Friday 5 September 2014

‘Expansionism and destabilization’: Russia lashes out NATO


‘Expansionism and destabilization’: 
Russia lashes out over NATO spearhead force in Eastern Europe!
Published time: September 05, 2014 22:55

Moscow has accused NATO of using the Ukrainian crisis as a “pretext” to “push its military presence closer to Russia’s borders,” and says that plans for a new rapid response force will sabotage the peace process in eastern Ukraine.

“The [expansion] plans have been harbored by NATO for a long time, and recent events have served as a pretext to put them into action,” said a statement published on the Russian Foreign Ministry’s website, following the wrapping up of the NATO summit in Wales.

“Together with the rhetoric at the summit, and the planned military exercises before the end of the year, this will increase tension, destabilization the nascent peace process, and further widen the division in Ukraine,” the ministry’s statement said.

“The above is also testament to NATO’s unconditional support for the extremists and neo-fascists in Kiev, including the Right Sector political movement,” it stressed.

During the two-day summit, the 28 NATO member states instituted the creation of a rapid response unit numbering at least 4,000. It could be deployed in Eastern Europe – where it will be based – in less than 48 hours.

The primary stated reason for the initiative is “Russia’s aggression against Ukraine.”

Russia’s NATO envoy, Aleksandr Grushko, also denounced NATO’s policy, suggesting that the alliance was engaged in “Cold War thinking,” and risked undermining the landmark 1997 treaty in which Moscow and Brussels officially proclaimed that they were no longer “adversaries.”

In a TV interview, Grushko said that NATO was “flexing its muscles,” and pointed out that an increased presence of NATO vessels in the Baltic and Black Sea would destroy the recently built-up level of trust in what were once the potential flashpoints in the standoff.


Grushko also called the planned NATO-Ukraine exercises a “provocation” because “foreign troops will appear in a country that is fighting its own people.”

“NATO must play no role in the Ukrainian conflict,” the official told Rossiya-24 network.

He also accused the US of “trying to unload the financial burden of maintaining NATO onto its allies.”

Despite the harsh rhetoric, Moscow left room for potential cooperation with NATO through the NATO-Russia Council, which the foreign ministry said is an “efficient mechanism for consultation and developing common approaches.”

“We will continue to cooperate with the alliance, providing it takes our national interests into account,” Grushko stressed.

NATO cooperation with Russia has been suspended since March, following the ascension of Crimea to the Russian Federation.

NATO Leaders to Vow to Lift Military Spending



NATO Leaders to Vow to Lift Military Spending
Commitment Would Be Nonbinding

By STEPHEN FIDLER CONNECT
Updated Sept. 4, 2014 12:01 p.m. ET


NEWPORT, Wales—Leaders of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization will pledge at a summit here to lift their military spending to 2% of each country's gross domestic product over the next 10 years, according to three officials familiar with the negotiations over the summit communiqué.

Only four of NATO's 28 member states currently meet or exceed that level: the U.S., U.K., Greece and Estonia. The decision to cite the 2% figure was the subject of intense political negotiations ahead of the meeting here. NATO summit conclusions negotiated ahead of time are rarely overturned by leaders.

Before the meeting started on Thursday, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said the alliance would "turn the corner and reverse the trend of declining military spending" at the summit.

The summit statement is expected to say that governments will "aim to" meet the 2% target in 10 years, meaning it is a nonbinding commitment. It will include a pledge for countries to spend 20% of their defense budget on investment, including new equipment. The latter target was included after German encouragement, since Berlin argues that the quality of military spending matters as much as the amount.

Diplomats said the pledge was initially resisted by Canada, which spent just 1% of GDP on defense last year, according to NATO estimates, and Germany, which spent 1.3%.

In 2002, NATO leaders decided at a summit in Prague that 2% should be the "benchmark" for military spending. Since then, military spending in most European countries has continued to decline.

UK's ability to meet the 2% NATO target under pressure.

NATO 2% TARGET
Posted on August 28, 2014 by Jeegar Kakkad

Ahead of the NATO Summit being held in the UK next week, the PM has written to the other NATO leaders setting out five priorities for the summit.

The one that stands out, in particular in the UK context, is the push for all nations to meet the 2% target for defence spending as a percentage of GDP.

As the PM states (emphasis added):
We must ensure that NATO has the capabilities it needs to respond to changing threats. That requires investment. The UK is already one of 4 members of the alliance to meet the target of spending 2% of our GDP on defence and I would urge other allies to make the strongest possible commitment to increase their defence spending, and to devote at least one fifth of it to equipment and research. As our economies start to recover, reversing the decline in defence spending and investing in our defence capabilities would strengthen alliance cohesion and signal that NATO means business.
Snap shot of ADS BLOG
Yet by many accounts, the UK is likely to see further real terms cuts to the MOD budget by 1-2% each year of the next Parliament (see Giles Wilkes on bloodletting or the FT report on the potential for a defence black hole).

With the UK economy growing again, our own ability to meet the 2% target could come under pressure.

If it does, will the next Government heed the PM’s advice and “reverse the decline in defence spending”?

The PM’s letter and five priorities came as news broke that the Russia had over 1,000 troops in Ukraine.

The PM’s other priorities?

1) Agree how NATO will sustain a robust presence in Eastern Europe in response to Russia’s illegal actions in Ukraine.
2) A landmark North Atlantic Armed Forces Charter that would demonstrate a collective commitment to our armed forces.
3) Meeting the 2% target.
4) Discuss how the Alliance can support the Afghan government in the years ahead.
5) Create a Global Security Network with partner countries and organisations that share Nato’s values.

Nato summit: £3.5bn armoured vehicle deal to be signed


ASCOD SV under development by General Dynamics UK
Nato summit: £3.5bn armoured vehicle deal to be signed

The MoD said the new Scout vehicles would be the Army's "eyes and ears" on future battlefields

The Ministry of Defence is set to sign a £3.5bn deal for nearly 600 new armoured vehicles ahead of the Nato summit in Wales.

The MoD will sign the order for 589 Scout Specialist Vehicles at General Dynamics in Caerphilly county.

David Cameron said the deal would aid UK security and "underpin" many jobs.

At the two-day summit in Newport, due to start on Thursday, the UK will call for increased defence spending by some of Nato's 28 member states.

Mr Cameron said the Scout deal would be the Army's largest single order for armoured vehicles for more than 30 years.

"These new vehicles are testament to the world-class engineering skills in south Wales and across the UK, helping to create the Army's first fully digitalised armoured vehicles," he said.

"Not only will they be crucial in helping to keep Britain safe, they will also underpin nearly 1,300 jobs across the UK and showcase the strength of the UK's highly skilled defence sector."

Mr Cameron said the UK had the second largest-defence budget in the alliance - "meeting Nato's 2% of GDP spending target" - and was providing "leadership" within the organisation.

'Threats on doorstep'

In a speech later at the Royal United Services Institute, a defence think tank, Defence Secretary Michael Fallon is expected to call on Nato countries to increase military spending.

"Not only is there a real risk of equipment obsolescence amongst Nato's European allies, but investment underpins our vital transatlantic bond," he will say.

"Nato was formed on the basis that Europe would pay her way.

"Like any insurance policy, defence only pays out when you pay in.

Kevin Connell, vice president of General Dynamics UK, explains what the £3.5bn order means
"US taxpayers won't go on picking up the cheque if we choose to prioritise social welfare spending when the threats are on our doorstep."

BBC defence correspondent Jonathan Beale said the comment on threats was a reference to Russian military intervention in Ukraine.

The MoD said the hi-tech Scout vehicles would be the Army's "eyes and ears" on the battlefields of the future.

Delivery of the first Scout vehicles is expected in 2017, with a brigade ready to deploy by the end of 2020.

General Dynamics, a US-based firm, said the Scout was a "highly-agile, tracked, medium-weight armoured fighting vehicle" which would offer "state-of-the-art" protection to troops.

The deal is expected to sustain 300 jobs in Wales.

Kevin Connell, vice president of General Dynamics UK, who runs the Scout SV programme, told BBC Wales: "We have a really talented workforce of more than 200 and we expect down the line when we start production for that to grow even further."

He said they were completing the final critical design reviews over next few months and hoped to start production in 2017, running right through to 2024.

"If the MoD exercises that production option, we're looking at 10 years solid work here and probably beyond that when you consider other variants and export opportunities."

ASCOD SV under development by General Dynamics UK

Obama 'Hopeful But Sceptical' of Ukraine Ceasefire!

Nato Summit 2014: 

US President Barack Obama speaks during a press 
conference in Estonia.(Getty Images)

Barack Obama 'Hopeful But Sceptical' of Latest Ceasefire Between Ukraine and Russia-Backed Rebels
Jack Moore By Jack Moore
September 5, 2014 17:33 BST


The American leader, speaking at the Nato summit, confirmed that the European Union was putting together the final details of a renewed sanction plan. When asked if new sanctions would be imposed against Russia he said that was the "likely scenario".

He said that the results being seen in discussions with Russia were the result of imposed sanctions on the country and the continued threat of sanctions from Western nations.

He also warned that the implementation of the truce agreed in the Belarussian capital, Minsk, still had to "be tested".

The new ceasefire, which began at 1500 GMT today, was announced by the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe's (OSCE) Heidi Tagliavini, a Swiss diplomat.

The plan is to include a stop to "active offensive operations" by both the Ukrainian military and pro-Russian rebels. It will allow international ceasefire monitoring, prisoner exchanges and humanitarian corridors to those affected by the conflict.

On other topics such as Isis (now known as the Islamic State), Obama said it is "critical we have Sunni-majority states [in the Middle East] rejecting Isis and joining an international coalition."

He added that the United States is "going to achieve our goal" of destroying the terror group, promising to do whatever it takes to ensure that the threat from the militants was countered.

The West is accusing Russia of arming and training rebels in Ukraine's restive eastern regions, a claim which Moscow denies.

UN agencies estimate more than 2,600 people have been killed in the fighting between pro-Russian separatists and the Ukrainian military since April.

Ukraine and Rebel Delegates Say Cease-Fire Begins Today- Friday



Ukraine and Rebel Delegates Say Cease-Fire Begins Today

KIEV, Ukraine — Ukrainian government forces and the pro-Russian separatist rebels fighting them in eastern Ukraine will observe a cease-fire starting on Friday(05-09-14), negotiators from all sides announced at a news conference in Minsk, Belarus.

The strength of the truce, however, was called into question by continued fighting around Mariupol, a port city in southeastern Ukraine, in the hours before it was to take effect.

Speaking from Minsk, negotiators representing the Ukrainian government, the separatists, Russia and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe said the cease-fire would come into force at 6 p.m. local time (11 a.m. Eastern time).

“The whole world is striving for peace. The whole of Ukraine is striving for peace, including millions of citizens in Donbass,” President Petro O. Poroshenko of Ukraine said in a statement on his official website confirming the agreement, referring to the region where the separatist strongholds are. “The highest value is human life, and we must do everything possible to stop the bloodshed and put an end to suffering.”

Mr. Poroshenko said in his statement that he had ordered his military commanders to respect the truce and asked his foreign minister to coordinate with the O.S.C.E. to ensure that the cease-fire was observed by both sides.

In the first hour after the cease-fire was to start, Mariupol appeared to be quiet.

According to Ukrainian officials and news reports from Minsk, the cease-fire included provisions for a halt to offensive operations, an exchange of captives, the creation of safe corridors for workers to deliver aid and start rebuilding shattered infrastructure in the war zone, and monitoring of the Ukraine-Russia border. Sergei Taruta, the governor of Donetsk Province in eastern Ukraine, said the border provisions were crucial. “If we seal the borders, the problem will be resolved,” he said.

Ukraine and many Western observers have accused Russia of backing the rebels with fighters and equipment, and of moving its own troops into Ukrainian territory to support the rebels. President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and his government have denied those accusations and insisted that Russia is not a party to the conflict.

The cease-fire agreement was announced in Minsk by Leonid D. Kuchma, a former president of Ukraine, representing the Ukrainian government, and by Alexander Zakharchenko, the prime minister and military commander of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic, representing the rebels. Russia was represented at the talks by its ambassador to Ukraine, Mikhail Zurabov, and the O.S.C.E. by its ambassador to Belarus, Heidi Tagliavini.

The announcement had been expected, after both Mr. Poroshenko and Mr. Putin said earlier this week that a truce was likely to emerge from the talks in Minsk.

Mr. Poroshenko had long insisted that he would never negotiate with “terrorists,” as he and others in the Ukrainian government have referred to the separatist militants. Instead, the government mounted a military offensive against the separatists that made considerable progress. But Russia demonstrated in recent days that it would intervene to prevent a conclusive defeat of the rebels, leaving Mr. Poroshenko with little alternative but to negotiate a cease-fire.


Timothy Ash, a market analyst at Standard Bank in London who closely monitors developments in Ukraine and Russia, said the agreement signed in Minsk on Friday meant the conflict would probably be frozen in a political stalemate similar to those in other Russian-dominated, quasi-independent “gray zones” like Transnistria in Moldova and Abkhazia in Georgia.

“Russian regular and irregular forces are not going to withdraw unless Poroshenko delivers on Putin’s agenda for a federal solution for Ukraine, which is really a nonstarter for any Ukrainian politician and political suicide, in effect,” Mr. Ash wrote on Friday in a note to clients.

Without a cease-fire now, Mr. Ash wrote, Mr. Poroshenko risked losing Mariupol, which remained under heavy attack by pro-Russian forces on Friday. “Any delay would probably have seen the loss of Mariupol, and then a land corridor secured by Russia to Crimea,” he wrote, which would have been “likely terminal” for Ukraine’s already struggling economy.

The cease-fire was expected to be based on a plan offered by Mr. Putin on Wednesday, which included a call for an immediate end to offensive operations by both sides, a withdrawal of Ukrainian artillery out of range of separatist-controlled cities, an end to airstrikes, an exchange of all captives, the opening of humanitarian corridors for residents of the separatist-controlled areas, the repairing of damaged infrastructure, and the deployment of international observers to monitor the truce.

Before the talks in Minsk, some separatist leaders had said they would respect a cease-fire, but others said they would reject it. The separatists also demanded that all Ukrainian forces withdraw completely from disputed areas.

Ukrainian and rebel forces traded artillery fire for several hours near Mariupol on Friday morning. The sound of heavy artillery rounds landing several miles to the east was audible at midday at a military checkpoint on the eastern edge of the city, and Ukrainian forces returned the fire from inside the town.

Ukrainian soldiers mustered in the area said they were preparing an attack against the rebel forces, who had advanced to a town within about 10 miles of the city on Thursday.

“Yesterday they were attacking,” said a unit commander, who gave only his nickname, Gurza. “They took Shirokino yesterday, and now there is fighting there. We cannot see their forces. It is just artillery preparing the way.” He said the rebel forces who took Novoazovsk, a coastal town close to the Russian border, last week had since advanced about halfway from there to Mariupol.

Mr. Taruta, the provincial governor, said seven people had been killed in heavy fighting at Shirokino, four on Thursday and three on Friday, including two children. He said Ukrainian forces had repelled the rebels and had control of the town on Friday.

The rebels have repeatedly said an attack on Mariupol itself was imminent, and a spokesman for the Ukrainian military, Col. Andriy Lysenko, said in Kiev on Friday that the rebels were moving tanks, artillery and other heavy equipment into position to mount the attack. He said Russia was also beginning to mass troops along the neck of land connecting the rest of Ukraine with the Crimean peninsula, which Russia annexed in March, with the intention of threatening Mariupol from two sides.

On the road north from Mariupol toward Donetsk, Ukrainian soldiers were strengthening their defenses, preparing to repel any rebel approach from that direction.

“It’s very dangerous,” said a Ukrainian commander of a checkpoint there, who went by the nickname Panzer. He said the Russian Army had been deployed in support of the rebels and had unleashed devastating artillery fire against Ukrainian positions.

“The Russian Army is very good,” he said. “They don’t take risks. They see us and bombard us from a distance. They fire artillery in a square. They bomb our positions, the village and anything else in the square. We can do nothing. We don’t have artillery with us.”

Ukrainian soldiers in Mariupol said before the cease-fire was to start that they did not trust the agreement in Minsk to end the fighting, noting that the last round of talks in August was followed by an intense artillery offensive around the city of Donetsk that forced Ukrainian troops back from large stretches of territory. They said they expected an outright assault on Mariupol at any time.

The renewed violence came as NATO leaders, seeking to counter Russian aggression, approved plans for a rapid-reaction force in Eastern Europe that could mobilize if an alliance country in the region came under attack.

“Should you even think of attacking one ally, you will be facing the whole alliance,” Anders Fogh Rasmussen, NATO’s secretary general, said at the meeting in Newport, Wales, according to The Associated Press. Although Ukraine is not a NATO member, alliance nations in Central and Eastern Europe have expressed alarm at the events in eastern Ukraine.

Though some Ukrainians reject the idea of compromise with the rebels, a majority are weary of upheaval. The current crisis started with demonstrations in Kiev, the capital, last November that resulted in the overthrow of the Russian-allied government and, eventually, a conflict in the east in which more than 2,600 people have died, by the United Nations’ count.

With the NATO meeting in Wales largely focused on events in Ukraine, the government in Kiev tried on Friday to shine a spotlight on Russia’s direct involvement in fighting in the east. An estimated 2,000 Russian soldiers have died in the conflict, Colonel Lysenko said at a briefing in Kiev. He gave no basis or time frame for that figure, which could not be independently verified. He said a convoy of seven vehicles carrying dead and wounded soldiers had crossed from Ukraine into Russia on Thursday evening.

There has been an outcry in Russia among military families over the lack of information about soldiers fighting in Ukraine. Some Russians have accused the government of hiding the information, much as it did during the wars in Afghanistan and Chechnya. Estimates of those killed and wounded have been far lower than the figure mentioned by Colonel Lysenko.

Carlotta Gall contributed reporting from Mariupol, Ukraine, and David M. Herszenhorn contributed from Moscow.

NATO approves new East Europe-based spearhead force

At least 4,000 troops: NATO approves new E. Europe-based spearhead force
Published time: September 05, 2014 14:24
Edited time: September 05, 2014 14:59 Get short URL

A new rapid reaction force, likely numbering at least 4,000 and ready to be deployed within 48 hours, will be created in Eastern Europe, after a decision by the 28 NATO member states following a conference in Wales.

“This is a demonstration of our solidarity and resolve,” said NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen as the summit, largely dedicated to Ukraine, and attended by the country’s President Petro Poroshenko, wrapped up.

"Should you even think of attacking one ally, you will be facing the whole alliance.”

NATO said the reason for the new unit is “a security environment which is more unpredictable than ever, including Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, violent extremism in the Middle East and instability in North Africa.”

“This spearhead will include several thousand land troops ready to deploy within a few days with air, sea and Special Forces support,” said Fogh Rasmussen.

The Baltic States and Romania have already offered to host the force, whose exact numbers have not been agreed, with Downing Street saying it will likely number 4,000 and Warsaw 5,000. Poland, the largest NATO state in Eastern Europe, is expected to house the headquarters.

The Baltic States have been among the most vocal advocates of NATO strengthening in the region, but the organization is bound by a 1997 agreement with Russia, which bars it from placing permanent bases in Lithuania, Latvia or Estonia. This can be circumvented by staging constant rotations of “exercises” that can in practice amount to the same thing.

The new force will be the vanguard of the existing NATO Response Force (NRF) that began operations a decade ago. The 25,000-strong NRF can take up to a month to deploy, by which time any military incursion can become a fait accompli.

“We must be able to act more swiftly,” said UK Prime Minister David Cameron, whose country said that it will provide up to a quarter of the new force’s troops.

Georgia coming in, Ukraine told to wait Fogh Rasmussen rebuffed Moscow’s warning that if Kiev made steps to join NATO, it would undermine the chances of reaching a lasting compromise in Ukraine.

"No third country has a veto over NATO enlargement. NATO's door remains open. Each country will be judged on its merits," said the former Danish Prime Minister.

Nonetheless, Ukraine, which has made intermittent moves towards joining the alliance in the last decade – and whose Prime Minister Arseny Yatsenyuk called for membership earlier this week – is not currently being considered, despite being granted a symbolic aid package from the alliance on Thursday.

"The alliance must stick to previously made statements that such an opportunity may appear possible only in the long-term future," said Norway’s Conservative prime minister, Erna Solberg.

"Ukraine is still a neutral state, bounded by its regulations and the security situation in the region. The whole of Ukraine must undergo essential changes before it joins NATO," she added.

On the other hand, Georgia, which fought a war with Russia in 2008, has made progress: it was included on the shortlist of countries looking for 'enhanced co-operation' with NATO, alongside Australia, Finland, Jordan and Sweden.

“We agreed on a substantive package of measures for Georgia… that will help Georgia advance in its preparations towards membership of NATO,” said Fogh Rasmussen.

The Polish capital Warsaw has been chosen as the venue for the next NATO summit in 2016, after Fogh Rasmussen said that the choice of location would “send a strong signal of Polish involvement in the alliance and a very visible presence by NATO in the eastern regions of the alliance.”

Nato Creating New Rapid Response Force to Deter 'Potential Aggressors'

Nato Summit 2014: 

Nato Creating New Rapid Response Force to Deter 'Potential Aggressors'
By Finbarr Bermingham
IBTSeptember 5, 2014 14:44 BST

The exact detail will be decided upon after the Nato Summit has ended but the force will include several thousand land troops, who are ready to deploy within a few days with sea, air and special forces support.

UK Prime Minister David Cameron has already pledged 3,500 troops to the new Readiness Action Plan (RAP) forces, as well as signing up to an additional Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF) with Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland, which could see an extra 10,000 military personnel mobilised at short notice, from the seven nations.

Nato will also establish a more visible, permanent base in Eastern Europe, including a command and control base in an unspecified allied country. IBTimes UK understands Poland, which has just emerged as the host of the next summit in two years, is likely to host such a headquarters.

The bloc is to reposition equipment, set up intelligence sharing, cooperate defence plans and organise more short-notice exercises in Eastern Europe in an effort to improve its readiness.

"This sends a clear message: Nato protects all allies at all times. It sends a clear message to any potential aggressor. Should you even think of attacking one ally, you will be facing the whole alliance," Nato Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told reporters.

"Our RAP is meant to defend Nato countries. It is fully in line with our international commitments and it will ensure that Nato remains strong, ready, robust and responsive to meet present and future challenges from wherever they come."

Other Agreements

The 28 members of Nato also announced  they had reached a consensus on cyber defence, which means anyone who launches a cyber-attack on a Nato member state risks violating Article 5 of its charter, which would, in effect, see the other members react against it.

It will launch training programmes with "allied states", namely Jordan, Georgia and Moldova, with a view to strengthening their military capacity.

This is in addition to the announcement on 4 September that it would provide financial and technical assistance to Ukraine's army, with individual member states committing to providing high-precision arms to the government in Kiev.

Rasmussen said that while no such request has been made with regard Iraq, Nato would "seriously consider" any invitation to provide defence capability training to the Iraqi army.

But he refused to be drawn on the possibility of launching Nato-led military strikes, saying such action has not been discussed (nor invited) and that Nato fully supports the unilateral action of individual member states.

Member states have, however, agreed to increase the exchange of intelligence on fighters returning from abroad.

In a message that will no doubt resonate in political circles in Moscow, the organisation has reaffirmed its expansionary policy.

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko told journalists he will next week introduce a bill in Ukraine's parliament in an effort to remove its neutrality – or non-bloc – clause, which means it cannot accede to Nato.

"The open door policy has been a historic success for Nato, it's allowed us to move towards a Nato whole, free and at peace. Nato's door remains open. Each country will continue to be judged on its merit and no third country has a veto over a Nato alliance. Each aspirant has work to do in different areas and we will give them the support they need," Ramussen said.

Already, moves have been made to fast-track the membership of Georgia and Montenegro, with the former likely to prove much more controversial, given its chequered history with Russia. It's thought a decision will be made on Montenegrin membership by the end of 2015.

UK: Anti-NATO protesters flood the streets of Newport



போர்வெறிப்புன்னகை: நேற்றோ 2014 மாநாடு வேல்ஸ்

Red Block PROTEST AT THE NATO SUMMIT - NEWPORT, WALES




PROTEST AT THE NATO SUMMIT - NEWPORT, WALES from Red block

Red Block says come to the
PROTEST AT THE NATO SUMMIT - NEWPORT, WALES
Wednesday, 3rd. September to Saturday, 6th. September

The leaders of NATO, including Barack Obama and Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg are meeting to plan further NATO imperialist aggression in Ukraine and other places.

Although this gang of imperialist terrorists has been defeated in Afghanistan their appetite for further aggression is undiminished.

Red Block is an alliance of communist organisations and we call upon communists and other militants to converge on Newport to protest when the imperialist leaders are meeting.

We shall be engaging in demonstrations and other campaigning activities.

A camp is being organised for the above period.  Contact revolutionarypraxis@talktalk.net as soon as possible if you wish to participate.  State how many are attending and when you plan to arrive. Tents will be provided but if you can bring one this will be helpful.  Also, bring a sleeping bag.  Food will be available and participants will be charged a £20 fee to help meet the costs of holding the camp.

Spread the word to other comrades and urge them to attend.

DOWN WITH NATO TERRORISM!

PEOPLE OF THE WORLD, UNITE AND DEFEAT

   NATO IMPERIALISM AND  ALL ITS LACKEYS!!

NYT TELLS JOURNALISTS TO AVOID WORDS “GENOCIDE,” “ETHNIC CLEANSING,” AND “OCCUPIED TERRITORY''

LEAKED NYT GAZA MEMO TELLS JOURNALISTS TO AVOID WORDS “GENOCIDE,” “ETHNIC CLEANSING,” AND “OCCUPIED TERRITORY” Amid the internal battle over...