solution to the problem of missing persons. The affected have been neglected.

You have on many occasions said that even the international community had let the affected people down. However, initially you were one of those who claimed that only the International Community could solve such humanitarian issues. Why have you taken a completely opposite stand now?

A: All the affected people including me expected the UN and the International Community to find a suitable solution to our humanitarian issues. We believed that the Human Rights Commissioner will somehow help us to find a suitable solution for our grievances. However, his recent stand and statements were completely different to the promises he previously gave. Therefore, I now feel the International Community has taken a different stand over humanitarian issues in Sri Lanka. I am of the view that further expectations will not result in any positive result.

You filed a writ of Habeas Corpus seeking the whereabouts of your husband Sasitharan alias Ezhilan. What exactly is the current situation of this legal process?

A: We filed a writ application at the Vavuniya High Court. The proceedings were changed to Mullaitivu since we surrendered in that area. Only after the change in Government that this case was even taken up for hearing.

Currently, the Mullaitivu Courts has recorded evidence from all the witnesses , thus the case has been reverted to the Vavuniya High Court for the verdict to be delivered.

Surrendering of LTTE cadres soon after the end of the war is not just between the LTTE and the Government. Countries such as Norway and Japan were connected to the surrender. Recently, Tamil National People's Front Leader, Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam who was directly connected to the surrender has given a clear description of the situation that prevailed at that time.

Recently, former Defence Secretary, Gotabaya Rajapaksa stated that they won the war with the help of India. Therefore, India is also aware of the surrender of LTTE cadres at the end of the war.

We did not secretly surrender. We surrendered in the presence of many people. Around 1,000 of them surrendered on the promises made by the security forces that they will be released on a General Amnesty.

In April 2017, an Army Commander while giving submissions in Courts, stated that he had details of those who surrendered and were under his custody.

Later he submitted that those details were taken from the Ministry of Rehabilitation. This list included 12,000 LTTE cadres who were released after rehabilitation. Anyhow, it should be noted at this juncture that being in one's custody was different from the rehabilitation process.

This Commander was of the view that this particular list obtained from the Ministry of Rehabilitation did not include Ezhilan's name.

If his name was there in that list, there was no need to file a Habeas Corpus Writ seeking the whereabouts of Ezhilan. There are contradictions in this issue. There are only 21 families that have filed legal action and the rest have isolated themselves from such incidents.

It is unacceptable to say that the rest refrained from seeking legal assistance due to threats. These 21 families have sought legal action and they too are subject to threats.

At this juncture it is a must that I find the whereabouts of my husband. Similarly, the rest who went missing also need justice.

Therefore, refraining from seeking action will not solve this issue. We all must unite in this struggle to find our loved ones.

This struggle will not end with me but my children will continue in this effort.

Although you were a member of the TNA, you have been criticizing the TNA. Are you still a member of the TNA?

A: When I decided to contest the provincial elections, I did not belong to any political party. Later I officially joined the Illankai Thamil Arasai Katchi (ITAK). I won the provincial elections after obtaining a ticket from ITAK.

I was affected in the struggle and this is the only reason I stepped into politics. However, I am not just a politician. My intention is not only politics, I want to sincerely support my people. I gave certain promises to my people in the Election Manifesto. I can only function according to these promises.

I come from a deprived background. During the change in government, I refused to support President Maithripala Sirisena or former President Mahinda Rajapaksa. When my husband surrendered to the security forces, former President Rajapaksa left the country and President Sirisena took over as Defence Minister. Therefore, I decided I will not support either of them. Apart from being a member of ITAK, I could not act against my conscience. There was no other member within the same party who was affected like me; therefore, I began to fight for my rights. The ITAK hierarchy took disciplinary action against me. They took a decision to remove me from the post of Secretary to the Women's Wing , but I remained as a member of ITAK. For three years I was told that I could not be the Secretary to the Women's Wing of ITAK.

TNA spokesman Sumanthiran is making many unacceptable and disappointing statements. According to my knowledge, he however is making these statements without the approval of the others in the party. These statements are all his own. If they took disciplinary action against me, they should also take disciplinary action against Sumanthiran for making these statements.

I have supported Chief Minister Wigneswaran, in the process of obtaining a political solution. He understood the grievances of our people and his stand on the political solution is agreeable.

I am still a member of ITAK. I will however not function against my conscience. ITAK has not invited me for any party event, after I was served with disciplinary action. I am quite clear where I stand.

Do you predict any changes in the vote base at the upcoming Local Government elections?

A: When we came into politics in the Provincial Council elections in 2013, people believed in us and extended their fullest support to the TNA. However, the situation was different then and after the change in government, the TNA chose a different path. People have realized this change.

Recently fisticuffs were exchanged between ITAK members during nominations. This caused disappointment among the people.

Therefore, a comparatively lower percentage in voting in the North for the TNA could be expected.

The recent TNA stand has made the people to conclude that they are similar to the Eelam People's Democratic Party. Both parties are of the same stance.

It is said that the conservative culture in Northern Society had prevented educated Tamil women from entering politics even after the 25 per cent quota was implemented with electoral reform. How do you assess this situation?

A: Women in the North are reasonably well-educated and knowledgeable, however the culture in the society has definitely held them back from entering the political arena.

I always encouraged women in the North to enter politics. I have been taking my struggle forward, being the only woman representative in the Provincial Council, where it is dominated by men.

Although the 25 per cent quota is implemented, due to cultural barriers many women in the North who are knowledgeable and eligible have stood away from entering politics and this is quite a sad development.

Also I would like to point out that political parties in the North have included women who were unsuitable for nominations, so that they could be puppets of the dominating males.

Tell us the projects your Ministry has undertaken to support war-affected women?

A: Our Ministry does not have enough funds to support all the affected women. But I have taken up personal and unofficial initiatives to support them. They have benefitted from these initiatives. We lack the support of the central government in developing the projects at provincial level.

We lack cadres in the Ministry to take our projects to grassroot level. I have written to the central government to deal with this issue.

What steps has the Provincial Ministry of Women's Affairs taken to curb sexual violence against women in northern society?

A: We have personally attended to cases by providing legal assistance and certain cases are directed by us to the Police to take further action.

We want to initiate steps to avoid sexual violence-related incidents. However, we also have a special unit which treats and provides support to victims of sexual violence.

In the current context, how do you view the contribution of the TNA to find a political solution?

A: During my four-year political involvement, I have realized that the Tamil people will not get a political solution. When there is no initiative to ensure accountability for human rights violation, it is quite clear that we will not get a political solution.

Email: che.myhero@gmail.com

The strategy behind Operation Olive Branch

NEWS TURKEY
The strategy behind Operation Olive Branch
ECE GOKSEDEF
After US attempts to mediate, Russia deployed troops to the area to stop an operation on the YPG in Afrin last year. On January 20, Turkey started the operation. Here is the importance of their strategy.
Operation Olive Branch will continue "until the last terrorist is neutralized," said Turkey’s army chief Hulusi Akar (AA)

Afrin, in northwest Syria bordering Turkey, used to be a city with a population of 80,000. Taking advantage of the chaos caused by the civil war in Syria, the YPG took control of it in 2012. During the years of civil war, since there are no clashes in Afrin, its population increased up to 300,000. And finally, after the evacuation of Aleppo in December 2016, people fled to Afrin, increasing the population to around 750,000. Around 60 percent is Arabs, five percent on the Turkish border in the northwest of the city is Turkmen, and the rest are Kurds. Hundreds of its original residents, who could flee the YPG after 2012, are in Turkey.

Afrin is located between two strategic Turkish-backed Free Syrian Army (FSA)-held areas: Azaz and Idlib. The two FSA commanders who talked to TRT World, tell of the geographical importance of Afrin in these words: We need to connect two opposition areas to support each other. But using the road in Turkey along the border from Kilis to Reyhanlı takes five hours. If we drive directly from Azaz to Idlib through Tel Rifat, it would only take less than two hours.

That makes the Tel Rifat front of upmost importance to the operation.

Here is the information TRT World has obtained from the opposition commanders on the field:


1- Azaz, Tel Rifat and Minagh Airport in the east

In total, around 10,000 FSA fighters are ready for the Afrin operation, some already actively taking part. More troops are being deployed to Azaz from Idlib. The troops in the Euphrates Shield area are not deployed for the Afrin operation, as they are mostly on patrol for any attacks from the YPG-held Manbij.

One of the first air bombardments by Turkish fighter jets have been conducted on this area. Also, FSA troops are ready to move ahead to Afrin on the ground.

The area’s strategic importance comes from its location, if the FSA will take control of the area, that will prevent the YPG from getting reinforcements from regime-held territories. And also, it will connect the Turkish army’s monitoring points in northern Idlib in the Euphrates Shield area.

On the first day of the operation, Russian troops in Afrin relocated to Tel Ajar, a town in northwestern Tel Rifat. The regime’s military training camp in Qafrjannah was also moved in Tel Ajar.

On Wednesday, when the clashes intensified in Tel Rifat, most of the Russian troops in Tel Ajar withdrew to the regime-held areas in the south, Nubl and Zahraa.

Nubl and Zahraa are two Shia villages, and Iranian-backed Shia militias are also on the ground.

The reinforcements coming from the YPG-held Manbij and Kobane are being taken to Afrin via those two villages. The regime supports the reinforcements.

2-Dar Jammal, south of Afrin

In the south, four Turkish army monitoring points were set up in Idlib, which prevents any YPG moves. There is no active fighting in this area. Turkish troops retaliate against the YPG’s shelling from time to time.

From Tel Rifat to Dar Jammal, there are 14 Arab villages, on which Turkey has been planning an operation against the YPG for more than a year.

Four paths going to Afrin 

1- Barsaya Mountain, Sharran, Qatmah, Qafrjannah in the northeast

North of Azaz, along the Turkish border, lies the Barsaya mountain. It has been the base for the YPG’s armories and ammunition, and Turkish fighter jets destroyed most of it in the first couple of days. The FSA, on the other hand, has been shelling the area since last year.

It’s now an active frontline. Difficult to pass through, the mountain is the first challenge for the FSA. From the Barsaya Mountain up to Qafrjannah, its a hilly area where the largest number of YPG militants are based, and is also the path to Afrin.

After Qafrjannah, the next stop is Afrin city’s countryside.

2- Bulbul, Qarababa on the north

The first bombardment by Turkish fighter jets started in the Bulbul area. Starting from the border up to the mountains, most of the villages have been taken by the FSA. After those villages, there are mountains, which stand in front of the way to Afrin in the south. The mountainous area sees active fighting now.

3- Rajo, Seikh Haddad in the west

Rajo is also a mountainous area, where the YPG is based on the exit points of the straits. Up to the mountainous area, the FSA now controls 10 km of Raco. From Rajo to Seikh Haddad, Turkish troops and FSA fighters are waiting for the mines to be cleared.

4- Jandaris in the southwest

The YPG positions in Jandaris have been heavily bombarded by Turkish fighter jets, since the start of the operation. The plains of Jandaris continue with hills and straits towards Afrin. That’s why the FSA on the ground is supported by intensified air operations.

After the defeat of Daesh, YPG’s objective revealed

Weeks after the fight against Daesh in Syria was mostly over, Russia called on all parties to gather in Sochi to talk about the future of Syria, including the YPG. Turkey harshly opposed this.

And then the US plans on permanent support for the YPG were revealed, despite their promises that co-operation with the YPG would be only until Daesh was defeated. On January 13, the US-led coalition declared that they were creating a new "border defence force" again, including the YPG.

The same day, Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan gave the signal for the country’s plans to start an operation in YPG-held Afrin, Syria’s border town with Turkey at its north.

And the air operation started a week later from three different points. The next day, ground troops started their move towards Afrin.

Afrin operation were discussed since 2016

Turkey first deployed its troops to its border with Syria near Afrin in July 2017. The Turkish-backed Free Syrian Army (FSA), on the other hand, was ready in the east.

Back then, the plan was to take control of Tel Rifat and Minagh Airport from the YPG, to cut their way to another YPG-held territory in the east, and to connect the opposition groups in the north and in Idlib. Before the talks come up with a solution, Hayat Tahrir al Sham, an al Qaeda-affiliated group, took control of most of Idlib, and plans changed. In Astana, talks led by Russia, Turkey and Iran, lend to the decision to set up military monitoring points in Idlib, before starting the operation.

Russia stops another possible operation in September

Two months later, the operation on Afrin was still on the table. And on September 4, Russia deployed troops and Syrian regime forces to east Afrin, to prevent clashes by creating a buffer zone between Turkish-backed opposition forces and the YPG.

According to the Moscow-based news website Sputnik, in a briefing to reporters, Chief of the Main Operational Directorate of the Russian Armed Forces, Commander Sergei Rudskoy said, “In order to prevent provocations and possible clashes between detachments of Free Syrian Army formations in the north of Syria and the Kurdish militia [YPG] with the assistance of the Russian reconciliation center, a de-confliction zone has been established in the Tel Rifat area.”

The situation on the ground back in July, and the practical buffer zones by Russia in Syria.



The US’ mediation efforts

Turkey’s plans for Tel Rifat and Minagh Airport did not only begin last July. At the end of 2016, Turkey was getting ready for an operation in the area, for the FSA to take over 14 Arab villages there. 150,000 Syrian refugees who took shelter in the camps in Azaz were also set to be sent to the area after the operation.

But the US took a mediation role between the FSA and the YPG, in a bid to stop Turkey’s possible operation against its ally. According to Mustafa Sajari, an opposition representative who holds talks with the US, the YPG promised to leave those villages and Tel Rifat to the FSA after weeks of negotiations. A promise that was never kept.



The YPG also didn’t keep its promise to leave Manbij, a city it took control of with the support of the US in August 2016. The same month, Turkey started its first military operation in Syria, Euphrates Shield, to defeat Daesh from its borders and also to prevent the creation of any corridor between YPG-held Manbij and Afrin.

The US has never cut its support for the YPG, in an excuse of using them in the fight against Daesh, which led the YPG to claim a quarter of Syria which was once controlled by Daesh.

Turkey’s reaction to the partnership is because of the YPG’s affiliation with the PKK, a designated terror group by Turkey, the US and the EU, and which has been fighting the Turkish state for more than 30 years.


Source: TRT World

NYT TELLS JOURNALISTS TO AVOID WORDS “GENOCIDE,” “ETHNIC CLEANSING,” AND “OCCUPIED TERRITORY''

LEAKED NYT GAZA MEMO TELLS JOURNALISTS TO AVOID WORDS “GENOCIDE,” “ETHNIC CLEANSING,” AND “OCCUPIED TERRITORY” Amid the internal battle over...