Saturday 11 November 2017

Real Motive Behind Saudi Purge Emerges: $800 Billion in Confiscated Assets

Real Motive Behind Saudi Purge Emerges: $800 Billion in Confiscated Assets

By Zero Hedge
Global Research, November 10, 2017 Zero Hedge 8 November 2017

From the very beginning, there was something off about Sunday’s unprecedented countercoup purge unleashed by Mohammad bin Salman on alleged political enemies, including some of Saudi Arabia’s richest and most powerful royals and government officials: it was just too brazen to be a simple “power consolidation” move; in fact most commentators were shocked by the sheer audacity, with one question outstanding: why take such a huge gamble? After all, there was little chatter of an imminent coup threat against either the senile Saudi King or the crown prince, MbS, and a crackdown of such proportions would only boost animosity against the current ruling royals further.


 Things gradually started to make sense when it emerged that some $33 billion in oligarch net worth was “at risk” among just the 4 wealthiest arrested Saudis, which included the media-friendly prince Alwaleed.

One day later, a Reuters source reported that in a just as dramatic expansion of the original crackdown, bank accounts of over 1,200 individuals had been frozen, a number which was growing by the minute. Commenting on this land cashgrab, we rhetorically asked “So when could the confiscatory process end? As we jokingly suggested yesterday, the ruling Saudi royal family has realized that not only can it crush any potential dissent by arresting dozens of potential coup-plotters, it can also replenish the country’s foreign reserves, which in the past 3 years have declined by over $250 billion, by confiscating some or all of their generous wealth, which is in the tens if not hundreds of billions. If MbS continues going down the list, he just may recoup a substantial enough amount to what it makes a difference on the sovereign account.”

Then an article overnight from the WSJ confirmed that fundamentally, the purge may be nothing more than a forced extortion scheme, as the Saudi government – already suffering from soaring budget deficits, sliding oil revenues and plunging reserves – was “aiming to confiscate cash and other assets worth as much as $800 billion in its broadening crackdown on alleged corruption among the kingdom’s elite.”

As we reported yesterday, the WSJ writes that the country’s central bank, the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority, said late Tuesday that it has frozen the bank accounts of “persons of interest” and said the move is “in response to the Attorney General’s request pending the legal cases against them.” But what is more notable, is that while we first suggested – jokingly – on Monday that the ulterior Saudi motive would be to simply “nationalize” the net worth of some of Saudi Arabia’s wealthiest individuals, now the WSJ confirms that this is precisely the case, and what’s more notably is that the amount in question is absolutely staggering: nearly 2x Saudi Arabia’s total foreign reserves!

As the WSJ alleges, “the crackdown could also help replenish state coffers. The government has said that assets accumulated through corruption will become state property, and people familiar with the matter say the government estimates the value of assets it can reclaim at up to 3 trillion Saudi riyal, or $800 billion.”























While much of that money remains abroad – and invested in various assets from bonds to stocks to precious metals and real estate – which will complicate efforts to reclaim it, even a portion of that amount would help shore up Saudi Arabia’s finances.


A prolonged period of low oil prices forced the government to borrow money on the international bond market and to draw extensively from the country’s foreign reserves, which dropped from $730 billion at their peak in 2014 to $487.6 billion in August, the latest available government data.

Confirming our speculation was advisory firm Eurasia Group, which in a note said that the crown prince “needs cash to fund the government’s investment plans” adding that “It was becoming increasingly clear that additional revenue is needed to improve the economy’s performance. The government will also strike deals with businessmen and royals to avoid arrest, but only as part of a greater commitment to the local economy.”


Of course, there is a major danger that such a draconian cash grab would result in a violent blowback by everyone who has funds parked in the Kingdom. To assuage fears, Saudi Arabia’s minister of commerce, Majid al Qasabi, on Tuesday sought to reassure the private sector that the corruption investigation wouldn’t interfere with normal business operations. The procedures and investigations undertaken by the anti-corruption agency won’t affect ongoing business or projects, he said. Furthermore, the Saudi central bank said that individual accounts had been frozen, not corporate accounts. “It is business as usual for both banks and corporates,” the central bank said.

However, this is problematic: first, not only is the list of names of detained and “frozen” accounts growing by the day…

The government earlier this week vowed that it would arrest more people as part of the corruption investigation, which began around three years ago. As a precautionary measure, authorities have banned a large number of people from traveling outside the country, among them hundreds of royals and people connected to those arrested, according to people familiar with the matter. The government hasn’t officially named the people who were detained.

… but the mere shock of a move that would be more appropriate for the 1950s USSR has prompted crushed any faith and confidence the international community may have had in Saudi governance and business practices.

The biggest irony would be if from this flagrant attmept to shore up the Kingdom’s deteriorating finances, a domestic and international bank run emerged, with locals and foreign individuals and companies quietly, or not so quietly, pulling their assets and capital from confiscation ground zero, in the process precipitating the very economic collapse that the move was meant to avoid.

Judging by the market reaction, which has sent Riyal forward tumbling on rising bets of either a recession, or devaluation, or both, this unorthodox attempt to inject up to $800 billion in assets into the struggling local economy, could soon backfire spectacularly.

Meanwhile, for those still confused about the current political scene in Saudi Arabia, here is an infographic courtesy of the WSJ which explains “Who Has Been Promoted, Who Has Been Detained in Saudi Arabia”



All images are from Zero Hedge.

The original source of this article is Zero Hedge Copyright © Zero Hedge, Zero Hedge, 2017

Kashmiris have not sacrificed lives for autonomy JKLF


Kashmiris have not sacrificed lives for autonomy: Yasin Malik to Farooq Abdullah
He was reacting to the remarks of National Conference president Farooq Abdullah in which he had said that “independent Kashmir was not a reality” and that Kashmiris should be granted internal autonomy.

Srinagar, Publish Date: Nov 11 2017 6:52PM | Updated Date: Nov 11 2017 6:52PM

Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF) chief Yasin Malik on Saturday said that Kashmiris haven’t given sacrifices for “so-called autonomy under which a Prime Minister was thrown into jail for eleven years”.

He was reacting to the remarks of National Conference president Farooq Abdullah in which he had said that “independent Kashmir was not a reality” and that Kashmiris should be granted internal autonomy.

“Farooq Abdullah has always played non-serious and selfish politics. Kashmiris never take his words and personality seriously,” said Malik, in a statement, issued today.

Terming the statement of Abdullah as “absurd and non-serious”, Malik said that to remain in news Farooq Abdullah always issues controversial statements like these. “… but people of Jammu Kashmir are fully aware of his irresponsible character, his non-seriousness and the level to which he can stoop down for his selfish gains and because of these facts no one takes his statements seriously.”


Malik said that Farooq and his father Sheikh Muhammad Abdullah have been doing politics in the name of Kashmir’s freedom for a long time.

“In fact Farooq Abdullah and his late Father has been doing politics in the name of freedom of Kashmir for a long time and it was he who in 1974 from Lal Chowk Srinagar floated the slogan of “Choen Daish Mouen Daish Kashur Daish Kashur Daish” (Your nation my nation is Kashmiri nation Kashmiri nation) and even participated in pro-freedom rallies in Mirpur Azad Kashmir,” said Malik, in the statement.

He claimed that they shunned the “path of freedom and sacrificed the interests of Kashmiris for their lust of power” to serve their own “selfish benefits”.

Rejecting the idea of so-called autonomy for Jammu Kashmir, Malik said that Kashmiris have not sacrificed thousands of lives for a “so-called fragile, absurd and ridiculous autonomy under which a prime minster of time who luckily was Farooq Abdullah sahib’s own father was handcuffed by an ordinary police man and thrown into jail for 11 long years.”

Advising Farooq Abdullah to shun his “political joker-like approach and assume some seriousness”, Malik said that resistance will continue till the achievement of the desired goal.

வட்டமடு காணி மீட்பு போராட்டம் 9 நாளாக தொடர்கிறது


”””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””” 
திருக்கோவில் பிரதேச செயலகத்திற்கு உட்பட்ட வட்டமடு காணியில் பயிர்ச்செய்கை மேற்கொள்வதற்கு  வனபரிபாலன திணைக்களம்  தடை!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

வட்டமடு காணி மீட்பு போராட்டம் 9 நாளாக தொடர்கிறது

Friday, November 10, 2017

50 வருடகால எமது பூர்வீகக் காணியில் விவசாயம் செய்வதற்கு தடைவிதிக்காதே!

நல்லாட்சி அரசே எமக்கு அநீதி இழைக்காதே!

வட்டமடு விவசாயிகளுக்கு ஏன் இந்த பாரபட்சம்! 

விவசாயக் காணிகளை கபளீகரம் செய்யும் அதிகாரிகளை இடமாற்றம் செய்!

ஏழை விவசாயிகளின் வயிற்றில் அடிக்காதே!

என்கிற முழக்கங்கள்  அடங்கிய பதாதைகளை ஏந்தியவாறு ஆர்ப்பாட்டத்தில் ஈடுபட்ட மக்கள் போராட்டத்தில்
ஈடுபட்டிருந்தனா்.


திருக்கோவில் பிரதேச செயலகத்திற்கு உட்பட்ட வட்டமடு காணியில் பயிர்ச்செய்கை மேற்கொள்வதற்கு விதிக்கப்பட்டுள்ள தடைக்கு எதிர்ப்பு தெரிவித்து  விவசாயிகள் இன்று (10) வெள்ளிக்கிழமை ஜூம்ஆ தொழுகையின் பின்னா் ஆா்ப்பாட்ட பேரணியொன்றை நடத்தினா்.
























திருக்கோவில் பிரதேச செயலகத்திற்குட்பட்ட வட்டமடு  பிரதேசத்தைச் சேர்ந்த நான்கு விவசாய அமைப்புக்களினால் ஏற்பாடு செய்யப்பட்ட இப்போராட்டம் இன்று (10) 09 ஆவது நாளாக மேற்கொள்ளப்பட்டு வருகின்றது.

நீண்ட காலமாக விவசாயம் செய்து வந்த தமது காணிகள், வனபரிபாலன திணைக்கள அதிகாரிகளினால் விவசாயம் செய்வதற்கு தடுக்கப்பட்டு வருவதனைக் கண்டித்தே இப்பேராட்டத்தை மேற்கொண்டு வருவதாக விவசாய அமைப்புக்களின் தலைவர் ஏ.எம். ஹனீபா தெரிவித்தார்.

நல்லாட்சியை ஏற்படுத்துவதற்கு பெரும் பங்காற்றிய ஏழை விவசாயிகளான எங்களின் அவலத்தை இந்த அரசாங்கம் கண்டு கொள்ளாமல் இருந்து வருவதனையடுத்து பெரும் மனவேதனையும், கவலையும் அடைந்துள்ளோம்.

காணிக்கான அனுமதிப்பத்திரத்துடன் உரமானியம் பெற்று கடந்தகாலங்களில் விவசாயம் செய்து, நீர் வரி செலுத்தி வந்த எங்களுக்கு தற்போது அதிகாரிகள் தடைவிதிப்பது நல்லாட்சியை கேலிக் கூத்தாக்கியுள்ளது.


காணிப் பிரச்சினையை தீர்த்து தருவோம், விவசாயிகளுக்கு நீர்ப்பாசன வசதியை ஏற்படுத்தி விவசாயத்துறையை அபிவிருத்தி செய்வோம் என்று கூறி வாக்குகளைப் பெற்றுச் சென்ற முஸ்லிம் அரசியல் தலைமைகள் இன்று எமது பிரச்சினைகள் எதனையும் கண்டு கொள்ளாமல் சுகபோகம் அனுபவித்து வருகின்றனர் என்றார்.



50 வருடகால எமது பூர்வீகக் காணியில் விவசாயம் செய்வதற்கு தடைவிதிக்காதே, நல்லாட்சி அரசே எமக்கு அநீதி இளைக்காதே, வட்டமடு விவசாயிகளுக்கு ஏன் இந்த பாரபட்சம், விவசாயக் காணிகளை கபளீகரம் செய்யும் அதிகாரிகளை இடமாற்றம் செய், ஏழை விவசாயிகளின் வயிற்றில் அடிக்காதே போன்ற வாசகங்கள் அடங்கிய பதாதைகளை ஏந்தியவாறு ஆர்ப்பாட்டத்தில் ஈடுபட்ட மக்கள் போராட்டத்தில் ஈடுபட்டிருந்தனா்.

(அம்பாறை சுழற்சி நிருபா் - ரி.கே. ரஹ்மதுல்லா) நன்றி:தினகரன்

NYT TELLS JOURNALISTS TO AVOID WORDS “GENOCIDE,” “ETHNIC CLEANSING,” AND “OCCUPIED TERRITORY''

LEAKED NYT GAZA MEMO TELLS JOURNALISTS TO AVOID WORDS “GENOCIDE,” “ETHNIC CLEANSING,” AND “OCCUPIED TERRITORY” Amid the internal battle over...